Mariano Madrigal - International Master
Known in the chess world as gmtalentoso, Mariano Madrigal is an International Master who tackles the 64 squares with both strategy and a pinch of flair. Starting with a modest rating back in 2016, Mariano's journey through blitz, bullet, daily, and rapid chess has been nothing short of a rollercoaster – complete with soaring peaks, tactical comebacks, and an impressive knack for turning the tables after losing a piece (winning nearly 100% of such games!).
Mariano’s style is a blend of patience and endurance, averaging about 68 moves per win and not afraid to throw in a long endgame, engaging in them nearly 76% of the time. But don’t be fooled by the calm facade – early resignation is almost nonexistent at only about 2.7%. Lost a piece? Mariano practically laughs it off and hunts the opponent down, showcasing a comeback rate over 84%. Talk about resilience!
Over the years, Mariano’s blitz rating danced from 1174 all the way past 2500, peaking impressively in the later chess seasons. Bullet games? Mariano hits mid-2400s like a speed demon on caffeine. Daily chess and rapid formats have also seen solid performances, highlighting versatility across time controls.
Mariano’s competitive spirit shines brightest at 3 PM and 4 PM with win rates nudging 60+%, though an inconvenient dip at early mornings keeps the mystery alive. The psychological tilt factor is moderately low, but when it hits 11, watch out – his opponents get some extra pressure.
Favorite opening to keep close to the vest? It’s a thrilling “Top Secret”, boasting nearly 49% win rate over 1900+ games in blitz alone. Whether facing familiar foes or new challengers, Mariano maintains a strategic edge, holding strong records against many opponents and never backing down.
Fun fact:
Despite a serious chess career, Mariano's honor as "International Master" means he’s always just one spectacular game away from either world domination or scrambling to explain why a knight leapt where it shouldn't!
Short summary
Hi Mariano — solid work. Your recent blitz shows strong piece activity, a good eye for tactics, and an ability to convert chances. Below I highlight what you did well in your wins, the main reason for the most recent loss, recurring patterns, and a short, practical plan to improve your blitz results.
Win: what you did well
In the win where you handled a Philidor-style structure you:
- Created and exploited tactical targets after simplifying — your Rxd7 trade opened lines that benefited your active pieces.
- Maintained piece activity and centralization (queen and rooks coordinating on open files), which forced your opponent into passive replies and time trouble.
- Converted cleanly when the opponent’s coordination broke down — you picked the largest, clean tactic (queen invasion) to finish the game.
Quick opening replay (early phase):
Loss: key mistakes and fixes
In the most recent Caro‑Kann Exchange loss the critical issues were:
- Overextending with a queen sortie into an area where Black had counterplay — your queen invasion (Qc7-style idea) came before your pieces were fully coordinated to handle a rook/file break.
- Underestimating opponent tactical replies — after the queen move Black found a rook breakthrough (Rxd5) that exploited the newly opened lines.
- Practical time management: in double-edged positions you pushed forward rather than spending a few seconds checking opponent forcing replies.
Concrete fix: before deep queen trips run a 3-second checklist: are my back-rank weaknesses covered? Can the opponent open a file or give a forcing check? If the answer is “maybe,” improve coordination (bring a rook or a minor piece) first.
Recurring patterns I see
- Strength: you flourish in tactical, open positions — active minor pieces and rook lifts are frequent and effective tools for you.
- Weakness: occasional coordination lapses (back-rank, overloaded defenders) and not always anticipating opponent counterplay when launching queen sorties.
- Blitz habit: you press for wins (good aggression), but sometimes skip one defensive resource check — tightening that will convert more games.
Opening notes — practical
Keep the systems that give you dynamic play but add small precautions:
- Philidor / similar e4 e5 lines: trade into positions where your rooks and queen get open files quickly; aim for invasion squares on the 7th or central files. Philidor Defense
- Caro‑Kann Exchange: symmetrical structure is fine, but avoid deep queen trips until rooks and minor pieces defend key squares. Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation
- When opponent aims for rook breaks (…Rxd5 / …Rcd8), prepare with defensive moves — a waiting rook or a minor piece often defuses the tactic.
Blitz-specific practice plan (30–40 minutes)
Do this 3–4× weekly. Short, focused, high-impact.
- 10–15 minutes: tactics (pattern drills: pins, forks, overloaded pieces, back‑rank mates). Call out candidate moves before you play them.
- 10 minutes: 3–5 blitz games (3|0 or 3|2). Use "one focus per game" — e.g., Game 1: king safety; Game 2: conversion; Game 3: time control.
- 10 minutes: quick review — pick the most instructive game, mark one recurring error, and write a one-line corrective rule.
Tactical & endgame drills
- Daily: 12 tactics, emphasizing pattern recognition (forks, skewers, pins, back-rank motifs).
- Weekly: 2–3 endgame positions (rook + queen vs queen, rook endings) to practice defense under restricted time.
- Blunder-check routine: before each move ask (fast): "Loose pieces? Checks/captures? Back-rank?" — say it out loud if it helps fast habits.
Mid-game checklist (use in blitz)
- Material and loose pieces — any hanging targets?
- Opponent forcing moves — any checks, captures, or discovered attacks immediately available?
- King safety & escape squares — are they intact?
- If attacking: is the target adequately overloaded/undefended? If not, prepare and improve coordination first.
Next 2-week goals
- Increase daily tactics to 12 with a 60%+ solve target on mixed puzzles.
- Play 30 short blitz games using “one focus per game.” Save one loss and one unclear win for review each day.
- Force a habit: before any queen deepening, run the 3-second defensive checklist.
Small encouragement
You have excellent instincts: active pieces, tactical awareness, and the hunger to press. Tightening coordination and adding a quick defensive scan will flip many narrow losses into wins. Keep the practice short, targeted and consistent.
Want help?
- I can walk through the loss move-by-move and show the exact tactical refutation.
- I can make a 7-day blitz workout (tactics + games + reviews) tailored to your openings.
- I can prepare a one-page cheat-sheet for your top 3 openings with typical plans and traps.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| deker10 | 128W / 137L / 23D | View Games |
| derekbaobao | 31W / 1L / 8D | View Games |
| Josias Alvarado | 33W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| jaredzl2007 | 17W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| paka55 | 12W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2378 | 2509 | 2258 | 1725 |
| 2024 | 2411 | 2468 | 2266 | 1725 |
| 2023 | 2354 | |||
| 2022 | 2395 | |||
| 2021 | 2452 | 2202 | ||
| 2020 | 2403 | 1674 | ||
| 2019 | 2159 | 2058 | 2202 | 2090 |
| 2018 | 2011 | 2130 | 2202 | 2091 |
| 2017 | 1922 | 2203 | 1890 | |
| 2016 | 2212 | 800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17W / 8L / 2D | 7W / 17L / 3D | 79.6 |
| 2024 | 213W / 205L / 39D | 212W / 207L / 32D | 81.3 |
| 2023 | 10W / 5L / 0D | 4W / 9L / 2D | 81.3 |
| 2022 | 5W / 3L / 0D | 1W / 8L / 0D | 75.8 |
| 2021 | 6W / 5L / 1D | 4W / 4L / 2D | 74.6 |
| 2020 | 48W / 49L / 6D | 47W / 42L / 12D | 70.1 |
| 2019 | 69W / 65L / 9D | 64W / 61L / 13D | 73.7 |
| 2018 | 148W / 82L / 26D | 141W / 95L / 13D | 61.4 |
| 2017 | 148W / 94L / 17D | 152W / 99L / 13D | 65.0 |
| 2016 | 70W / 33L / 6D | 72W / 34L / 5D | 78.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld, 6.O-O c6 7.b3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 162 | 90 | 59 | 13 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 91 | 49 | 35 | 7 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 73 | 38 | 26 | 9 | 52.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 71 | 36 | 28 | 7 | 50.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 58 | 32 | 21 | 5 | 55.2% |
| French Defense | 55 | 25 | 24 | 6 | 45.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 49 | 21 | 24 | 4 | 42.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 45 | 26 | 17 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 40 | 14 | 21 | 5 | 35.0% |
| Czech Defense | 38 | 16 | 20 | 2 | 42.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 54 | 33 | 18 | 3 | 61.1% |
| Modern | 29 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 58.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 24 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 20 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 55.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 19 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 47.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 16 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 28 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |