Overview
Isfarinets is an International Master (FIDE) and a feared blitz specialist. Known for long, technical battles and razor-sharp opening preparation, Isfarinets blends practical tactics with patient endgame technique. Preferred time control: Blitz.
Peak blitz form: 2867 (2025-11-18). Peak bullet milestone: 2681 (2024-01-28).
Playing profile
Fast, resilient and endgame-oriented. Highlights from the record:
- Primary arena: Blitz — the format where Isfarinets posts the strongest results.
- Large experience pool: over a thousand decisive blitz results (Wins: 1,230 / Losses: 1,095 / Draws: 229).
- High endgame frequency (79.71%) and long average decisive games — typically grinding opponents down rather than quick tactical brilliancies.
- Psychology: unusually strong performance at unconventional hours (best time: ~03:00).
Openings & style
Isfarinets prefers dynamic, strategically rich openings that can lead to deep endgames. A curated slice of the repertoire:
- Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation — reliable and well-rehearsed (win ~54%).
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense — frequent choice for imbalance (win ~54%).
- English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense — strong practical score (win ~58%).
- Catalan Opening: Closed — excellent conversion rate from small advantages (win ~62%).
- Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 — a spicy weapon used to unbalance opponents (win ~57%).
Rivals, streaks & memorable numbers
- Most-played opponent: KrovavyOryel — ~557 games (head-to-head 284–240–33). A marathon rivalry.
- Longest winning streak: 19 games — a formidable run of form.
- Longest losing streak: 10 games — followed by resilient recovery.
Sample blitz game (short)
A compact example of Isfarinets' typical flow: controlled opening, middlegame pressure, patient endgame conversion.
Replayable moves:
Progress & visual
Career trend: steady growth with notable spikes in late 2023–2025, reflecting sustained success on fast time controls.
Fun facts & miscellany
- Nickname idea for streamers: “The Endgame Barber” — pieces tend to get quietly trimmed away in long technical wins.
- Comebacks after material loss are frequent enough to be scary: win rate after losing a piece ~42.65%.
- Versatile repertoire: ranges from sharp gambits to slow Catalan routes — keeps opponents off balance.
- Also frequently faces thefergusonhunter6969 and Wladimir Skulener.
Where to follow
Look for the username "Isfarinets" on major online platforms to watch live blitz games, studies, and training content. For quick checks of frequent rivals try KrovavyOryel or thefergusonhunter6969.
Post‑mortem summary (blitz)
Nice run — your blitz shows textbook strengths: purposeful openings, aggressive piece activity, and clean endgame conversion. Most losses are short and stem from early tactical oversights or rushed decisions in time pressure. Below I highlight strengths, recurring leaks, and a focused improvement plan you can apply over the next month.
What you’re doing well
- Opening repertoire and familiarity — you steer the game into systems you know (for example Catalan Opening and Grünfeld Defense), which gives you comfortable middlegame plans.
- Piece activity and initiative — you consistently place rooks on open files and bishops on long diagonals, turning activity into concrete targets.
- Endgame technique — you convert passed pawns and use the king actively to support promotion races; that paid off in your wins versus stronger opponents.
- Tactical follow‑through — when you spot combinations you execute them reliably, producing decisive material gains or mate threats.
Recurring problems (highest impact)
- Early queen captures/central pawn grabs getting punished — some quick losses came after Qxe4/Qxa4 style captures where the opponent had tactical replies. Pause before grabbing central material if opponent has knights/bishops aimed at your queen.
- Missed discovered checks and forks — a pattern in a few losses: you capture a pawn and a discovered tactical shot or fork appears. Make a quick scan for checks, captures and threats before finalizing a move.
- Time management in 180s — a number of games ended with very little time left, and that amplifies mistakes. Keep slightly more reserve time heading into the critical middle/endgame phase.
- Pawn structure mistakes that open files toward your king — avoid trades that hand open lines to the opponent without a clear blockade or counterplay plan.
4‑week blitz improvement plan
- Daily (12–15 min): Tactics warmup focused on forks, discovered attacks, pins. Make “checks/captures/threats” your first scan each time you move.
- 3×/week (20 min): Opening trap checklist — for each main line you play, list 2 traps opponents use and 2 traps you can fall into. Drill the correct responses until reflexive.
- 2×/week (20 min): Time‑management drills — play short sessions where your goal is to finish with 10–15s extra. Practice a 3‑step decision routine: 1) checks, 2) captures, 3) threats.
- 2×/week (10 min): Endgame micro‑sessions — king+pawn, rook+passer technique, conversion with time pressure. Practice promotion races and stalemate awareness.
- Weekly review (30 min): Post‑mortem 3 games (a win, a loss, a messy drawn position). Write one practical rule you’ll use next time for similar positions.
Practical blitz rules to use immediately
- Before capturing with the queen: do a split‑second check for opponent checks, forks, or discovered attacks.
- If low on time and the position is unclear, simplify: trade pieces and play for a clear plan rather than a complex tactic.
- Avoid pre‑moves in messy positions with potential checks or captures; reserve pre‑moves for safe, quiet recaptures.
- If you can activate your king faster than the opponent can create counterplay, activate it — you already do this well; make it an automatic decision in endgames.
Games to revisit (study priorities)
- Win vs really65 — excellent model for converting activity into a promotion and mating net; review the mid→endgame transition and mating patterns.
- Win vs thefergusonhunter6969 — clean passed pawn conversion and king activation; reinforce those technique patterns.
- Loss vs Krow_2327 — early queen capture was punished; drill discovered‑attack motifs and scenarios where Qxe4 is unsafe.
Quick checklist before you click a move (blitz)
- Any checks I must respond to? (Address them first.)
- Will this capture open a line or create a fork on my pieces?
- Does the move leave a square or pawn weak that the opponent can exploit immediately?
- If short on time, can I simplify and keep a clear winning plan?
Final note
Your long‑term trend and opening performance are strong — the lifts you need are specific and high‑leverage: a disciplined tactical scan early, and slightly better time allocation. Tighten those two areas and your blitz win rate will rise noticeably.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| playtowin2020 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| the_void_which_binds | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| the2007kid | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| really65 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| krow_2327 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| enzofavara | 1W / 1L / 1D | View |
| TPlovetiramisu | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thefergusonhunter6969 | 30W / 9L / 4D | View |
| Maxim Borisov S | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| hamidrezatahmasebii | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| KrovavyOryel | 284W / 240L / 33D | View Games |
| thefergusonhunter6969 | 30W / 9L / 4D | View Games |
| Wladimir Skulener | 13W / 10L / 1D | View Games |
| boemboembekkertje | 12W / 4L / 5D | View Games |
| ritz_carlton | 12W / 4L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2759 | |||
| 2025 | 2744 | |||
| 2024 | 2596 | 2652 | ||
| 2023 | 2685 | |||
| 2022 | 2643 | |||
| 2020 | 2521 | |||
| 2019 | 2517 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 21W / 11L / 6D | 12W / 20L / 5D | 83.2 |
| 2025 | 193W / 170L / 49D | 180W / 195L / 38D | 81.7 |
| 2024 | 48W / 40L / 7D | 40W / 51L / 2D | 73.9 |
| 2023 | 84W / 69L / 12D | 67W / 83L / 11D | 75.9 |
| 2022 | 7W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 5L / 2D | 74.3 |
| 2020 | 242W / 180L / 39D | 196W / 213L / 47D | 76.1 |
| 2019 | 85W / 44L / 6D | 85W / 43L / 9D | 71.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 114 | 62 | 45 | 7 | 54.4% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 87 | 35 | 38 | 14 | 40.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 86 | 47 | 34 | 5 | 54.6% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 72 | 34 | 32 | 6 | 47.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 59 | 34 | 20 | 5 | 57.6% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 49 | 27 | 21 | 1 | 55.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 46 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 52.2% |
| Catalan Opening | 42 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 47.6% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 42 | 24 | 15 | 3 | 57.1% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 40 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| King's Indian Attack | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |