Artem Sadovsky: The International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Artem Sadovsky, known in the chess world (and on Chess.com) as Artem_Sadovskii, an International Master who has been dazzling opponents with a mix of brilliance, resilience, and just a hint of flair. With a peak blitz rating soaring to an impressive 2708 and bullet rating touching the rarefied air of 2836, Artem plays like a grandmaster trapped in an International Master's body — except that nobody suspects the masterful computations hidden beneath the calm exterior.
Artem’s journey is peppered with exciting battles: from fiery bullet duels where clocks tick dangerously close to zero, to marathon blitz matches filled with tactical fireworks. With over 5000 blitz games played and a win rate that tips just over 50% in his favor, Artem is no stranger to the battlefield, showing off a tactical comeback rate of a staggering 84.39% — proving he’s not just tough but downright stubborn when behind on the scoreboard.
Playing Style? Artem is the chess equivalent of a late-night thriller: lots of twists, turns, and dramatic finishes. His penchant for lengthy endgames (almost 80% endgame frequency) and games averaging around 82 moves per outcome means patience is one virtue he has mastered — a true journeyman of the sixty-four squares. Don’t worry if you see him resign early though; only about 4% of the time does he throw in the towel ahead of time. Artem prefers battles to fairy tales.
Known for his sharp mind and quick wit, Artem even enjoys a cheeky early resignation when the position is hopeless, but usually, he’s the one forcing others to resign — and quite often with style. His recent victory with the Alapin Sicilian showed off his positional prowess and knack for exploiting opponents' weaknesses, ending proudly by resignation after a thorough strategic onslaught.
Off the board, Artem is the kind of player who’s as approachable as a friendly chess cat — enigmatic on the board, but approachable and always ready to share a clever joke or two about hanging pieces and blundering bishops. As Artem would say, “In chess, as in life, sometimes you just have to castle early and hope for the best!”
Notable Achievements:
- International Master title awarded by FIDE
- Peak Blitz rating: 2708 (April 2025)
- Peak Bullet rating: 2836 (April 2025)
- Known for exceptional comeback skills with an 84.39% rate
- Master of the Alapin Sicilian opening and plenty of "Top Secret" moves
Whether online or in real life, Artem Sadovsky continues to intrigue chess fans worldwide — always ready to sit down for one more game, proving that even at the peak of calculated strategy, there’s room for a bit of fun and unpredictability.
Quick summary
Nice job — you converted a messy middlegame into a win by creating a dangerous passed pawn and using active rooks. The loss shows a recurring vulnerability: mating nets and exposed king lines in sharp middlegames. Below I break down concrete things you did well, repeated mistakes to fix, and a short bullet-focused plan you can follow for the next two weeks.
Win: key moments & takeaways
Game: Black vs Nicholas Figorito — opening was the Modern Defense. Open the final line to replay the game and spot the critical moments.
Replay (orientation = Black):
- You created and pushed a passed pawn on the c-file and used it as a hook for counterplay — excellent practical idea in bullet where opponents often panic on pawn storms.
- You traded into a simplified position at the right time (exchanging rooks and then targeting weaknesses) instead of forcing unclear complications — good judgment under time pressure.
- You kept your pieces active (rooks and queen coordinating on the queenside) and used checks/pressure to limit White’s counterplay.
Where an extra half-point could be found
- There were moments (early middlegame) where a single tactical oversight could have lost material — work on 1–2 ply tactics pattern recognition so these shots become automatic in bullet.
Loss: what went wrong
Game (you as White) — the finish was a quick mating net with the opponent’s queen swinging in. Replay the final sequence below.
Replay (orientation = White):
- King safety: after central exchanges your king ended up exposed. In similar structures prefer a safe king (move earlier) or avoid walking into open files where enemy queen + rook can coordinate.
- Back-rank / mating net awareness: the opponent exploited loose back-rank squares and mating patterns (queen + rook infiltration). Make it a habit to check your back rank before each move when pieces are off the board.
- Allowing tactical continuations: the opponent’s c2/c3/c-file tactics were decisive. When pawns or minor pieces are in contact with a passed/advanced pawn, pause and ask “do I have any checks/captures/interferences?”
Recurring patterns I noticed (across the recent games)
- Strength: you handle the Modern Defense/g6 setups very well — good piece play and counterplay on the wings.
- Tendency to allow mating nets after simplifying — when material or queens are traded, you sometimes leave the king too exposed.
- Excellent practical instincts with passed pawns and rook activation; keep leveraging that in bullet.
- Time pressure: many games drop to ~10–20 seconds. When clocks drop that low your calculation suffers — plan to keep a small reserve (10–15s) for critical moments.
Practical bullet checklist (what to do during the game)
- Before moving, in under 2–3 seconds scan: checks, captures, threats. That single quick scan prevents many hanging tactics and mate nets.
- Prioritize king safety over “one extra tempo” when the center opens — a safe king converts more reliably than a small material edge under attack.
- Use premoves selectively. Don’t premove into captures when a queen/rook can appear — avoid auto-premove on volatile squares.
- If you’re winning material, simplify and trade down; if you’re losing, seek complications where the opponent can blunder in time pressure.
- When creating a passed pawn, keep pieces active to support it. Isolate the opponent’s pieces and cut their king off from defense.
Short 2‑week bullet practice plan
- Daily (15–25 minutes)
- 5–8 minutes tactics trainer (focus: back-rank mates, forks, skewers, discovered checks).
- 10 bullet games with a specific aim — e.g., “today: don’t let the king be exposed” or “today: no premoves on captures.”
- 5 minutes post‑game review: mark 1 tactical miss and 1 positional decision per game.
- Weekly
- 2 longer rapid games (10+0) to practice accurate plan-making without extreme time pressure.
- One 30 minute session reviewing 5 lost games and writing one sentence on how the result would change with a better move.
Concrete technical drills
- Back-rank drill: set up positions with rooks and practice defending by creating luft or trading rooks.
- Passed pawn technique: practice converting rook + passed pawn endgames in 5–10 minute study sessions.
- Quick pattern library: memorize ~30 mating/tactical motifs (queen+rook mate, smothered mate, knight forks, discovered checks).
Next steps / offer
If you want, I can:
- Do a deeper move-by-move analysis of any single game (pick one) and annotate the 5 most critical moments.
- Generate a 14-day training calendar with daily exercises tuned to your openings (I see you play a lot of the Modern Defense).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marat Denishev | 119W / 180L / 20D | View Games |
| mrmaglov | 160W / 7L / 9D | View Games |
| ZURAB AZMAIPARASHVILI | 75W / 52L / 13D | View Games |
| Gleb Apryshko | 54W / 79L / 6D | View Games |
| Zurab Javakhadze | 42W / 67L / 9D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2837 | 2719 | 2332 | |
| 2024 | 2700 | 2408 | 2326 | |
| 2023 | 2524 | 2545 | 2332 | |
| 2022 | 2281 | 2441 | 2532 | |
| 2021 | 2733 | 2515 | 2529 | 2000 |
| 2020 | 2632 | 2598 | 2521 | |
| 2019 | 2516 | 2601 | ||
| 2018 | 2459 | 2440 | ||
| 2017 | 2602 | 2461 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100W / 49L / 12D | 89W / 65L / 14D | 87.2 |
| 2024 | 354W / 350L / 43D | 333W / 366L / 50D | 86.0 |
| 2023 | 127W / 108L / 16D | 127W / 122L / 14D | 79.6 |
| 2022 | 309W / 280L / 42D | 324W / 260L / 51D | 72.8 |
| 2021 | 867W / 661L / 129D | 821W / 691L / 144D | 84.2 |
| 2020 | 398W / 312L / 71D | 407W / 317L / 58D | 84.6 |
| 2019 | 217W / 192L / 32D | 210W / 208L / 24D | 83.1 |
| 2018 | 193W / 170L / 19D | 177W / 174L / 28D | 86.0 |
| 2017 | 145W / 133L / 24D | 144W / 138L / 21D | 92.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 830 | 422 | 364 | 44 | 50.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 510 | 237 | 191 | 82 | 46.5% |
| Modern Defense | 311 | 167 | 116 | 28 | 53.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 293 | 145 | 124 | 24 | 49.5% |
| Unknown | 280 | 152 | 127 | 1 | 54.3% |
| Australian Defense | 260 | 137 | 102 | 21 | 52.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 239 | 138 | 86 | 15 | 57.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 225 | 125 | 81 | 19 | 55.6% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 215 | 110 | 91 | 14 | 51.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 186 | 94 | 76 | 16 | 50.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 761 | 362 | 352 | 47 | 47.6% |
| Modern | 753 | 369 | 348 | 36 | 49.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 382 | 176 | 180 | 26 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 363 | 163 | 169 | 31 | 44.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 290 | 120 | 151 | 19 | 41.4% |
| King's Indian Attack | 266 | 134 | 123 | 9 | 50.4% |
| Modern Defense | 182 | 97 | 67 | 18 | 53.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 175 | 85 | 77 | 13 | 48.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 143 | 67 | 66 | 10 | 46.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 139 | 56 | 78 | 5 | 40.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 68.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| Modern | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scotch Game | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 6.Nf3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 6 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |