Chess Profile: Kiệt Phạm (aka TimeToCrush)
Meet Kiệt Phạm, the chess enthusiast known on the battlefield of 64 squares as TimeToCrush. A player whose name itself is a warning to opponents all over the virtual boards, TimeToCrush has been steadily climbing the rating ladder from humble beginnings in the 1200s to a formidable peak of 2608 in Bullet, 2581 in Blitz, and a solid 2289 in Rapid by 2025. For those who love daily games, a consistent 1871 peak rating makes Kiệt a reliable foe - though much less frequent in this slower format.
Playing Style & Personality
Kiệt’s style is a blend of grit and persistence, boasting an impressive 84.06% comeback rate—meaning when things look grim after losing a piece, don't count them out! They venture deep into endgames, as reflected by a high 77.91% endgame frequency, savoring the strategic finesse for which many lose their patience.
Early resignations are rare, just a humble 2.13%, probably because giving up early would mean missing the chance to flip the board on opponents—literally. Patience is a virtue, after all.
Strengths & Openings
Kiệt dominates with the mysterious Top Secret opening repertoire across all time controls, securing a striking 60% win rate in Rapid and hovering around 50% in faster games. They also show particular love for classical lines such as the Sicilian Defense Old Sicilian Variation and the English Opening King's English Variation, winning every game they've played using these.
Competitive Record & Stats
With thousands of games logged, Kiệt is no stranger to the ups and downs of competitive chess. Their Blitz and Bullet win/loss records are near the edge of a razor, showing a warrior who battles fiercely until the last second. Despite a slightly higher loss ratio in Bullet (5475 wins to 5785 losses), their resilience is unbeatable, proven by a current winning streak.
Fun fact: Kiệt has an uncanny knack for playing better on Tuesdays and later evenings, with the best win rate at 9 PM (21:00) clocking in at a whopping 57.14%!
Memorable Recent Game
In a recent encounter against ImDH22, Kiệt’s opening with the English Opening King's English Variation led to a commanding victory by resignation. Demonstrating classical positional play, it was a tactical ballet culminating on move 58, proving Kiệt’s mastery in squeezing opponents until they yield.
Off the Board
Known for keeping a tilt factor of just 20 – meaning about as cool as an ice cube – Kiệt keeps calm and collected, never letting setbacks ruin their game. Although every chess player has their moments, TimeToCrush’s psychological resilience is their secret weapon.
In summary: Kiệt Phạm is not just ‘time to crush’ your pieces, but also time to witness a chess journey filled with grit, endurance, and plenty of wins that often leave opponents scratching their heads – and their pawns wondering, "what just happened?"
Blitz performance takeaway
Your recent blitz results show a mix of sharp, active play and occasional time pressure. You’ve demonstrated willingness to enter tactical lines and use piece activity to press for advantages, but there are times when time management and endgame technique could be stronger. The data you shared also suggests you have specific openings you like that tend to yield solid results, which you can leverage more consistently in fast time controls.
What you’re doing well
- You pursue active development and put pressure on opponents early, especially with principled bishop checks and timely central pushes.
- You're comfortable in tactical clashes and are not afraid to go for material or attack when a line opens up.
- You can hold longer games and convert drawing chances when the position simplifies, showing good endurance in blitz endgames.
- Your opening choices (like the Scandinavian and Amar Gambit family lines) tend to lead to dynamic games where you can dictate the pace when you know the typical plans.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: a few losses indicate you can fall into heavy time pressure later in the game. Build a pacing plan so you allocate critical thinking time to key moments and keep a buffer for the endgame.
- Endgame technique: strengthen rook and minor piece endings. In longer blitz, aim to simplify into winning or drawing endgames with clear, tested plan rather than chasing complex lines.
- Consistent application of opening ideas: while you have favorable results in certain lines, ensure you know the typical middlegame plans and common pitfalls (pawn breaks, king safety, and piece coordination) so you’re not surprised by a standard reply.
- Decision-making under pressure: practice quick, reliable spot checks for tactics and threats to avoid missing forcing moves or hanging material in the middle game.
Opening strategy and plan
Your openings data shows solid results in the Scandinavian Defense and Amar Gambit, with favorable win rates and a good track record in sharp lines. This suggests your strength lies in dynamic play and tactical clashes. For blitz, consider a compact, well-understood subset of these lines and a few safe, solid options to fall back on when you’re low on time. Also, keep a short list of standard responses to popular anti-Scandinavian and anti-Amar ideas so you’re not caught in unfamiliar territory in fast games.
Practical drills and training plan
- Time management drill: play short 5+3 or 3+2 blitz sessions focusing on keeping at least 1–2 minutes in reserve for the endgame. After each game, note the move where you spent the most time and set a limit for similar situations.
- Endgame practice: weekly rook-endgame puzzles and simple king activity drills. Practice converting a rook and pawn endgame with a passed pawn as the primary objective.
- Opening familiarity: drill two main lines from Scandinavian and Amar Gambit, including 8–12 typical middlegame plans and common traps, using a set of 20-30 quick practice games to build recall under time pressure.
- Tactical pattern recognition: 2–3 short puzzle sets (5–8 minutes each) daily to sharpen the instinct for forcing moves and typical tactics that arise in your chosen openings.
- Post-game reflection: after each blitz session, write down one concrete improvement (e.g., “don’t trade queens when you’re ahead on the kingside attack”) and one thing to try next time (e.g., “keep the rooks on open files longer”).
Next steps
If you’d like, I can tailor a concise two-week plan focused on your most-used openings and common endgames, plus a time-management routine you can follow in every blitz game. You can also share a couple of recent positions you found tricky, and I’ll propose concrete move-by-move improvements and a short drill set tailored to those themes.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| playingtrashgame | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| abc_xyz4744 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kroonts13 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tomorinao61 | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| imab3020 | 1W / 2L / 1D | View |
| ritz_carlton | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| azat-can | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gmssm2010 | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| al_sa_co | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Kamil Grycel | 5W / 4L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ntukhang | 376W / 65L / 22D | View Games |
| harry_drakevn | 205W / 149L / 11D | View Games |
| haole2807 | 123W / 60L / 8D | View Games |
| dumamaychotaovao | 71W / 22L / 5D | View Games |
| jacky3252 | 9W / 67L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2602 | 2604 | 2329 | 2329 |
| 2024 | 2235 | 2358 | 2276 | 1871 |
| 2023 | 2122 | 2203 | 2233 | 1871 |
| 2022 | 1793 | 1959 | 2002 | 1824 |
| 2021 | 1543 | 852 | 1703 | 1792 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2417W / 2377L / 273D | 2227W / 2631L / 232D | 83.0 |
| 2024 | 1595W / 1469L / 126D | 1412W / 1632L / 144D | 76.6 |
| 2023 | 833W / 776L / 83D | 758W / 824L / 99D | 78.3 |
| 2022 | 549W / 458L / 53D | 539W / 450L / 55D | 72.0 |
| 2021 | 602W / 400L / 36D | 529W / 435L / 37D | 63.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 43 | 27 | 16 | 0 | 62.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 40 | 23 | 13 | 4 | 57.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 37 | 27 | 7 | 3 | 73.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 32 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 32 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 62.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 27 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 74.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 21 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Australian Defense | 21 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 1799 | 878 | 835 | 86 | 48.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 1095 | 489 | 556 | 50 | 44.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1004 | 451 | 504 | 49 | 44.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 455 | 189 | 249 | 17 | 41.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 445 | 206 | 216 | 23 | 46.3% |
| French Defense | 399 | 182 | 207 | 10 | 45.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 397 | 166 | 208 | 23 | 41.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 356 | 161 | 183 | 12 | 45.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 344 | 178 | 147 | 19 | 51.7% |
| Modern | 296 | 145 | 131 | 20 | 49.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 618 | 322 | 257 | 39 | 52.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 393 | 225 | 158 | 10 | 57.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 380 | 189 | 175 | 16 | 49.7% |
| Unknown | 263 | 147 | 116 | 0 | 55.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 251 | 117 | 123 | 11 | 46.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 206 | 111 | 84 | 11 | 53.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 205 | 92 | 102 | 11 | 44.9% |
| Scotch Game | 185 | 98 | 78 | 9 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 156 | 67 | 78 | 11 | 43.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 136 | 65 | 66 | 5 | 47.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 2 |
| Losing | 54 | 0 |