Matt Herman (Herman-NY) - International Master Extraordinaire
Matt Herman is not your run-of-the-mill chess player. Awarded the prestigious title of International Master by FIDE, Herman has proven time and again that their brain is a well-oiled chess machine.
A Blitz Beast & More
Blitz is where Herman really lights up the board, with ratings sky-rocketing from a respectable 2161 in 2012 to a jaw-dropping peak of 2664 in 2024. Winning over 400 blitz games with a solid 50%+ win rate, Herman embraces lightning-fast thinking—after all, who needs sleep when you have milliseconds to outsmart your opponent?
Rapid and bullet games also feature prominently in Herman's chess repertoire. While Rapid play has seen consistent performance with wins outpacing losses, Bullet games tell a tale of daring risks and fierce battles—they say fortune favors the bold, and Herman seems to agree!
The Opening Wizardry
Herman's opening strategy remains a well-kept secret, dominating opponents with a 50%+ win rate in blitz and even better in rapid games. Whether it’s a sneaky gambit or solid classical lines, opponents know they're in for a strategic waltz or a tactical punch—or often both.
Stamina and Style
Playing long and lots of games (a whopping 300 blitz games alone in 2024!), Herman’s average game length hovers around 76 moves, revealing a player who patiently grinds down opponents and rarely takes the early exit—though if things get grim early on, Hermann isn’t shy about resigning quickly to conserve energy and dignity (early resignation rate just under 1%... classy!).
Psychological Edge & Comebacks
Here’s something that would make a psychologist beep with interest: Matt’s comeback rate is a staggering 91.4%. Lose a piece? No problem—Herman wins 100% of the time after losing material, proving that stubborn tenacity and tactical awareness are core strengths.
Sure, a tilt factor of 14 means emotions can run high—because who doesn’t get a little salty when the coffee spills mid-game—but that never stops Herman from making the next move.
Notorious Opponents and Fun Rivalries
Matt has danced across the 64 squares with thousands of opponents, boasting perfect win records against some and a few notable nemeses with zero wins (looking at you, alexeishirov). But hey, that just makes the game more thrilling.
Late-Night Tactician
Stats show Herman is quite the night owl, boasting over 50% win rates during the witching hours of 10 PM and 11 PM, and even a mysterious 100% win rate at 9 AM (clearly, some magic is at play there!).
In summary:
- Title: International Master
- Favorite time to play: Late nights and Sunday afternoons
- Playing style: Patient, tactical, with a penchant for comebacks
- Quirks: Slightly emotional but fiercely determined
In a world where the queen often reigns supreme, Matt Herman plays chess like a grandmaster of wit, resilience, and a hint of mystery. Keep an eye on Herman—whether it’s blitz, rapid, or bullet, an interesting game is always just a move away.
Hi Matt (Herman-NY)!
Congratulations on maintaining a high 2664 (2024-10-01) and producing spectacular attacking wins such as your recent victory against Masterisback04. Below is some personalised feedback drawn from your latest games.
What you’re doing well
- Tactical sharpness – Your ability to unleash combinations (e.g. …Rxc3 in the Najdorf or the h-file sacrifice attack vs BaptisteYannick) regularly decides games in your favour.
- Dynamic opening choices – The Sicilian, QGD and Nimzo setups you employ keep the position unbalanced, suiting your active style.
- Resilience in complications – Even in time trouble you often find resources such as …Nf4–h3+ in your last win, turning pressure into mating nets.
Main areas to focus on next
-
Time management
• Four of your last six losses were “lost on time” in roughly equal or promising positions.
• Aim to hit “safe-moves” earlier in predictable sequences (e.g. Najdorf sidelines) and keep 20-30 seconds as an emergency reserve.
• Try a few sessions of increment only training (e.g. 1 + 2) to practise quick but accurate play. -
Handling the h3/g4 Anti-Najdorf systems
• Against 6.h3 g4 lines you twice chose …Rc8/…Rxc3 very quickly and entered positions where White’s centre remained intact.
• Consider the calmer plan 9…Be7, 10…h6, delaying …Rxc3 until you can meet bxc3 with …d5.
• Build an “if-then” memory aid for this branch so you spend zero extra seconds in future games. -
End-game conversion under pressure
• Versus LSChess and chess13524678 you reached favourable end-games but the clock out-raced you.
• Drill simple rook-and-pawn endings vs an engine using 20-second total start times to automate winning techniques.
• Adopt a mental checklist (king activity, passed pawns, rook behind passer) to avoid re-calculating basics. -
Strategic pauses
• Your middlegame plans are sometimes too force-driven; incorporate one move of prophylaxis before launching tactics (e.g. …Kh8 in the Najdorf, …a6 in QGD structures).
Mini-Exercise (from your loss vs AlexeiShirov)
After 17…Nxe4 the critical line 18…Bb4+ 19.Ke2 Qe5! would have kept material balance and freed your c3-knight.
Replay and calculate the variation in under 30 seconds:
Stats & Tracking
Monitor your progress with the built-in tools:
& . A visible dip in wins during late-night sessions matches many of your flag-losses; consider scheduling key games earlier.Action plan for the next two weeks
- Play 25 blitz games focusing solely on staying above 20 seconds by move 30.
- Analyse each Anti-Najdorf with an engine and store one pre-selected safe reply in your notes.
- Solve 50 rook-and-pawn end-game puzzles, time-capped at 90 seconds each.
- Review one game per day asking “Where was my first unnecessary think?”
Keep enjoying your dynamic style, Matt. With a small investment in time-handling and structure awareness, you’re well on course to break the next rating barrier.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marc Esserman | 22W / 48L / 4D | View Games |
| Samson Benen | 5W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| banjokazooien64 | 4W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| torrentec | 1W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| Schachschnecke | 2W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2555 | 907 | ||
| 2023 | 2519 | 2231 | ||
| 2021 | 2453 | 2352 | ||
| 2020 | 2524 | 2408 | 2007 | |
| 2019 | 2468 | |||
| 2018 | 2278 | |||
| 2017 | 2272 | |||
| 2016 | 2121 | |||
| 2015 | 2141 | |||
| 2014 | 2494 | |||
| 2013 | 2423 | 2424 | ||
| 2012 | 2261 | 2425 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 80W / 63L / 9D | 63W / 70L / 16D | 84.2 |
| 2023 | 66W / 46L / 6D | 51W / 57L / 7D | 78.1 |
| 2021 | 20W / 11L / 0D | 15W / 14L / 2D | 68.6 |
| 2020 | 16W / 10L / 1D | 13W / 8L / 4D | 75.9 |
| 2019 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 47.5 |
| 2018 | 11W / 13L / 5D | 16W / 13L / 0D | 70.8 |
| 2017 | 18W / 16L / 1D | 15W / 13L / 1D | 74.0 |
| 2016 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 79.0 |
| 2015 | 6W / 5L / 0D | 2W / 10L / 1D | 78.7 |
| 2014 | 12W / 21L / 3D | 9W / 27L / 1D | 84.9 |
| 2013 | 11W / 4L / 0D | 11W / 2L / 3D | 72.2 |
| 2012 | 3W / 0L / 1D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 81.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 32 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 20 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 20 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 35.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 16 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 28.6% |
| East Indian Defense | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 38.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Keres Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Capablanca Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 7 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |