About Marcel Petersen
Marcel Petersen is a titled chess player who earned the FIDE Candidate Master title. They approach the board with a curious mix of humor and precision, turning fast-paced Bullet battles into little adventures where every pawn push can be a punchline.
Off the clock, Marcel studies openings, scribbles notes, and enjoys friendly games with the chess community. Their online presence reflects a playful spirit alongside serious preparation.
Career Highlights
- FIDE Candidate Master title holder.
- Bullet specialist, renowned for quick thinking and sharp tactics.
- Consistent activity across Bullet and Rapid formats with notable performance milestones.
Playing Style
They favor bold, tactical play in the opening and keep up relentless pressure with rapid decision-making. When the clock ticks down, Marcel thrives in dynamic positions and creative endgames, never afraid to take a bold line.
Current Focus
Marcel remains highly active in Bullet events, blending speed with depth to stay sharp. They also share experiences and insights through quick games with the community.
Profile: marcelpetersen
Progress chart:
Quick Facts
- Preferred time control: Bullet
- Openings repertoire spans a wide range, from Caro-Kann and Scandinavian to flexible attacking setups
- Peak Bullet rating: 2804 (2025-08-12)
- Longest winning streak: 35 games
Recent bullet game highlights
From your latest bolt of games, you showed a strong ability to convert long tactical battles into a win, and you also demonstrated solid defense in tougher positions. In one of your wins, you maintained pressure and coordinated pieces effectively, finishing with a decisive, clean finish. In a loss, there were moments of sharp counterplay from your opponent that exposed some gaps in king safety and defensive setup. In a draw, you held a challenging position and kept the game balanced, but there were chances to press for a win that weren’t fully realized.
What you do well
- You are comfortable in complex middlegames and can spot forcing ideas that push toward a decisive result.
- You coordinate major pieces well in attacking sequences, creating clear paths to finish or convert material advantages.
- Your openings show strength in certain lines, giving you a solid, principled base to work from in practice games.
- You can recover from mistakes and stay focused, turning pressure into concrete plans as the game unfolds.
Areas to improve
- Defensive resilience in sharp positions: when opponents mount counterplay, reinforce king safety and be wary of back-rank threats or sudden queen activity.
- Endgame conversion: aim to turn long, tactical battles into wins earlier, and practice converting even small material or spatial advantages into a finished game.
- Time management during the middlegame: balance calculation with practical moves to avoid time pressure that leads to blunders or missed defensive resources.
- Opening consistency: deepen your understanding of underperforming lines and tailor study to build reliable, repeatable plans in those openings.
Opening choices and plan
Your results across openings show you perform well in certain solid systems and need more work in others. Specifically, your good results in the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation and the Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid suggest you handle solid, strategic setups with comfort. In other lines like the Scandinavian Defense and Alekhine Defense, results are more mixed, so these are good candidates for targeted improvement. Consider deepening two to three openings with structured, recurring plans you can rely on in practical play. Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation and Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation are strong candidates to continue leveraging, while you build familiarity with the less comfortable lines.]]
- Prioritize 1-2 openings for deeper study and create a pocket of standard plans you can apply quickly.
- For the openings that underperform, work through model games focusing on typical middlegame ideas and common tactical motifs you’re likely to encounter.
Momentum, trends, and next steps
Your rating trajectory shows positive momentum over the last one, three, six, and twelve months, with the strongest recent improvement in the three-month window. This suggests your current training and practice are paying off, but there is still room to raise your conversion rate from draws and near-equal positions into wins. A steady, focused training plan can help sustain and accelerate this progress. Consider the following next steps:
- Maintain a consistent cadence of opening study plus two endgame drills per week, focusing on rook endings and typical endgame conversion patterns.
- Integrate one targeted tactic session weekly to sharpen pattern recognition for common mating nets and counterplay ideas you’ve faced recently.
- Review every bullet game with a coach or self-review to extract one concrete improvement from each game (one idea to avoid a repetition of a similar error).
- Keep using the profile anchor: marcel%20petersen to track improvements and reflect on progress with a mentor or coach.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Andras Toth | 8W / 6L / 1D | |
| b-d-l | 5W / 5L / 0D | |
| ninjaweasel | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Richard Leyva Proenza | 6W / 9L / 0D | |
| Štefan Mazúr | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| skiwalker | 3W / 2L / 1D | |
| flyingdonkeymo | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| ijo-dan | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lirbbb | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| vladislav_lisnyak | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chessfiction | 26W / 26L / 11D | |
| thetruechessgenie | 38W / 18L / 6D | |
| Alice Lee | 16W / 39L / 4D | |
| jesuschristmylivinghope | 21W / 24L / 7D | |
| maverick_nyc | 25W / 21L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2804 | 2703 | 2561 | 1971 |
| 2024 | 2704 | 2615 | 2500 | 1942 |
| 2023 | 2450 | 2215 | 2401 | 1893 |
| 2022 | 2464 | 2346 | 2303 | 1717 |
| 2021 | 2348 | 2277 | 2384 | 1928 |
| 2020 | 2370 | 2344 | 1941 | 1867 |
| 2019 | 2120 | 2222 | 1989 | 1594 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1304W / 962L / 216D | 1136W / 1148L / 211D | 90.6 |
| 2024 | 1544W / 960L / 221D | 1373W / 1125L / 226D | 88.3 |
| 2023 | 717W / 409L / 103D | 658W / 456L / 115D | 85.5 |
| 2022 | 908W / 527L / 129D | 820W / 622L / 92D | 84.5 |
| 2021 | 865W / 494L / 111D | 794W / 560L / 106D | 80.1 |
| 2020 | 802W / 442L / 96D | 704W / 521L / 106D | 81.5 |
| 2019 | 759W / 400L / 71D | 694W / 410L / 110D | 77.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 572 | 306 | 227 | 39 | 53.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 512 | 282 | 177 | 53 | 55.1% |
| Modern | 396 | 200 | 163 | 33 | 50.5% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 391 | 235 | 127 | 29 | 60.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 387 | 203 | 145 | 39 | 52.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 301 | 176 | 106 | 19 | 58.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 294 | 155 | 103 | 36 | 52.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 239 | 128 | 90 | 21 | 53.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 234 | 137 | 72 | 25 | 58.5% |
| Czech Defense | 214 | 108 | 91 | 15 | 50.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 161 | 110 | 39 | 12 | 68.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 146 | 96 | 37 | 13 | 65.8% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 131 | 86 | 38 | 7 | 65.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 124 | 77 | 27 | 20 | 62.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 119 | 82 | 24 | 13 | 68.9% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 93 | 53 | 23 | 17 | 57.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 89 | 54 | 24 | 11 | 60.7% |
| Ruy Lopez | 84 | 51 | 23 | 10 | 60.7% |
| Scotch Game | 69 | 41 | 23 | 5 | 59.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 69 | 46 | 18 | 5 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 614 | 351 | 215 | 48 | 57.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 451 | 224 | 188 | 39 | 49.7% |
| Modern | 429 | 237 | 153 | 39 | 55.2% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 380 | 210 | 143 | 27 | 55.3% |
| Czech Defense | 374 | 217 | 142 | 15 | 58.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 366 | 232 | 115 | 19 | 63.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 341 | 201 | 115 | 25 | 58.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 313 | 161 | 125 | 27 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 279 | 161 | 91 | 27 | 57.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 272 | 154 | 101 | 17 | 56.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 35 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |