Kim Steven Yap - International Master of Chess
Kim Steven Yap, known in the chess realm as kimstevenyap, carries the prestigious title of International Master bestowed by FIDE. This is no small feat—earning such a title means Kim has mastered the tricky art of anticipating the opponent’s moves and checkmating kings with astute precision, all while keeping a cool head (most of the time).
Since emerging on the chess scene, Kim has demonstrated a rollercoaster career, peppered with ups and downs, and enough tactical brilliance to leave spectators amazed. With an impressive peak rapid rating creeping over 2250 and blitz ratings flirting with the 2750 mark, Kim is the sort of player who can blitz through puzzles and opponents alike with nimble fingers and a sharp mind.
Despite some early years that looked more like a game of "oops, I did it again" (hello, 0 wins in 2012 rapid games), Kim turned it around spectacularly, cruising through winning streaks as long as 37 games! Talk about momentum! The current winning streak may be at zero, but anyone who's played Kim knows patience pays off—and the next hot streak is just around the corner.
And speaking of streaks, Kim doesn’t just win; they do so with style. Averaging over 70 moves per game before sealing the deal, Kim is the kind of player who dances through the middlegame, outmaneuvering opponents who dare to underestimate the tactical awareness that yields an 85.87% comeback rate. Want to capture a piece and think you have a free meal? Think again—Kim's 100% win rate after losing a piece tells a tale of resilience worthy of a Hollywood comeback movie.
Kim’s performance is well-rounded across time controls: from rapid to blitz to bullet, with especially formidable results in bullet chess (over 60% win rate!). It’s safe to say that Kim’s fingers probably move faster than the eye can follow, although the board might sometimes wonder, “Wait, what just happened?”
Off the board, Kim maintains a balanced psychological temperament with a tilt factor that’s considerably low for a player of this caliber, suggesting a Zen-like calm under fire (or at least a strong poker face when the chess gods are merciless).
Facing down nearly 6,000 games against a wide array of opponents, Kim has earned respect and admiration. Whether it’s a friendly rival or a fierce competitor, Kim’s adaptability and tactical brilliance shine through. Some opponents have found no mercy (looking at you, 'gravale' with a 100% win rate by Kim!), but that’s the nature of the beast on this checkered battlefield.
In short: Kim Steven Yap is a force to be reckoned with, commanding the chessboard with the prowess of a grandmaster and the wit of a trickster. So, if you ever find yourself squared off against Kim, don’t take your chances—this International Master has an arsenal of moves that would make even the toughest pawns tremble.
Quick summary
Nice session overall — you converted clean tactical chances and created decisive rook infiltration in the win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E. Your opening results are a strength (high win rates in Sicilians, French Advance, Caro‑Kann and several gambits). The main weaknesses in the recent sample are time management (several games ended on time) and a handful of missed defensive resources in sharp middlegames.
What you did well (keep this up)
- Creating a passed pawn and pushing it intelligently — your win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E shows excellent pawn‑storm finishing technique (you turned a queenside passer into decisive rook activity).
- Rook coordination and penetration — you look for the 7th/2nd rank and double rooks quickly when the opportunity appears.
- Opening preparation — your openings performance JSON shows deep, repeatable success; these lines give you practical chances and avoid early chaos.
- Clinical finishing under pressure — you finished with tactics and a neat mating motif in the win (good pattern recognition).
Recurring problems to fix
- Time trouble / Zeitnot: several games ended on time (opponents won on time). Play a little faster in the opening/midgame and save time for complex endgames. Treat clock management as a skill to train.
- Occasional loose pieces and missed defensive resources — when the position is sharp you sometimes leave tactical holes (think “Loose Piece” / LPDO risk).
- Overcomplication when a simpler plan would do — in some games you pushed for complications instead of consolidating a small edge, which cost time and accuracy.
- Back‑rank & rook tactics: a couple of losses show that a single rook infiltration or back‑rank tactic can swing the result. Always check your king’s luft and rook cover before committing pawns.
Concrete training & drills (30–60 minute sessions)
- Tactics warm‑up (15–20 min): 10–15 mixed tactical puzzles focusing on mating nets, forks and discovered attacks. Emphasize speed + accuracy — track your time per puzzle.
- Clock drills (10–15 min): play 3–5 blitz games with the specific goal “never lose on time.” If you fall behind, practice simplifying (trade pieces) to reduce calculation time demands.
- Endgame practice (15 min): rook + pawn vs rook and basic queen/rook mates. Convert rook+passed pawn positions similar to your win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E.
- One opening refresher (15–30 min): pick one result from your opening list (e.g., French Advance or Sicilian Alapin) and review typical middlegame plans so you play the first 10 moves faster and with confidence.
Game‑level advice (apply these during Blitz)
- First 10 moves: play your known moves quickly. If your opening is one of your strengths, use that saved time for the middlegame.
- When ahead on the clock: simplify. Exchange pieces and head for a technical win rather than searching for flashy swindles.
- When behind on the clock: swap queens or major pieces where possible, reduce tactical complications, and look for immediate forcing moves to create practical chances.
- Before every capture: five‑second check — is the piece defended? Any forks, pins, or intermezzos? This reduces LPDO risk.
Small habits that give big gains
- Make a one‑second pre‑move check after each move: threats, hanging pieces, and checks. This habit cuts mouse slips and Fingerfehler.
- Use increment efficiently: if you get +2 secs per move, take them every 8–10 moves to keep your clock healthy.
- If you see a winning pawn push (passed pawn or pawn break), calculate the forcing line first — don’t race the pawn without checking tactics behind it.
Opening pointers (based on your stats)
Your WinRates show the following opportunities:
- Sicilian / French Advance / Caro‑Kann: keep these as core repertoire. You score well here — polish one tricky subvariation in each to eliminate the occasional surprise line.
- Gambits that worked (Evans, Bird Batavo): use them as surprise weapons in blitz — they give practical chances and short time targets for the opponent.
- Work on the most common reply your opponents use against your main defenses — a 20–30 minute targeted study per week reduces early time spent looking up moves.
Mini‑plan for the next 2 weeks
- Week 1: daily 20–30 min tactics + three 5‑minute clock drills (goal: no time losses).
- Week 2: one opening review session (30 min) + 3 classical (longer) training games to practice technical conversion of advantages.
- Track progress: record whether you still lose on time and reduce that by at least 50% over two weeks.
Examples from your recent games
Win vs %3Cfeelyourmoves%3E — good technique:
- You converted a queenside passer into active rooks and finished with a decisive rook infiltration (final Rhf2#). Review that finish and note how you used the b‑pawn as a decoy.
Loss vs %3Ckappitoshka%3E — time loss + defensive tasks:
- Position looked complicated late — the game ended on time. In similar situations trade when low on clock, and keep an eye on back‑rank checks and perpetual threats.
Losses vs %3Csuperjem123%3E — tactical awareness:
- These games had sharp tactical moments where a single missed tactic cost a decisive material or initiative. Slow down one extra second on forcing sequences.
Interactive replay (review the winning finish)
Load this short replay of your win to study the final coordination — watch the b‑pawn advance and how rooks join the attack.
Next‑game checklist (5 items)
- Open with your prepared line — play moves 1–10 quickly.
- After each opponent move, ask “What threats exist?” (1‑second check).
- If under 1 minute on the clock: swap pieces or look for forcing simplifications.
- Before any capture: verify if the target is defended or a tactic is possible.
- When you get a passed pawn or clear material edge — simplify and convert, don’t go hunting for brilliancies.
If you want, next
I can:
- Make a 2‑week training plan tailored to blitz (with daily drills and progress tracking).
- Annotate any one loss in detail (move‑by‑move) and show practical improvements.
- Create a short opening cheat‑sheet (10 moves + typical middlegame plans) for one of your top openings.
Tell me which of the three you want and I’ll prepare it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kappitoshka | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| feelyourmoves | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Jan Emmanuel Garcia | 4W / 9L / 0D | View |
| strawhatpirat3 | 1W / 1L / 1D | View |
| coelleirgraspela | 5W / 0L / 1D | View |
| johnmarco_balane | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| joevenpolsotin | 4W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Glennen Artuz | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| tedian_montoyo | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| thelastofthemohicans | 230W / 69L / 10D | View Games |
| uzu12345 | 52W / 11L / 5D | View Games |
| vatajiwe | 48W / 7L / 6D | View Games |
| englaterraduane | 42W / 4L / 3D | View Games |
| grandemas | 30W / 16L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2606 | 2252 | ||
| 2024 | 2576 | 2239 | ||
| 2023 | 2598 | 2198 | 1425 | |
| 2022 | 2522 | 2726 | 2020 | |
| 2021 | 2374 | 2548 | 1742 | |
| 2020 | 1784 | 2549 | 1964 | |
| 2019 | 1741 | 2505 | 1964 | |
| 2018 | 2251 | 1754 | 1900 | |
| 2017 | 1690 | 2025 | 2118 | |
| 2016 | 2428 | 1956 | 2114 | 1425 |
| 2015 | 2370 | 2083 | 2100 | |
| 2014 | 2122 | 2149 | 1504 | |
| 2013 | 2164 | 1989 | 1494 | 2008 |
| 2012 | 2324 | 1907 | 1433 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26W / 20L / 7D | 36W / 14L / 8D | 85.4 |
| 2024 | 29W / 13L / 5D | 21W / 15L / 5D | 88.1 |
| 2023 | 79W / 30L / 16D | 59W / 38L / 13D | 82.1 |
| 2022 | 332W / 237L / 26D | 278W / 289L / 38D | 79.1 |
| 2021 | 283W / 188L / 34D | 247W / 226L / 27D | 77.2 |
| 2020 | 89W / 54L / 4D | 82W / 63L / 7D | 74.2 |
| 2019 | 193W / 106L / 14D | 171W / 130L / 14D | 73.6 |
| 2018 | 834W / 418L / 58D | 738W / 490L / 66D | 77.5 |
| 2017 | 157W / 51L / 7D | 151W / 63L / 10D | 59.0 |
| 2016 | 84W / 39L / 3D | 81W / 36L / 5D | 73.7 |
| 2015 | 162W / 71L / 7D | 153W / 79L / 11D | 73.5 |
| 2014 | 20W / 6L / 3D | 16W / 10L / 2D | 54.7 |
| 2013 | 62W / 39L / 1D | 65W / 40L / 5D | 70.2 |
| 2012 | 108W / 40L / 6D | 94W / 57L / 3D | 72.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 520 | 341 | 165 | 14 | 65.6% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 113 | 77 | 36 | 0 | 68.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 108 | 65 | 43 | 0 | 60.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 87 | 55 | 30 | 2 | 63.2% |
| Modern Defense | 86 | 52 | 32 | 2 | 60.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 85 | 60 | 23 | 2 | 70.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 85 | 56 | 26 | 3 | 65.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 82 | 48 | 31 | 3 | 58.5% |
| Czech Defense | 77 | 42 | 33 | 2 | 54.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 71 | 47 | 23 | 1 | 66.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 655 | 398 | 234 | 23 | 60.8% |
| Modern | 636 | 348 | 254 | 34 | 54.7% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 294 | 174 | 106 | 14 | 59.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 293 | 168 | 105 | 20 | 57.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 166 | 90 | 72 | 4 | 54.2% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 145 | 95 | 42 | 8 | 65.5% |
| Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 | 137 | 89 | 46 | 2 | 65.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 134 | 79 | 49 | 6 | 59.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 130 | 73 | 51 | 6 | 56.1% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 129 | 80 | 43 | 6 | 62.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 76.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 70.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Evans Gambit: 5...Ba5 6.d4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 37 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |