Chase Philips (aka xshyne) - Chess Aficionado & Blitz Conqueror
Chase Philips, also known by the cunning pseudonym xshyne, is a chess player who has taken the online blitz world by storm—well, storm mixed with occasional gusts of unexpected losses. Since diving headfirst into the chess battlefield in 2015, Chase’s journey is nothing short of a rollercoaster filled with rapid ascents, nail-biting stalemates, and amusing blunders.
Starting with humble beginnings and a blitz rating hovering around the low 1700s, Chase methodically sharpened his skills, pushing his peak blitz rating impressively above 2500 in late 2024—proof that persistence (and probably caffeine) pays off. Not to be outdone in bullet, Chase also briefly flirted with the incredible 2547 rating, making lightning-fast decisions that confound mere mortals. While rapid chess isn’t his marquee event, reaching a 2170 peak hints at versatility and a strategic mind ready for longer battles when needed.
Known for a rather... brisk playing style—his average winning game lasts barely over 3 moves and losses around 3 moves too (because who doesn’t love a quick surrender once in a while?), Chase exhibits a particularly laughable "early resignation" passion, resigning an astounding 95% of the time when things go south. Yet, those who’ve witnessed his epic comeback rate (just shy of 4.5%) know that when the fight is on, he’s tough to topple.
Favorite openings? Well, Chase is a bit eclectic, dabbling with various defenses and gambits, but he seems to have a soft spot for the French Defense and Nimzowitsch variations, balancing aggression and cunning defense like a true chess ninja. Rumor has it his secret weapon might even be the rarely seen and often misunderstood Englund Gambit, catching opponents off guard more than once.
Stats & Highlights:
- Total Blitz Games: Over 10,000 with a win rate around 55%, showing substantial dedication and resilience.
- Longest Winning Streak: 72 games—because streaks aren't just for luck; they're for sheer determination (and maybe some lucky blunders by opponents).
- Preferred Time Control: Rapid, yet truly shines in blitz and bullet formats.
- Psychological Edge: Best time to challenge xshyne? Around 11 AM. Beware the morning coffee-fueled tactical brilliance.
Despite the quirky tendency to wave the white flag quickly, Chase Philips’ passion for the game and impressive rating climbs illustrate a player who loves chess both as a serious challenge and a playground for creativity. Expect excitement, unexpected twists, and maybe a few cheeky resignations when playing against xshyne.
Most Recent Masterpiece:
In a dazzling display on June 5, 2025, Chase executed a textbook checkmate in an intense game against Mozart_Szachowy — a triumph achieved through meticulous strategy and unrelenting pressure.
Noteworthy Rivalries:
Chase has a varied record with frequent opponents like emeraldddd (very competitive with a nearly even battle history) and 111michael, against whom Chase maintains a modest win margin. But against others like schack-hugo and buggingout, he boasts a pristine undefeated record, proving his prowess when the stakes get serious.
Overview
Chase, you show solid blitz understanding with a willingness to engage in sharp, tactical positions. Your openings give you flexible options, and you handle time pressure relatively well when the position is dynamic. The long-term trend suggests you can stabilize and build consistent results by focusing on fundamentals and a simple, repeatable routine.
What you’re doing well
- Strong practical play in dynamic, tactical middlegames where you seize initiative and keep pressure on your opponent.
- Good results with a few sturdy defenses, showing you can choose solid structures and execute typical plans cleanly.
- Openings flexibility gives you multiple paths to unbalance opponents and avoid predictable lines in blitz.
- Ability to find resourceful, tricky ideas under time pressure when the position allows creative play.
Areas to improve
- Long-term consistency: the 12-month trend indicates you may drift at times; aim to consolidate improvements and avoid backslides by sticking to a simple, repeatable routine.
- Endgame practice in blitz: strengthen conversion in short rook and minor-piece endings; study common endgames so small edges convert into wins reliably.
- Time management in complex positions: set a clear plan for each phase of the game, guard against time pressure, and use a quick, structured method to evaluate candidate moves.
- Blunder avoidance under pressure: review games to identify patterns that lead to avoidable mistakes, especially in the transition from middle game to endgame.
Openings performance quick note
You show positive results in a mix of defenses that lead to rich, unbalanced positions. In particular, certain defensive setups have yielded strong win rates, suggesting they’re reliable weapons in blitz. Consider reinforcing a small, personal repertoire from these lines to reduce decision fatigue in the heat of the clock.
Training plan to boost blitz results
- Daily tactics: 15–20 minutes of focused tactics puzzles to improve quick calculation and pattern recognition under time pressure.
- Endgame drills: 2 short endgame sessions per week (rook endings, king-and-pawn endings, and basic opposition) to improve conversion in blitz.
- Opening refinement: pick 2–3 openings you like (one defensive, one dynamic) and study 3 common plans for each, plus 2 typical pitfalls to avoid.
- Post-game review: after every blitz session, annotate 2 critical moments and identify 1 better plan you could have played, then write a brief improvement note.
- Time-management routine: practice a “time budget” for each phase of the game (opening, middlegame, endgame) and use a consistent approach to pacing in every game.
Practical next steps
- Adopt a compact blitz study cycle: 2 weeks of focused tactics, 2 weeks of opening reinforcement, then a week of endgame drills.
- Review your last 20 blitz games and extract 3 recurring mistakes; build a personal checklist to prevent those in future games.
- Track progress with a simple log: note the time you start and finish critical positions and whether you avoided the common traps you studied.
- If you’d like to review specific games together, you can check your profile here: chasephillips
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| egosmasherr | 52W / 37L / 0D | View |
| stargazing247 | 8W / 7L / 0D | View |
| australianapprentice69 | 7W / 2L / 0D | View |
| thechampion_18 | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| passwordwimp | 11W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Owen McCoy | 37W / 39L / 2D | View |
| untitledplayer1234 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nemcsok_kris | 5W / 4L / 0D | View |
| andrey_fedichkin | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Cindy Qiao | 85W / 67L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Eilia Zomorrodian | 726W / 896L / 9D | View Games |
| 111michael | 596W / 589L / 6D | View Games |
| nochewycandy | 273W / 752L / 11D | View Games |
| 31tcejorp | 425W / 562L / 6D | View Games |
| Aron Teh | 270W / 246L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1882 | 2198 | 1428 | |
| 2024 | 2285 | 2212 | 1428 | |
| 2023 | 1847 | 2238 | ||
| 2022 | 1928 | 2475 | 1082 | |
| 2021 | 1903 | 2263 | ||
| 2020 | 1862 | 2273 | ||
| 2019 | 1605 | 2308 | ||
| 2018 | 1659 | 2255 | ||
| 2017 | 1718 | |||
| 2016 | 1393 | 1676 | ||
| 2015 | 1065 | 1675 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2864W / 3256L / 34D | 2826W / 3313L / 30D | 0.3 |
| 2024 | 1670W / 1510L / 24D | 1676W / 1464L / 20D | 3.1 |
| 2023 | 51W / 57L / 0D | 49W / 57L / 1D | 10.4 |
| 2022 | 37W / 17L / 1D | 43W / 15L / 0D | 8.0 |
| 2021 | 8W / 10L / 0D | 9W / 8L / 0D | 12.8 |
| 2020 | 252W / 180L / 5D | 218W / 218L / 2D | 8.7 |
| 2019 | 110W / 71L / 3D | 105W / 86L / 3D | 5.3 |
| 2018 | 630W / 363L / 0D | 669W / 347L / 0D | 2.6 |
| 2017 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 51.5 |
| 2016 | 14W / 14L / 1D | 16W / 13L / 0D | 53.3 |
| 2015 | 27W / 19L / 0D | 26W / 18L / 1D | 62.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17567 | 8988 | 8496 | 83 | 51.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 55.0% |
| Slav Defense | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 76.9% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| French Defense | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 54.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4089 | 1871 | 2191 | 27 | 45.8% |
| French Defense | 43 | 28 | 14 | 1 | 65.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 39 | 22 | 17 | 0 | 56.4% |
| Australian Defense | 34 | 20 | 13 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 25 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 56.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 27.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.e3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 72 | 0 |
| Losing | 24 | 2 |