Daniel Mieles Palau – International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Daniel Mieles Palau, known in the chess sphere as DanielMieles1985. An International Master granted by FIDE, Daniel combines tactical finesse with a touch of the unexpected, often leaving opponents wondering if they just played chess or survived a grandmaster’s magic act.
From Pawns to Prodigy
Daniel’s journey up the ranks reads like a thrilling novel. Starting from humble beginnings with bullet ratings barely nudging past 1300 in 2013 to smashing a peak bullet rating of 2824 in late 2024, his bullets fly fast and furious — and mostly hit their mark. While his rapid and blitz styles show a cooler composure, his bullet games reveal a warrior spirit who thrives under pressure, winning over 2100 games and boasting a win rate north of 52% in bullet chess.
The Style and Swagger
Known for an aggressive approach, Daniel melds a powerful opening repertoire – expertly weaving the Top Secret opening (because who doesn’t love a little mystery?) with solid defenses like the Caro-Kann. His average game clocks in at a hefty 80 moves when he wins, proving he's not just about quick shots but also marathon masterminding.
Despite a modest early resignation rate of about 1.6%, Daniel's comeback rate sits impressively at over 81%, meaning don’t count him out when the chips are down – he's likely plotting your downfall.
Perfect Timing or Master of Madness?
Analysis of Daniel’s play times might just make you chuckle: his best hours to rack up wins are early morning and late night's quiet hours, with an astounding 80% win rate at 9 AM and nearly 60% during the witching hours of 2-3 AM. It's safe to say Daniel either runs on coffee or midnight inspiration.
Recent Highlights & Memorable Battles
Just recently, Daniel secured a brilliant victory against Simca1100 featuring a sharp Caro-Kann Panov Fianchetto Defense. With nimble tactics and a calm endgame, Daniel clocked the win on time, adding yet another feather to his cap.
Sure, even greats have their off days. His last loss came from an intense Sicilian Defense Open Dragon, proving that if dragons breathe fire, Daniel's still the fearless knight charging headfirst.
The Personality Behind the Pieces
Daniel is more than just numbers and tactics; the psychological trends show a Tilt Factor of 9, which might mean he occasionally grumbles under his breath but bounces back quicker than you can say "checkmate." Known among opponents as a formidable rival, his streaks include a longest winning spree of 13 games and tenacious resilience through tough losses.
Whether playing white or black, Daniel’s game radiates confidence, winning more than half the time when wielding the white pieces, and nearly 50% with black – impressive numbers for any chess gladiator.
In Summary
With thousands of games logged and a vast spectrum of victorious strategies, Daniel Mieles Palau is a name to remember on any leaderboard. A grand tactician with a dash of charm and a sprinkle of unpredictability, Daniel keeps the chess world on its toes — one bullet game at a time.
Curious to watch his games? Check out his latest battles on Chess.com under the username DanielMieles1985 and see the magic unfold.
What’s going well in your rapid games
You show a flexible and practical approach, which serves you well in fast time controls. Your willingness to experiment with different openings keeps your game fresh and helps you find plans that fit your style. In openings data, you’ve had particularly solid results with English structures and certain Nimzo-Larsen setups, suggesting you can generate active play from flexible, less theoretical lines. You also demonstrate the ability to pressure the position and create dynamic chances when your pieces come into play quickly.
- Successful attempts with English Opening variants indicate you can build clear development and solid middle-game plans from these setups.
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack shows a promising path where you can translate aggressive, flexible play into tangible chances.
- When you switch to more direct Sicilian ideas in practice, you create sharp, tactical chances and keep the opponents under pressure.
Key improvement areas to focus on
- Convert more of your initiative into concrete results. In a few games you built good attacking chances but didn’t finish the job; focus on forcing moves that push the opponent into difficult choices and minimize unnecessary trade-offs that relieve pressure.
- Endgame conversion. With several draws in your recent activity, sharpen techniques to convert advantages into wins, especially in rook and minor-piece endgames. Practice simple, clear plans for common pawn structures you encounter in your openings.
- Opening depth for consistency. Some Sicilian lines appear to yield many drawn positions in your sample. Pick 1-2 Sicilian branches you like and study typical middlegame themes and endgame transitions so you can maintain pressure and avoid passive positions.
- Time management on critical moments. In rapid, making efficient decisions on key turning points matters as much as finding strong moves. Build a small checklist for critical positions (develop all pieces, ensure king safety, watch for tactical threats) and use it in your post-gameReviews.
Opening focus and practical plan
Based on your openings performance, you have strengths in several lines. Consider prioritizing a compact, reliable repertoire built around a couple of openings where you’ve shown success, and then gradually expanding. Suggested focus areas:
- English Opening: Closed, and related Botvinnik-reversed structures. These show solid results; deepen your understanding of typical middlegame ideas and plan a consistent method for advancing on the kingside or center depending on Black’s setup.
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack. Build a repeatable plan for the typical responses, focusing on active piece play and quick central breaks when available.
- Sicilian Defense variants you’ve already tried (notably the Four Knights Cobra variation). Strengthen the key tactical motifs and common pawn structures you encounter so you can translate pressure into material or decisive activity.
If you’d like, I can outline a 3-month opening plan with specific training goals for each line. For now, a focused 2-opening plan with regular review tends to yield the best long-term gains.
Recommended training plan
- Choose two openings to master over the next 4 weeks. For example: English Opening (Closed, Botvinnik-style) and Nimzo-Larsen Attack. Study 3 representative middlegame themes for each, plus 5 common endgames you’re likely to reach from them.
- Daily tactics: spend 15-20 minutes on a tactical trainer with themes that appear in your chosen openings (pins, skewers, discovered attacks, and typical sacrifice ideas).
- Post-game review: after every rapid game, write one concrete improvement note. If you missed a tactic or a plan, capture the exact position and your better alternative.
- Endgame practice: dedicate 2 sessions per week to rook-and-pawn and minor-piece endgames that commonly arise from your openings; learn a few go-to endgame conversion patterns.
Want deeper, personalized guidance?
Share a couple of your recent rapid games or ask for a board-ready plan focusing on your two chosen openings. I can tailor a targeted improvement sheet with suggested drills and annotated example positions. danielmielespalau
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Leo Bispo | 30W / 24L / 4D | |
| Jonathan Tayar | 25W / 16L / 2D | |
| Tim Wong | 23W / 16L / 4D | |
| Anselm Wagner | 18W / 17L / 3D | |
| white31 | 18W / 19L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2766 | 2581 | 2383 | |
| 2024 | 2817 | 2576 | ||
| 2023 | 2754 | 2479 | ||
| 2022 | 2664 | 2455 | ||
| 2021 | 2623 | 2641 | 2383 | |
| 2020 | 2805 | 2590 | 2367 | 800 |
| 2019 | 2661 | |||
| 2014 | 1741 | |||
| 2013 | 1800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10W / 12L / 1D | 12W / 14L / 1D | 73.7 |
| 2024 | 128W / 96L / 19D | 112W / 108L / 24D | 80.4 |
| 2023 | 321W / 205L / 53D | 273W / 250L / 58D | 81.5 |
| 2022 | 61W / 36L / 14D | 62W / 46L / 1D | 74.7 |
| 2021 | 439W / 276L / 71D | 410W / 298L / 66D | 79.9 |
| 2020 | 377W / 233L / 71D | 329W / 286L / 55D | 83.4 |
| 2019 | 20W / 9L / 2D | 14W / 12L / 3D | 97.9 |
| 2014 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 4.0 |
| 2013 | 5W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 0D | 68.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 786 | 454 | 284 | 48 | 57.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 346 | 177 | 135 | 34 | 51.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 223 | 111 | 80 | 32 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 175 | 89 | 74 | 12 | 50.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 156 | 88 | 58 | 10 | 56.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 150 | 77 | 54 | 19 | 51.3% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 117 | 64 | 42 | 11 | 54.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 104 | 54 | 37 | 13 | 51.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 96 | 49 | 41 | 6 | 51.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 85 | 51 | 28 | 6 | 60.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 50 | 30 | 18 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 39 | 28 | 9 | 2 | 71.8% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 28 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 42.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 24 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 20 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 19 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 18 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 17 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 41.2% |
| Australian Defense | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System Reversed, 4. g3 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Delayed Fianchetto | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 6 |