Aborigen_came – The Blitz Virtuoso
Rising steadily through the competitive ranks since 2016, Aborigen_came has established himself as a formidable force in fast-paced chess formats. With a remarkable blitz rating that soared from 2257 in his early days to an impressive 2805 in 2025, his evolution as a player is a testament to years of dedicated study and relentless practice.
Specializing in blitz and bullet formats, Aborigen_came has demonstrated exceptional tactical awareness and resilience. His comeback rate is extraordinarily high, and on even the most challenging positions—sometimes even after giving away a piece—he manages to turn the tides in his favor. His deep familiarity with modern opening theory, from dynamic Sicilian lines to inventive variations in the Alekhine Defense, has allowed him to craft a diverse and unpredictable repertoire.
Not one to be easily rattled, his psychological fortitude is evident in his low tilt factor and the steady win percentages across different times of day and days of the week. Whether playing as White, boasting a slightly higher conversion rate, or grappling with the challenges of Black, his playing style is defined by a blend of aggressive endgame technique and disciplined early-game strategy. With an average game length that reflects both creativity and meticulous calculation, Aborigen_came’s approach to the board combines speed with precision.
His journey is punctuated by impressive streaks – including a longest winning run of 24 games – and a deep understanding of modern chess dynamics. A true professional of the board, Aborigen_came continues to refine his craft, consistently challenging opponents and proving himself in thousands of online battles. His career ratings over the years not only highlight his rapid improvement but also his capacity to perform under pressure, a quality that fans and fellow competitors admire.
As he forges ahead into new challenges, Aborigen_came remains an inspiration for enthusiasts of dynamic chess, embodying the spirit of continual growth, tactical genius, and unwavering resilience on the board.
Alexey’s blitz feedback — quick read
You’ve shown strong fighting spirit in blitz, with sharp middlegame play and the ability to convert pressure into a win in some games. Your recent success shows you can coordinate pieces and capitalize on tactical chances when the position is dynamic. The data also hints at where you can steadily raise your level with focused practice.
What you’re doing well
- Initiative and energy in the middlegame: you create forcing lines and keep the opponent under pressure, which often yields tangible advantages.
- Ability to finish off games when you have the initiative: you convert attacking chances into concrete results, as shown in your recent decisive wins.
- Opening experimentation shows you handle dynamic lines reasonably well and can pick practical paths that suit your style (for example, the Amar Gambit and Scandinavian family lines are generating favorable results for you).
- Resilience under time pressure: you don’t collapse quickly in tight spots and can keep fighting, which is essential in blitz.
Areas to improve — concrete steps
- Time management in sharp positions: in blitz, you often reach tactical mêlées where a precise move choice is critical. Practice making a quick “first look” assessment (what is my best forcing move? what is the direct threat I must answer?) within 10–15 seconds, then spend a bit more time on the candidate moves that actually exist.
- Pattern recognition in tactics: some losses came from missed tactical themes. Increase your puzzle practice focusing on common motifs (forks, pins, skewers, overloading, and back-rank ideas) to raise your automatic recognition under time pressure.
- Endgame technique: you’ll benefit from refining rook endings, king activity, and pawn endgames. Even a simple plan like activating the king, creating counterplay with a passed pawn, and converting a pawn majority can turn many blitz results in your favor.
- Opening decision discipline: you’ve shown comfort in aggressive openings, but in blitz you’ll benefit from having a few solid, low-variance lines as backups. This lowers the risk of getting into uncomfortable positions early on.
- Consistency in long tactical sequences: when the position becomes deeply tactical, try to settle on a clear plan rather than evaluating every branch. Seek forcing moves first and only branch when necessary.
Opening insights and practical recommendations
Your openings data shows that the Amar Gambit and Scandinavian Defense are among your most successful choices, with solid win rates. The French Defense and Alekhine involve sharp play that also suits your appetite for complex positions. Consider the following plan:
- Continue developing familiarity with Amar Gambit and Scandinavian lines. Build quick reference notes for typical middlegame plans, key pawn structures, and common tactical ideas you should look for after the early complications.
- Maintain a reliable, solid response against aggressive opponents. Have a few “safe” lines in reserve that you can rely on when you’re in a time crunch or facing unfamiliar setups.
- When you’re unsure in the opening, steer toward calmer, straightforward paths that keep your pieces active and your king safe, then rely on your middlegame energy to create chances.
Training plan for the near term
- Daily tactical drills: 15 minutes of puzzles focusing on pattern recognition (forks, pins, discovered attacks) to improve fast calculation in blitz.
- Endgame practice: two short rook-endgames per week and one king-and-pawn endgame study to reinforce practical conversion skills.
- Opening review: 2 sessions per week dedicated to Amar Gambit and Scandinavian lines. For each session, identify 2-3 common middlegame plans and 1 frequently occurring tactical theme to watch for.
- Post-game reflection: after each blitz session, pick one winning idea you want to repeat and one decision that could be improved. Write a brief note and test that idea in your next game.
Small, actionable checklist for next week
- Complete 5 tactical puzzles daily, focusing on quick recognition rather than deep calculation.
- Practice an Amar Gambit line and a Scandinavian line each twice, noting the main middlegame ideas you expect to see.
- Review 2 recent blitz games: identify one moment you over- or under-calculated, and write down the alternative path you could have taken.
- Do a light endgame drill: rook endings with pawns on opposite wings, and practice keeping the king active.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chesssknock | 125W / 86L / 77D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Roman Zhenetl | 144W / 174L / 30D | View Games |
| Роман | 156W / 118L / 47D | View Games |
| chesssknock | 125W / 86L / 77D | View Games |
| mops_2004 | 119W / 92L / 62D | View Games |
| Kevin Bordi | 82W / 113L / 36D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2609 | 2901 | 2472 | |
| 2024 | 2804 | |||
| 2023 | 2750 | 2466 | ||
| 2022 | 2548 | 2808 | 2454 | |
| 2021 | 2569 | 2735 | ||
| 2020 | 2558 | 2770 | 2342 | |
| 2019 | 2535 | 2713 | 2049 | |
| 2018 | 2415 | 2628 | 2266 | |
| 2017 | 1493 | 2508 | ||
| 2016 | 2257 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 606W / 317L / 106D | 474W / 431L / 122D | 88.4 |
| 2024 | 1285W / 965L / 281D | 1032W / 1220L / 278D | 90.2 |
| 2023 | 686W / 500L / 210D | 576W / 660L / 171D | 92.5 |
| 2022 | 1592W / 1217L / 358D | 1387W / 1363L / 374D | 89.2 |
| 2021 | 1076W / 766L / 284D | 912W / 947L / 266D | 89.8 |
| 2020 | 190W / 116L / 31D | 188W / 116L / 36D | 86.5 |
| 2019 | 785W / 554L / 159D | 682W / 644L / 172D | 88.4 |
| 2018 | 272W / 177L / 58D | 259W / 176L / 73D | 89.9 |
| 2017 | 158W / 99L / 36D | 159W / 101L / 27D | 83.2 |
| 2016 | 20W / 6L / 0D | 21W / 4L / 1D | 79.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 4198 | 1848 | 1822 | 528 | 44.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3099 | 1569 | 1163 | 367 | 50.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 2037 | 1086 | 735 | 216 | 53.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1850 | 831 | 792 | 227 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1416 | 694 | 565 | 157 | 49.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1187 | 620 | 459 | 108 | 52.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1111 | 522 | 434 | 155 | 47.0% |
| Czech Defense | 779 | 371 | 319 | 89 | 47.6% |
| Modern | 735 | 314 | 342 | 79 | 42.7% |
| French Defense | 637 | 344 | 225 | 68 | 54.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 114 | 70 | 40 | 4 | 61.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 105 | 71 | 30 | 4 | 67.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 78 | 49 | 23 | 6 | 62.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 70 | 45 | 20 | 5 | 64.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 68 | 41 | 21 | 6 | 60.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 43 | 20 | 18 | 5 | 46.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 31 | 12 | 18 | 1 | 38.7% |
| Australian Defense | 28 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 25 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 72.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Australian Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation, Alekhine Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |