Simen Agdestein - Grandmaster of the 64 Squares
Meet Simen Agdestein, a Norwegian chess Grandmaster whose chessboard prowess is as well-honed as a lion's hunting instincts. Earning his title from FIDE, Simen has shown a remarkable evolutionary leap in the blitz domain, scaling his ratings from a fledgling 1340 in 2012 to a staggering peak over 2700 by 2025 — talk about rapid growth in the wild kingdom of chess!
With a blitz win record boasting 720 victories against 520 losses and 60 draws, Simen demonstrates a ferocious appetite for competition. His most fearsome prey includes longtime rivals like nguyenduchoa and sondremelaa, whom he’s bested many a time. On the rapid front, his tactical maneuvers sparkle with a win rate just above 51%, showcasing his adaptability across varied time controls. And while he's dipped his toe only sparingly into bullet chess, his tactical awareness strikes chaos and order in equal measure.
Simen’s gameplay exhibits a fascinating life cycle: an average of 67 moves per win suggests patience and endurance, while his 82% comeback rate after setbacks mirrors nature’s resilience — never quite out of the survival game. His endgame frequency sits high at nearly 79%, proving that when it comes to mating threats and trapping prey, Simen is as methodical as a spider weaving its web.
A creature of habit yet a curious beast, Simen’s prime hunting hours show a peak win rate around 19:00 (7 PM), making evenings prime time for his checkmating quests. And with a longest winning streak of 13 games, his momentum can grow like a wolf pack’s hunting frenzy.
Known for his solid openings nestled under a cloak of "Top Secret", Simen’s strategic DNA is a mystery to opponents who find themselves ensnared in his web of tactics and calculated risks. Despite a 6.38% early resignation rate, this Grandmaster prefers to fight to the bitter end, proving the tenacity of his species.
Simen Agdestein is more than just a player — he is the chessboard's apex predator, blending cunning strategy with survival instincts that keep his competition in constant check. If chess were an ecosystem, Simen would surely be the alpha, prowling for every opportunity.
Personalised Feedback for GM Simen Agdestein
What you are doing well
- Dynamic Pawn Play: Your willingness to seize space with early h- and g-pawn thrusts (e.g. 13.h4/15.h5 against wanyaland) keeps opponents under constant pressure and often forces concessions before move 20.
- Piece Activity in the Middlegame: Games such as the win over ATM622 show excellent coordination; minor pieces quickly find central outposts (Nf4/Ne5) and rooks double on open files with impressive speed.
- Conversion Technique in Simplified Positions: Once you reach favorable rook or minor-piece endings you rarely let the advantage slip. The accurate a-pawn sprint (54.a7!) was exemplary.
- Versatile Opening Repertoire: Alternating between 1.e4, 1.d4 and 1.Nf3 makes preparation against you difficult and keeps your play fresh.
Areas to Strengthen
- Time Management (the main leak)
Five of the last seven losses were on time in objectively defensible positions. Re-watch the critical phase in the loss to Polina Shuvalova: after 40…Bc5+ you had >30 seconds but spent >25 on routine moves. Consider adding a “move commitment rule”—once you have a satisfactory move, play it within 3 seconds. - Over-extension on the Wing
The Reti-type structure with g- and h-pawn storms works well versus lower-rated opposition, yet against 2700-level players it left weak squares (e.g. f5 in the game vs Christopher Woojin Yoo). Insert an early Qa4/Nbd2 to discourage …b5/…c5 before pushing your rook pawns. - Handling of Opponent’s Counter-Breaks
In several defeats (e.g. 24…exd5! by jcibarra), central breaks hit when your pieces were still on the flanks. Build the habit of asking “What break is my opponent threatening?” every third move; this single question will save rating points. - Endgame Clock Usage
Positions such as the rook-and-rook ending against ReadySkate were defensible. Practise increment blitz endgames exclusively for a week to ingrain fast, correct reflexes.
Concrete Action Plan (2-week cycle)
- Bulletproof Opening Segments
Prepare a 10-move “autopilot” file for each main opening. Aim to reach a playable middlegame within 60 seconds on the clock. - Structured Calculation Drill
Daily 15-minute session: set a clock for 90 seconds per puzzle, verbalise candidate moves, commit. This mirrors the pace needed in 3 | 1 games and combats chronic Zeitnot. - Mini-Endgame Sparring
Starting from equal rook endings with 20 seconds +1 s increment versus a training partner; goal is zero flag losses. Track results → . - Post-Game Tagging
After each session label the critical move where your time dipped below 20 s. A one-word tag (“Hesitation”, “Calculation”, “Tilt”) makes patterns visible → .
Performance Benchmarks
• Current personal best: 2735 (2023-09-26)
• Target for next month: +25 Elo while keeping flag losses < 10 %
Motivational Snapshot
Remember the crisp 31.Ne5! vs ATM622 that turned the tide. Lock in that feeling—quick, confident, and forcing. Strive to replicate it every game.
Next Steps
I recommend annotating two recent time-losses in depth. If you paste one of them here I can supply a move-by-move improvement guide using
Good luck, Simen—fine-tune the clock, and the results will follow!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nguyen Duc Hoa | 17W / 11L / 0D | |
| sondremelaa | 12W / 7L / 2D | |
| Pavel Ponkratov | 4W / 9L / 0D | |
| Andre Nielsen | 6W / 6L / 0D | |
| Oladapo Adu | 9W / 3L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2670 | |||
| 2024 | 2618 | |||
| 2023 | 2615 | |||
| 2022 | 2455 | |||
| 2021 | 2552 | 2487 | ||
| 2020 | 2432 | 2542 | ||
| 2019 | 2358 | |||
| 2018 | 2025 | 2475 | 2614 | |
| 2017 | 2365 | |||
| 2012 | 1998 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9W / 3L / 0D | 4W / 5L / 1D | 90.7 |
| 2024 | 37W / 18L / 3D | 22W / 24L / 5D | 91.7 |
| 2023 | 55W / 36L / 10D | 54W / 35L / 7D | 80.3 |
| 2022 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 59.5 |
| 2021 | 21W / 17L / 3D | 29W / 13L / 1D | 81.9 |
| 2020 | 70W / 38L / 2D | 77W / 45L / 4D | 47.4 |
| 2019 | 27W / 18L / 1D | 21W / 29L / 0D | 72.9 |
| 2018 | 61W / 44L / 4D | 65W / 44L / 7D | 76.8 |
| 2017 | 85W / 77L / 8D | 85W / 83L / 8D | 75.1 |
| 2012 | 7W / 1L / 0D | 7W / 0L / 0D | 52.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 54 | 31 | 1 | 62.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 54 | 29 | 22 | 3 | 53.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 35 | 14 | 18 | 3 | 40.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 33 | 15 | 16 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 25 | 9 | 14 | 2 | 36.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 25 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 58.3% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 21 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 20 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 17 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 76.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 1 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |