Overview
Oleksandr Zhukovskyi — FIDE Candidate Master and a modern blitz specialist — has carved a reputation as a relentless, tactical-minded player who loves long, complex fights. Preferred time control: Blitz (frequent high-volume play and big rating swings during 2025). His peak performances include notable high-water marks in both blitz and bullet: 2784 (2025-07-14) and 2709 (2025-07-08).
- Title: Candidate Master (FIDE)
- Preferred time control: Blitz (fast, practical and often theatrical)
- Play personality tags: Blitz goblin, Caffeine blitzer
Career highlights & big-picture stats
Oleksandr’s 2025 stretch is the story: heavy game volume, steep peaks and a string of memorable runs that pushed him into the high 2600s–2700s in online blitz and bullet ladders.
- Blitz record (all-time snapshot): Wins 695 • Losses 710 • Draws 132
- Bullet record (all-time snapshot): Wins 297 • Losses 274 • Draws 29
- Longest winning streak: 14 games; Longest losing streak: 10 games
- Comeback aptitude: very strong — comeback rate ~87.7% (often bounces back after setbacks)
Playing style & tendencies
Oleksandr blends tactical sharpness with unusual endurance. He often drags positions deep (high avg moves per game) and converts complicated endgames — his endgame frequency is unusually high for an online blitz specialist.
- Endgame frequency: 81.84% — he finishes games and likes long technical fights
- Average moves per decisive game: ~80 — expect long scrambles rather than quick finishes
- Tactical resilience: Win rate after losing material ~44.9% — a classic swindler who finds resources
- Psychology: Tilt factor 10 (competitive, emotional intensity under pressure); best time of day: early morning (notably 04:00)
Openings & repertoires
Oleksandr favors asymmetrical, offbeat systems that create imbalanced middlegames where practical chances and tactics flourish. He’s comfortable reversing typical theory roles — both as White and Black.
- Signature and frequently-played: Nimzo-Larsen Attack — large sample size and central to his identity (Blitz: 140 games)
- Other staples: Alekhine Defense (regular choice as Black), Colle System (Rhamphorhynchus Variation) — effective and practical
- Notable Blitz opening performance: Colle: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — win rate ~54% (strong vs average opposition)
- Notable Bullet lines: English Opening — Anglo-Indian Defense with excellent conversion (~71% in a small sample)
Notable runs & moments
2025 shows huge activity and a rapid rating ascent in online blitz and bullet ladders. Several monthly blocks record hundreds of games — a training camp disguised as competition.
- Big peak window: summer 2025 — several months with peak blitz ~2784 and bullet ~2709
- High-volume months include May–November 2025 with many decisive, long games
- Most-played opponent (online): EdgarCo — favorable scoreline (14–7–1)
Memorable micro-stats (quick scan)
- Avg first capture move: ~6.5 — middlegame battles develop before contact
- White win rate ~49.4% • Black win rate ~43.4%
- Strength-adjusted win rates: Blitz ~0.509, Bullet ~0.529 — performs slightly above expectation vs rating
- Preferred first moves in 2025: e4 and b3 notable in the sample (creative and flexible startup choices)
Sample position & study
Here’s a compact opening sequence that captures Oleksandr’s taste for classical development with a twist — a handy example to study his middlegame ideas.
Openable game viewer:
Personality & what to expect
Oleksandr is often described as intense at the board, stubborn in defense and imaginative in attack. Online he can be a relentless grinder — the kind who enjoys long endgames as much as flashy sacrifices.
- Coachable tendencies: likes concrete positions, studies opening novelties, thrives on practical chances
- Watch-outs for opponents: strong comeback instincts, durable in time trouble, low early-resignation rate
- Play him late at night or early morning at your own risk — his best windows include odd hours (04:00 and small-sample spikes at 08:00)
Links & interactive references
- Rating progress snapshot:
- Peak stats: Blitz 2784 (2025-07-14) • Bullet 2709 (2025-07-08)
- Common openings referenced above: Nimzo-Larsen Attack • Alekhine Defense • Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Most-played opponent sample: EdgarCo
Placeholder notes: add tournament bios, PGNs, or coaching details here to enrich the profile.
Quick summary
Nice stretch — your rating and form are trending up. You’re winning complicated blitz battles and converting sharp tactical chances (well done). At the same time, there are recurring patterns that cost you fast losses: early simplifications that leave you passive, and a few tactical oversights in sharp positions. Below I break down concrete strengths, what to fix, and a simple practice plan.
Recent notable game (reviewable)
Here’s the win where you finished with a decisive combination — good tactical vision and clean finish. Replay it to see the turning points and how you forced simplification into a winning assault.
- Opponent: Владимир Матвеев
- Viewer:
What you’re doing well
- Growing rating and momentum — your slope and recent month gains show you’re improving (keep it up!).
- Good tactical alertness in complex positions — you spotted and executed the decisive sacrifice in the win above.
- Comfortable in asymmetrical positions and imbalances (you push for initiative rather than passive play).
- Repertoire strength — your aggregate WinRate and Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~0.509) suggest you perform reliably versus similar opponents.
Recurring issues to fix
Across recent losses there are patterns worth addressing:
- Early simplifications that backfire — examples where you exchanged into a position that left you with less activity or weak squares. Before trading, ask: “Who benefits from simplification?”
- Tactical oversights in sharp lines — a couple of games finish quickly after one or two missed tactics (watch for opponent pins, forks and discovered checks).
- Time usage in blitz — several games end soon after a rapid sequence of moves. When the clock is ticking, prioritize safe, sensible moves (and avoid speculative sacrifices without a follow-up).
- King safety and back-rank concerns — avoid automatic pawn pushes if they create holes or open lines toward your king.
- Opening reactions to Bg4/Bf5 and early piece trades — you had some trouble vs early exchanges (consider concrete replies instead of automatic recaptures).
Concrete next-step improvements (blitz-focused)
Make these small, repeatable habits to get quick gains:
- Tactical warmup (10–15 min/day): 15–25 blitz tactics focused on forks, pins, and sacrifices; finish each tactic by writing down the key motif.
- Two-move safety check before every move: look for opponent checks, captures, and threats — especially checks or captures that win material.
- Trade checklist: before exchanging pieces ask — (a) does it improve my king safety? (b) does it give opponent an outpost or passed pawn? (c) who benefits from simplification?
- Clock management drill: play 5 blitz games where you force yourself to keep 10–15 seconds on the clock after 10 moves (use a mental timer to slow down on critical moments).
- One opening micro-review per session: pick the most-played line you faced (for you, a lot of g3/Bg2 setups and double-fianchetto / King's Indian Attack positions) and study 3 typical plans — where to put knights, typical pawn breaks, and ideal exchanges.
Opening-specific notes
You often meet/transpose into double fianchetto / King's-Indian-Attack style setups and also face …Bg4 and early exchanges. Small adjustments:
- Against early …Bg4: consider a quick h3 and then reposition your bishop to avoid doubled/traded pieces on poor squares; don’t rush the recapture that opens files to your king.
- If opponent plays …c5/c4 effectively (as in your win), plan to blockade and activate rooks along the half-open files rather than reflexively chasing pawns.
- Prepare 2–3 “go-to” ideas after the opening — an aggressive pawn break, a rook lift, and a simple maneuver to a strong outpost — so you don’t spend too much time deciding in blitz.
Study one model game per opening you use — see typical plans rather than memorizing long move sequences.
Endgame & practical play
- Simplify when you have an advantage and keep at least one active piece — rook + active king beats passive rook endings in blitz more often than not.
- Basic king-and-pawn endgames and rook endgames: 10–15 minutes twice a week reviewing common technical wins and stalemate patterns.
- Practice conversion: when you’re a pawn up in blitz, trade pieces to reduce tactics and force a winning king+pawn plan.
Weekly training plan (30–90 minutes total)
- 3× 15 min tactics (mixed themes).
- 2× 20–30 min: one slow game (15+10) — play and then annotate 3 critical moves with engine + your reasoning; one rapid opening review of your most-played line.
- 1× 15–20 min endgame drills (basic rook & pawn endgames, opposition, promotion races).
Mental & practical tips for blitz
- When ahead on the clock: simplify and trade queens if it reduces tactical risk.
- When behind on the clock: create practical complications, but avoid speculative sacrifices without a clear follow-up.
- Use one “safety” premove only — avoid chain pre-moves that hang pieces.
- After each loss, note the single mistake (tactical miss, bad trade, time trouble) and spend 5 minutes to understand the pattern — small reflections compound quickly.
Follow-up
If you want, send one game you felt you should have won and I’ll annotate the key 3–5 moments and a short plan to rebalance your decision-making in similar positions. Also tell me which opening you want to keep and which you’d like to prune from your blitz repertoire.
- Example opponents you faced recently: Julia Antolak, Joost Michielsen, elmismoxd.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| elmismoxd | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| elprimo0o0 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| GEOMAX5 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Joost Michielsen | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Julia Antolak | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| matveev_vladimir | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Símon Þórhallsson | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Aleksandar Tomic | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| firegus16 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| 69360420obama | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| edgarco | 14W / 7L / 1D | |
| meruemback | 14W / 0L / 0D | |
| tottoman92 | 4W / 9L / 1D | |
| Михаил Экдышман | 9W / 4L / 1D | |
| sml60 | 4W / 3L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2600 | 2647 | ||
| 2020 | 1623 | 1824 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 527W / 460L / 77D | 462W / 520L / 84D | 82.6 |
| 2020 | 1W / 3L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 62.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 140 | 68 | 63 | 9 | 48.6% |
| Alekhine Defense | 120 | 49 | 60 | 11 | 40.8% |
| Petrov's Defense | 97 | 43 | 39 | 15 | 44.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 74 | 40 | 31 | 3 | 54.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 38 | 8 | 25 | 5 | 21.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 37 | 14 | 19 | 4 | 37.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 36 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 35 | 11 | 21 | 3 | 31.4% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation | 33 | 12 | 17 | 4 | 36.4% |
| Modern | 32 | 14 | 16 | 2 | 43.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 80 | 31 | 44 | 5 | 38.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 68 | 34 | 32 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 37 | 13 | 22 | 2 | 35.1% |
| East Indian Defense | 25 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 44.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 25 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 44.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 63.2% |
| Modern | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 3 |