Frode Elsness - The International Master Whisperer
Frode Elsness, also known by the enigmatic username DarkPassenger007, is an International Master who dances deftly across the chessboard with the flair of a grandmaster in disguise. Awarded the prestigious IM title by FIDE, Frode has proven time and again that a great mind is as much about strategy as it is about persistence—and maybe a hint of mystery.
Rating Journey
From a blitz rating just shy of 2000 in 2017 to breaking the 2500 barrier in blitz by 2024, Frode's rapid rise has been nothing short of impressive. Bullet ratings tell a similar story, peaking above 2300, revealing a player who’s not just fast but also fiercely accurate under extreme time pressure. Rapid games see Frode comfortably around the 2000 mark, with a tactical sharpness that’s a nightmare for opponents.
Playing Style and Strengths
- Endgame enthusiast: Frode fires up the endgame phase in nearly 70% of his games, showing patience and precision.
- Never gives up: With an 85.57% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece, Frode could turn a chessboard disaster into a victory party.
- Attack with style: His average game spans over 70 moves when winning—who said blitz games can’t be a saga?
Record That Speaks Volumes
Blazing through 300+ blitz games and nearly 650 bullet clashes, Frode has racked up impressive wins, especially in blitz where he boasts a near 48% win rate over 350 highly classified games. His black pieces are particularly dangerous, wielding a win rate above 39%! Caution to foes: resigning early is not Frode’s style; he fights to the last move.
The Opponent Chronicles
Frode has tangled with a wide spectrum of challengers. He maintains a respectable edge against frequent opponents such as fartnroses12 (67.5% win rate over 77 games) and dispatches others with ruthless efficiency. But watch out—some opponents still get the better of him, keeping the rivalry alive and chessboards sizzling.
A Psychological Profile
Despite a tilt factor of 15 (pretty good for such high-stakes battles), Frode shows a pronounced edge in rated games, winning nearly 40% more! He prefers peak playing hours around the evening, where his win rates soar above 60%, sometimes hitting a dazzling 80% at 10 AM (because why not?).
Fun Facts
- Longest winning streak: a notable 15 games, proving once and for all that unstoppable streaks do exist beyond fairy tales.
- Uses “Top Secret” openings so secret even he might forget what they are.
- Will almost never resign early; Frode believes every queen deserves a fair fight!
In short, Frode Elsness is not just a chess player, but a calculated storm on 64 squares, charming foes and fans alike with his resilience, strategy, and that elusive dark passenger spirit.
What stands out in your recent blitz games
You often pursue active, sharp middlegame play and are comfortable creating complex situations. Your willingness to seize the initiative after solid development helps you generate practical chances in quick games. In several games you leveraged open files and piece activity to press for improvement, which is a strong trait in blitz where swift calculation and aggression can pay off.
- You mix material and positional ideas well, especially in dynamic openings like the Sicilian and Caro-Kann lines you’ve used. Your pieces often operate on multiple fronts, which can create practical problems for your opponents.
- Your willingness to attack and complicate positions can create winning chances even when the position is not perfectly clear. This is a valuable asset in blitz when precise long-term plans are harder to maintain.
- You show tenacity in the endgame, keeping pressure on the opponent’s structure and using rook activity to create drawing or winning chances.
Concrete areas to improve for faster, cleaner wins
- Endgame technique under time pressure: In several games, converting even small advantages can be tricky in blitz. Practice common rook endgames on open files and simple king-and-pawn endgames to convert faster and more confidently.
- Decision discipline in sharp lines: In highly tactical middlegames, it’s easy to chase leads. Develop a quick two-step check for each critical move: (a) what is my opponent threatening now, and (b) what is the immediate gain or risk of my move? If the answer isn’t clear, switch to a safer, developing move that keeps the position solid.
- Prophylaxis and waiting moves: Add a habit of looking for opponent’s plan before committing to a forcing line. If you’re unsure, prefer developing moves that improve king safety and connect rooks rather than forcing trades that may leave you with a weakened king.
- Opening planning and comfort zone: You’ve shown comfort in several sharp setups. Consider picking a small, coherent trio of lines and study their typical middlegame plans and endgames. A short, consistent framework helps you avoid over-aggression or missteps in blitz when time is tight.
Practical drills to accelerate improvement
- Endgames: Do 2–3 brief rook-endgame drills per week (rook on open file vs. rook, king activity, pawn runs). Focus on keeping rooks active and controlling key files.
- Tactics with purpose: Solve 15–20 tactical puzzles weekly that emphasize back-rank ideas, forks, and forced sequences. After solving, review one alternative line to understand why your move is best or not.
- Pattern study: Pick 2–3 recurring middlegame motifs from the openings you play (for example, typical Sicilian breaks or Caro-Kann pawn structures) and walk through the standard plans for both sides. This helps you recognize patterns faster in blitz.
- Time-management habit: In each game, aim to spend no more than 2–3 minutes on the first 12 moves. If you’re behind on time, switch to a simpler, safer plan and avoid cycles of long calculation in unclear positions.
High-level notes from your recent games
Overall, your games show strong fight and initiative. When you maintain king safety and keep rooks and queens coordinating, you create practical winning chances. In positions where the attack doesn’t materialize quickly, lean on solid development, simple plan-based moves, and timely simplifications to reach cleaner endgames.
If you want, I can annotate the specific recent games you provided and point to exact moments where a small shift in plan would have yielded a quicker win or a more secure draw.
Interactive note
If you’d like, you can attach a concise PGN snippet for each game and I’ll tailor a per-game improvement note focusing on the exact turns that shaped the result.
Example placeholder for a quick per-game PGN snippet:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| eric_cartman_irl | 52W / 22L / 3D | View Games |
| chessscientisttt | 13W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| ambarov | 12W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| Димитрий Король | 1W / 12L / 1D | View Games |
| Carl Magnuson | 6W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2321 | 2436 | ||
| 2024 | 2326 | 2393 | ||
| 2023 | 1955 | 2352 | 2029 | |
| 2021 | 2193 | 1924 | ||
| 2017 | 1999 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 68W / 102L / 8D | 58W / 112L / 6D | 70.1 |
| 2024 | 160W / 285L / 25D | 177W / 269L / 29D | 70.5 |
| 2023 | 28W / 14L / 1D | 28W / 9L / 2D | 67.3 |
| 2021 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 1D | 85.3 |
| 2017 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 53.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 58 | 25 | 29 | 4 | 43.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 6 | 15 | 2 | 26.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 16 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 31.2% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 14 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 38.5% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 111 | 23 | 82 | 6 | 20.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 79 | 22 | 55 | 2 | 27.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 52 | 16 | 34 | 2 | 30.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 33 | 12 | 19 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Modern | 28 | 12 | 14 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 26 | 3 | 20 | 3 | 11.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 24 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 52.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 22 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 40.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 4 |