John Bartholomew - The International Master of Chess and Persistence
John Bartholomew, also known by his chess handle Fins0905, is an esteemed International Master (IM) recognized by FIDE, the global chess federation. John's chess journey is as dynamic as his rating graphs, fighting battles on boards large and small, across blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily chess formats.
Champion of Speed and Strategy
With a blitz peak rating surpassing 3100 (yes, you read that right, 3100+!), John has not only proven himself as a quick thinker but a consistently brilliant tactician. His bullet rating peaked at 2819, rapid at 2715, and daily chess hit a solid 2516. Known to effortlessly transition from lightning-fast moves in bullet games to deep, strategic battles in daily chess, John embodies versatility.
Playing Style & Statistics
- Win Rates: Around 65% blitz wins and impressive 76% bullet wins - he basically turns the chess clock into his best friend.
- Opening Master: John’s secret weapon is humorously labeled "Top Secret" in his openings, a clever nod to his mysterious yet effective strategies that confound opponents.
- Endgame Enthusiast: With an endgame frequency around 79%, John does not shy away from the gritty conclusion where most players sneeze and lose. He outlasts many by being a chess marathoner.
- Comeback Artist: Losing a piece? No worries. John recovers with nearly a 69% win rate after losing material, showing both resilience and nerves of steel.
- Psychology & Timing: John has a tilt factor of 10 - so he definitely gets frustrated, but hey, who doesn’t? His best time to play? Noon sharp – if you want to beat him, try breakfast time instead!
Memorable Moments
John’s chess life is peppered with streaks - an incredible longest winning streak of 101 games (seriously, did he have chess batteries or what?), though even legends face rough patches; his longest losing streak stands at 10 games. Regardless, every loss fuels his fire for the next battle!
Recent Games Highlights
Among his recent triumphs is a win using the Scandinavian Defense (Mieses-Kotrc Main Line), where John danced through opponent attacks to take victory on time – the clock was his ally, and he played a blitzkrieg worthy of legends.
A Personality Beyond Pawns
Not just a numbers guy, John’s friendly approach and engaging teaching style have made him beloved in the online chess community. Whether he's cracking jokes, explaining complex middlegame tactics, or promoting chess improvement, he does it all with a warm smile and the patience of a saint. Just don’t mention “losing on time” in his presence – that might get a grin of ironic disdain.
To sum up: John Bartholomew’s chess journey is a blend of tactical genius, grinding stamina, and that elusive human spark that keeps the 64 squares endlessly fascinating. Whether speeding through bullet or smoothing out daily games, he’s a player who proves that chess is as much about heart as it is about the pieces.
Coach’s quick read on your recent bullet games
Bullet chess rewards fast, practical decisions. You’ve shown solid initiative and the ability to press when your pieces become active. The main opportunities are clock management, staying vigilant for tactics, and sharpening endgame conversion in ultra-fast time controls. Below are concrete, actionable steps to tighten up your play over the next sessions.
What you do well
- You often develop quickly and create pressure in the early middlegame, keeping lines open for rooks and queens to operate.
- You can generate practical chances in messy positions by prioritizing piece activity and keeping the king relatively safe while launching quick attacks.
- You show resilience in tight time pressure, continuing to fight and find active follow-ups rather than collapsing when the clock is short.
Key improvement areas with concrete steps
- Time management in bullet games: adopt a simple, repeatable plan for the first 8–10 moves. Use a safe, solid opening path so you don’t get bogged down in early calculations. Practice with a timer to build a steady rhythm, aiming to finish the opening phase with a clear plan rather than chasing tactics you haven’t fully calculated yet.
- Defensive vigilance and blunder avoidance: after every move, do a quick 1-second scan for possible tactics against you (hanging pieces, overworked pieces, or sudden checks). Train a 2-step checklist: “What did my opponent threaten last move? Do I have any immediate tactical shots against me?”
- Endgame conversion in rapid games: when the position starts to simplify, look for active king activity and rook activity. Practice a few short rook endgames to learn how to maximize rook leadership and passers in fast games.
- Opening consolidation and repertoire depth: you’ve shown versatility across many openings. Consider narrowing to 2–3 reliable lines for White and 2–3 for Black, and study the typical middlegame plans and pawn structures that arise from those choices. This reduces overthinking and speeds up decisions later in the game.
Openings performance context
Your openings show strong results in several lines, including some solid, straightforward setups. Focusing on a small, well-understood repertoire will help you convert early advantages into wins more consistently in bullets. Consider picking a couple of White and Black paths you enjoy and study their typical middlegame plans, common pawn structures, and critical turning points.
Two-week practice plan
- Daily tactics: 10–15 minutes of short tactical puzzles to sharpen pattern recognition and reduce blunders under time pressure.
- Opening study: choose 2 White replies and 2 Black defenses to focus on. Review 5-7 model games for each to internalize typical middlegame plans.
- Bullet practice: aim for 3–5 rapid games per session with post-game quick notes. Identify 2-3 recurring mistakes and write down a one-line fix for each.
- Post-game review: after each session, pick one win and one loss to briefly summarize what worked well and what you’d do differently next time.
Next steps to boost consistency
- Share a couple of your preferred opening choices for both sides, and I’ll tailor a compact improvement plan around them.
- Set a timer for opening choices in practice games to build confidence in the early moves and reduce time spent calculating risky lines.
- In review, focus on two patterns you notice in losses (for example, overextension in the middlegame or missed tactical refutations) and prepare a simple, repeatable response plan for those patterns.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Grigor Dilanyan | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| Henry Soto Hernandez | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sadigmammadov_003 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Alfonso Jose Alfaro Rojas | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| hascitonacacata | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 148W / 66L / 11D | |
| Hoang Thong Tu | 94W / 57L / 8D | |
| Daniel Rensch | 98W / 42L / 16D | |
| 2011KING | 97W / 8L / 1D | |
| Eric Hansen | 22W / 56L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2868 | 2606 | ||
| 2024 | 2802 | 2601 | ||
| 2023 | 2775 | 2591 | ||
| 2022 | 2709 | 2801 | 2659 | |
| 2021 | 2795 | 2659 | ||
| 2020 | 2708 | 2691 | 2659 | |
| 2019 | 2670 | 2736 | 2658 | |
| 2018 | 2768 | 2565 | 2261 | |
| 2017 | 2805 | 2495 | 2448 | |
| 2016 | 2804 | 2444 | 2001 | 2132 |
| 2015 | 2613 | 2407 | 1907 | 2090 |
| 2014 | 2517 | 2373 | 1901 | |
| 2013 | 2528 | 2434 | 2264 | |
| 2012 | 2617 | 2450 | 2418 | |
| 2011 | 2275 | 2273 | ||
| 2010 | 2381 | |||
| 2009 | 2402 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17W / 7L / 1D | 17W / 5L / 1D | 96.4 |
| 2024 | 25W / 10L / 5D | 30W / 15L / 6D | 102.3 |
| 2023 | 40W / 14L / 4D | 32W / 14L / 11D | 91.8 |
| 2022 | 243W / 204L / 53D | 220W / 227L / 58D | 94.8 |
| 2021 | 114W / 53L / 12D | 94W / 74L / 19D | 92.8 |
| 2020 | 104W / 52L / 26D | 118W / 44L / 15D | 91.9 |
| 2019 | 457W / 89L / 28D | 446W / 87L / 33D | 72.4 |
| 2018 | 855W / 405L / 79D | 865W / 394L / 94D | 82.1 |
| 2017 | 21W / 10L / 6D | 21W / 11L / 4D | 77.8 |
| 2016 | 136W / 49L / 9D | 127W / 49L / 9D | 77.7 |
| 2015 | 70W / 25L / 8D | 72W / 19L / 9D | 79.5 |
| 2014 | 126W / 28L / 7D | 132W / 33L / 8D | 73.6 |
| 2013 | 600W / 84L / 25D | 562W / 128L / 27D | 74.5 |
| 2012 | 945W / 131L / 32D | 985W / 128L / 16D | 68.7 |
| 2011 | 75W / 8L / 2D | 70W / 5L / 2D | 58.7 |
| 2010 | 19W / 0L / 1D | 15W / 1L / 2D | 49.5 |
| 2009 | 66W / 5L / 7D | 63W / 6L / 4D | 54.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 591 | 361 | 172 | 58 | 61.1% |
| Australian Defense | 110 | 78 | 24 | 8 | 70.9% |
| Slav Defense | 105 | 56 | 35 | 14 | 53.3% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 104 | 58 | 31 | 15 | 55.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 104 | 73 | 19 | 12 | 70.2% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 90 | 54 | 25 | 11 | 60.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 83 | 45 | 31 | 7 | 54.2% |
| Slav Defense: Exchange Variation | 79 | 51 | 21 | 7 | 64.6% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 77 | 46 | 28 | 3 | 59.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 75 | 51 | 15 | 9 | 68.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 86.4% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 769 | 600 | 148 | 21 | 78.0% |
| Australian Defense | 212 | 155 | 47 | 10 | 73.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 179 | 142 | 34 | 3 | 79.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 171 | 121 | 45 | 5 | 70.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 169 | 135 | 32 | 2 | 79.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 157 | 126 | 28 | 3 | 80.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 155 | 120 | 29 | 6 | 77.4% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 137 | 115 | 19 | 3 | 83.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 108 | 67 | 33 | 8 | 62.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 97 | 79 | 15 | 3 | 81.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 64.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 72.7% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 75.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 101 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |