Profile Summary: edmontongoaters
Meet edmontongoaters, a chess warrior who has taken the bullet and blitz arenas by storm with a fierce and fast-paced style. This player’s journey through the 64 squares is nothing short of a rollercoaster ride—from humble 2093 bullet beginnings in mid-2024 to a blistering peak rating of 2717 in March 2025, proving that true grit and countless pawns sacrificed eventually pay off.
Known for their resilience, edmontongoaters boasts a phenomenal comeback rate of 87.23%—which means when things look bleak, this player’s tactical awareness and fighting spirit turn the tide more often than you’d expect. They rarely give up early (only 0.27% early resignations), preferring instead to battle deep into endgames that average over 80 moves.
Specializing in unpredictable openings labeled mysteriously as "Top Secret", edmontongoaters has mastered the art of keeping opponents on their toes, especially in bullet chess with nearly 2700 games played in this category alone. The win rates in blitz and rapid formats hover impressively above 50%, peaking in rapid at a solid 68.21%, highlighting a versatile grasp across time controls.
edmontongoaters’ opponents might feel the sting of a well-placed checkmate or the clock running out—this player has claimed victories by both means frequently, including the recent dazzling 70-move bullet checkmate against Szach-mistrz (which you can admire here).
When not causing havoc on the board, edmontongoaters likely experiments with openings like the Clemenz Opening and wields the Queen’s Gambit Declined Three Knights Variation with equal deftness.
Whether it’s an early Sunday morning blitz or a late-night bullet skirmish at 2 AM—their statistically best time of day to play—this player keeps their cool. But beware the tilt factor of 9; even the strongest falters. Currently riding a hot streak of three wins, edmontongoaters continues to sharpen their mind and moves.
In short: if you find yourself matched with edmontongoaters, prepare for a battle that’s equal parts endurance, deception, and a healthy dose of goaty determination. And if you lose—well—there’s always the chance they’re just warming up.
Overview and momentum for your bullet play
Your recent bullet results show you are capable of handling sharp, dynamic positions and turning early pressure into practical chances. You’ve been building momentum over the last few months, with a healthy rate of improvement and a solid feel for practical play under a tight clock. The data suggests you’re strongest when you keep the position active, coordinate your pieces efficiently, and push through to concrete endings. To keep this trend going, a targeted plan focusing on opening choices, endgame technique, and consistent post‑game review should help push your win rate a bit higher and stabilize results in the fastest time controls.
What you do well
- Proactive piece activity: you tend to develop pieces quickly and create immediate threats when the position opens up, which is especially valuable in bullet formats where every move counts.
- Initiative conversion: several games show you convert positional or tactical pressure into material or mating chances, finishing games decisively when you keep the attack going.
- Endgame resourcefulness: you’re comfortable moving into endgames with active king and pawn play, which helps convert advantages into wins even when material is balanced.
- Resilience under time pressure: you manage the clock well in many sequences, keeping threats alive and avoiding simple blunders in tight time scrambles.
Key improvement areas to focus on
- Opening consistency: you use a mix of aggressive lines and solid setups. In bullet games, it’s easy to drift into riskier lines that can backfire under quick counterplay. Consider consolidating 1–2 openings you feel comfortable with and learn the typical middlegame plans and common replies.
- Strategic benchmarks before exchanges: in some games, trades (especially queens and rooks) came a bit too soon. Before a major exchange, quickly evaluate whether you gain a clear plan (king safety, open files, or active minor pieces) or if you’re handing your opponent a simpler path to equality. If not sure, simplify more gradually or aim to keep pieces on the board.
- Endgame technique refinement: while you handle rook and pawn endings well, there are opportunities to tighten technique in slightly worse endings (knowing when to push outside passed pawns, centralize the king, and use opposition). Short, focused rook-endgame drills can raise conversion rates in tight races.
- Pattern recognition and puzzle practice: strengthen motifs that commonly appear in your openings (tactics around open files, back-rank weaknesses, and typical knight/fork ideas). Regular practice will help you spot forcing moves earlier in the game.
Opening and endgame focus plan
You’ve shown a mix of modern and strategic defenses and some aggressive setups. From the openings data, your Amar Gambit and several sharp Sicilian/Indian lines have yielded strong results, while more standard lines also show solid viability. A practical way forward is to stabilize your approach by prioritizing two complementary themes:
- Amar Gambit family (aggressive, tactical play): lean into this when you want to seize early initiative and create complex chances. Build a short repertoire of typical middlegame motifs you’re comfortable with after the initial attack. This will help you maximize the chances in fast games while keeping lines under control.
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack and similar solid, flexible setups: use one main, steadier line to reduce the risk of getting outplayed in the early middlegame. Learn the key middlegame plans and common defensive resources, so you can steer toward your preferred endgames with confidence.
Two quick references to study and compare as you refine your plan: Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Amar Gambit. You can also glance at your overall opening performance to guide your practice focus.
Concrete training plan for the next 4 weeks
- Weekly openings study (2 sessions): pick your two main lines (Amar Gambit and Nimzo-Larsen Attack) and build a simple one-page plan sheet outlining typical middlegame ideas, common pawn breaks, and key defensive responses.
- Endgame practice (2 sessions per week): do 15–20 minute rook-endgame drills (rook vs rook with pawns, outside passed pawns, opposition) and 1 longer session focusing on rook endings with active king and pawn play.
- Tactical pattern work (Daily, 10–15 minutes): focus on recurring motifs that show up in your openings (open-files tactics, back-rank weaknesses, forks, and discovered attacks).
- Post-game analysis (after every bullet game): spend 5–10 minutes reviewing critical moments with a coach or engine, noting 1–2 concrete improvements to apply next game.
- Clock discipline (ongoing): practice a habit of scanning for forcing moves within 2–3 candidate lines per move, reducing time spent on non-critical branches in the first 8–10 moves of a game.
Progress indicators and how you’ll know you’re improving
- Shorter decision times in the opening phase with clearer middlegame plans after the first 8 moves.
- Higher success rate converting advantages in endgames, especially rook endings with outside passed pawns.
- Steadier performance in openings with your two main lines, reflected in a more consistent win rate across bullet sessions.
Want a quick reference or a deeper dive?
If you’d like, I can pull out a short, personalized study plan based on a specific opening you want to master, or I can annotate a few of your recent games to pinpoint exact moments to improve. You can also view your profile as a reference here: edmontongoaters.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rialguefor | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Levente Marosi | 1W / 3L / 2D | View |
| grigoli2008 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tytypapa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| trinhlamvu111 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chessgold2500 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Tom-Frederik Woelk | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| eamonncmoore | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Mohsen Ghorbani | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cochessde | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| omniscentreaderv | 188W / 161L / 38D | View Games |
| sardynek2800 | 52W / 12L / 5D | View Games |
| jimmyjoy23 | 21W / 20L / 6D | View Games |
| jacobpaimer | 11W / 33L / 2D | View Games |
| tydfger | 8W / 26L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2561 | 2477 | 2374 | 1696 |
| 2024 | 2525 | 2239 | 2227 | 1670 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 703W / 724L / 129D | 690W / 734L / 124D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 379W / 266L / 48D | 362W / 282L / 46D | 81.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 452 | 199 | 217 | 36 | 44.0% |
| Australian Defense | 248 | 121 | 108 | 19 | 48.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 237 | 105 | 115 | 17 | 44.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 130 | 56 | 67 | 7 | 43.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 113 | 66 | 42 | 5 | 58.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 104 | 50 | 48 | 6 | 48.1% |
| Slav Defense: Exchange Variation | 82 | 44 | 37 | 1 | 53.7% |
| Döry Defense | 71 | 30 | 34 | 7 | 42.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 65 | 29 | 32 | 4 | 44.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 64 | 26 | 29 | 9 | 40.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 36 | 22 | 10 | 4 | 61.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 22 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 21 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 18 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 18 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Döry Defense | 15 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 46.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 13 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 13 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 38.5% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 3 |