Ambru Dan (dan910712)
Ambru Dan, known in the chess world by the username dan910712, is a player who embodies the true spirit of the game: fierce, resilient, and slightly unpredictable – like a chessboard ninja lurking in the shadows.
Since 2010, Dan has journeyed through the ranks, steadily sharpening his skills and amassing a formidable blitz rating peak of 2494 as recently as August 2024. Not shy of an intense time scramble, his bullet peak soared to 2444, while his rapid games hit a solid ceiling at 2200. Daily chess? He's no stranger either, having achieved a personal best of 1801 back in 2010, proving versatility across all time controls.
With over 3863 wins in blitz alone, Dan’s competitive record reads like an epic saga, peppered with comebacks, bold sacrifices, and that occasional "Oops, why did I do that?" moment. His tactical awareness is splendid, boasting a remarkable 85% comeback rate after going down a piece – basically, the chess equivalent of channeling Rocky Balboa mid-fight.
Style-wise, Dan is a connoisseur of the King’s Indian Defense, particularly the Semi-Averbakh System and Normal Variation, favoring them with near 50% win rates in blitz. But don’t be fooled by a single opening love; he’s got a wide repertoire that includes the Sicilian Defense in its many spicy flavors – Pelikan, Sveshnikov, and the Canal Attack among them – showcasing a taste for tactical fireworks and strategic complexity.
Dan's games are often long, thoughtful affairs (his average moves per win is a respectable 78), hinting at a patience and tenacity that chess aficionados admire. Ending games primarily by resignation rather than daring checkmates or timeouts, he knows when to celebrate victory — and when to concede gracefully.
With a nickname yet to be claimed and a tilt factor that reminds us that even chess warriors have their off days, Ambru Dan plays best in the deep, mysterious hours of the night around 3 AM. Perhaps it's the witching hour that unlocks his truest potential, or maybe it's just the coffee kicking in.
His most recent notable victories through 2025 include impressive games full of strategic depth and time-pressure wizardry, often ending with opponents running out of time or resigning in disbelief. A true testament to the fact that in the realm of chess, Dan is both a tactician and a fighter – a player worth watching, challenging, and learning from.
In short: Ambru Dan is the kind of player who makes you double-check your moves, laugh a bit at the unpredictability of chess, and admire the grind behind every point earned on that 64-square battlefield.
Overview of practical takeaways from your recent blitz games
You showed willingness to activate your pieces and press in the middlegame across your recent games. The win demonstrates how timely exchanges can open lines for your pieces and convert pressure into a victory. The loss highlights how a sharp tactical sequence can tilt the position quickly, so strengthening your defense against aggressive setups is valuable. The draw indicates you can sustain pressure in complex positions, but there were moments where simplifying or prioritizing king safety would have reduced risk. These are common blitz patterns to refine as you train for faster time controls.
Key improvement areas to focus on
- Endgame clarity and simplification decisions: In some late exchanges, there were opportunities to simplify with a clear plan (for example, trading into rook endgames or minor-piece endings where your activity matters more than material). Practice identifying when to simplify versus when to keep tension.
- Tactical vigilance in dynamic positions: In sharper lines, the board can become highly tactical very quickly. Build a quick pattern repertoire (forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks) and practice spotting forcing moves in the first 10–15 seconds of a new position.
- King safety and back-rank awareness: In blitz, back-rank and open-file threats can decide the game fast. Prioritize solid king shelter after development and be mindful of lines that expose the king to rapid counterplay.
- Opening plan and structure under time pressure: You mix solid setups with sharper lines. For blitz, it helps to commit to one or two straightforward plans in each opening as a fallback, so you can keep momentum even when the clock runs low.
Practical drills to implement next
- Daily tactical patterns: Solve 15–20 tactical puzzles focused on forks, pins, discovered checks, and king safety patterns. Do a quick review of each solution and note the motif used.
- Endgame basics: Practice rook endings and minor-piece endings with a partner or a simple engine drill. Focus on keeping rooks active, activating the king, and using the outside passed pawn idea when it exists.
- Two-opening plan reinforcement: Pick two openings you play frequently and study 2–3 typical middlegame plans for each. Create short cheat-sheets with the key ideas, common pawn structures, and typical maneuvers you should aim for.
- Blitz timing discipline: In each session, allocate fixed portions to move generation, calculation, and review. Example: 2 minutes to develop a plan, 2 minutes to calculate forcing lines, and 1 minute to check king safety before each critical decision.
Two-week focused plan
- Choose two openings you enjoy (for example, a solid, flexible setup against 1.d4 and a dynamic line against 1.e4) and study 3 model games for each. Note the typical plans and common pawn structures you want to reach.
- Every day: 20–30 minutes of tactical puzzles, 20–30 minutes of endgame practice, and 2 short blitz sessions (3–5 games each) focusing on applying the opening plans and the new patterns you’ve studied.
- After each blitz session, write a one-sentence takeaway: one thing you did well and one concrete improvement to work on next time.
Openings in your repertoire: a balanced path forward
Your current openings show you are comfortable with a mix of solid and dynamic ideas. To reduce risk in blitz, aim for two trusted lines with clear, repeatable plans. Build simple mental models for middlegame plans that arise from those structures (for example, play for piece activity and control of open files, or aim for a solid pawn center and counterplay on the wings). This approach helps you stay consistent under time pressure while still keeping chances to seize the initiative when the position allows.
Next steps and monitoring progress
Implement the two-week plan and then review what changed in your decision-making and calculation under time pressure. If you’d like, share a brief summary after each week describing a couple of concrete improvements you noticed in your play or a few critical moments you handled better. I can tailor additional drills and focused feedback based on those notes.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| szilvesztersandor | 51W / 9L / 4D | View Games |
| Nita Lucian | 28W / 18L / 7D | View Games |
| real_napper | 25W / 13L / 8D | View Games |
| Paul Cristian Rusan | 22W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| Matei Acsinte | 12W / 21L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2341 | |||
| 2024 | 2315 | 2417 | 2200 | 1390 |
| 2023 | 2360 | 2375 | 1305 | |
| 2022 | 2348 | 2200 | ||
| 2021 | 2292 | 2211 | 1993 | |
| 2020 | 2161 | 2303 | 1823 | |
| 2019 | 2036 | |||
| 2018 | 2115 | |||
| 2017 | 2185 | 2172 | ||
| 2016 | 2238 | 2104 | ||
| 2014 | 1431 | |||
| 2012 | 1455 | |||
| 2011 | 1548 | |||
| 2010 | 1103 | 1467 | 1581 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9W / 10L / 0D | 5W / 10L / 1D | 76.3 |
| 2024 | 397W / 391L / 63D | 320W / 456L / 69D | 80.2 |
| 2023 | 142W / 139L / 26D | 124W / 165L / 28D | 82.2 |
| 2022 | 39W / 31L / 2D | 27W / 29L / 10D | 82.9 |
| 2021 | 279W / 280L / 48D | 271W / 294L / 50D | 82.5 |
| 2020 | 488W / 424L / 59D | 451W / 459L / 67D | 81.8 |
| 2019 | 35W / 22L / 4D | 39W / 20L / 5D | 74.2 |
| 2018 | 111W / 100L / 13D | 87W / 126L / 10D | 80.1 |
| 2017 | 389W / 356L / 56D | 329W / 406L / 49D | 78.4 |
| 2016 | 303W / 273L / 34D | 290W / 286L / 38D | 78.7 |
| 2014 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 42.5 |
| 2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 25.5 |
| 2011 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 11.0 |
| 2010 | 9W / 6L / 1D | 8W / 8L / 0D | 44.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 561 | 255 | 267 | 39 | 45.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 362 | 180 | 151 | 31 | 49.7% |
| Australian Defense | 280 | 144 | 118 | 18 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 271 | 99 | 150 | 22 | 36.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 262 | 95 | 148 | 19 | 36.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 237 | 104 | 106 | 27 | 43.9% |
| Slav Defense | 227 | 106 | 107 | 14 | 46.7% |
| King's Indian Defense | 217 | 103 | 99 | 15 | 47.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 191 | 85 | 94 | 12 | 44.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 178 | 65 | 95 | 18 | 36.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scotch Game | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Benoni Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 19 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 15.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 29 | 10 | 16 | 3 | 34.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 16 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 16 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 53.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 13 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 23.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 2 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |