Profile Summary: white31 — The FIDE Master with a Bullet Twist
Meet white31, a formidable FIDE Master who dances through the chessboard like a caffeinated knight on a mission. This player has been blazing trails since 2012, steadily ramping up their bullet rating from a modest 1399 to a mind-boggling peak of 2761 in 2021—yes, you read that right. If bullet chess were a race, white31 would be the undisputed Usain Bolt of blitzing pawns and queens.
Boasting an overall win rate hovering around 50% in bullet, and an impressive 61% in blitz games, white31’s style is a thrilling mix of rapid-fire tactics and devastating comebacks (a staggering 90.55% comeback rate!). They even manage to win 100% of the time after losing a piece—because giving up early is so last decade, with an early resignation rate of just 0.52%. In fact, the average victorious game stretches well into the 70+ moves zone, proving white31’s stamina and endgame wizardry.
With their longest winning streak reaching an epic 52 games and an ever-impressive current streak of 8, this player knows how to keep the pressure on. Known for their sharp tactical awareness and psychological resilience, white31 tilts only about 16% (which is quite human when under fire), and their performance peaks during daylight hours, especially around mid-morning.
If you ever face off against white31, brace yourself for relentless, high-speed chess warfare and a glimmer of brilliance that’s earned them the prestigious FIDE Master title. They might just outpace your thoughts and checkmate your dreams—whether you’re a casual or a rival aiming for glory.
Fun fact: white31’s favorite opening is a well-kept secret — maybe because once the game starts, all bets are off!
What you’re doing well in blitz
You show a strong willingness to navigate sharp, tactical positions and seize the initiative early. Your record in some aggressive lines (notably the Amar Gambit family) indicates you’re very comfortable creating practical problems for opponents who try to equalize calmly. When you hit gimmes for attack, you generate concrete chances and pressure which opponents often struggle to answer quickly in blitz.
- You’re comfortable breaking out of quiet positions and going for active piece play, which can overwhelm less-prepared defenses in short time controls.
- Your willingness to sacrifice or complicate situations tends to pay off in blitz, leading to decisive wins when your opponent missteps.
- You frequently develop pieces efficiently and coordinate threats along open files or diagonals, which helps maintain momentum in the middlegame.
- You show resilience in dynamic middlegame battles and can convert gains from tactical skirmishes into a win, as seen in several recent decisions.
Areas to improve
In blitz, time pressure and consistent planning are often the deciding factors. Focus areas to strengthen your results include:
- Time management in blitz games. There are indications of time pressure affecting accuracy, especially when you’re chasing complications. Build a simple time-budget: allocate a fixed amount of time for the opening and early middlegame, and reserve a buffer for critical decision moments.
- Having a reliable fallback plan after the first few moves. While aggressive lines are exciting, ensure you have a clear plan if the opponent defends accurately and the position becomes closed or tactical opportunities don’t materialize.
- Endgame technique and conversion. A few games show you get advantages but miss precise sequences to convert; practice common endgame patterns and simple rook endings to improve consistency.
- Defensive awareness in sharp lines. When you’re attacking, be mindful of sudden counterplay. Quick checks for key threats (especially toward your king) can prevent unexpected shifts in momentum.
Practical plan to level up
Use this focused plan over the next two weeks to build steadier results in blitz.
- Time budgeting drill: In each blitz session, practice with a 3+2 or 2+1 pace for at least the first 15 moves, then reassess. Note where you spend too much time and trim choices to a short list of 2–3 forced plans per opening.
- Solid backup openings: Pick 2 White lines and 2 Black responses that you’re comfortable with beyond your favorite aggressive setups. For White, pair your go-to aggressive move with a solid, less-volatile option (for example, a principled development-based approach). For Black, have a reliable counter to 1.e4 and 1.d4 that leads to clear middlegame plans.
- Pattern-focused puzzles: Daily 10-minute puzzle practice that emphasizes tactic motifs you’ve encountered in blitz (forks, discovered attacks, decoys, and piece-heavy attacks). This helps you spot winning ideas faster under time pressure.
- Post-game review rhythm: After each blitz session, review 1–2 of your losses and 1 win. Write down the key turning points: where the initiative swung, where time pressure bit, and what you could have done differently (better moves, safer prophylaxis, or simpler simplifications).
- Endgame quick drills: Practice rook endings, queen endings, and common knight vs. bishop endgames. Knowing a few conversion patterns will boost your score in tight blitz finishers.
Two-week targets to track progress
Set tangible goals to measure improvement in blitz accuracy and reliability:
- Reduce time trouble: finish games with a comfortable remaining time, and avoid last-minute speculative decisions.
- Improve conversion: aim to convert at least 60–70% of clearly obtained middlegame advantages into a win.
- Balance openings: ensure your backup openings produce playable middlegames at least 75% of the time, not just sharp tactical shoots.
Next steps
If you’d like, I can annotate your upcoming games to highlight where time was wasted, where a simpler plan would have sufficed, and which tactical ideas consistently lead to success. I can also tailor a mini-repertoire and provide quick, practical drills based on the exact patterns you see most often in your blitz play.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| coachjkane | 278W / 329L / 23D | View Games |
| WarlordX | 220W / 166L / 11D | View Games |
| Anselm Wagner | 159W / 167L / 8D | View Games |
| przemekpiotrowski | 127W / 118L / 10D | View Games |
| labrador19 | 124W / 107L / 16D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2608 | 2625 | ||
| 2024 | 2390 | 2618 | ||
| 2023 | 2414 | |||
| 2022 | 2493 | 2251 | ||
| 2021 | 2618 | 2167 | 1759 | |
| 2020 | 2684 | 2085 | ||
| 2019 | 2386 | |||
| 2018 | 2484 | |||
| 2017 | 2443 | |||
| 2016 | 2456 | |||
| 2015 | 2313 | |||
| 2014 | 2054 | |||
| 2012 | 2054 | 2114 | ||
| 2011 | 2118 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 895W / 353L / 39D | 917W / 333L / 36D | 75.0 |
| 2024 | 68W / 11L / 1D | 69W / 12L / 0D | 71.8 |
| 2023 | 184W / 20L / 1D | 170W / 16L / 5D | 66.9 |
| 2022 | 443W / 168L / 15D | 426W / 186L / 17D | 74.9 |
| 2021 | 2651W / 2735L / 269D | 2601W / 2804L / 264D | 79.2 |
| 2020 | 1544W / 1501L / 133D | 1471W / 1579L / 143D | 79.4 |
| 2019 | 299W / 346L / 17D | 277W / 364L / 19D | 78.5 |
| 2018 | 1082W / 1067L / 90D | 982W / 1189L / 87D | 79.0 |
| 2017 | 204W / 185L / 9D | 188W / 190L / 12D | 79.2 |
| 2016 | 357W / 344L / 18D | 317W / 355L / 33D | 77.3 |
| 2015 | 8W / 5L / 0D | 10W / 3L / 0D | 67.2 |
| 2014 | 11W / 9L / 0D | 9W / 10L / 1D | 70.6 |
| 2012 | 54W / 26L / 2D | 48W / 32L / 2D | 67.7 |
| 2011 | 27W / 7L / 1D | 24W / 8L / 1D | 71.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 2907 | 1475 | 1317 | 115 | 50.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1175 | 596 | 538 | 41 | 50.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1173 | 594 | 541 | 38 | 50.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 1154 | 637 | 484 | 33 | 55.2% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 1018 | 447 | 535 | 36 | 43.9% |
| Modern | 875 | 444 | 404 | 27 | 50.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 844 | 440 | 371 | 33 | 52.1% |
| Döry Defense | 831 | 434 | 362 | 35 | 52.2% |
| East Indian Defense | 808 | 370 | 401 | 37 | 45.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 756 | 401 | 323 | 32 | 53.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 62 | 38 | 19 | 5 | 61.3% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 20 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 20 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 35.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 19 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 57.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Modern | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 57.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 52 | 1 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |