Jakob Leon Pajeken - International Master
Also known in the chess world by the formidable alias KubaGepard, Jakob Leon Pajeken is an International Master with a tactical mind as quick and cunning as a cheetah – quite fitting for such a fierce competitor on the board.
Jakob's blitz rating has seen a spectacular climb, blazing from modest beginnings around 1586 in 2018 up to a blistering peak of 2787 in 2025. With over 7,000 games played across various speeds, KubaGepard’s persistence is clear; he’s no stranger to the thrill of rapid-fire decision making.
His style? A mix of psychological endurance and tactical brilliance. Not one to give up easily, Jakob has a remarkable comeback rate of over 60% and even manages to maintain a 66.89% win rate after losing a piece, giving new meaning to the phrase "turning the tide."
Jakob often dominates on White with a nearly 47.3% win rate and shows no less prowess playing Black. But beware: early resignations are somewhat of a quirk with a 36.3% rate — maybe impatience or just strategic surrender to keep things exciting for the audience.
His calmness under pressure shines in extended endgames, appearing in more than half of his matches, and his longest winning streak stands tall at 11 games, proving consistency when the gears engage.
Fun facts:
- Jakob plays his best at 13:00 and 22:00 hours, with win rates soaring to 52.3% and 62.5% respectively. Night owls, take note!
- An avid blitz player, KubaGepard also likes to dabble in bullet and rapid formats, showing versatility across all chess battlefield speeds.
- He has an impressively varied opponent list but holds a perfect record (100%) against several challengers, showcasing both stamina and skill.
In short, Jakob Leon Pajeken is a chess force to be reckoned with — equal parts analytical mastermind and competition shark. If you face him, remember: the gepard doesn’t rest; he pounces.
Overview of Your Recent Games
Jakob Leon Pajeken, analyzing your recent blitz games shows a strong, strategic playstyle with solid opening preparation. Your wins demonstrate good control of the board and awareness of your opponent's threats. However, losses and the drawn games also reveal areas where improvements can boost your consistency and rating further.
What You Are Doing Well
- Opening Choices: You frequently employ classical and dynamic openings such as the Sicilian Defense (especially the Kan/Maroczy Bind) and Queen's Gambit structures that lead to active play. This aligns well with your overall style and rating level.
- Time Management: You manage your clock well in most games, keeping adequate time for complex middlegame decisions, which is crucial in blitz.
- Positional Awareness: Moves such as centralizing pieces and avoiding premature material grabs show good strategic understanding.
- Endgame Skills: Your games feature several endgame exchanges showing your willingness to enter simplified positions, which works well if you are confident in your technique.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Complications: In some losses, tactical oversights or underestimating opponent threats allowed significant material loss or weakened your king safety. Work on tactics puzzles focusing on pattern recognition to improve here.
- Opening Consistency: While you use strong openings, your win rates in some, like the Sicilian Najdorf Variation and Queen's Gambit Accepted lines, suggest room to deepen your theoretical knowledge to avoid early loss of initiative.
- Transition Between Phases: Smooth transition from the opening to middlegame is essential. Sometimes structural weaknesses arise when trying to simplify too early or hurriedly exchanging pieces. Consider reviewing classic games in your chosen openings to understand typical plans better.
- Reducing Blunders: Blitz games are prone to errors, but staying calm and double-checking your calculations in critical positions can help reduce costly blunders.
- Endgame Precision: Although your endgame play is good, closely studying rook endgames and king + pawn endgames could further increase your conversion rate from equal or slightly better positions.
Suggestions for Training
- Use a tactic trainer daily, focusing on pattern recognition and calculation speed to handle blitz time controls better.
- Study your frequent openings deeply, especially weak spots revealed in recent games. For example, revisit defensive ideas in the Sicilian Kan and the Queen's Gambit structures.
- Analyze critical losses in detail, identifying moments where alternative moves could have kept you in the game.
- Practice endgame fundamentals with practical endgame drills that emphasize technique and time management.
- Consider slowing down slightly on critical moves, especially in complex positions, to avoid blunders.
Long-Term Rating and Performance Trends
Your rating has experienced some fluctuations with a recent small decrease over the past six months but shows positive trends over shorter intervals suggesting growth potential. Maintaining focus on consistency and tactical sharpness will help recover and surpass your peak rating.
Final Thoughts
Jakob, your commitment and foundational skills are clear. With targeted improvements in opening knowledge, tactical sharpness, and endgame technique, you can enhance your performance and consistency in blitz games. Keep your confidence high and analyze your games regularly—that’s the path to continual progress.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jack Rodgers | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| birb_memes | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| blueshark23 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| gabber2011 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Polarbear1224 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| tolyanius | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| iplayagainst_pieces | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| tedi10 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| bigmantyrone | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| khalil_obf | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Johnny Antonios | 17W / 11L / 4D | |
| centaurios | 6W / 13L / 0D | |
| oganromchess | 9W / 9L / 0D | |
| i_chose_chess | 11W / 4L / 0D | |
| nrangano | 9W / 5L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2681 | |||
| 2024 | 2497 | 2586 | 2000 | |
| 2023 | 1611 | 2567 | ||
| 2022 | 2582 | |||
| 2021 | 2440 | |||
| 2020 | 2299 | |||
| 2019 | 1886 | |||
| 2018 | 1991 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 75W / 55L / 11D | 68W / 60L / 16D | 85.1 |
| 2024 | 194W / 159L / 42D | 196W / 153L / 37D | 83.8 |
| 2023 | 35W / 30L / 3D | 34W / 39L / 3D | 48.5 |
| 2022 | 63W / 54L / 8D | 51W / 56L / 21D | 85.1 |
| 2021 | 434W / 489L / 66D | 400W / 499L / 87D | 71.0 |
| 2020 | 328W / 339L / 2D | 334W / 380L / 7D | 4.8 |
| 2019 | 0W / 0L / 1D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 38.0 |
| 2018 | 4W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 1D | 70.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1575 | 735 | 832 | 8 | 46.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 174 | 78 | 79 | 17 | 44.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 151 | 61 | 75 | 15 | 40.4% |
| Döry Defense | 106 | 49 | 47 | 10 | 46.2% |
| QGA: 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 | 92 | 36 | 49 | 7 | 39.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 83 | 37 | 40 | 6 | 44.6% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 77 | 37 | 29 | 11 | 48.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 60 | 30 | 18 | 12 | 50.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 58 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 43.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 56 | 21 | 30 | 5 | 37.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 2 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |