Avatar of Kim Steven Yap

Kim Steven Yap IM

Username: kimstevenyap

Location: Singapore

Playing Since: 2012-12-13 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 1425
3W / 1L / 1D
Rapid: 2252
124W / 37L / 30D
Blitz: 2611
3152W / 2171L / 323D
Bullet: 2522
1371W / 797L / 69D

Kim Steven Yap - International Master of Chess

Kim Steven Yap, known in the chess realm as kimstevenyap, carries the prestigious title of International Master bestowed by FIDE. This is no small feat—earning such a title means Kim has mastered the tricky art of anticipating the opponent’s moves and checkmating kings with astute precision, all while keeping a cool head (most of the time).

Since emerging on the chess scene, Kim has demonstrated a rollercoaster career, peppered with ups and downs, and enough tactical brilliance to leave spectators amazed. With an impressive peak rapid rating creeping over 2250 and blitz ratings flirting with the 2750 mark, Kim is the sort of player who can blitz through puzzles and opponents alike with nimble fingers and a sharp mind.

Despite some early years that looked more like a game of "oops, I did it again" (hello, 0 wins in 2012 rapid games), Kim turned it around spectacularly, cruising through winning streaks as long as 37 games! Talk about momentum! The current winning streak may be at zero, but anyone who's played Kim knows patience pays off—and the next hot streak is just around the corner.

And speaking of streaks, Kim doesn’t just win; they do so with style. Averaging over 70 moves per game before sealing the deal, Kim is the kind of player who dances through the middlegame, outmaneuvering opponents who dare to underestimate the tactical awareness that yields an 85.87% comeback rate. Want to capture a piece and think you have a free meal? Think again—Kim's 100% win rate after losing a piece tells a tale of resilience worthy of a Hollywood comeback movie.

Kim’s performance is well-rounded across time controls: from rapid to blitz to bullet, with especially formidable results in bullet chess (over 60% win rate!). It’s safe to say that Kim’s fingers probably move faster than the eye can follow, although the board might sometimes wonder, “Wait, what just happened?”

Off the board, Kim maintains a balanced psychological temperament with a tilt factor that’s considerably low for a player of this caliber, suggesting a Zen-like calm under fire (or at least a strong poker face when the chess gods are merciless).

Facing down nearly 6,000 games against a wide array of opponents, Kim has earned respect and admiration. Whether it’s a friendly rival or a fierce competitor, Kim’s adaptability and tactical brilliance shine through. Some opponents have found no mercy (looking at you, 'gravale' with a 100% win rate by Kim!), but that’s the nature of the beast on this checkered battlefield.

In short: Kim Steven Yap is a force to be reckoned with, commanding the chessboard with the prowess of a grandmaster and the wit of a trickster. So, if you ever find yourself squared off against Kim, don’t take your chances—this International Master has an arsenal of moves that would make even the toughest pawns tremble.


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Quick summary

Nice session overall — you converted clean tactical chances and created decisive rook infiltration in the win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E. Your opening results are a strength (high win rates in Sicilians, French Advance, Caro‑Kann and several gambits). The main weaknesses in the recent sample are time management (several games ended on time) and a handful of missed defensive resources in sharp middlegames.

What you did well (keep this up)

  • Creating a passed pawn and pushing it intelligently — your win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E shows excellent pawn‑storm finishing technique (you turned a queenside passer into decisive rook activity).
  • Rook coordination and penetration — you look for the 7th/2nd rank and double rooks quickly when the opportunity appears.
  • Opening preparation — your openings performance JSON shows deep, repeatable success; these lines give you practical chances and avoid early chaos.
  • Clinical finishing under pressure — you finished with tactics and a neat mating motif in the win (good pattern recognition).

Recurring problems to fix

  • Time trouble / Zeitnot: several games ended on time (opponents won on time). Play a little faster in the opening/midgame and save time for complex endgames. Treat clock management as a skill to train.
  • Occasional loose pieces and missed defensive resources — when the position is sharp you sometimes leave tactical holes (think “Loose Piece” / LPDO risk).
  • Overcomplication when a simpler plan would do — in some games you pushed for complications instead of consolidating a small edge, which cost time and accuracy.
  • Back‑rank & rook tactics: a couple of losses show that a single rook infiltration or back‑rank tactic can swing the result. Always check your king’s luft and rook cover before committing pawns.

Concrete training & drills (30–60 minute sessions)

  • Tactics warm‑up (15–20 min): 10–15 mixed tactical puzzles focusing on mating nets, forks and discovered attacks. Emphasize speed + accuracy — track your time per puzzle.
  • Clock drills (10–15 min): play 3–5 blitz games with the specific goal “never lose on time.” If you fall behind, practice simplifying (trade pieces) to reduce calculation time demands.
  • Endgame practice (15 min): rook + pawn vs rook and basic queen/rook mates. Convert rook+passed pawn positions similar to your win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E.
  • One opening refresher (15–30 min): pick one result from your opening list (e.g., French Advance or Sicilian Alapin) and review typical middlegame plans so you play the first 10 moves faster and with confidence.

Game‑level advice (apply these during Blitz)

  • First 10 moves: play your known moves quickly. If your opening is one of your strengths, use that saved time for the middlegame.
  • When ahead on the clock: simplify. Exchange pieces and head for a technical win rather than searching for flashy swindles.
  • When behind on the clock: swap queens or major pieces where possible, reduce tactical complications, and look for immediate forcing moves to create practical chances.
  • Before every capture: five‑second check — is the piece defended? Any forks, pins, or intermezzos? This reduces LPDO risk.

Small habits that give big gains

  • Make a one‑second pre‑move check after each move: threats, hanging pieces, and checks. This habit cuts mouse slips and Fingerfehler.
  • Use increment efficiently: if you get +2 secs per move, take them every 8–10 moves to keep your clock healthy.
  • If you see a winning pawn push (passed pawn or pawn break), calculate the forcing line first — don’t race the pawn without checking tactics behind it.

Opening pointers (based on your stats)

Your WinRates show the following opportunities:

  • Sicilian / French Advance / Caro‑Kann: keep these as core repertoire. You score well here — polish one tricky subvariation in each to eliminate the occasional surprise line.
  • Gambits that worked (Evans, Bird Batavo): use them as surprise weapons in blitz — they give practical chances and short time targets for the opponent.
  • Work on the most common reply your opponents use against your main defenses — a 20–30 minute targeted study per week reduces early time spent looking up moves.

Mini‑plan for the next 2 weeks

  • Week 1: daily 20–30 min tactics + three 5‑minute clock drills (goal: no time losses).
  • Week 2: one opening review session (30 min) + 3 classical (longer) training games to practice technical conversion of advantages.
  • Track progress: record whether you still lose on time and reduce that by at least 50% over two weeks.

Examples from your recent games

Win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E — good technique:

  • You converted a queenside passer into active rooks and finished with a decisive rook infiltration (final Rhf2#). Review that finish and note how you used the b‑pawn as a decoy.

Loss vs %3Ckappitoshka%3E — time loss + defensive tasks:

  • Position looked complicated late — the game ended on time. In similar situations trade when low on clock, and keep an eye on back‑rank checks and perpetual threats.

Losses vs %3Csuperjem123%3E — tactical awareness:

  • These games had sharp tactical moments where a single missed tactic cost a decisive material or initiative. Slow down one extra second on forcing sequences.

Interactive replay (review the winning finish)

Load this short replay of your win to study the final coordination — watch the b‑pawn advance and how rooks join the attack.

Next‑game checklist (5 items)

  • Open with your prepared line — play moves 1–10 quickly.
  • After each opponent move, ask “What threats exist?” (1‑second check).
  • If under 1 minute on the clock: swap pieces or look for forcing simplifications.
  • Before any capture: verify if the target is defended or a tactic is possible.
  • When you get a passed pawn or clear material edge — simplify and convert, don’t go hunting for brilliancies.

If you want, next

I can:

  • Make a 2‑week training plan tailored to blitz (with daily drills and progress tracking).
  • Annotate any one loss in detail (move‑by‑move) and show practical improvements.
  • Create a short opening cheat‑sheet (10 moves + typical middlegame plans) for one of your top openings.

Tell me which of the three you want and I’ll prepare it.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
kappitoshka 0W / 1L / 0D View
feelyourmoves 2W / 0L / 0D View
Jan Emmanuel Garcia 4W / 9L / 0D View
strawhatpirat3 1W / 1L / 1D View
coelleirgraspela 5W / 0L / 1D View
johnmarco_balane 2W / 0L / 0D View
joevenpolsotin 4W / 0L / 0D View
Glennen Artuz 2W / 0L / 1D View
tedian_montoyo 2W / 0L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
thelastofthemohicans 230W / 69L / 10D View Games
uzu12345 52W / 11L / 5D View Games
vatajiwe 48W / 7L / 6D View Games
englaterraduane 42W / 4L / 3D View Games
grandemas 30W / 16L / 2D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2606 2252
2024 2576 2239
2023 2598 2198 1425
2022 2522 2726 2020
2021 2374 2548 1742
2020 1784 2549 1964
2019 1741 2505 1964
2018 2251 1754 1900
2017 1690 2025 2118
2016 2428 1956 2114 1425
2015 2370 2083 2100
2014 2122 2149 1504
2013 2164 1989 1494 2008
2012 2324 1907 1433
Rating by Year2012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202527261425YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 26W / 20L / 7D 36W / 14L / 8D 85.4
2024 29W / 13L / 5D 21W / 15L / 5D 88.1
2023 79W / 30L / 16D 59W / 38L / 13D 82.1
2022 332W / 237L / 26D 278W / 289L / 38D 79.1
2021 283W / 188L / 34D 247W / 226L / 27D 77.2
2020 89W / 54L / 4D 82W / 63L / 7D 74.2
2019 193W / 106L / 14D 171W / 130L / 14D 73.6
2018 834W / 418L / 58D 738W / 490L / 66D 77.5
2017 157W / 51L / 7D 151W / 63L / 10D 59.0
2016 84W / 39L / 3D 81W / 36L / 5D 73.7
2015 162W / 71L / 7D 153W / 79L / 11D 73.5
2014 20W / 6L / 3D 16W / 10L / 2D 54.7
2013 62W / 39L / 1D 65W / 40L / 5D 70.2
2012 108W / 40L / 6D 94W / 57L / 3D 72.6

Openings: Most Played

Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Modern 520 341 165 14 65.6%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 113 77 36 0 68.1%
Sicilian Defense 108 65 43 0 60.2%
Amar Gambit 87 55 30 2 63.2%
Modern Defense 86 52 32 2 60.5%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 85 60 23 2 70.6%
French Defense: Advance Variation 85 56 26 3 65.9%
Caro-Kann Defense 82 48 31 3 58.5%
Czech Defense 77 42 33 2 54.5%
Alekhine Defense 71 47 23 1 66.2%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Sicilian Defense 655 398 234 23 60.8%
Modern 636 348 254 34 54.7%
French Defense: Advance Variation 294 174 106 14 59.2%
Caro-Kann Defense 293 168 105 20 57.3%
Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation 166 90 72 4 54.2%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 145 95 42 8 65.5%
Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 137 89 46 2 65.0%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 134 79 49 6 59.0%
Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line 130 73 51 6 56.1%
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense 129 80 43 6 62.0%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Sicilian Defense 21 16 3 2 76.2%
Caro-Kann Defense 11 8 2 1 72.7%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 11 10 0 1 90.9%
Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation 11 10 1 0 90.9%
Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack 10 9 1 0 90.0%
Scandinavian Defense 10 7 0 3 70.0%
French Defense: Advance Variation 10 6 4 0 60.0%
Modern 8 6 1 1 75.0%
Evans Gambit: 5...Ba5 6.d4 8 8 0 0 100.0%
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit 7 4 1 2 57.1%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Caro-Kann Defense 2 2 0 0 100.0%
French Defense: Advance Variation 1 1 0 0 100.0%
Scandinavian Defense 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Sicilian Defense 1 0 0 1 0.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 37 0
Losing 11 1
🐞 Report a Problem