Profile Summary of tydfger
Meet tydfger, a fearless gladiator of the chessboard whose journey brims with thrilling battles, unexpected comebacks, and relentless duels in the blistering world of Bullet chess. Known for a peak Bullet rating of 2784 achieved in May 2025, tydfger is the embodiment of speed, precision, and endurance, blending rapid tactical awareness with an enviable resilience against adversity.
Known to favor the intense and lightning-fast Bullet time control, tydfger's style is a fascinating mix of deep endgame knowledge—engaging in lengthy fights that average around 89 moves per win—with a surprisingly low early resignation rate of only 1.4%. This player isn't one to quit early, even if the pressure mounts: a comeback rate of 86% and a knack for winning after losing pieces (36.5% success) show true grit.
Opening repertoire is a playground of creative and somewhat unorthodox choices. The King’s Fianchetto Opening is the trusty steed, played over 1000 times with a solid 39% win rate. Not averse to murky waters, tydfger also dabbles in the Mieses Opening and King's Indian Attack, often steering into tactical skirmishes with opponents who wish they’d chosen a safer hobby.
While their Blitz adventures peak at a formidable 2147 rating, and Rapid and Daily formats are more niche playgrounds with peak ratings around 1533 and 1668 respectively, Bullet is where tydfger feels truly alive—winning, losing, and drawing hundreds of games with electrifying intensity.
Psychological resilience comes with its ups and downs; a tilt factor of 25 indicates that even the bravest soul sometimes feels the sting of frustration. But the spotlight hour is clear: 6 PM is prime time for making opponents run for cover.
Always up for a challenge, tydfger's most frequent sparring partner, watnegs, has been battled 866 times—a saga worthy of its own epic tale—although with a modest win ratio there. Other frequent opponents have tasted a mixed bag of triumph and defeat, highlighting tydfger’s unpredictability on the field.
When not storming the Bullet battlefield, tydfger enjoys defending with the Sicilian Defense variants or opening with a calm and collected g3, proving that subtlety can sneak up even in the fastest games.
Need inspiration? Here's a recent masterpiece where tydfger won on time with a clever King’s Fianchetto Opening battle:
.Whether dominating the board or battling against time, tydfger remains a dynamic and entertaining player to watch, proving that in chess, speed and strategy go hand in hand... or maybe hand in mouse-click.
Overview of your recent blitz performance
You’ve shown a positive, multi‑month trend in your blitz play. The strength-adjusted win rate sits around 0.534, which means you are slightly above average in practical play. The 3‑month and 6‑month rating changes indicate you’ve moved up substantially over the last half year, with a solid upward slope in the recent period. In the most recent blitz games, you faced sharp, tactical battles and some tough results; these are common in blitz and offer clear targets for improvement.
Tip: when the clock is tight, aim to reduce complexity by choosing solid, safe plans and look for simple, forcing moves that keep you in control.
What you’re doing well
- You handle dynamic, tactical positions well and are comfortable seeking active play in sharp openings.
- Your results in certain openings show you can generate initiative and pressure, especially in lines like the Scandinavian Defense and Amar Gambit (these openings have higher win rates in your history).
- You are capable of creating practical chances even when the position is imbalanced, which is a key strength in blitz.
Openings to lean on in blitz, based on your performance: Scandinavian Defense, Amar Gambit, and Australian Defense.
Key areas to improve (blitz focus)
- Time management and clock discipline. In blitz, a few seconds can decide the game—practice keeping a steady pace and avoid spending too long on speculative lines.
- Endgame technique. Work on converting small advantages in rook endings and simple king‑and‑pawn endings; many blitz losses hinge on finishing with precise endgames.
- Blunder avoidance in tactical melee. Tighten your calculation on forcing sequences and look for safe simplifications when you’re unsure.
- Opening choice under time pressure. Favor lines with clear plans and fewer tricky decisions, unless you’re deeply familiar with the sharp lines.
Concrete improvement plan for the next weeks
- Daily tactic habit: solve 5–10 short puzzles focused on forks, pins, skewers, and quick tactic patterns to reinforce pattern recognition under time pressure.
- Endgame micro‑practice: study king and pawn endings, rook endings, and basic opposition ideas with quick drills (2–3 sessions per week).
- Opening study: deepen your familiarity with top performing choices. Practice a streamlined repertoire in blitz: - Scandinavian Defense and Amar Gambit for dynamic play. - Consider a safer, simpler set of responses in other lines to reduce risk when low on time. Use the openings resources below to guide study: - Scandinavian Defense - Amar Gambit - London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation if you choose to explore it further.
- In‑game routine: set a mini‑checklist for the first 10 moves (development, king safety, rook connectedness), then switch to a “simplify to equality” plan if you sense time trouble.
- Review after each blitz session. Identify 2–3 critical turning points in your losses and practice one representative safe alternative at each point.
Openings performance guidance
Your data shows strong results with several dynamic openings. Highlights:
- Scandinavian Defense: 57.8% win rate across 45 games.
- Amar Gambit: 54.8% win rate across 42 games.
- Australian Defense: 54.3% win rate across 35 games.
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation: 45.8% win rate across 83 games (more mixed; worth studying but may require careful handling under time pressure).
Strategy suggestion: lean into the Scandinavian and Amar Gambit more in blitz to maximize your active play and reduce risk of long, purely technical battles. For London System lines, consider selective, well‑rehearsed plans and avoid over‑extension in the early middlegame unless you’re confident in the resulting structures. If you want quick, practical references, explore these openings further with the resources listed below. tydfger
Recommendations and quick drills
- Daily 15–20 minute tactic routines focused on common blitz motifs (forks, pins, discovered attacks).
- Two short endgame sessions per week (rook endings and pawn endings) to improve conversion.
- Limit high‑risk lines in blitz; practice a “safety first” mindset in the opening and aim to reach a solid middlegame within the first 15 moves.
- Post‑game analysis: after each blitz, write down two alternative moves you considered and why you chose the move you played, plus one safer alternative you wish you had played.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| maxkho2 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Hemanthsankar | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| protegox | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| botoyannn | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| andry_rajoelina | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| taursente | 2W / 4L / 0D | View |
| ikar2021 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| the-lion-of-india | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| despacito_slowly | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| abot8 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| watnegs | 245W / 593L / 28D | View Games |
| SoupSailor | 219W / 355L / 10D | View Games |
| Jesse Zafirakos | 84W / 383L / 18D | View Games |
| Kocho_Shinobu_18 | 140W / 166L / 9D | View Games |
| blazer_74 | 108W / 157L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2442 | 2200 | 1533 | 1668 |
| 2024 | 2229 | 1677 | 1533 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2044W / 2533L / 196D | 1939W / 2659L / 148D | 86.1 |
| 2024 | 278W / 384L / 40D | 239W / 400L / 48D | 95.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 85 | 39 | 40 | 6 | 45.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 50 | 27 | 19 | 4 | 54.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 45 | 25 | 16 | 4 | 55.6% |
| Australian Defense | 36 | 19 | 15 | 2 | 52.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 32 | 17 | 14 | 1 | 53.1% |
| Colle: 3...Bf5, Alekhine Variation | 31 | 17 | 13 | 1 | 54.8% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 28 | 11 | 13 | 4 | 39.3% |
| King's Indian Defense | 27 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 27 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 27 | 11 | 13 | 3 | 40.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2990 | 1201 | 1681 | 108 | 40.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 897 | 413 | 456 | 28 | 46.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 822 | 326 | 470 | 26 | 39.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 568 | 216 | 339 | 13 | 38.0% |
| Czech Defense | 381 | 187 | 187 | 7 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 345 | 139 | 196 | 10 | 40.3% |
| King's Indian Attack | 338 | 150 | 175 | 13 | 44.4% |
| Australian Defense | 275 | 115 | 148 | 12 | 41.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 243 | 122 | 115 | 6 | 50.2% |
| Döry Defense | 219 | 93 | 119 | 7 | 42.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 53 | 1 |
| Losing | 25 | 0 |