Jens E Ingebretsen (jens1102)
International Master
Meet Jens E Ingebretsen, a chess gladiator with an intellect sharp enough to slice through defenses and a title to prove it: International Master, bestowed by FIDE. Jens’s journey through the ranks isn’t just about lofty titles and fancy ratings—though they’ve flirted with a blitz peak rating of 2855, which is nothing short of wizardry—it’s about resilience, grit, and a stubborn refusal to quit.
Jens has amassed thousands of games across blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily formats, proving their versatility. Their blitz games alone number over 12,000 with a nearly 50% win rate, showing a masterful balance of aggression and caution. They handle the clock like a caffeinated magician, boasting a longest winning streak of 19 games and always ready to strike back with an 86% comeback rate after a setback.
When not calculating 15 moves deep or sacrificing a knight into the abyss, Jens is a student of openings (and secret recipes, apparently), favoring a Top Secret repertoire in blitz and bullet. They have a soft spot for the Catalan Opening too—achieving a flawless 100% win rate in those rare appearances with it.
Jens's style is that of tenacity: an average game winning in nearly 80 moves and losses stretching to over 83 moves, showing a fierce battle until the bitter end. Early resignations are few and far between (only 3.4%), which is a polite way of saying Jens likes to fight till the checkmate or timeout.
Their psychological resilience is legendary—with a tilt factor far lower than many mere mortals, Jens excels especially during the early morning hours. Ask anyone: the best time to catch Jens at the board is 6 AM, a sacred hour when the chess gods align and blunders are few.
You can witness Jens’s strategic prowess in their recent games, including a captivating victory using the Reti Opening, where subtle positional play forced their opponent into resignation, and tactical fireworks sealed a win in a Pirc Defense battle.
Off the board, Jens's impressive record against a wide variety of opponents demonstrates adaptability, and a near 50% win rate against all comers, but beware—the score against some opponents can be as harsh as a well-placed pawn fork!
In short, Jens E Ingebretsen isn’t just a player—they are a relentless calculated storm on 64 squares, a true connoisseur of the game’s subtle and fierce beauty, and undoubtedly, a force to be reckoned with in the chess world.
Blitz play: what stands out
You’ve shown a strong willingness to enter sharp, tactical positions in blitz. This helps create winning chances when calculations are accurate and your opponent misreads the threats. It also means you can turn small advantages into real chances, but it can backfire when time pressure ampifies mistakes or when the position becomes too chaotic to navigate quickly.
Strengths you’re bringing to your blitz games
- Comfort with aggressive, initiative-rich openings that pressure the opponent from the start, which often yields practical winning chances in blitz.
- Good use of piece activity to create concrete threats. When your rooks, queens, and minor pieces coordinate well, you generate practical winning chances even in messy positions.
- Strong talent for spotting tactical motifs and forcing lines that put opponents under decision pressure.
Key areas to sharpen for more consistent results
- Time management: aim to establish a simple plan by move 15–20 in most games and stick to it. Use the clock as a resource—don’t let it run away from you in complex middlegames.
- Endgame conversion: when you gain material or activity, practice converting advantages into a win. Work on common rook and pawn endings and quick king activity patterns to avoid letting a small edge slip away.
- Opening consistency: your blitz repertoire includes very sharp lines. Consider adding a reliable, solid alternative for when you’re lower on time or facing an unfamiliar reply, so you can quickly steer into clean, playable middlegames.
- Defensive discipline: in some games, the attack creates weaknesses in your own position. Balance aggression with solid king safety and structural considerations.
Opening choices and practical plans
Your openings show a preference for sharp, tactical trajectories (such as aggressive gambits) that can pay off when you’re in rhythm. If you enjoy this style, continue studying those lines, but also build a small set of solid, low-variance options to fall back on when the clock is tight or when the opponent’s responses derail your main plan. Practical middlegame plans are often more reliable in blitz than deep theoretical lines you can’t finish calculating.
- Amar Gambit and Blackburne Shilling Gambit are strong tools when you want to seize the initiative and unbalance the game quickly. Build a clear, repeatable plan for the most common responses so you can trust your first 15 moves even under time pressure.
- Unknown or highly unbalanced lines can backfire if you’re not fluent in the typical middlegame ideas. Consider adding one or two solid, well-understood alternatives to your toolkit.
- Pair aggressive lines with straightforward, practical middlegame targets (control of the center, active piece play, and king safety) to improve consistency across your blitz sessions.
Short interpretation of trends and what to prioritize
Your strength-adjusted win rate suggests your results are in a reasonable range given the types of positions you choose. The longer-term trend shows some fluctuation, so the goal is to build steadier momentum. Prioritize targeted practice on decision-making under time pressure and dependable endgame technique to reduce volatility.
Focused 2-week training plan
- Time-management sprint: daily 15–20 minute drills where you must reach a reasonable, plan-based middle game by move 15, then switch to rapid calculation for the next 5–10 moves.
- Endgame fundamentals: 20 minutes per day on rook endings, king activity, and pawn endgames. Use simple rule sets (opposition, railing, and outside passed pawns) to convert advantages reliably.
- Pattern study: review tactical motifs from your favorite aggressive openings and commit to recognizing them within a few seconds of seeing the structure.
- Post-game review routine: after each blitz session, pick two losses and identify one move you would adjust to keep the initiative or simplify toward a won endgame.
- Bridge to slower practice: once a week, play a longer game (15+10 or 25+5) to reinforce patience and calculation without the extreme time pressure of blitz.
Next steps
If you want, I can tailor a concise two-week plan around your most frequently used openings and recurring time-pressure moments. You can also share a couple of recent games for a targeted, move-by-move critique.
Quick reference
Profile glance: jens%20e%20ingebretsen
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gau_npukyputb | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| quirkyquokka6969 | 4W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gau248 | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Seo Jungmin | 1W / 4L / 1D | View |
| floatingnervous | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Jose Miguel Fernandez Garcia | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Vladimir Bilic | 13W / 8L / 3D | View |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 17W / 17L / 4D | View |
| Clément Candelot | 1W / 3L / 1D | View |
| Maksim Gogin | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Elias Sidali | 212W / 108L / 16D | View Games |
| isaks | 154W / 94L / 15D | View Games |
| oli1504 | 182W / 5L / 2D | View Games |
| thebovalmna2005 | 64W / 69L / 11D | View Games |
| kristofferpinaas01 | 83W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2448 | 2809 | 2226 | |
| 2024 | 2494 | 2602 | ||
| 2023 | 2541 | 2587 | 1349 | |
| 2022 | 2574 | 2619 | 2234 | 1398 |
| 2021 | 2505 | 2507 | 2212 | |
| 2020 | 2350 | 2377 | 2250 | |
| 2019 | 2027 | 2395 | 2250 | 1479 |
| 2018 | 2085 | 2265 | 1291 | 1490 |
| 2017 | 1861 | 1996 | 1490 | |
| 2016 | 1867 | 1788 | 1200 | 1505 |
| 2015 | 1341 | 1423 | 1109 | 1159 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 303W / 241L / 56D | 256W / 287L / 47D | 93.9 |
| 2024 | 268W / 268L / 50D | 266W / 272L / 52D | 94.1 |
| 2023 | 486W / 416L / 76D | 452W / 446L / 91D | 92.1 |
| 2022 | 547W / 448L / 84D | 457W / 526L / 93D | 92.0 |
| 2021 | 647W / 518L / 110D | 643W / 474L / 118D | 87.1 |
| 2020 | 287W / 224L / 41D | 274W / 243L / 44D | 81.6 |
| 2019 | 626W / 508L / 83D | 613W / 532L / 76D | 81.7 |
| 2018 | 366W / 248L / 40D | 363W / 272L / 37D | 77.9 |
| 2017 | 168W / 99L / 14D | 152W / 116L / 13D | 73.6 |
| 2016 | 293W / 217L / 23D | 265W / 252L / 16D | 61.6 |
| 2015 | 105W / 71L / 9D | 88W / 90L / 9D | 67.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 300 | 145 | 127 | 28 | 48.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 298 | 142 | 134 | 22 | 47.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 279 | 128 | 116 | 35 | 45.9% |
| Unknown | 271 | 126 | 145 | 0 | 46.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 270 | 133 | 120 | 17 | 49.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 270 | 151 | 108 | 11 | 55.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 258 | 157 | 83 | 18 | 60.9% |
| French Defense | 220 | 107 | 92 | 21 | 48.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 213 | 111 | 90 | 12 | 52.1% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 210 | 95 | 96 | 19 | 45.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 231 | 122 | 93 | 16 | 52.8% |
| French Defense | 145 | 90 | 52 | 3 | 62.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 95 | 47 | 40 | 8 | 49.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 78 | 48 | 28 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 65 | 34 | 29 | 2 | 52.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 62 | 31 | 28 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 61 | 29 | 29 | 3 | 47.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 60 | 33 | 22 | 5 | 55.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 60 | 36 | 22 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 57 | 29 | 21 | 7 | 50.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 21.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 84.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |