International Master Tran Thanh Tu (gm3t)
Meet Tran Thanh Tu, the chess player who's proven that brains and a good dose of persistence can conquer any battlefield—whether it's on a 64-square board or in the realm of online rankings. Awarded the prestigious title of International Master by FIDE, Tran has consistently dazzled with a mix of tactical wizardry, psychological resilience, and perhaps a pinch of magic.
Rise Through the Ranks
Starting from humble beginnings with a Daily rating just north of 1000 in 2020, Tran quickly climbed the ladder. By 2021, a peak Daily rating of 2173 was no surprise to those who had witnessed their sharp moves and ice-cool nerves. Rapid games? Max rating soared over 2500 in 2022 and 2023, showing their flair for quick, precise decision-making. Blitz and Bullet formats don’t intimidate Tran either: max blitz rating peaked at 2518 and bullet games have showcased stunning win rates.
Winning Streaks & Style
With a longest winning streak of a jaw-dropping 49 games and a current streak still alive and kicking at 3 wins, Tran isn't just a player — they’re a one-person chess tsunami. Their average moves per win clock in around 56, demonstrating deep strategic planning rather than rushing to flashy checkmates.
Opening Mystery
Tran is a practitioner of the art of the unknown with an opening repertoire humorously dubbed "Top Secret". This secret sauce has brought them an astonishing 84% win rate in daily games — because who doesn’t love a bit of mystery and intrigue? Opponents often wonder, "What’s Tran thinking?" and usually never get a satisfying answer.
Tactical Genius
Forget giving up early — Tran's brain kicks into overdrive with a comeback rate near 71% and an almost mythical 97.7% win rate after losing a piece. Losing material? No problem. Tran turns the tables with a grin, as if saying, “You just lost more than a piece... you lost control!”
Psychology & Personality
With a tilt factor of just 9, Tran handles losses gracefully, channeling frustration into future brilliance. Their slightly cheeky 20% early resignation rate is more like a tactical pre-move to save energy for the next storm. Whether playing White or Black, the win rates remain impressively steady above 80%, proving their adaptability and balance.
Friendly Rivalries
Tran has faced a colorful parade of opponents — beating many with ease and laughing in the face of tough rivals. For some opponents, the record is a perfect 100% win rate for Tran. Some not-so-lucky opponents might say Tran’s moves come with an invisible force field. Others, well... let’s just say they've got a 0% win rate against this International Master.
The Legend Continues
Whether it's rapid-fire blitz, icy-bullet time, or the deep, contemplative daily games, Tran Thanh Tu is a force in the chess world who combines serious skill with a dash of humor and relentless determination. Opponents beware: when Tran sits at the board, there's no such thing as a safe pawn chain or a quiet king.
Hi Tran Thanh Tu, here is your personalised chess feedback
Quick Glance at Your Progress
Your current Daily peak: 2208 (2022-06-06).
Keep an eye on your trends with
Strengths to Keep Leveraging
- Tactical alertness under pressure. In your recent win against bobsythedobsy you found the 17.exf8=Q+ deflection idea and converted smoothly (see mini-replay below).
- Dynamic exploitation of imbalances. As Black versus Radagast_78 you willingly accepted doubled pawns in the Alapin, then used the half-open d-file and dark-squared bishop pair to seize the initiative.
- Piece activity in the late middlegame. Your rook lifts (e.g. 26…R7d2!! in the Nimzowitsch‐Defence game) show good board vision and a willingness to coordinate heavy pieces.
- End-game technique. Once you reach a material edge you rarely let it slip; the K+Q vs K+minor conversion against Radagast_78 was textbook.
Areas for Improvement
- Over-extension of wing pawns. Both your loss to Falcon_126 and the older defeat vs kwokman featured early g/h-pawn pushes that weakened the king. Before advancing a flank pawn, run a quick checklist: “Will this square still be guarded if files open?”
- Central tension management. In the Nimzowitsch-Larsen loss you allowed …c5xd4 followed by …Qxd5, giving Black a free central majority. Consider inserting prophylactic moves such as cxd5 or dxc5 sooner to keep the centre closed.
- Consistency in your White repertoire. You alternate between 1.e4, 1.Nf3 and 1.b3. Variety is healthy, but using a “core” setup (e.g. Queens-Indian style with 1.Nf3 & 2.c4) will deepen your theory and reduce prep time.
- Clock discipline. Two 2023 championship games were lost on time. Set a daily reminder and enable move-notifications so that technical forfeits never cancel good positions.
- Conversion in material-plus endgames with opposite-coloured bishops. In several wins you needed extra moves to finish because the wrong rook/bishop was activated first. Practise thematic end-games where you’re up a pawn but colours are opposite to sharpen the plan of creating a second weakness.
Opening Radar
• As White your best score comes from the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack (1.b3). Study plans after …d5 and …c5, especially the critical …c5xd4 followed by …Nc6 set-ups.
• With Black you frequently choose the Nimzowitsch Defence (1.e4 Nc6) and the Alapin-Sicilian sideline. Consider adding one solid main-line opening (e.g. Caro-Kann or Slav) so you have a “quiet” alternative when a must-draw situation arises.
Model Snapshot
Here is the critical segment from your recent miniature where you punished an unsafe king:
Next-Step Training Plan (6 weeks)
- Week 1-2: Build a central-pawn audit habit. After every opponent pawn capture in the centre, ask “whose pawn majority is healthier?” Practise with 10 annotated master games featuring the Exchange French or Caro-Kann.
- Week 3-4: End-game drills on Chess.com Classroom or Lichess Studies: Opposite coloured bishops with extra pawn (minimum 25 positions, both colours).
- Week 5: Choose one main-line defence vs 1.e4 and play five rapid games focusing only on reaching the desired structure.
- Week 6: Self-review: pick three of your 2024-25 losses, annotate them and compare with engine suggestions. Look for the first moment evaluation dropped >1.0.
Final Thoughts
Your ability to spot tactics and generate activity already matches 2100-level players. By tightening central strategy and king safety, a climb towards 2200 is realistic this year. Stay curious, review systematically, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lenhador0000 | 9W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| miszczu97 | 7W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| Touzane Olivier | 7W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| Sanjeev Mishra | 4W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| freelander2014 | 3W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2622 | 2275 | ||
| 2024 | 1999 | |||
| 2023 | 2495 | 2487 | 1988 | |
| 2022 | 2486 | 2487 | 2013 | |
| 2021 | 1788 | 2395 | 2333 | 2173 |
| 2020 | 2051 | 2173 | 2329 | 1810 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60W / 3L / 6D | 57W / 10L / 1D | 56.2 |
| 2024 | 3W / 1L / 1D | 5W / 1L / 0D | 81.1 |
| 2023 | 21W / 17L / 2D | 26W / 15L / 0D | 43.9 |
| 2022 | 55W / 3L / 3D | 46W / 11L / 2D | 73.4 |
| 2021 | 105W / 7L / 8D | 99W / 11L / 5D | 58.7 |
| 2020 | 152W / 33L / 6D | 173W / 26L / 4D | 60.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 29 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 86.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 26 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 96.2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 54.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 57.1% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Milner-Barry Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 19 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 50 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 82.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 22 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 81.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Döry Defense | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Czech Defense | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 49 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |