Overview
EnisMetin34 is a titled chess player who earned the National Master title from the National Chess Federation. Off the board, they are a popular streamer who brings energy, humor, and practical insights to the game. On the board, Enis Metin favors fast, sharp battles and has built a reputation for strong bullet performances that keep viewers entertained and inspired.
Known for a quick, tactical style and a knack for turning the heat up in the opening, EnisMetin34 blends competition with a friendly, approachable vibe. For fans exploring their profile, see the profile link: Enis Metin.
Career and presence
A staple in online streams, EnisMetin34 combines competitive play with educational commentary. The focus is often on Bullet battles, where speed and precision collide, but their reach extends across Blitz and Rapid formats as well. The streaming persona thrives on engaging banter, clear explanations, and a habit of turning even rough positions into entertaining learning moments.
Preferred time control: Bullet.
Opening tendencies
EnisMetin34’s opening choices in Blitz and Bullet reveal a preference for dynamic, combative lines. Notable patterns include:
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack — strong showings in Blitz (WinRate 56.25% across 192 games).
- Alekhine Defense — robust results in Blitz (64.17% win rate across 120 games).
- French Defense — solid performance (WinRate 62.93% across 116 games).
- Scandinavian Defense — versatile and effective (58.18% win rate across 110 games).
- Amping up aggression in related systems like the Amazon Attack and B50/B21 families with encouraging results.
For a broader look, see the openings performance data: Opening performance.
Fun facts and sample
Beyond the board, EnisMetin34 keeps the vibe light and educational—proving that strong chess and a good laugh can go hand in hand. A quick sample of content can be explored with a PGN snippet:
What you did well in your recent rapid games
You show a strong willingness to enter sharp, tactical middlegames and to keep the initiative. In the recent win, you pressed actively in the middlegame and found chances to attack on the kingside, which demonstrates solid calculation under pressure. In the loss, you kept fighting and found practical chances in the complex position, showing resilience and composure even when the position became double-edged. Your draw indicates you can hold difficult structures and convert preventively against pressure.
- You handle dynamic openings with energy and are comfortable chasing active plans when the position allows it.
- Your piece activity tends to be high in the middlegame, which creates practical problems for opponents.
- You can unbalance positions and create chances even from quieter starts by leveraging pawn storms or piece pressure on key diagonals and files.
- When you find a forcing line, you stay organized and look for concrete targets rather than drifting into passive equality.
Areas to focus on for improvement
- Balance boldness with structural safety. In several sharp lines, pushing pawns and opening files can create long-term weaknesses if your pieces aren’t fully developed or your king isn’t safe. Aim to complete development and ensure king safety before committing to major structural ruptures.
- Endgame technique. Work on common rook and minor piece endings so you can convert winning positions cleanly and avoid drawing tendencies from unclear middlegames.
- Calculation discipline in the middlegame. In some games, there were moments where a tactical sequence seemed promising but carried hidden recapture threats for your opponent. Practice short, check-by-check calculations and verify key tactical motifs (forks, pins, discovered checks) before committing to exchanges.
- Time management and plan formation. Develop a simple, repeatable plan for the first 15–20 moves (develop, castle, connect rooks, contest the center). This helps preserve time for critical middlegame decisions and reduces risky improvisation under time pressure.
- Opening consistency and repertoire tuning. You’ve shown strength in certain lines, but some openings produced very sharp or unbalanced middlegames. Consider consolidating 2–3 reliable openings and studying their typical middlegame plans so you can steer the game toward positions you understand well.
Opening notes and practical plan
From your openings performance, you have some standout results in lines like KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 and Barnes Defense, suggesting strength in straightforward, developing play with quick piece activity. You also show willingness to engage in dynamic, double-edged lines in the Sicilian family and related structures. To build on that, consider:
- Keep cultivating the strong lines where you perform best (for example, the KGA Fischer approach and the Barnes Defense) as your core practical repertoire. These give you clear plans and easier middlegame transitions.
- For sharper branches that have less favorable win rates (for example certain Dragon/Dragon-like lines), study typical middle-game plans and common tactical motifs so you can navigate the complexities without getting overwhelmed.
- Pair openings with a concise, pre-game plan: after the first few moves, identify two candidate middlegame plans (e.g., central break with e4-e5 or f-pawn pushes, or a queenside minority attack) and choose one that suits your style and opponent’s setup.
Targeted practice plan for the next weeks
- Tactics bite-sized daily: 15–20 minutes focusing on forks, pins, and discovered attacks, to sharpen calculation in the heat of the middlegame.
- Opening focus (2–3 lines): spend 25–30 minutes per week reinforcing your core repertoire (e.g., KGA Fischer 4.Bc4 and Barnes Defense), plus a light review of one sharper line you’re less confident with to reduce surprises.
- Endgame drills: 20 minutes per session working on rook endings and simple knight vs bishop/endgames to convert advantages reliably.
- Post-game reviews: after each rapid game, write a short 2–3 sentence summary of the key decision points and one alternative plan you could have chosen.
- Time-management practice: in a couple of practice games, set a plan to reach a stable position by move 15, then allocate the remaining time to analyze the critical middlegame choices.
Quick references you can use
Profile and openings quick notes: Enis Metin
Opening ideas to revisit: Sicilian Defense
Sample practice PGN you can import for focused drills:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Perea Fruet | 0W / 5L / 0D | |
| Veronika Shubenkova | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Diana Preobrazhenskaya | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| srawberryfields | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| stefanoskazantzoglou | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| eaglevalley | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sepi_mhz | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ryo | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cherrytreehousekid | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| icyreapm4 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nhrk99 | 75W / 3L / 0D | |
| heryerdenmat | 31W / 14L / 0D | |
| Burak Ozalp | 19W / 16L / 3D | |
| Kaan Akbaş | 7W / 31L / 0D | |
| yasseryasser128 | 27W / 9L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2544 | 2439 | 2338 | |
| 2024 | 2482 | 2588 | 2338 | |
| 2023 | 2234 | 2217 | ||
| 2022 | 2154 | 2340 | 2319 | |
| 2021 | 2079 | 2212 | 1870 | |
| 2020 | 1274 | 2085 | 2077 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 65W / 67L / 8D | 62W / 75L / 6D | 72.6 |
| 2024 | 212W / 175L / 19D | 216W / 171L / 17D | 65.2 |
| 2023 | 219W / 106L / 3D | 193W / 134L / 11D | 50.4 |
| 2022 | 972W / 643L / 65D | 896W / 720L / 84D | 66.6 |
| 2021 | 180W / 77L / 3D | 163W / 90L / 3D | 60.2 |
| 2020 | 137W / 36L / 7D | 137W / 44L / 4D | 69.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 281 | 149 | 132 | 0 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 192 | 105 | 79 | 8 | 54.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 192 | 108 | 76 | 8 | 56.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 153 | 78 | 63 | 12 | 51.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 129 | 74 | 53 | 2 | 57.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 120 | 77 | 36 | 7 | 64.2% |
| French Defense | 116 | 73 | 41 | 2 | 62.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 110 | 66 | 42 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 110 | 64 | 41 | 5 | 58.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 93 | 58 | 31 | 4 | 62.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 69 | 37 | 29 | 3 | 53.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 62 | 42 | 20 | 0 | 67.7% |
| French Defense | 57 | 32 | 24 | 1 | 56.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 55 | 36 | 18 | 1 | 65.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 54 | 29 | 25 | 0 | 53.7% |
| Czech Defense | 51 | 23 | 24 | 4 | 45.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 51 | 23 | 27 | 1 | 45.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 50 | 31 | 18 | 1 | 62.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 49 | 27 | 20 | 2 | 55.1% |
| Modern | 48 | 28 | 18 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 28 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 18 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 41.7% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 42 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 2 |