Uurtsaikh Agibileg - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Agibileg, the International Master who’s quietly rewriting the rules of chess—mostly by keeping opponents guessing and sometimes making them question reality. With a peak blitz rating soaring up to a stunning 2926 in May 2024, this player doesn’t just play fast; they play flawlessly fast. If bullet chess were a superhero, Agibileg would be its alter ego.
Starting out with a modest 999 bullet rating in early 2013 (everyone starts somewhere, right?), Agibileg rapidly progressed into a formidable chess force. This journey is marked by a rollercoaster of games played—over 8,000 blitz matches with nearly 3,000 victories and an impressive win rate hovering near 50%. And let's not forget their rapid and daily ratings, steadily climbing to over 2600, proving that even in slower formats, Agibileg has the patience and precision of a chess zen master.
When it comes to openings, code name "Top Secret" seems fitting, since over 6,000 games were played under this mysterious label, making their opponents feel like they're trying to decode the Da Vinci chess cipher. Still, we peeked through the curtain at some favored lines: the Queen’s Gambit Declined - Queen’s Knight Variation with a flawless 100% win rate, and the Sicilian Defense Taimanov Variation, boasting over 70% success—because nothing says "surprise!" like a killer opening with exotic flair.
Agibileg’s tactical awareness is something to behold. With an astonishing comeback rate of 87.24%, they transform seemingly dire positions into masterpieces of resilience. When the going gets tough (or when pieces mysteriously vanish), this player fights back with almost half of their games ending in victory after losing a piece. Talk about turning lemons into checkmates!
Chess is not just about the board — it's about timing too. Agibileg prefers the peak hour of 3 PM for matches, when brain cells are most aligned and coffee levels presumably optimal. Interestingly, Sundays bring out their best winning chances (a cheerful 52%), so if you ever want to see them stumble, consider challenging them on a Wednesday afternoon.
Despite an early resignation rate of just under 2%, Agibileg typically battles through endgame oceans, averaging over 76 moves per win. That’s endurance worthy of an ultramarathon runner—but for knights and bishops.
In the spirit of sportsmanship, let’s not forget the losses that fuel future triumphs. The sharpest recent defeat came at the hands of a well-prepared opponent wielding the Indian Game: Knight’s Variation—reminding us all that even masters have off days, or at least moments of dramatic flair on the clock.
Recent Triumph
On June 3, 2025, Agibileg annihilated Mikasinski with a memorable checkmate in a classical Grunfeld Defense Exchange. This game showcased deep preparation, patience, and relentless pressure evolving over 91 moves—proving chess is not a sprint, but an elegant marathon.
Follow the link to watch the magic: AGIBILEG vs Mikasinski - Checkmate Finale
Whether blitzing through malls of pawns and knights or carefully weaving a web of strategic brilliance, Uurtsaikh Agibileg continues to captivate the chess world with a mix of speed, cunning, and a sprinkle of mystery—truly an IM who keeps their moves top secret!
Recent Game Review
Uurtsaikh, your recent rapid games demonstrate strong strategic understanding and solid positional play with a diverse repertoire opening-wise. Here are some highlights and key areas to focus on:
- Strengths:
- You excel in the Queen's Gambit Declined and various Grünfeld Defense lines with a strong winning record, which reflects your deep understanding of these openings.
- Good ability to create and convert advantages in the middlegame, as seen in your games where you effectively use piece activity and positional pressure.
- Solid endgame techniques, often putting consistent pressure on opponents leading them to resign.
- Your win-loss record and win rate against strong opponents remain very impressive, indicating resilience and adaptability.
- Areas for Improvement:
- Handling Sicilian Defense Variations: Your performance in some Sicilian Defense variations, specifically the Taimanov Variation, has a lower success rate. It could be beneficial to analyze your games in this opening to identify tactical pitfalls or strategic misunderstandings.
- Endgame Precision under Pressure: While your endgame is generally strong, some recent losses showed moments where precise calculation in complex endgame positions was required. Continuing to practice complicated endgames with reduced material may enhance your confidence and accuracy.
- Tactical Sharpness: A few losses involved missed tactical opportunities or underestimating opponent threats. Invest time in tactical training to maintain sharp calculation skills, especially in fast time controls like rapid.
- Opening Preparation Variety: Though your main openings are reliable, occasionally introducing new lines or anti-preparation moves might surprise opponents and create fresh advantages.
Performance and Trend Insights
Your rating trend over the past 3 to 6 months is strongly positive, with an upward slope around 45 points per period, displaying continuous improvement. That said, a slight drop in the last month (-25 points) suggests a temporary lapse or tougher challenges. Staying focused on consistent training and review could recover and extend your upward momentum.
- Your strength-adjusted win rate is balanced near 50%, quite respectable at your high rating level.
- Strong win rate above 80% in carefully chosen openings like the Dőry Defense and Queen's Gambit lines means sticking to your opening strengths while working on weaker areas effectively.
- Maintaining your resilience and learning from losses will be key to breaking through any plateaus.
Recommendations for Improvement
To continue boosting your performance, consider incorporating the following into your training regimen:
- Targeted Opening Study: Deeply review your games in openings with lower success rates, especially the Sicilian Taimanov, to understand and correct recurring mistakes.
- Endgame Drills: Focus on complex endgame scenarios and practice calculation under time constraints to improve decision-making late in the game.
- Tactical Training: Work daily on tactics puzzles geared to your rating level to sharpen calculation and pattern recognition, reducing oversights.
- Game Analysis: Continue to analyze your wins and losses thoroughly. Identify turning points and alternative moves to deepen your strategic insight.
- Opening Experimentation: Experiment with introducing new opening ideas or sidelines in your repertoire to keep opponents off balance.
By focusing on these areas, you will likely see sustained rating gains and stronger competitive performances in rapid games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kheni19474 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ethan Sheehan | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Varun Krishnan | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chill_out112 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Apoorv Kamble | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mart500 | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Yinn Long Wong | 3W / 5L / 0D | View |
| nice_2_m8te_u | 2W / 2L / 1D | View |
| renediskarte | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chess_286 | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dambasuren Batsuren | 27W / 63L / 6D | View Games |
| Vladimir Bilic | 13W / 14L / 10D | View Games |
| miguel_2747 | 11W / 23L / 1D | View Games |
| Alexander Rustemov | 11W / 20L / 2D | View Games |
| Itgelt Khuyagtsogt | 14W / 15L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2641 | 2808 | 2599 | |
| 2024 | 2634 | 2686 | 2497 | 1062 |
| 2023 | 2644 | 2674 | 2367 | 933 |
| 2022 | 2518 | 2593 | 2334 | |
| 2021 | 2413 | 2732 | 2329 | |
| 2020 | 2411 | 2517 | 2296 | |
| 2019 | 2205 | 2408 | 1885 | |
| 2018 | 2285 | 2196 | ||
| 2017 | 2021 | |||
| 2016 | 1909 | 984 | ||
| 2015 | 1726 | 1732 | ||
| 2014 | 1723 | 1493 | ||
| 2013 | 1642 | 1755 | 1553 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 431W / 298L / 67D | 326W / 396L / 67D | 84.4 |
| 2024 | 562W / 412L / 91D | 470W / 513L / 86D | 86.3 |
| 2023 | 327W / 178L / 29D | 268W / 205L / 35D | 76.9 |
| 2022 | 120W / 89L / 21D | 96W / 115L / 16D | 83.7 |
| 2021 | 222W / 141L / 34D | 195W / 198L / 20D | 80.1 |
| 2020 | 238W / 207L / 39D | 213W / 221L / 44D | 81.8 |
| 2019 | 70W / 48L / 12D | 68W / 54L / 6D | 82.0 |
| 2018 | 47W / 30L / 1D | 31W / 34L / 7D | 84.5 |
| 2017 | 49W / 36L / 4D | 44W / 50L / 3D | 72.1 |
| 2016 | 29W / 13L / 0D | 25W / 14L / 3D | 77.0 |
| 2015 | 58W / 60L / 1D | 71W / 44L / 5D | 69.3 |
| 2014 | 8W / 10L / 0D | 9W / 11L / 0D | 60.7 |
| 2013 | 82W / 68L / 7D | 61W / 85L / 11D | 72.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 51 | 26 | 24 | 1 | 51.0% |
| Australian Defense | 32 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Modern | 30 | 12 | 17 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 71.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 20 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 55.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 55.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 52.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 17 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 47.1% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 16 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 268 | 150 | 100 | 18 | 56.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 217 | 102 | 97 | 18 | 47.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 196 | 112 | 67 | 17 | 57.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Accelerated | 196 | 109 | 72 | 15 | 55.6% |
| Australian Defense | 189 | 98 | 77 | 14 | 51.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 187 | 74 | 103 | 10 | 39.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 187 | 98 | 73 | 16 | 52.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 179 | 73 | 81 | 25 | 40.8% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 174 | 103 | 61 | 10 | 59.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 153 | 64 | 78 | 11 | 41.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 8 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 12.5% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 62.5% |
| King's Indian Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Accelerated | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 3 |