Profile of Alexandr Ulanov (DrMelekess)
International Master of Tactical Brilliance and Online Chess Wizardry
Meet Alexandr Ulanov, better known by the fearsome chess handle DrMelekess, an International Master accredited by FIDE and a force to be reckoned with on the virtual battlefield of Chess.com. With a peak bullet rating soaring past 3000 and blitz rating close behind at an astonishing 2898, Alexandr plays rapid-fire chess like a caffeinated grandmaster with knight forks for breakfast.
Starting modestly in 2016 with an innocent blitz rating around 1358, Alexandr's climb has been nothing short of meteoric. Crushing opponents with precision, he's accumulated over 1,456 wins combined in blitz and bullet formats, proving that slow and steady doesn’t win every race—especially in bullet chess where reflexes reign supreme.
Alexandr’s style can be amusingly described as "prepared chaos." Known for the enigmatic Top Secret opening strategy, he has racked up a winning rate over 53% in blitz using this mysterious arsenal. His repertoire isn’t just mysterious; it is effective, including a perfectly executed Scandinavian Defense, and selectively wielding gambits like the Englund, turning opponents' heads and board control upside down.
Notable Strengths & Stats
- Strong Comebacks: Showing a staggering 89.3% comeback rate after disadvantageous positions.
- Endgame Specialist: Plays the endgame with such frequency and mastery that sometimes opponents suspect spell work.
- Win Rate After Losing Piece: Over 55%, proving even piece losses are no cause for panic.
- Average Moves: A marathon player – averaging almost 90 moves in wins and losses alike, keeping both players on the edge of their seats.
- Best Time to Play: Surprisingly early mornings at 4 AM, when the rest of us are dreaming checkmates.
Recent Battles
Alexandr’s recent games are a rollercoaster of thrilling victories, with one memorable win by checkmate against Mitul, showcasing his love for the Queens Indian Defense, Fianchetto Classical Variation. Yet, even legends stumble now and then—he recently lost a nail-biter to Mitul by checkmate after a tactical twist in the Reti Opening.
Personality Snapshot
With a tilt factor of 9 (out of 100) and an early resignation rate under 2%, Alexandr clearly respects the art of a hard-fought battle. He never surrenders easily; his resilience is akin to a chess gladiator. Fun fact: his opponents often wonder if he's secretly running on coffee and advanced algorithms simultaneously.
Fan Warning
Challengers beware! Alexandr’s prowess is backed by a serious arsenal, but don't let his calm demeanor fool you—his blitz and bullet skills strike with lightning speed and chessboard dominance.
Whether you’re aiming for a friendly game or pondering a duel of wits, know that with DrMelekess, you’re entering an arena where every second counts and every move tells a story.
Ready your pawns... the master awaits.
Performance snapshot
You have shown a mix of results in your recent bullet games. The short-term rating movement suggests you can push for sharp finishes, while slightly longer windows show some fluctuation. In bullet, the ability to decide quickly and keep pressure on your opponent matters most, and you’re already leveraging that well. Your openings data indicate strength in several aggressive lines, which can translate into dynamic middlegames if you keep a clear plan.
What you’re doing well
- You manage fast time controls with energy and look for concrete tactical chances, often finishing with strong attacking intent.
- You show practical resourcefulness in complex positions, converting tactical opportunities into decisive results when the position allows.
- Your opening choices align with active, gives-you-ideas play. You have good results in lines that lead to clear middlegame plans, which helps you maintain momentum in fast games.
- Pattern recognition is developing — you can spot common tactical motifs and use them to create threats even when you’re on the clock.
Areas to improve
- Consistency under pressure: In very fast games, avoid overextending with risky material grabs. When in doubt, prioritize safety and maintain material balance, then look for a clean follow-up.
- Time management discipline: Build a simple timer routine — allocate a few seconds to quick checks in the first 8–10 moves and reserve the rest for critical moments. This helps prevent hasty decisions late in the clock.
- Opening consolidation: While your aggressive openings work well, pick 1–2 main lines and study typical middlegame plans. This reduces random deviations in busy bullets and strengthens your follow-through.
- Endgame technique: Many bullet games reach simplified endings quickly. Focus on common rook endings and king–pawn endings to convert advantages efficiently and avoid drawing out the finish.
- Post-game reflection: After each bullet game, note 2–3 moments where a calmer alternative would have preserved or gained more, and turn those into quick drills for next sessions.
Openings performance notes
Your results are strongest in lines like the East Indian Defense and related aggressive setups, which tend to yield active play and clear middlegame plans. Consider making those lines your reliable core in bullet practice, while integrating a couple of solid, safer options (such as certain Scandinavian or London System variations) to balance risk.
If you’d like, I can tailor a short, two-opening repertoire with a compact middlegame plan for each, so you have a reliable framework during fast games. East Indian Defense and Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit have shown strong performance in your dataset, and they can guide your practical choices.
Strength Adjusted Win Rate context
The overall strength-adjusted win rate is around 0.526, which indicates room for steady improvement. Focus on turning those sharp, creative ideas into clean, practical moves under time pressure. Build a small toolbox of safe tactical patterns and endgame conversions to raise that rate over the next few months.
Rating trend context
Short-term momentum is positive (1-month change around +20), but medium-term trends show dips at times (3-month change around -5; 6-month and 12-month trends are more stable or slightly negative). Use this as a cue to prioritize consistent technique and routine practice over chasing rapid gains. A steady study schedule tends to translate into smoother long-term progress.
If you’d like, I can help you set up a 4-week practice cycle focused on tactics, endgames, and selective openings to stabilize and improve those trend numbers.
Practical training plan (starter)
- Daily: 15 minutes of tactical puzzles focusing on patterns that frequently appear in bullet games (back-rank motifs, overloads, and forcing checks).
- Two weekly bullet sessions with after-action review: identify two critical moments and whether safer alternatives were available.
- Endgame drills: once a week, practice rook endings and king-pawn endings (5–8 moves to convert or hold).
- Opening focus: select 1–2 core lines (e.g., East Indian Defense and a solid Scandinavian variant) and write a 1-page plan sheet outlining main middlegame ideas and typical pawn structures.
- Posture and time checks: before each game, decide on a quick, repeatable plan (e.g., assess material balance, threat, and key squares within the first 8 moves).
Next steps
Let’s use the next block of bullet games to test a tighter opening plan and a simple endgame conversion routine. If you share 2–3 recent positions you found challenging, I’ll give concrete, move-by-move recommendations to practice.
Quick references and placeholders
For convenience, you can review your profile and openings as needed: alexandr_ulanov. If you want to explore a specific opening reference, see East Indian Defense or Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| korbansihir | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Gabriel Arteaga | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fandebobbyfischer | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nextgrandmaster122 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| cherrymely | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Renato Terry | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| volodinalexandr | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jesus Dominguez | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Andrey Klymchuk | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| qglen | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| BellJackson95 | 21W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| Richard Rapport | 6W / 23L / 1D | View Games |
| Bruno Trezza | 12W / 15L / 2D | View Games |
| David Haydon | 13W / 12L / 4D | View Games |
| Maxime Lagarde | 11W / 15L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3004 | 2810 | ||
| 2024 | 3007 | 2657 | ||
| 2021 | 2960 | 2698 | ||
| 2020 | 2868 | 2646 | ||
| 2019 | 2706 | 2702 | 2462 | |
| 2018 | 2726 | 2599 | ||
| 2017 | 2606 | 2552 | ||
| 2016 | 2620 | 2189 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53W / 9L / 6D | 37W / 22L / 5D | 85.9 |
| 2024 | 24W / 6L / 3D | 27W / 6L / 2D | 77.8 |
| 2021 | 23W / 12L / 5D | 24W / 11L / 5D | 89.3 |
| 2020 | 28W / 17L / 4D | 29W / 13L / 6D | 88.5 |
| 2019 | 232W / 144L / 31D | 191W / 161L / 46D | 97.3 |
| 2018 | 45W / 37L / 2D | 49W / 27L / 4D | 81.2 |
| 2017 | 229W / 163L / 30D | 229W / 161L / 26D | 90.7 |
| 2016 | 136W / 63L / 13D | 146W / 66L / 8D | 90.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 151 | 89 | 46 | 16 | 58.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 79 | 52 | 22 | 5 | 65.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 71 | 38 | 26 | 7 | 53.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 44 | 27 | 12 | 5 | 61.4% |
| Modern | 44 | 29 | 13 | 2 | 65.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 38 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 38 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 37 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 59.5% |
| Australian Defense | 36 | 20 | 12 | 4 | 55.6% |
| Döry Defense | 36 | 21 | 13 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 144 | 98 | 39 | 7 | 68.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 140 | 88 | 46 | 6 | 62.9% |
| Döry Defense | 81 | 50 | 27 | 4 | 61.7% |
| Australian Defense | 70 | 42 | 26 | 2 | 60.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 55 | 39 | 13 | 3 | 70.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 45 | 26 | 17 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Modern | 40 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 39 | 23 | 15 | 1 | 59.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 38 | 28 | 9 | 1 | 73.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 20 | 13 | 0 | 60.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 5 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |