Teddy Coleman - International Master
Teddy Coleman, known in the chess world as a formidable International Master titleholder, is a player whose blitz performance has been nothing short of a rollercoaster ride—if rollercoasters had eloquent strategy and psychological warfare packed into every twist and turn. Teddy's blitz rating skyrocketed from a humble 1322 in 2012 to an impressive peak beyond 2600, proving that early flashiness was no fluke but the prelude to a chess marvel in the making.
With a longest winning streak of 17 games and a current hot streak of 7, Teddy’s sense of timing might just be better than their opponents’. Their opening performance, mysteriously labeled "Top Secret," maintains a stubborn 50% win rate across formats, hinting at either a ninja-like unpredictability or possibly a guarded family recipe for success.
Teddy’s playing style reveals a penchant for endurance, averaging nearly 74 moves to victory and rarely surrendering early (early resignation rate of just 1.58%), embodying the spirit of a chess marathoner who enjoys long walks through the endgame wilderness. This stamina pays dividends, supported by an astonishing 89.86% comeback rate and a near-perfect 98.33% win rate after losing a piece—some say Teddy could turn losing a top-ranked queen into just a minor inconvenience.
Their psychological resilience is notable, although occasional “tilts” occur with a tilt factor of 12, reminding us that even chess titans can have off days—probably due to spilled coffee or a rogue spectator coughing during a critical move.
Interestingly, Teddy enjoys playing most in the late afternoon, scoring highest wins at 16:00 with a 61.51% win rate. Maybe their cat demands attention then, or perhaps it’s just the perfect mind sharpening hour. On Fridays, Teddy is even more deadly, winning over 53% of their games, which must be a licensed way to kick off the weekend.
Throughout years, Teddy has faced internet legends and casual players alike, with notable triumphs against "computer4-impossible," a foe so tough it’s practically their arch-nemesis, resulting in an 80-game rivalry that some chess historians will wax poetic about.
In summary: Teddy Coleman is a chess warrior who blends strategic endurance, psychological fortitude, and an intriguing mystery opening that keeps friends and foes alike guessing. Whether they’re dazzling in blitz, bullet, or rapid, Teddy’s games are always a spectacle—sometimes worth watching for the suspense alone, and definitely worth learning from for aspiring chess adventurers!
Overview of your recent daily games
You’ve shown solid progress across a variety of openings and your overall results are leaning toward wins more often than losses. Your rating has climbed by roughly two hundred points over the last year-long view, and your strength-adjusted win rate is strong. This indicates you’re applying good clinical judgment and finding successful plans in many positions.
- Your opening choices are diverse, and you’ve had decisive results in several lines, which is a good sign of flexibility and understanding.
- There have been a couple of drawn or challenged lines that you can strengthen, but the general trajectory is positive and you are learning to convert opportunities into wins.
- There were a few high-tension middlegame sequences in recent games that ended in sharp tactical clashes; these are useful study points to improve resilience and defense.
What you’re doing well
- You’re comfortable switching between different openings and applying practical plans in the middlegame. This versatility keeps your opponents unsure and often gives you chances to press.
- Your opening performance data shows positive results in several lines, including aggressive Sicilian and English variations. This suggests you’re getting good development and piece activity early in games.
- Your overall win record in the data set is favorable, which reflects solid decision-making and the ability to capitalize on opportunities when they arise.
Areas to focus on for improvement
- Convert more opening advantages into decisive wins. In lines where you’ve drawn or faced tougher defenses, look for clean middlegame plans and avoid getting into edge-of-the-board tactical skirmishes when a simpler path to advantage exists.
- Strengthen your defense against sharp tactical ideas and back-rank threats. Some battles in your recent games showed how quickly a position can shift after a tactical breakthrough; building a few reliable defensive principles can help you weather those storms.
- Deepen your knowledge in a couple of opening branches that produced mixed results (for example the Kan Variation and the English Drill Variation). Having a clearer middlegame plan and typical responses will help you convert draws into wins.
- Endgame awareness and conversion. Practice common endgames you’re likely to reach in these lines (rook endings, simple minor piece endings, and technique for converting small material gains) so you can press to a finish with confidence.
Action plan for the next sessions
- Draft a simple middlegame plan for each top opening you play. For example, in the Sicilian Alapin and English variations you favor, note a few core ideas to aim for after the opening phase (central control, piece activity, and timely pawn breaks).
- Daily puzzle focus on tactics you’re likely to encounter in these openings, especially motifs around promotions, back rank weaknesses, and tactical shots that can shift a position quickly.
- Weekly game review: pick one recent game and identify two critical decision points. For each, write down what you could have done differently and what plan you should follow in similar positions.
- Practice two to three targeted openings over the next week. Use the same color you feel strongest with and build confidence in your recurring plans there.
Suggested quick resources and reminders
- Consider reinforcing the openings where you’ve seen success by reviewing standard plans and typical middlegame ideas. Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Revisit common defensive resources against sharp lines in the Kan Variation and the English Drill Variation to improve resilience under pressure.
- Use a few short weekly review sessions focused on endgame patterns to improve conversion skills in longer games.
Optional quick PGN recap
If you’d like, I can embed a concise PGN snapshot from your recent wins to highlight key moments. Let me know which game you want highlighted and I’ll include a compact, readable version.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| hsalgo | 55W / 32L / 2D | View Games |
| chesse444 | 19W / 12L / 0D | View Games |
| Daniel Rensch | 11W / 10L / 8D | View Games |
| Mark Kotliar | 12W / 8L / 5D | View Games |
| Alina Kashlinskaya | 5W / 16L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2382 | 1326 | ||
| 2024 | 2428 | |||
| 2023 | 2428 | |||
| 2022 | 2429 | 2330 | 768 | |
| 2021 | 2368 | 2452 | 2527 | 400 |
| 2020 | 2350 | 2554 | 2499 | 400 |
| 2019 | 2295 | 2412 | ||
| 2018 | 2409 | |||
| 2017 | 2182 | 2247 | 2385 | |
| 2016 | 2206 | 2249 | ||
| 2015 | 1946 | 2227 | ||
| 2014 | 2156 | 2000 | ||
| 2013 | 1200 | 2100 | ||
| 2012 | 1864 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5W / 4L / 0D | 6W / 1L / 1D | 8.1 |
| 2024 | 11W / 2L / 0D | 12W / 3L / 0D | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 7W / 3L / 0D | 3W / 7L / 1D | 0.0 |
| 2022 | 7W / 1L / 0D | 6W / 2L / 0D | 67.8 |
| 2021 | 36W / 31L / 5D | 33W / 25L / 5D | 69.1 |
| 2020 | 610W / 453L / 87D | 544W / 514L / 90D | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 336W / 241L / 55D | 291W / 270L / 60D | 75.4 |
| 2018 | 303W / 198L / 56D | 252W / 229L / 65D | 78.0 |
| 2017 | 131W / 104L / 17D | 118W / 117L / 19D | 79.1 |
| 2016 | 136W / 82L / 19D | 127W / 89L / 21D | 75.9 |
| 2015 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 75.3 |
| 2014 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 74.7 |
| 2013 | 32W / 15L / 2D | 33W / 12L / 2D | 74.6 |
| 2012 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 5W / 0L / 0D | 57.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 220 | 129 | 72 | 19 | 58.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 158 | 83 | 69 | 6 | 52.5% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 141 | 68 | 65 | 8 | 48.2% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 135 | 56 | 67 | 12 | 41.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 129 | 55 | 59 | 15 | 42.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 127 | 60 | 55 | 12 | 47.2% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 123 | 68 | 48 | 7 | 55.3% |
| Australian Defense | 107 | 53 | 48 | 6 | 49.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 102 | 52 | 42 | 8 | 51.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 99 | 51 | 39 | 9 | 51.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 115 | 58 | 54 | 3 | 50.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 72 | 43 | 26 | 3 | 59.7% |
| Australian Defense | 43 | 21 | 20 | 2 | 48.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 38 | 18 | 17 | 3 | 47.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 34 | 12 | 19 | 3 | 35.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 34 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 55.9% |
| Döry Defense | 29 | 11 | 15 | 3 | 37.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 24 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 21 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 17 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 47.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 5 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |