IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl – The International Master with a Mysterious Name
Known only by their cryptic username, IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl has carved a niche in the blitz and bullet chess arenas with the skill and finesse worthy of their International Master title awarded by FIDE. With peak ratings soaring to 2771 in blitz and an impressive 2636 in bullet, this enigmatic player combines serious talent with a dash of mystery.
A strategist who thrives best at dawn (specifically around 4 AM), IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl's games often feature an average of over 80 moves per win in blitz, showcasing patience and endurance in some of the fiercest time scrambles. Their love for the endgame is evident, appearing in nearly 77% of their games, proving that this player isn’t just about quick flashy wins, but about grinding out advantages till the very end.
Style and Strengths
- Comback Wizardry: A remarkable 90.16% comeback rate indicates this player rarely throws in the towel, turning even dire situations into opportunities.
- Tactical Awareness: With nearly 48% win rate even after losing a piece, IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl is both resilient and resourceful.
- Opening Preferences: Despite the top secret nature of their games, they are known to dabble in the Sicilian Defense, French Defense, and Italian Game, with the Sicilian Defense Kramnik Variation boasting a 100% success rate in recorded games.
Statistics at a Glance
Over thousands of blitz games, with a total record exceeding 2192 wins, 1915 losses, and 434 draws, IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl demonstrates both experience and consistency. The bullet record is solid too: 222 wins and 166 losses, with some lightning-fast maneuvers that leave opponents dizzy.
Famous Battles
In one of their recent notable victories, IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl showcased mastery in a Sicilian Defense Kramnik Variation against username239759821, winning by resignation after a complex 43-move battle.
However, nobody's perfect — losses against seasoned foes like nengrani1234 and ginger_gm remind us this player is still human despite the digital flair of their name.
Personality & Quirks
With an amusing nickname that looks like a secret code, it’s rumored that IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl might be a chess-playing AI in disguise or just someone who really enjoys confusing their foes — on and off the board. Their low early resignation rate of just around 1% and tendency to fight till the end make them a fearsome and sometimes maddening opponent.
Whether it’s the breakneck pace of blitz, the razor-sharp tactics of bullet, or even dipping toes into rapid, IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl's tenacity and unpredictable style keep fans and foes alike on their toes. One thing is for sure: when they clock in, the chessboard is about to witness some serious art — complicated, coded, and utterly captivating.
Quick summary for IlIlIlIllIIIlIlIIlIIlIIIl
Good work — your recent games show strong opening knowledge and active piece play, plus the ability to convert small advantages in blitz. The losses reveal the two areas to focus on now: fast tactical vigilance in the early middlegame, and consistent time management in sharp positions. Below are game-specific notes and a short, practical training plan you can apply this week.
Recent win — highlights & what went well
Game: vs Charizard1011 — English Opening / Neo‑Catalan ideas (English Opening)
- Good strategic idea: you used queenside pawn pushes from move 6–9 to create targets and a passed pawn. That gave you space and concrete targets to attack.
- Piece activity: your knights and rooks found very active squares (knight jumps around c6/b4 and rook swinging). You made the opponent defend awkwardly and eventually forced simplifications that favored you.
- Conversion: when the opponent traded into a queenless middlegame you kept the pieces coordinated and converted the extra activity into a decisive advantage — good endgame judgment in blitz.
- Nice sequence to finish the game: you exchanged into a position where your rooks and knight controlled the open files and the opponent’s knight was out of play.
Replay the finish (interactive):
Recent loss — where to improve (game vs Andrew Jiang)
Opening: early Sicilian tension (Sicilian Defense). The decisive problem came after the king was exposed to a queen check and your kingside structure became fragile.
- King safety first: after you exchanged on f6 early, your king later became exposed to a quick queen sortie to the h4 square. In similar pawn structures prioritize prophylaxis — a pawn move like g3 or h3 earlier (when safe) could blunt checks.
- Tactical awareness: the sequence where the opponent re-routed their knight and opened lines for the queen happened quickly — in blitz you need a simple checklist when you capture: (1) are there checks, (2) are my backrank/king squares covered, (3) can the opponent generate immediate counterplay?
- Time usage: you burned a lot of time on early moves (sudden long think at move 9 down to ~1:05). In sharp tactical positions consider pre-deciding a plan (exchange or simplify) and if unsure, make practical moves to keep the clock even.
Actionable corrections for this line:
- When you take on f6 (or allow gxf6), be ready for quick central and wing counterplay — look for incoming queen checks and rook lifts before committing to long captures.
- If you get to an unclear middlegame with queens on the board, steer toward simplification if your king is less safe: trade queens when you're unsure and down on time.
Other recurring issues from recent games
- Balancing openings: you play a broad repertoire (English, Sicilian, Pirc). That's a strength, but when playing blitz, prefer the systems you’ve practiced enough to play confidently without heavy calculation. Lean on your best openings (your stats show strong results with Caro‑Kann, French Exchange and Modern) when you want steady results.
- Tactical pattern recognition: a lot of lost games come from single-move tactics (queen checks, knight forks, back‑rank issues). A short daily tactic warm-up (15–20 minutes) focused on motifs like queen checks, forks, pins and back‑rank tactics will pay immediate dividends.
- Time management: you win more when you keep reasonable time on the clock. Set a target: avoid dropping below 45 seconds before move 15 in a 3‑minute game — if you find yourself under 30 seconds with complex decisions, trade or make simplifying moves.
What you’re already doing well
- Active piece play — you consistently look for outposts and open files, and that converts to wins when executed cleanly.
- Opening knowledge — your opening win rates (Caro‑Kann, French Exchange, Modern) show you have solid preparation and understanding of structures.
- Conversion ability — in quiet positions you convert small advantages rather than blundering them away; that’s a high‑level skill in blitz.
Short, practical training plan (1 week)
- Daily: 20 minutes tactics (focus on checks, pins, forks and back‑rank) — use a mix of easy + medium problems to build speed and pattern recognition. See tactics.
- 3 days: 3+2 or 3+0 blitz sessions, but after each loss, spend 3–5 minutes reviewing the decisive moment (did you miss a check/tactic or run out of time?).
- 2 sessions: 30 minutes → rapid (15+10) focusing on the opening lines you want to keep (play the Caro‑Kann/Modern or the line you feel safest in to build confidence).
- Endgame drill: 15 minutes total — basic rook endgames and king+rook vs king exercises (these are common conversion scenarios in blitz).
Next 3 concrete checklist items for your next 10 blitz games
- Before every capture when queens are on the board — look for a direct check or a tactic against the king (1 quick scan: checks, forks, discovered attacks).
- If you’re under 45 seconds and the position is complex, choose the simplifying option (trade queens or a piece) rather than risk a blunder.
- Pick 1 opening to “force‑practice” in blitz this week (play it 10 times) so you get typical plans down to instinct rather than calculation.
Useful links & quick references
- Openings: English Opening, Sicilian Defense, Pirc Defense
- Study motif: tactics (daily 15–20 min)
- Opponent references: Charizard1011, Andrew Jiang, Nestor Favian Lozano Ramirez
Final note
You’re clearly strong — your rating history and opening performance back that up. Small, repeatable habits (quick tactical scans and disciplined time thresholds) will stop the majority of your blitz losses. If you want, I can produce a 2‑week training schedule tailored to the exact openings you want to keep in rotation.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Jiang | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cogitoergovinco | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| veganator13 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Charizard1011 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Dawid Czerw | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| alirezhsii | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Samuel Fieberg | 1W / 4L / 2D | View |
| media2012 | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| the-splinter | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| wo_ipad | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ShirouEmiyaUBW | 17W / 51L / 8D | View Games |
| justatrickstar | 2W / 22L / 6D | View Games |
| pablo592 | 6W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
| ErnestoGuevaraLynch | 9W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| Mihai Ionescu | 9W / 2L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2593 | 2654 | ||
| 2024 | 2567 | 2523 | 2400 | |
| 2023 | 2538 | 2521 | ||
| 2022 | 2322 | 2495 | 1900 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 205W / 158L / 30D | 190W / 160L / 43D | 83.2 |
| 2024 | 601W / 517L / 128D | 615W / 515L / 116D | 82.3 |
| 2023 | 179W / 155L / 32D | 173W / 168L / 30D | 78.6 |
| 2022 | 283W / 232L / 49D | 262W / 259L / 54D | 75.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 385 | 191 | 157 | 37 | 49.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 149 | 78 | 52 | 19 | 52.4% |
| Czech Defense | 144 | 76 | 59 | 9 | 52.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 130 | 61 | 52 | 17 | 46.9% |
| Four Knights Game | 121 | 58 | 50 | 13 | 47.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 118 | 58 | 50 | 10 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 114 | 55 | 53 | 6 | 48.2% |
| Australian Defense | 106 | 47 | 48 | 11 | 44.3% |
| Modern | 104 | 56 | 39 | 9 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 97 | 44 | 42 | 11 | 45.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 29 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 51.7% |
| Czech Defense | 28 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Modern | 23 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 78.3% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 43.5% |
| Modern Defense | 21 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 52.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 18 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |