Piotr Piesik – International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Piotr Piesik, a chess maestro who has earned the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE. Known by the username Kildepiotr, Piotr has dazzled opponents with a tactical flair that often leaves them wondering if they've just been outwitted by a grandmaster disguised as a humble chess enthusiast.
Rating and Performance
Piotr’s blitz rating reached a staggering peak of 2777 in May 2025, placing him among the elite speed demons of the chess world. His bullet and rapid ratings are no less impressive, peaking at 2481 and 2680 respectively—proving he can outfox rivals in any format and any time control.
Playing Style & Strengths
A consummate strategist with a knack for dramatic comebacks, Piotr boasts a comeback rate of 86% and triumphs over tough positions with a cool 60% win rate after losing a piece. He’s not one to surrender early, although his early resignation rate of 0.8% shows that when Piotr calls it, it’s usually game over. His endgame prowess is legendary, with a frequent play in endgames (over 83%) and an average game lasting close to 80 moves—he’s a fighter 'til the 64th square and beyond.
Signature Openings
- Top Secret opening dominates his repertoire with a win rate north of 62% across thousands of games—so secretive, it makes the CIA jealous.
- The King’s Indian Attack Yugoslav Variation brings him a reliable 75% win record — his go-to for confounding opponents.
- In blitz battles, Piotr manages to mix in fearless modern and neo-Grünfeld defenses, sometimes leaving his adversaries pondering if they just faced a chess enigma.
Fun Facts & Recent Highlights
Piotr’s psychological resilience shines with a tilt factor of just 7 (which in chess is practically Zen-level calm!). His best time to strike is noon, suggesting that lunch is really the most strategic meal of the day. Despite his fierce competitive edge, he’s known to keep a cool head—until the clock runs out, when opponents have been defeated often by time pressure rather than checkmate.
Just recently, in a high-stakes blitz encounter, Piotr (as Black) outlasted PainTrain08 in a thrilling Colle System duel, winning on time with a precision and speed that only an IM could wield.
Summary
Whether blitz, bullet, or rapid, Piotr “Kildepiotr” Piesik remains a formidable presence on the chessboard, blending deep theoretical knowledge with quick tactical punches. A player who treats every game like a grand performance—with strategy, grit, and more than a dash of panache.
In other words: If you see Piotr’s username pop up, buckle up—you’re in for a chess ride!
What’s going well in your blitz play
You tend to start with active piece play and maintain pressure on the opponent’s king. When you seize the initiative, your pieces coordinate well and create concrete threats that keep your opponent reacting.
- Good use of dynamic openings that lead to sharp middlegames and chances for tactical chances.
- Consistent willingness to complicate the position, which suits blitz where time is limited.
- Strong practical conversion when you gain a tangible edge in the middlegame.
Areas to focus on for faster improvement
- Time management: in blitz, pick a simple plan early and avoid long, multi-branch calculations in less critical positions. Set a personal thinking time target per move to prevent clock pressure from dictating your decisions.
- Endgame technique: many blitz games hinge on converting advantages in endgames. Practice a few reliable endgame patterns (knight vs pawns, rook endings with pawns) so you can convert faster.
- Blunder prevention: in tactical melees, pause for a quick second to check for obvious threats and unprotected pieces before committing to a capture or forcing line.
- Pattern recognition in openings: deepen familiarity with your top lines (the strong-performing Modern and Indian Defense variants) so you recognize typical middlegame plans quickly and without extensive calculation.
Opening choices and practical plan
Your opening repertoire shows strength across a variety of systems, including Modern, Hungarian Opening variants, Colle System, and Indian Defense lines. This gives you flexible paths into dynamic middlegames. To improve consistency, consider committing to a small core of lines and study common middlegame plans that arise from each, so you can quickly reach good positions in blitz.
- Choose 1-2 lines from Modern and 1-2 from Indian Defense to deepen understanding of typical middlegame ideas.
- For each line, learn 2-3 standard plans (e.g., where to place the pieces, typical pawn breaks, and how to exploit king safety) so you can act confidently even when time is short.
Practical training plan (next 2 weeks)
- Daily quick puzzles: 10-15 minutes focusing on common blitz motifs ( forks, skewers, back-rank ideas, and mating nets).
- Endgame focus: practice short rook endings and king+pawn endgames 2–3 times per week to improve conversion in blitz.
- Opening study: allocate 15–20 minutes to deepen 2 lines you rely on, including a few standard middlegame plans for each.
- Post-game review: after each blitz game, write 2–3 bullet points about what decisions helped and where you could improve; replay critical positions on a board to reinforce the ideas.
Starter drills you can start now
- Run a short tactical set focused on patterns that frequently appear in blitz.
- Practice one key endgame pattern per week (for example, king and rook against king with pawns) to build reliable conversion tools.
- Review your two most recent games (one win, one loss) and extract three takeaways from each for quick improvement.
Optional review aid
If you’d like, I can embed a move-by-move snapshot of a recent game here for quick reference using a placeholder. For example:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aleksei Belov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Erik Rönkä | 7W / 3L / 0D | |
| Marton Foldes | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Sina Movahed | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| Pranav V | 0W / 9L / 1D | |
| gabber2011 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| koorosh_92 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| mostafasakha | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Isaak Parpiev | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sn2022s | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Renato Terry | 2W / 13L / 6D | |
| Przemyslaw Koc | 14W / 2L / 4D | |
| Alexander Rustemov | 7W / 7L / 3D | |
| Oleksandr Bortnyk | 1W / 8L / 3D | |
| rasmussvane | 2W / 8L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2746 | |||
| 2024 | 2704 | |||
| 2023 | 2655 | 2350 | ||
| 2022 | 2376 | 2607 | 2188 | |
| 2021 | 2372 | 2641 | ||
| 2020 | 2391 | 2582 | 2063 | |
| 2019 | 2153 | 2473 | ||
| 2018 | 2253 | 2532 | ||
| 2017 | 2223 | 2407 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 140W / 77L / 29D | 134W / 99L / 15D | 88.8 |
| 2024 | 133W / 75L / 24D | 123W / 76L / 24D | 88.7 |
| 2023 | 146W / 79L / 30D | 139W / 92L / 25D | 85.8 |
| 2022 | 648W / 147L / 55D | 578W / 200L / 63D | 79.5 |
| 2021 | 222W / 89L / 42D | 186W / 128L / 35D | 88.3 |
| 2020 | 393W / 160L / 73D | 352W / 224L / 65D | 82.1 |
| 2019 | 34W / 12L / 6D | 29W / 18L / 7D | 78.8 |
| 2018 | 134W / 60L / 13D | 100W / 89L / 18D | 85.6 |
| 2017 | 116W / 53L / 8D | 89W / 69L / 16D | 81.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 676 | 453 | 175 | 48 | 67.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 610 | 412 | 152 | 46 | 67.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 517 | 306 | 168 | 43 | 59.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 375 | 254 | 85 | 36 | 67.7% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 327 | 226 | 66 | 35 | 69.1% |
| King's Indian Attack | 276 | 178 | 66 | 32 | 64.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 211 | 113 | 74 | 24 | 53.5% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 193 | 137 | 44 | 12 | 71.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld, 6.O-O c6 7.b3 | 172 | 113 | 41 | 18 | 65.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 123 | 62 | 44 | 17 | 50.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Modern | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Modern | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld, 6.O-O c6 7.b3 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| French Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 35 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 2 |