Profile
Introducing Ala Eddine Boulrens, online as waste_time07, a chess player who thrives in fast time controls and turns pressure into opportunity. Known for inventive Blitz play and stubborn endgames, he blends sharp calculation with a willingness to take practical risks on the clock.
He embraces a wide opening repertoire and loves testing ideas in rapid battles. For a quick glimpse at his online profile, see waste_time07.
Preferred Time Control
Blitz is his stage. In seconds on the clock, he fights to seize initiative and convert advantages before the timer runs out.
Playing Style
Fast, sharp, and relentless in the endgame. He seeks dynamic piece activity and applies steady pressure, often turning tense positions into winning chances through bold calculation.
- Endgame frequency: high
- Comeback potential after setbacks: strong
- Prefers practical, messy positions that reward resourceful play
Openings & Repertoire
In Blitz and Bullet, his openings show a love for flexible structures. Notably, the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation appears prominently, alongside Czech Defense and Caro-Kann Defense among other solid systems.
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation — frequently played in Blitz
- Czech Defense — solid, flexible
- Caro-Kann Defense — resilient and reliable
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — occasional sharp lines
Career Highlights
A Blitz strategist who peaked around 2661 in Blitz in 2025. Longest winning streak recorded is 14 games, reflecting a fierce momentum when things click. For a broader snapshot, see the internal chart:
.
Overview and recent trajectory
You’ve shown a solid ability to press in blitz and to convert aggressive middlegames. The data indicates a stronger short‑term improvement recently, with a positive one and three month change, but some fluctuations over longer windows. The trend lines suggest that your momentum has been uneven, so the focus now should be on consistency and lowering avoidable mistakes, especially in time pressure and late middlegames.
What you’re doing well
- Your willingness to play active, dynamic lines and seek practical chances in the middlegame.
- Solid handling of multiple openings, with good results in several robust setups (notably some Caro-Kann and certain systems from the Sicilian family). This shows you can adapt to different pawn structures and piece placements.
- Strong potential in tactical skirmishes when you have initiative, which you often create in blitz time controls.
Key areas to improve
- Time management under pressure. In blitz, it’s easy to get pulled into deep calculations in the early middlegame. Build a simple decision framework: identify your top 2–3 candidate moves, and commit to a quick pick if you’re below a certain clock threshold.
- Decision discipline in the middlegame. When the position becomes sharp, jot down a rough plan instead of calculating every line. This helps avoid drifting into uncertain lines and reduces wasteful trades.
- Endgame readiness. A number of losses in blitz arise from not converting small advantages or misplaying simple endings. Strengthen king-and-pawn endgames and rook endings with short, practical study moments each week.
- Opening consolidation. Some lines in your openings lead to positions with unclear plans or riskier middlegames in blitz. Streamline your repertoire to 2–3 openings you know deeply and can play quickly, then add a safe, secondary option for surprise choices.
Opening performance at a glance
Your Opening choices show a mix of solid and dynamic options. Highlights and cautions:
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation — solid results with a wide sample. Focus on developing quick control of the center and timely knight re‑routes to support typical pawn breaks.
- Caro-Kann Defense — generally reliable in blitz; stick to clear plans and minimize recreations of ad hoc structures under time pressure.
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — more volatile in blitz. If you’re facing this line, shift to a safer plan or keep the structure simple to avoid getting tied to risky pawn advances.
- Other solid paths (Barnes Defense, Scandinavian, etc.) show respectable win rates. Consider leaning more on these lines where you feel you can execute a clear plan quickly.
Tip: build a compact opening cheat sheet for your 2–3 favorite setups, including typical middlegame plans and common early tactical motifs you should watch for.
Training plan and concrete steps
- Daily quick-tactics routine (10–15 minutes): focus on patterns you tend to miss in blitz (pins, forks, discovered attacks). End each session by listing 2 patterns to watch in your next game.
- Post-game review: after each blitz session, pick 2 critical moments (turning points) and write down the top 2–3 candidate moves you considered, then compare with a short engine or another strong player’s commentary to identify concrete improvements.
- Endgame practice: dedicate 1 session per week to practical rook endings and simple king-pawn endings; practice converting a small material edge or holding a drawn endgame.
- Time-management drills: play short blitz (3+2 or 5+0) focusing on moving with a plan rather than over‑analyzing every line; set a rule to not dwell beyond a set number of seconds on non-critical decisions.
- Opening refinement: choose 2–3 openings to master in detail over the next 2 weeks. Create a quick-reference sheet with typical middlegame plans, typical pawn breaks, and a handful of standard responses you’ll face.
Quick practice tools and placeholders
Want to reference a game or drill directly? You can insert placeholders to tailor this plan to you:
- Profile reference: ala%20eddine%20boulrens
- Opening reference: Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Practice example:
Notes and next steps
To turn these insights into measurable progress, start by locking in 2 openings you love and feel comfortable applying in blitz. Build a 2-week plan with specific daily tasks (tactics, endgames, and one opening study session). Then, review your progress weekly and adjust the plan to keep the momentum steady.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| species8473 | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| Volodymyr Molyboha | 0W / 3L / 1D | |
| elipro97 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lubelskiszachista | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| anilp_2003 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| noker-029 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| rudykoboi75 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| teyovari_1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| babaaaa31 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| jakor2 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Anis Achour | 25W / 40L / 5D | |
| ZURAB AZMAIPARASHVILI | 10W / 19L / 3D | |
| demoned81 | 7W / 13L / 2D | |
| wassimoricha | 12W / 3L / 2D | |
| saitago | 8W / 6L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2504 | 2556 | 2088 | |
| 2024 | 2578 | 2477 | 2022 | |
| 2023 | 1550 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 416W / 340L / 73D | 391W / 360L / 78D | 82.4 |
| 2024 | 370W / 312L / 73D | 344W / 356L / 61D | 83.2 |
| 2023 | 3W / 1L / 1D | 3W / 1L / 0D | 49.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 123 | 70 | 37 | 16 | 56.9% |
| Czech Defense | 102 | 49 | 46 | 7 | 48.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 66 | 35 | 26 | 5 | 53.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 53 | 27 | 23 | 3 | 50.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 53 | 20 | 28 | 5 | 37.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 50 | 26 | 21 | 3 | 52.0% |
| Modern | 39 | 19 | 17 | 3 | 48.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 37 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 62.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 33 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 57.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 33 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 57.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 88 | 35 | 44 | 9 | 39.8% |
| Modern | 82 | 40 | 36 | 6 | 48.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 75 | 38 | 35 | 2 | 50.7% |
| Czech Defense | 72 | 26 | 41 | 5 | 36.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 69 | 32 | 33 | 4 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 53 | 27 | 19 | 7 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 52 | 23 | 26 | 3 | 44.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 40 | 20 | 16 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 38 | 17 | 15 | 6 | 44.7% |
| Döry Defense | 38 | 17 | 17 | 4 | 44.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 g4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |