Jingyao Tin: The Grandmaster Who Defies Time and Pawns
Known in the chess world by the enigmatic username tjychess, Jingyao Tin is no ordinary player. A true Grandmaster by FIDE’s decree, Jingyao has long since established themselves as a formidable force on the 64 squares — a battlefield where knights leap, queens dominate, and kings hide desperately.
From Humble Beginnings to Bullet Blitzing Legend
Starting from a modest bullet rating of 1320 in 2012, Jingyao's meteoric rise can only be described as a chess fairy tale. By 2025, their bullet rating soared past the 3000 mark, peaking at an impressive 3093. For perspective, that’s like playing chess so fast and so well that even the rooks can’t keep up. Their winning streaks? Once went as high as 20 games in a row — that's two dozen fierce opponents all overwhelmed by relentless precision.
Blitz and Rapid: Not Just Dates on a Calendar
While many players dread blitz’s intimidating pace, Jingyao thrives. With peak blitz ratings over 3000 and an average win rate hovering above 50%, they combine speed with accuracy. In rapid, where you catch your breath for a nano second longer, their 60% win rate proves they’re no slouch. And rumor has it, their 100% win rate in casual daily games means it’s dangerous to play Jingyao when you’re on your phone.
Tactical Genius and Psychological Warrior
This Grandmaster’s come-back ability is legendary; a staggering 91.53% rally rate after being in a tough spot shows Jingyao never throws in the towel early. In fact, after losing a piece, they bounce back nearly 100% of the time — leaving opponents wondering if the 'missing' piece was just a mirage. Jared from accounting called Jingyao's playstyle “psychological warfare with a sprinkle of wizardry,” which might be the most accurate summary you'll find.
A Player of Consistency and Endurance
Jingyao’s games are marathons, not sprints. With an average of 81 moves per win and a whopping 81.5% endgame frequency, they patiently outwit opponents in the late game. While others rage quit early, Jingyao keeps calm, proving that every pawn (and every minute) counts.
Favorite Opponents & Eccentric Statistics
Among familiar rivals, Jingyao has tangled with players like chessbrah and danielnaroditsky, mixing impressive wins with a few humbling results. Their opening performance? A secret that’s top-secret — just like an espionage thriller on the chessboard, winning over 55% in bullet alone.
Chess at Strange Hours
Dedicated doesn’t begin to cover it — Jingyao’s best win rates are at odd hours like 6 a.m. and late nights. They say the early bird catches the worm; Jingyao proves the early chess grandmaster catches the checkmate.
In Conclusion
Jingyao Tin isn’t just a name in the FIDE registry but a chess phenomenon mixing relentless speed with deep strategy, tactical resilience, and psychological endurance. Whether it's a bullet blizzard or a rapid rumble, expect nothing less than brilliance… and maybe a few surprising blunders that only make the comeback sweeter.
Overview of your recent daily games
You’re showing solid consistency across your daily games and tend to convert advantages into wins. You navigate solid openings and transition into active middlegames with good piece coordination. Keep building on these strengths to maintain the momentum.
What you’re doing well
- Opening choices and plans: You frequently reach solid Queen’s Gambit Declined and Slav structures, providing a stable framework to work from and letting your pieces coordinate effectively.
- Central control and piece coordination: Early development and pawn structure support a strong central presence, with rooks and minor pieces working well together on files and diagonals.
- Endgame conversion: You tend to maintain initiative and convert advantages into wins with practical, clear plans.
Areas to improve
- Time management in longer games: Some long-thinking moments suggest working on pacing to keep accuracy under control without getting too close to the clock.
- Prophylaxis and counterplay: In middlegame transitions, there are opportunities to anticipate opponent ideas earlier and reduce their active options.
- Endgame clarity: Develop a simple, repeatable routine for endgames to convert small advantages more reliably and avoid unnecessary trades.
Highlights from your recent wins
Your wins illustrate solid handling of standard openings and strong transitions to favorable middlegames, with steady center pressure and good capitalization on opponents’ missteps.
Example review PGN placeholder:
Openings performance snapshot
- Your openings performance shows strength across a variety of lines, indicating good adaptability and understanding rather than reliance on memorized sequences.
- Continue to deepen a compact, principled repertoire against common defenses to sustain this level and reduce uncertainty in critical moments.
Actionable plan for the next 4 weeks
- Daily puzzles: 10-15 minutes focused on tactics that appear in your games to sharpen calculation under time pressure.
- Game review: Do a light, constructive analysis of two recent games per week with a coach or using engine annotations to identify missed prophylaxis and better continuation ideas.
- Opening refinement: Solidify a two-line repertoire for White and Black against your most common defenses, focusing on understanding typical middlegame plans rather than memorizing long move sequences.
- Endgame practice: Study simple endgames typical of your openings (rook endings, minor piece imbalances) and practice clear conversion plans.
Notes and placeholders
Use placeholders to enrich your review notes, for example to attach a full game view or profile link as you prefer:
Full game view placeholder:
Profile: jingyao%20tin
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dogsofwar | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| fishanick | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Mark Heimann | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| Roberto Junio Brito Molina | 13W / 21L / 6D | |
| Search-of-Harmony | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Erik Obgolts | 67W / 47L / 12D | |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 43W / 38L / 4D | |
| hannibal4 | 54W / 23L / 7D | |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 35W / 36L / 4D | |
| Anatoly Bykhovsky | 37W / 24L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2988 | 2898 | ||
| 2024 | 2961 | 3040 | 2372 | |
| 2023 | 2810 | 2859 | 2365 | |
| 2022 | 2847 | 2814 | 2365 | |
| 2021 | 2710 | 2734 | 2402 | |
| 2020 | 2761 | 2763 | 2239 | 1793 |
| 2019 | 2511 | 2563 | 2238 | |
| 2018 | 2594 | 2644 | 2238 | |
| 2017 | 2575 | 2504 | 2238 | |
| 2016 | 2483 | 2430 | ||
| 2015 | 2462 | 2410 | 2238 | |
| 2014 | 2354 | 2368 | 2238 | 2000 |
| 2013 | 2105 | 2273 | 1200 | |
| 2012 | 2070 | 2158 | 1927 | |
| 2011 | 2038 | |||
| 2010 | 1975 | 1808 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 266W / 193L / 64D | 244W / 212L / 66D | 89.5 |
| 2024 | 509W / 293L / 80D | 455W / 328L / 100D | 87.8 |
| 2023 | 572W / 305L / 92D | 478W / 371L / 123D | 88.8 |
| 2022 | 56W / 21L / 7D | 56W / 26L / 5D | 83.6 |
| 2021 | 952W / 585L / 116D | 898W / 684L / 91D | 79.7 |
| 2020 | 851W / 536L / 143D | 805W / 595L / 105D | 78.2 |
| 2019 | 407W / 272L / 39D | 374W / 315L / 40D | 72.6 |
| 2018 | 494W / 290L / 49D | 420W / 370L / 53D | 80.4 |
| 2017 | 22W / 7L / 1D | 16W / 12L / 1D | 83.2 |
| 2016 | 20W / 12L / 1D | 15W / 13L / 3D | 76.6 |
| 2015 | 42W / 21L / 1D | 36W / 28L / 2D | 79.3 |
| 2014 | 203W / 188L / 18D | 206W / 165L / 29D | 80.2 |
| 2013 | 41W / 26L / 2D | 33W / 32L / 5D | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 43W / 11L / 4D | 37W / 18L / 3D | 81.3 |
| 2011 | 5W / 2L / 0D | 6W / 1L / 1D | 83.3 |
| 2010 | 42W / 21L / 6D | 38W / 30L / 2D | 77.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 572 | 316 | 223 | 33 | 55.2% |
| Döry Defense | 481 | 260 | 188 | 33 | 54.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 444 | 250 | 163 | 31 | 56.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 437 | 244 | 158 | 35 | 55.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 297 | 162 | 116 | 19 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 274 | 173 | 80 | 21 | 63.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 264 | 136 | 119 | 9 | 51.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 207 | 105 | 90 | 12 | 50.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 204 | 122 | 71 | 11 | 59.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 189 | 113 | 64 | 12 | 59.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 206 | 99 | 77 | 30 | 48.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 203 | 113 | 67 | 23 | 55.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 191 | 90 | 85 | 16 | 47.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 156 | 72 | 64 | 20 | 46.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 155 | 76 | 60 | 19 | 49.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 140 | 73 | 59 | 8 | 52.1% |
| Döry Defense | 132 | 68 | 50 | 14 | 51.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 117 | 63 | 40 | 14 | 53.9% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 107 | 59 | 34 | 14 | 55.1% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 106 | 67 | 33 | 6 | 63.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knorre Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Be7 5.cxd5 Nxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Döry Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 4 |