Noe Tutisani - The International Master of Mystery
Alias: LazyIM
Title: International Master (IM)
Peak Blitz Rating: An astonishing 2933 (November 2021)
Peak Rapid Rating: A swift 2498 (October 2021)
Peak Bullet Rating: A lightning-fast 2822 (June 2021)
Noe Tutisani, better known in the virtual warzones as LazyIM, is a chess player whose skill in rapid-fire attacks rivals a caffeinated squirrel. Earning the coveted title of International Master from FIDE, Noe blends keen tactical awareness with a surprising endgame stamina — winning on average after 73 moves, which is longer than your average Hollywood blockbuster!
With a comeback rate near 89%, Noe never quite throws in the towel, except for the occasional early resignation (just 1.29% of the time). When under pressure, their resilience shines, boasting a solid 42.56% win rate even after losing a piece — proving that the game's not over until it’s over, and perhaps even then, there’s a secret move up their sleeve.
Noe’s blitz records are a rollercoaster ride through the ranks, culminating in a peak rating of 2933 — a score so high, it might as well be measured in intergalactic credits. Their favorite opening is a closely-guarded “Top Secret,” but one thing is for sure: with over 3500 blitz games played, there’s no shortage of intense battles fought and won.
Psychology-wise, Noe’s tilt factor is a modest 11, meaning they rarely lose their cool. Most of their wins come in the quiet hours around midnight — perfect for those who enjoy plotting checkmates while others sleep.
Memorable Recent Game Highlight
In a recent November 2021 blitz match, playing White against F19HT3R, Noe deftly navigated the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56). After a fierce battle full of sharp tactics and a well-timed knight sacrifice, Noe sealed victory by resignation — showcasing why opponents should never underestimate LazyIM!
“Chess is 99% tactics and 1% knowing how to stay awake late at night,” - probably something Noe would say.
Hi Noe – here’s some constructive feedback based on your latest blitz sessions
What you’re doing well
- Tactical awareness: You routinely spot resourceful shots such as 24.Bxc6! (Italian win) and 13.Nd5! (Sicilian win), punishing loose enemy queens and backward pawns.
- Opening initiative: Consistent, well-prepared repertoires in the Open Sicilian and Modern Benoni give you active piece play straight from move one.
- Practical conversion when ahead: When the clock isn’t an issue you conduct clean technical finishes (e.g. rook ending after 25.Qxb4+).
- Fighting spirit: Even in worse positions you keep creating problems, often bouncing back on the clock or the board.
Main areas to improve
- Time management
Four of your last five losses were flagged positions that were objectively drawable or winning. Adopt a “good-enough, then move” mindset for 3-minute games and practise keeping ≥20 s from move 25 onward. - Over-extension of wing pawns
In the Najdorf loss you advanced a4-a5 and h4-h5 without sufficient back-up, inviting …b4 and …g5 hooks against your own king. Study the idea of the hook and only push when three or more pieces can join the attack. - Benoni structure maintenance
Allowing early Bxf6/Nxd7 exchanges leaves the c4 outpost and d6 pawn weak (see loss vs Revisor). Re-watch Bronstein’s model plans: keep the dark-squared bishop and aim for …b5 breaks before exchanging on c3. - Simplify into favourable endgames sooner
Several time losses came after declining queen trades you were better in (e.g. 32…Qxd4+? instead of 32…Rxd4! equal endgame). Remember: “When ahead on material – trade pieces, keep pawns.”
Action plan for the next 7 days
| Goal | Exercise | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Faster decisions | Play 50 bullet games spending < 3 s per move; review blunders afterwards. | Cut average think-time by 15 % |
| Benoni technique | “Guess-the-move” on 20 master Benoni games. | ≥ 65 % match score |
| Endgame stamina | Solve 30 rook-pawn endings. | 90 % accuracy |
Illustrative snippets
Sharp calculation under pressure
Missed simplification that cost the game
In the Modern Defense loss you could play 32.Rxd4! exchanging queens and reaching a drawn rook ending instead of 32…Qxd4+ followed by tactics against your king.
Stats & progress
Peak blitz rating: 2933 (2021-11-02)
Next steps
- Five-minute daily visualisation (replay a master game blindfold from memory).
- Arrange a time-odds sparring set versus Alexey Korotylev — you start with +15 s to focus on technique.
- Submit three annotated games by Friday for detailed commentary.
Keep the attacking flair, tighten the clock handling, and your next rating jump will follow quickly. Good luck, Noe!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Khatanbaatar Bazar | 16W / 14L / 2D | View Games |
| Alexey Jarovinsky | 11W / 16L / 4D | View Games |
| Konstantin Kodinets | 14W / 12L / 5D | View Games |
| Mert Erdoğdu | 14W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
| Vjacheslav Weetik | 10W / 14L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2700 | 2933 | 2498 | |
| 2020 | 2526 | |||
| 2019 | 2600 | 2605 | ||
| 2018 | 2561 | 2579 | 1904 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 445W / 479L / 66D | 391W / 505L / 81D | 71.6 |
| 2020 | 6W / 12L / 0D | 6W / 12L / 1D | 60.5 |
| 2019 | 303W / 270L / 47D | 221W / 323L / 54D | 72.6 |
| 2018 | 166W / 113L / 17D | 133W / 149L / 18D | 73.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 140 | 72 | 57 | 11 | 51.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 114 | 49 | 57 | 8 | 43.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 94 | 43 | 43 | 8 | 45.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 81 | 37 | 37 | 7 | 45.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 75 | 35 | 35 | 5 | 46.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 73 | 26 | 44 | 3 | 35.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 73 | 28 | 40 | 5 | 38.4% |
| Modern | 68 | 31 | 34 | 3 | 45.6% |
| Czech Defense | 63 | 28 | 28 | 7 | 44.4% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 53 | 24 | 21 | 8 | 45.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bf4 O-O 6.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 52 | 25 | 26 | 1 | 48.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Modern | 15 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 20.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 14.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 4 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |