Avatar of Mark Wilson

Mark Wilson

Username: wilson_mark_c

Location: Auckland

Playing Since: 2015-12-25 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 1296
1W / 0L / 0D
Rapid: 2205
183W / 157L / 30D
Blitz: 2301
9671W / 8625L / 1054D
Bullet: 2037
11720W / 10065L / 1057D

Overview

Mark Wilson, known online as wilson_mark_c, is a chess player who thrives in rapid online formats. He blends patient calculation with bold tactics, rarely afraid to blur the lines between defense and attack. Fans enjoy his light-hearted banter after games and his willingness to explain ideas in clear, human terms. Mark Wilson

Time Control and Persona

Preferred time control: Rapid. He excels in fast battles where quick decisions and sharp nerves win the day.

Chart snapshot:

Rapid Rating20212022202422362200YearRapid Rating

Opening Prowess

Mark's openings span a wide range across Bullet and Blitz, with particular familiarity in several solid defenses and dynamic lines. Notable explorations include:

  • Bullet: Barnes Defense (4769 games, 2431 wins, 50.98%), Benoni Defense (1115 games, 597 wins, 53.54%), Nimzo-Larsen Attack (708 games, 356 wins, 50.28%), Döry Defense (669 games, 341 wins, 50.97%).
  • Blitz: Barnes Defense (2242 games, 1049 wins, 46.79%), Nimzo-Larsen Attack (2085 games, 991 wins, 47.53%), Benoni Defense (1181 games, 624 wins, 52.84%), French Defense (750 games, 382 wins, 50.93%).

Peak Moments

  • Bullet peak rating: 2220 (2025-01-23)
  • Blitz peak rating: 2332 (2022-05-17)
  • Rapid peak rating: 2272 (2021-10-17)

Fun Facts and Style

  • Longest winning streak: 26
  • Endgame frequency: 75.3%
  • Tilt factor: 14
  • Best time of day to play: 14:00

Coach's Avatar

What went well in your recent rapid games

Mark, you demonstrated strong tactical awareness and the ability to convert pressure into a win when the position opened up. Your rooks and queen coordination on the central and king-side files created clear threats that your opponents struggled to neutralize.

  • You successfully pursued active plans in the middlegame, using piece activity to create practical chances and force concessions from your opponents.
  • In several games, you maintained pressure on key files and squares (for example, lines involving rook lifts and pawn breaks) that kept your opponents under consistent attack.
  • You showed composure in dynamic positions and kept the initiative, which is essential for converting advantages into decisive results.

Key improvements to focus on

  • Time management: allocate your thinking time more evenly across the opening and middlegame so you’re not in time trouble during critical transitions. A simple plan is to step through a few candidate plans after the first 15 moves and then commit to one clear idea.
  • Endgame technique: in winning positions, aim to simplify into favorable endgames only after you’ve secured material or a clear positional edge. If you’re unsure, simplify to solidities like rooks versus rooks with active king activity rather than chasing complex tactical sequences.
  • Opening diversification: rely on a compact, dependable repertoire rather than switching between too many lines. This builds confidence and reduces early mistakes. Consider reinforcing a couple of trusted systems (for example, a solid set of setups in the Nimzo-Larsen family and a Colle-type system) to handle a wider range of opponents.
  • Avoid over-calculation in the early middlegame: before diving into sharp lines, confirm basic threats and piece safety. If you spot a tempting tactic, quickly verify that you’re not missing a hidden counterplay from your opponent.
  • Pattern recognition and key ideas: strengthen common middlegame motifs you encounter in your openings (pawn storms, piece trades that open files, and pressure on weak squares). This helps you convert advantages more reliably and reduces the risk of overreaching.

Opening plan and recommendations

Based on your openings performance, you seem comfortable with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and you’ve had success with selective Colle-type structures. These can form a solid core to build your practice around:

  • Continue developing your Nimzo-Larsen Attack repertoire, focusing on standard plans that target quick control of the center and timely piece pressure on the king’s side. Practice typical responses to common Black setups so you can plan two or three consistent middlegame ideas.
  • In the Colle System family (including the Rhamphorhynchus Variation), you’ve shown strength. Consider adding a couple of well-understood lines from this family to your regular practice, which can provide reliable structures and clear middlegame plans.
  • Be mindful of responses in lines you find less comfortable (for example, some of the asymmetrical defences). Prepare a simple, safe plan for each to reduce early losses and keep the position within your comfort zone.

Training plan and next steps

  • Two-week focus plan:
    • Week 1: solidify 1-2 openings (Nimzo-Larsen and Colle) with a lightweight, repeatable middlegame plan for each. Play 4-6 practice games per week in those lines and review the critical middlegame transitions.
    • Week 2: deepen understanding of typical middlegame themes arising from those openings (control of central squares, timely pawn breaks, and rook coordination on open files). Add 3 tactical puzzle sessions focusing on motifs you encountered in your recent games.
  • Weekly review: analyze your last 3 rapid games to identify one recurring mistake in the early middlegame and one recurring sign-off in the endgame. Develop a concrete, small adjustment for each issue.
  • Tactical and endgame practice: commit to 20–30 minutes of targeted tactics 3–4 days per week and 1 short endgame drill session weekly (rook endings and opposite-side scenarios are good starters).
  • Pre-game preparation: before your next rapid session, set a clear plan for the first 12–15 moves in your main openings, and have a simple fallback plan if your opponent deviates from the expected path.

Next steps

Stick to a concise plan for your openings, maintain active piece play, and work on converting advantages into wins with calm, calculated decisions. We’ll review progress after your next block of rapid games and adjust the plan based on what you find most effective in practice.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
zloygepard 39W / 60L / 2D
nogamesnopain 2W / 3L / 0D
cefuroxime_axetil 2W / 3L / 0D
melnikovsergey 6W / 4L / 1D
tiopepe 3W / 0L / 0D
silouj 6W / 8L / 5D
zphsd001 1W / 0L / 0D
ricardoschutt 17W / 20L / 5D
cheezemaster45 5W / 0L / 0D
lucho2018 2W / 0L / 0D
Most Played Opponents
mkapho13122 72W / 72L / 4D
sahel torres 47W / 56L / 4D
zloygepard 39W / 60L / 2D
zaid112 43W / 44L / 12D
yanowsky 27W / 56L / 1D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2092
2024 2060 2301 2205
2023 2017 2287
2022 2003 2200 2236
2021 1924 2301 2200
2020 1367 2305
2019 2201
2018 2190
2017 2060
2016 2063
Rating by Year201620172018201920202021202220232024202523051367YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 2099W / 1644L / 173D 2046W / 1681L / 187D 71.2
2024 1880W / 1532L / 163D 1854W / 1563L / 162D 71.7
2023 1354W / 1337L / 128D 1339W / 1353L / 150D 72.6
2022 1027W / 922L / 109D 1003W / 941L / 119D 70.6
2021 661W / 566L / 57D 603W / 602L / 74D 71.1
2020 825W / 790L / 83D 807W / 790L / 107D 74.1
2019 2W / 0L / 0D 2W / 1L / 1D 66.8
2018 905W / 716L / 94D 867W / 735L / 94D 73.3
2017 1282W / 1058L / 141D 1275W / 1097L / 127D 72.8
2016 845W / 708L / 81D 799W / 735L / 85D 73.6

Openings: Most Played

Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Barnes Defense 5187 2650 2293 244 51.1%
Benoni Defense 1215 653 506 56 53.7%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 729 367 329 33 50.3%
Döry Defense 718 367 319 32 51.1%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 688 355 297 36 51.6%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation 686 342 310 34 49.9%
Scandinavian Defense 630 329 270 31 52.2%
Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit 627 321 289 17 51.2%
Czech Defense 608 326 269 13 53.6%
Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line 585 318 245 22 54.4%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Barnes Defense 2242 1049 1055 138 46.8%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 2085 991 979 115 47.5%
Benoni Defense 1181 624 512 45 52.8%
French Defense 750 382 332 36 50.9%
Döry Defense 641 314 289 38 49.0%
French Defense: Burn Variation 567 292 257 18 51.5%
Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit 500 252 210 38 50.4%
Scandinavian Defense 488 256 210 22 52.5%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 463 234 200 29 50.5%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 441 212 206 23 48.1%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 110 57 48 5 51.8%
Barnes Defense 94 42 45 7 44.7%
Benoni Defense 20 10 7 3 50.0%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 11 4 6 1 36.4%
Döry Defense 10 5 4 1 50.0%
Australian Defense 8 4 4 0 50.0%
Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit 7 3 2 2 42.9%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 6 5 1 0 83.3%
Czech Defense 6 3 3 0 50.0%
Amar Gambit 5 3 1 1 60.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 26 1
Losing 14 0