Itgelt Khuyagtsogt (Itk04) - International Master
Born from the misty steppes of Mongolia and forged in the fires of countless online battles, Itgelt Khuyagtsogt — or Itk04 to the chess internet elite — is no mere player; they are a tactical juggernaut bearing the prestigious title of International Master bestowed by FIDE. With a rating that soared to blistering heights of up to 2832 in Blitz chess, Itgelt has proven their brilliance is as sharp and unpredictable as a knight’s fork.
Since 2013, Itgelt has been carving their path through the ranks, showing relentless improvement year after year. Starting with humble Blitz ratings barely over 1000, they now dominate the 2800+ territory — a realm few mortals dare enter. Bullet chess? Maxing out at an intimidating 2756, Itgelt’s lightning-fast calculations could give engines a run for their silicon.
Not just a speed demon, Itgelt’s playing style reflects a deep love for the endgame, appearing in over 70% of their matches — a true connoisseur of the final act. Their average winning game lasts 58 moves, suggesting that perseverance and strategy outlast the flashy opening tricks. Also, despite the chess gods occasionally attempting to humble them, Itgelt bounces back with a comeback rate exceeding 65%, and magically manages a win almost every time they lose a piece (a staggering 99.64% success after such setbacks).
Fascinatingly, they have endured a long longest winning streak of 92 games — imagine the nerves of their opponents! Yet, even masters must face the tilt; Itgelt’s tilt factor is a modest 20, ensuring their mental game remains mostly intact during fierce competitions.
Online, Itgelt is a formidable force, having played thousands of games with over 4,600 wins in Blitz alone, tackling top opponents with varying success but always entertaining the audience with sharp and witty moves. With a near 54% win rate in Blitz and a solid presence across Bullet and Rapid formats, they blend speed, skill, and patience into a deadly cocktail of chess mastery.
When not storming chess servers, you might find Itgelt pondering the mysteries of the Top Secret opening they favor — an enigmatic strategy that has brought them victory more often than not. Despite a serious chess pedigree, they fit the mold of a modern grand strategist with a hint of humor and diary of battles fought online, making chess both art and a riot of calculation.
In short, Itgelt Khuyagtsogt is a legend in the making — a player whose moves tell stories, whose games are battles, and whose username Itk04 commands respect in any chess forum. Expect brilliance, expect surprises, and most of all, expect the unexpected when facing this International Master.
Quick summary
Nice session, Itgelt — you converted several winning games and kept the initiative in many sharp positions. Your short‑term rating is trending up (+22 this month, +522 over 3–6 months), so the training is paying off. Below are focused, practical points based on tonight’s blitz games.
Highlights — what you did well
- Active piece play: You repeatedly activated rooks and queens onto open files and the 7th/8th ranks — this earned you decisive targets.
- Endgame technique & practical play: You converted endgames and pressed on the clock, turning pressure into wins or time victories.
- Opening breadth: Comfort in many structures (French/Tarrasch, Queen’s Gambit/Catalan, King’s Indian ideas) makes you hard to prepare against.
- Finishing awareness: You spotted decisive tactical motifs in the Catalan‑type game vs Erik R. Gasparyan and punished king safety errors — well done.
Main weaknesses to fix (fast wins)
- King safety in sharp middlegames: In the loss vs Xiao Tong you were caught by a mating net / tactical sequence on the kingside. Before pawn grabs or attacking, scan for opponent checks and sacrifices near your king.
- Back‑rank and loose‑piece awareness: A few games had hanging pieces or back‑rank vulnerabilities. Habit: ask “Is my back rank safe?” before simplifying.
- Time management under complexity: You reached critical low clock values in complex positions. Prioritize candidate moves (safety, forcing checks/captures) to avoid spending too much time on one line.
- Accepting material without checking opponent counterplay: Double‑check captures that open lines toward your king or create tactical motifs for the opponent.
Concrete drills (this week)
- Tactics daily — 15 minutes focused on mating patterns, back‑rank mates, pins and forks. Review mistakes; don’t just see the solution.
- King‑safety checklist — before each move in blitz, pause 2–3 seconds and ask: "Checks? Sacrifices? Flight squares?"
- Time‑control practice — play 4 games of 10+5 forcing yourself to maintain 20–30 sec for critical decisions; use increment to avoid flagging while training accuracy.
- Opening patch — pick one shaky line (example: the Tarrasch/French) and learn the typical middlegame plans rather than long move lists. Start with French Defense motifs.
Game‑specific review tasks (5–10 minutes each)
- Loss vs Xiao Tong: replay the critical sequence where the queen and pawns opened lines. Mark the moment you could have traded queens or improved king safety — propose two alternatives.
- Win vs Thekarm (won on time): check for earlier prophylactic moves that would have reduced opponent counterplay — note one improvement for next time.
- Win vs Srihari L (won on time): analyze the rook endgame transitions you executed well and save one technique to reuse (e.g., cutting the king off, pawn advance timing).
Simple 90‑minute session plan (next practice)
- 10 min warmup — easy tactics + king‑safety checklist practice.
- 30 min focused practice — 3 × 10+5 games applying the checklist; take one note per game.
- 20 min targeted study — annotate the loss vs Xiao Tong and write 3 alternative lines.
- 20 min cooldown — 8–10 blitz games (3+2) applying one specific change (e.g., “never accept the c‑file capture if back rank is weak”).
Next steps I can help with
- I can annotate the loss vs Xiao Tong move‑by‑move and suggest concrete alternative moves.
- I can create a 7‑day tactics schedule focused on the exact tactical themes you missed tonight.
- I can prepare a 6‑move mini‑repertoire in one opening (example: a safe French/Tarrasch plan with typical middlegame ideas).
Placeholders / quick links
- Opponents: Erik R. Gasparyan, Xiao Tong, Thekarm, Srihari L
- Opening to review: French Defense, Catalan Opening
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shamil Arslanov | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Clément Candelot | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thechosenone009 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| name554590 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| better-than-you32 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ilan Schnaider | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Mattechecetmatt | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chesstalent2006 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Vladimir Bilic | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Ethan Sheehan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| smurf4playingfriends | 383W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| justforlols1 | 202W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| hereisjonny | 167W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| billgatesbobby | 163W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| mglgangsta | 126W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2845 | 2823 | 2344 | |
| 2024 | 2826 | |||
| 2023 | 2713 | 2805 | 2444 | |
| 2022 | 2481 | 2623 | 2217 | |
| 2021 | 2564 | 2558 | 2217 | |
| 2020 | 2501 | 2421 | 2217 | |
| 2019 | 2240 | 2431 | ||
| 2018 | 2080 | 2238 | ||
| 2017 | 1947 | 2077 | 1788 | 899 |
| 2016 | 1708 | 1954 | 1686 | |
| 2015 | 1579 | 1717 | 1701 | 899 |
| 2014 | 1410 | 1624 | 1685 | 1011 |
| 2013 | 1344 | 1193 | 1569 | 1054 |
| 2012 | 1338 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53W / 58L / 13D | 57W / 51L / 12D | 93.6 |
| 2024 | 2W / 2L / 1D | 3W / 0L / 1D | 94.1 |
| 2023 | 276W / 243L / 48D | 243W / 267L / 66D | 89.8 |
| 2022 | 169W / 140L / 27D | 149W / 176L / 22D | 89.0 |
| 2021 | 86W / 64L / 10D | 70W / 79L / 10D | 82.1 |
| 2020 | 332W / 246L / 38D | 318W / 265L / 42D | 72.7 |
| 2019 | 364W / 348L / 64D | 376W / 351L / 61D | 85.7 |
| 2018 | 988W / 502L / 51D | 961W / 526L / 48D | 52.5 |
| 2017 | 295W / 231L / 24D | 286W / 249L / 16D | 71.3 |
| 2016 | 124W / 96L / 5D | 121W / 94L / 8D | 70.6 |
| 2015 | 96W / 82L / 11D | 81W / 104L / 5D | 68.4 |
| 2014 | 180W / 138L / 11D | 170W / 144L / 10D | 64.2 |
| 2013 | 32W / 24L / 0D | 28W / 27L / 1D | 69.6 |
| 2012 | 4W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 60.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 465 | 363 | 87 | 15 | 78.1% |
| Australian Defense | 321 | 245 | 65 | 11 | 76.3% |
| French Defense | 287 | 175 | 95 | 17 | 61.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 260 | 197 | 56 | 7 | 75.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 230 | 174 | 51 | 5 | 75.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 183 | 108 | 68 | 7 | 59.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 175 | 88 | 80 | 7 | 50.3% |
| Czech Defense | 150 | 88 | 52 | 10 | 58.7% |
| Modern | 147 | 66 | 70 | 11 | 44.9% |
| Döry Defense | 144 | 66 | 66 | 12 | 45.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 163 | 84 | 71 | 8 | 51.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 101 | 45 | 51 | 5 | 44.5% |
| Australian Defense | 99 | 49 | 46 | 4 | 49.5% |
| French Defense | 88 | 51 | 34 | 3 | 58.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 81 | 40 | 39 | 2 | 49.4% |
| Döry Defense | 63 | 34 | 26 | 3 | 54.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 63 | 26 | 34 | 3 | 41.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 59 | 30 | 25 | 4 | 50.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 54 | 29 | 20 | 5 | 53.7% |
| Modern | 54 | 22 | 28 | 4 | 40.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scotch Game | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 92 | 1 |
| Losing | 20 | 0 |