About Kamil Warchoł
Kamil Warchoł is a Polish chess player who earned the FIDE Master title. They are best known for their dynamic Blitz play, where quick wits and bold decisions light up the board. They compete online under the username kamilianin235, bringing a touch of humor and a lot of energy to every fast-paced game.
Their blitz journey has been marked by steady growth and memorable runs, including a notable peak in 2025.
2688 (2025-05-19)Chess Career
As a titled player, Kamil has built a reputation through intense Blitz competition. Their profile shows a long-running Blitz presence across 2020–2025, with hundreds of games that demonstrate resilience, creativity, and a penchant for sharp, fast games. The journey continues to blend competitive success with a playful spirit on the board.
Playing Style
They play a tactical, resourceful game with a knack for finding chances in tight middlegames and converting endgame opportunities. In Blitz, their endgames are well-practiced and frequent—Endgame Frequency: 71.77%—and they bounce back quickly after setbacks, with a Comeback Rate of 78.34%. It’s a style that favors activity, surprises, and when in doubt, a surprising King’s Indian-esque flourish or Amar Gambit to wake the position.
Opening Repertoire in Blitz
Koala-level calm with a workshop of sharp lines. Their Blitz openings frequently feature Sicilian structures, Giuoco Piano families, and the Amar Gambit, among others. Highlights include:
Want to know more or follow their journey? Check out their profile: Kamil Warchoł
Overview of your recent blitz play
You’ve shown resilience across several blitz games, with a positive multi‑month trend despite a short-term dip. The data suggests you perform well in several openings, especially when you land in familiar middlegame plans and convert favorable endgames. The next step is to reinforce reliable opening choices, sharpen critical decision points in the middlegame, and train endgame technique to convert more of your advantages into wins.
What you’re doing well
- Long‑term improvement: Your longer‑term rating trend is positive, which indicates growth over time and a solid understanding of key chess concepts.
- Strong opening results in reliable lines: Two openings stand out for their effectiveness in blitz. The Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation and the Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation have shown good win rates, suggesting you’re comfortable steering these games into solid middlegame positions where you can outplay your opponent.
- Endgame chances when you simplify: In games where you trade into cleaner endgames, your king activity and coordination give you practical chances to press for a win or a solid draw.
- Creativity in the middlegame: You’re not afraid to complicate when the position allows it, which often creates practical winning chances in blitz.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: There are moments where the clock pressure can lead to avoidable mistakes or vague plans. Practice a steady pace and use a simple time check every 6–8 moves to keep on track.
- Decision clarity in the middlegame: When the position becomes tactical, aim for a clear plan rather than chasing exchanges. Set a short, concrete plan (e.g., improve a specific piece, target a weak pawn) within a few moves of the critical moment.
- Endgame technique: Strengthen rook and king endgames, as many blitz games reach equal or near‑equal endgames. Work on standard rook endings and king activity drills to convert won positions more reliably.
- Pattern recognition through puzzles: Regular tactical puzzle training helps you spot common motifs in blitz quickly, reducing hesitation in sharp positions.
Opening plan and how to use it in blitz
Your data indicates solid results with Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation and Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation. Consider building a compact, repeatable blitz repertoire around these lines to reduce decision fatigue and increase consistency. Focus on the key middlegame ideas rather than memorizing long move sequences:
- In Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, aim for solid development, control of central squares, and principled pawn breaks that untangle the position while keeping concrete plans.
- In Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation, prioritize quick development, safe king position, and pressure on the center and the d5 square to create practical chances.
- Complement with flexible White options (for example, a controlled English setup) to keep opponents guessing and reduce heavy theory load in quick games.
Optional reading and practice can focus on these themes: Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation and Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation.
Time management and decision making in blitz
To convert your positive trajectory into more wins, work on pacing and decisiveness. Try these in practice sessions:
- Limit deep searches in uncertain positions to a fixed depth or a fixed number of moves before reassessing.
- Devote at most 2–3 minutes to critical, tactical positions and then commit to a concrete continuation.
- After every blitz game, do a quick post‑mortem: identify one move you would not repeat and one better plan you could have executed.
Training plan to sustain and accelerate improvement
Use a focused, repeatable weekly routine to address the patterns in your opening choices and endgames:
- Daily: 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles focusing on common blitz motifs (forks, pins, discovered attacks).
- Weekly: 1 dedicated opening study session for each of your two primary blitz openings; extract 2–3 practical plans for typical middlegame structures.
- Biweekly: analyze 2 of your recent blitz games to identify missed endgame opportunities and safer transition paths.
- Endgame practice: 2 short sessions per week on rook endings and king activity drills to improve conversion in late game transitions.
Next steps and quick win plan
- Choose two openings as your blitz backbone (e.g., Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation and Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation) and study their core ideas and typical pawn structures.
- Play a block of 10 blitz games focusing on applying the two openings; after each game, note one strong plan you executed well and one improvement for the next game.
- In 5‑minute practice sessions, drill 5–7 common endgame situations you’re likely to face with rook endings or king activity, and review the correct technique after each session.
- Keep up with a daily puzzle routine and a weekly game review to reinforce pattern recognition and reduce hesitation in sharp positions.
Profile and quick references
For quick access to your profile and opening references, you can review related resources here: Kamil Warchoł and Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| catsurfer | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| eng-kareem-magdy | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| FunMaxi | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| jasonrbt | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| kostok10 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| rijeka_trsat | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| sharan4052 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| quolltin | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| caophamnhatphuc | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| najjacafirmetinabajoo | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| carrokanndestroyer | 42W / 12L / 5D | |
| patrykmat123 | 37W / 15L / 7D | |
| rapidchess01 | 29W / 17L / 3D | |
| czarek58 | 27W / 2L / 4D | |
| adam17240 | 15W / 1L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2528 | 2520 | 2178 | |
| 2024 | 2573 | 2472 | 2178 | 1270 |
| 2023 | 2431 | 2472 | 2178 | 1256 |
| 2022 | 2143 | 2243 | 2199 | 1303 |
| 2021 | 2147 | 2231 | 2080 | 1248 |
| 2020 | 2059 | 2199 | 2066 | 1721 |
| 2019 | 1367 | |||
| 2018 | 1390 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 185W / 163L / 41D | 169W / 190L / 23D | 87.0 |
| 2024 | 291W / 252L / 39D | 265W / 288L / 35D | 77.6 |
| 2023 | 268W / 254L / 34D | 251W / 265L / 36D | 78.5 |
| 2022 | 428W / 376L / 35D | 401W / 385L / 36D | 66.1 |
| 2021 | 374W / 274L / 38D | 341W / 288L / 40D | 69.3 |
| 2020 | 760W / 336L / 92D | 722W / 354L / 100D | 72.4 |
| 2019 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 91.5 |
| 2018 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 77.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 211 | 109 | 92 | 10 | 51.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 198 | 105 | 84 | 9 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 188 | 106 | 69 | 13 | 56.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 181 | 129 | 38 | 14 | 71.3% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99 | 79 | 1 | 55.3% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 176 | 112 | 51 | 13 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 162 | 91 | 59 | 12 | 56.2% |
| Czech Defense | 155 | 83 | 68 | 4 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 119 | 68 | 44 | 7 | 57.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 119 | 70 | 39 | 10 | 58.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 458 | 232 | 206 | 20 | 50.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 163 | 90 | 65 | 8 | 55.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 125 | 59 | 61 | 5 | 47.2% |
| Australian Defense | 68 | 34 | 29 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 57 | 29 | 26 | 2 | 50.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 51 | 25 | 22 | 4 | 49.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 47 | 28 | 17 | 2 | 59.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 37 | 23 | 12 | 2 | 62.2% |
| Modern Defense | 35 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 51.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 35 | 20 | 11 | 4 | 57.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 12 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Scotch Game | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 48 | 30 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 57 | 38 | 19 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 41 | 28 | 13 | 0 | 68.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 39 | 24 | 15 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 38 | 24 | 14 | 0 | 63.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 26 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 53.9% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 26 | 16 | 9 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 21 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 61.9% |
| Unknown Opening* | 20 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 35.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 1 |
| Losing | 36 | 0 |