Zhandos Agmanov: The International Master of the Chessboard
Meet Zhandos Agmanov, an International Master bestowed by FIDE, who has turned chess into both an art and a science — with a sprinkle of humor and an obvious knack for blitz battles. While the world’s chess clocks tick mercilessly, Zhandos moves with the precision and speed of a caffeinated knight sprinting across the board.
Starting from a blitz rating of just under 2000 in 2020, Zhandos skyrocketed to a peak well above 2900 in just a few years, with a bullet rating that once flirted with a staggering 3043. For those who don’t know, a bullet rating that high probably means blinking is considered a tactical weakness.
With over a thousand wins in blitz chess alone, Zhandos has demonstrated not only resilience but a comeback rate that rivals the best—winning almost 94% of the time after a losing position and nearly 99% after losing a piece. Offering proof that the phrase "losing your piece isn't losing the game" is basically their life's motto.
When it comes to openings, Zhandos keeps things cryptic with a “Top Secret” approach boasting nearly a 47% win rate across some 2300 blitz games. The opponent list reads like a who's who of the online chess world, including some near-legendary foes and a few who might wish they’d never challenged Zhandos at all. Fun fact: Zhandos has a perfect 100% win rate against the elusive user lguhd—a record hard to achieve and probably impossible to beat in casual pub chess.
Playing style is patient, with an average of over 90 moves per win or loss—proof that Zhandos enjoys his battles long and well-fought, savoring endgames like a fine chess-themed wine. He even manages to tilt at a mere 8%, which in chess psychology language means “cool-headed and ready for the next game.”
Whether it’s blitz at 23:00 with a 62.86% win rate or a calm midday rapid, Zhandos adapts and excels, making their mark one calculated move at a time. In short: if Zhandos Agmanov were a chess piece, they'd most likely be a queen—versatile, unstoppable, and always striking when least expected.
Quick summary
Zhandos — nice tactical feel in these recent blitz wins. You create direct pressure on the enemy king, spot forcing continuations and convert sharp positions confidently. Below are targeted observations, one annotated example from your most recent win, and a short training plan you can use between sessions.
Example: highlights from your most recent win
Game vs Marc-Andria Maurizzi — key ideas you used:
- You opened lines quickly against the castled king and used a rook sacrifice on the h-file to rip open the king position and finish the attack (sacrifice on h6 followed by a rook lift to g6). That shows excellent initiative and basic calculation under time pressure.
- Your queen and rooks coordinated well to create multiple threats; when the opponent tried to defend passively the king became the target and you exploited it decisively.
Replay the final attacking sequence (interactive):
What you're doing well
- Consistent attacking instincts — you see king-side targets quickly and follow through with precise forcing moves.
- Good use of piece coordination — rooks and queen frequently combine to create decisive threats.
- Wide opening repertoire and willingness to take imbalanced positions (this creates practical chances in blitz).
- Psychological edge: you pressure opponents early and force uncomfortable defensive decisions.
Key areas to improve
- Time management: some wins came on the opponent’s flag or after long time scrambles. Keep more time for the critical tactical moments — keep 10–20 seconds for complex decisions in blitz.
- Transition technique: after a successful attack you sometimes leave a few winning moves available and risk counterplay. Practice converting the advantage in simplified material imbalances and rook endgames.
- Opening clarity under blitz: when opponents deviate early you sometimes spend too much time. Tighten up your main lines and a few offbeat replies so you can play them fast and confidently.
- Defense against counterplay: when opponents get one chance (passed pawn, rook infiltration) you can be vulnerable. Work on defensive patterns and active counter-threats.
Concrete training plan (weekly, blitz-focused)
- Daily (15–25 minutes): 10–20 tactical puzzles with an emphasis on mating nets, sacrifices and quiet defender moves. Start puzzles with a 60–90 second limit to simulate blitz decision-making.
- 3× per week (20 minutes): Play 5–10 blitz games with the goal of using the same opening lines. Reinforce the lines you score well with — for example, keep practicing your favorites like London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation and QGD: Ragozin to reach fast familiarity.
- 2× per week (30 minutes): Endgame drills — rook vs rook, king and pawn vs king, and basic Lucena setup. Aim to convert simple advantages quickly and know the standard defensive resources.
- Weekly review (15–30 minutes): Pick one lost or drawn blitz game and annotate by explaining why you chose each move (use a voice memo or short notes). Focus on where you could have used time better or improved the candidate moves list.
Practical blitz tips (apply immediately)
- When familiar with the position, play fast; when the position is sharp, stop the clock and spend 8–15 seconds to verify your calculation before moving.
- Use pre-moves only when there are no tactical risks (simplified positions or obvious recaptures).
- Prioritize king safety checks — if your attack requires removing defenders or opening files, calculate those trades first.
- If ahead on the clock, simplify to winning endgames; if behind, keep complications and practical chances on the board.
Small repertoire and study suggestions
- Double down on openings where your win rate is strong — practice typical plans and move orders rather than memorizing single moves.
- Study pattern-based resources: mating patterns, typical sacrifices on h/g files, and standard rook lifts like the Rg6 idea you used.
- Keep a short file of “go-to” tactical motifs (10–15 positions) to review before each blitz session; build instant recognition.
Next steps
- Replay the highlighted game vs Marc-Andria Maurizzi and annotate 3 moments: where you could have spent less time, where you absolutely needed to calculate, and one alternative for the opponent.
- Start a 2-week challenge: 10 tactics/day + 3 blitz games/day in the same opening. Track whether your conversion and time usage improves.
- If you want, send me one loss or close game (PGN or link) and I’ll give a short postmortem focused on practical improvements for blitz.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marc-Andria Maurizzi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| spitfire_007 | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| ErnestoGuevaraLynch | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dinamicosking | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Matyas Marek | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Borna Franc | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Nikola Mitkov | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| 0817chess | 5W / 0L / 1D | View |
| real1madrid3cr7 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Coldplace | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mark_anthony_13 | 23W / 31L / 12D | View Games |
| Ivan Yeletsky | 14W / 22L / 8D | View Games |
| Reza Mahdavi | 16W / 24L / 2D | View Games |
| David Paravyan | 9W / 23L / 4D | View Games |
| babonya23 | 17W / 9L / 9D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2902 | |||
| 2024 | 2823 | |||
| 2023 | 2887 | |||
| 2022 | 2907 | 2919 | 2400 | |
| 2021 | 3010 | 2905 | 2400 | |
| 2020 | 3006 | 2910 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20W / 9L / 1D | 14W / 9L / 3D | 87.0 |
| 2024 | 20W / 11L / 4D | 17W / 16L / 6D | 102.4 |
| 2023 | 6W / 7L / 3D | 6W / 5L / 2D | 102.2 |
| 2022 | 176W / 122L / 32D | 151W / 147L / 32D | 99.9 |
| 2021 | 182W / 154L / 58D | 174W / 178L / 53D | 88.2 |
| 2020 | 221W / 169L / 54D | 204W / 200L / 42D | 96.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 164 | 72 | 69 | 23 | 43.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 120 | 50 | 61 | 9 | 41.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 58 | 29 | 22 | 7 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 56 | 20 | 26 | 10 | 35.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 50 | 24 | 22 | 4 | 48.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 49 | 27 | 15 | 7 | 55.1% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 48 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 48 | 26 | 14 | 8 | 54.2% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.e3 | 45 | 26 | 15 | 4 | 57.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 43 | 21 | 14 | 8 | 48.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 1 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |