Overview — umesh840: Rapid specialist
umesh840 is an energetic online chess player active from 2015 through 2025, best known for a preference for Rapid time controls. A late‑blooming tactician with a penchant for long, decisive battles, umesh840 mixes resilient endgame technique with a strong comeback ability. Preferred time control: Rapid. Peak Rapid rating: 1650 (2025-11-17).
- Active years: 2015–2025 (regular activity spikes in 2023 and 2025)
- Preferred time control: Rapid (consistent volume and highest performance)
- Player profile keywords: umesh840, Rapid chess, Caro‑Kann, Amar Gambit, comeback specialist
Playing style & strengths
umesh840 plays long, practical games and rarely gives up without a fight. The numbers tell a story of endurance above flash: long average game lengths, a high endgame frequency, and an exceptional comeback rate.
- Endgame frequency: 58.31% — many games reach material simplifications and technical play
- Comeback rate: 80.07% — can turn difficult positions around
- Average moves per decisive game: ~58–62 moves — patient, strategic approach
- White vs Black: White win rate ≈ 46.9%, Black win rate ≈ 48.4% — comfortable playing both sides
- Tactical resilience: Win after losing a piece ~44.8%
Opening repertoire (highlights)
umesh840 favors solid yet flexible choices. In Rapid games the Caro‑Kann is a cornerstone of the repertoire, supplemented by dynamic choices like the Amar Gambit and reliable defenses such as the French and Philidor.
- Primary: Caro-Kann Defense — most-played in Rapid, with strong results in the Exchange line (Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation).
- Sharp & tricky: Amar Gambit — good win rate in Rapid; an effective surprise weapon.
- Solid choices: Philidor Defense and French Defense — respectable success and reliable structure.
- Also drills: Scandinavian, Barnes variations, and occasional offbeat openings to unsettle opponents.
Time & performance patterns
Timing matters. umesh840 shows clear peaks and valleys by hour and weekday — perfect for opponents planning a match schedule.
- Best time of day: late evening — declared "BestTimeOfDayToPlay" is 22:00 and hour 22 shows an excellent win rate (~71%).
- Strong hours: 3:00 (≈59%), 14:00 (≈57%), and 8:00–11:00 often solid.
- Days: Friday and Tuesday are among the better-performing days (Friday ≈51.6%).
- Psychology: tilt factor 10 — competitive but susceptible to short bad runs; known to bounce back.
Streaks & notable opponents
umesh840 has experienced both hot runs and cold spells. Expect persistence — but be ready when a losing streak appears.
- Longest winning streak: 9 games
- Longest losing streak: 10 games; current losing streak: 4 games (as of last activity)
- Most-played opponent: jishnukarthika — head-to-head record: 9 wins, 2 losses, 1 draw in favor of umesh840
- Other frequent matchups: josebutler08, avanish4128, arditi-mehmeti, ajulratishsherly
Notable metrics & psychological profile
Useful quick facts for coaches or opponents scouting umesh840.
- Average first capture occurs around move 6–7 — the middlegame begins early.
- High comeback and resistance rates: a player who fights until the end.
- Rated vs casual difference: tends to perform slightly better in casual or unscored games (rated vs casual win difference: -25.3 suggests variance when rating pressure is on).
Sample game & analytics (placeholders)
Here’s a quick sample to inspect a typical middlegame transition. Use the viewer to replay moves and study tactics.
- Replay snippet:
- Rating history snapshot (Rapid):
- Peak Rapid rating placeholder: 1650 (2025-11-17)
Fun facts & final notes
Light-hearted observations for a profile that’s part scouting report, part personality sketch.
- Nickname suggestion: "The Late Game Locksmith" — opens with patience, closes with grinding technique.
- Favorite surprise: Amar Gambit when you least expect it. Opponents beware.
- SEO-ready summary: umesh840 chess player profile, Rapid chess specialist, Caro‑Kann, Amar Gambit, comeback rate, peak Rapid 1650.
Quick summary
Nice work — you're converting chances and getting clean wins from sharp middlegames (see your wins vs adamuskaz and ginelut). Your opening choices (especially the Caro-Kann Defense and its Exchange lines) give you reliable structures to play for a win. That said, several recent losses share the same pattern: a tactical shot from the opponent on an overextended square or a loose piece. Focus areas: concrete calculation, piece safety, and a short study plan to cut blunders.
What you did well
- Good opening preparation: your Caro‑Kann lines consistently reach playable middlegames where you know the plans (Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation shows a high win rate for you).
- Converting tactical chances — your win against ginelut ended in a decisive rook/king attack (nice coordination and follow‑through).
- Active rooks and second‑rank pressure: several wins came from forcing the opponent's king into the open and using rooks on the 7th/2nd ranks.
- Resilience: your long-term data shows steady improvement (3–6 month trends are positive), so your habits are working overall.
Recurring problems to fix
- Loose pieces and tactical shots — in the recent loss to wolfcourse the opponent exploited a knight capture on d4. Before capturing, check opponent replies for forks, pins, and discovered checks.
- Premature pawn grabs / overextension — when you advance pawns to gain space, ask: "Which squares open? Which piece will exploit those squares?" If an enemy piece can jump to a strong outpost (e.g., a knight to d4 or e4), hold back or prepare prevention.
- King safety and back‑rank vulnerability — some games show the king stuck in the center or a missing luft. Keep a small escape square or trade pieces before committing to risky pawn moves near your king.
- Short calculation window in rapid — you still blunder in the first 10 moves occasionally. Slow down for 5–10 extra seconds on critical captures and checks.
Concrete, short plan (next 2 weeks)
- Daily 10–15 minutes: tactics puzzles focused on forks, pins, skewers, and x‑ray tactics (these are the tactical motifs costing you material).
- 3 games per day at 10+10: practice slow rapid with increment — force yourself to spend an extra 10–15 seconds on every capture and every king‑exposed move.
- Post‑mortem routine: for every loss, run the game through an engine to find the one moment where evaluation swung, then write down the pattern (e.g., "fell for a knight fork on d4").
- Opening maintenance: pick two Caro‑Kann lines (main line + Exchange) and review 3 model games for each — focus on typical pawn breaks and ideal square for the knights/bishops.
One tactical checklist (use before every capture)
- Is any opponent piece attacking the square I will move to or the square that will be opened? (Look for forks.)
- Does this capture open a line to my king or leave a back‑rank weakness?
- What is the opponent's best reply — do I have a forcing defense (check, capture, threat)?
- If a piece trades, who benefits from the resulting pawn structure and open files?
Suggested studies & drills
- Tactics set: 10–20 puzzles daily (forks/pins/x‑rays). Aim for accuracy over speed.
- Endgame basics: king + rook vs king, and basic pawn endgames — convert small advantages confidently.
- Openings: review the typical Caro‑Kann pawn breaks and the Exchange Variation plans — learn one plan for white and one for black in those structures.
- One game review weekly with a coach or stronger friend — get an external check on your thought process.
Example game to study
Replay your mate vs ginelut to see how coordination paid off — follow the attacking idea and note where the opponent's king got squeezed.
Next‑session checklist (before you play)
- Warm up: 5 tactical puzzles (focus on motifs you missed recently).
- Pick one opening goal: "Today I will avoid early pawn grabs in the Pirc/Caro lines."
- After each game: 2–3 minute quick review — identify the turning point and save it for deeper review later.
Motivation & closing
Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate (≈ 51.6%) and longer term rating slope show you belong at this level — small, consistent fixes will yield rating gains. Start with the tactical checklist and 10+10 practice for two weeks and we’ll re-evaluate. If you want, send one loss PGN and I’ll annotate the critical moments move‑by‑move.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| siva2105 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mohamedellban | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dragunov_svd | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Robotic Pawn | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| xwinnerpawnx | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| arcydziegiel-litwor | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| wolfcourse | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| glackk | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| jithinspartans | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| a_shis_h | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jishnukarthika | 9W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| josebutler08 | 4W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| avanish4128 | 1W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| ajulratishsherly | 2W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| arditi-mehmeti | 3W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1017 | 1576 | 1277 | |
| 2023 | 575 | 1440 | 1556 | |
| 2017 | 1169 | 1090 | ||
| 2016 | 1190 | 1028 | ||
| 2015 | 537 | 651 | 966 | 1039 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 128W / 133L / 10D | 132W / 125L / 15D | 64.9 |
| 2023 | 41W / 35L / 0D | 48W / 25L / 2D | 60.4 |
| 2017 | 14W / 9L / 0D | 7W / 15L / 1D | 61.8 |
| 2016 | 28W / 20L / 0D | 28W / 21L / 0D | 56.6 |
| 2015 | 55W / 94L / 2D | 64W / 85L / 6D | 52.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 20.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 162 | 82 | 71 | 9 | 50.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 42 | 25 | 14 | 3 | 59.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 35 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 48.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 32 | 17 | 14 | 1 | 53.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 30 | 8 | 21 | 1 | 26.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 25 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 44.0% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Elephant Gambit | 18 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 38.9% |
| French Defense | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 52.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 1 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |