Lenka Ptacnikova - Woman Grandmaster of the Chessboard
With the precision of a seasoned biologist dissecting complex organisms, Lenka Ptacnikova navigates the 64 squares with a flair that’s nothing short of evolutionary brilliance. Awarded the distinguished title of Woman Grandmaster by FIDE, Lenka’s chess journey is a fascinating study in adaptation, strategy, and resilience — proving that in the wild world of chess, survival is all about outsmarting your opponent one move at a time.
Whether blitzing through positions at lightning speed or patiently outmaneuvering foes in longer games, Lenka’s performance statistics reveal a player thriving under diverse battlefield conditions. Her blitz rating has soared close to 2300, and she boasts a commendable 82% win rate in daily games — evidence of a predator perfectly evolved for both quick strikes and slow, patient hunts.
Lenka’s tactical phenotype is a marvel: an impressive 82.94% comeback rate suggests she’s allergic to defeat, often turning near-extinction scenarios into triumphs. Her win rate after losing a piece is a flawless 100%, a testament to her cunning and resourcefulness in the chess ecosystem. With an average of 65 moves to victory, Lenka’s games unfold like carefully choreographed chemical reactions, where every step leads closer to checkmate.
Her opening repertoire remains intriguingly “top secret,” much like a rare genetic sequence, giving opponents little chance to predict her next evolution. And with a longest winning streak of 22 games, it’s clear Lenka is no mere transient in the game’s food chain — she’s a dominant species.
Beyond numbers, Lenka Ptacnikova is a vibrant chess force who combines intensity, wit, and a touch of humor to every match. A true grandmaster of strategy and survival, she continues to mutate her gameplay and outwit challengers across the globe — proving that in the realm of chess, it’s not just the strongest that survive, but the most adaptable and ingenious.
Hi Lenka Ptacnikova!
You have been playing dynamic, ambitious chess, often steering the game into unbalanced Sicilian structures as Black and flexible English / King’s-Indian-Attack set-ups as White. Below is a concise review of your recent games together with personalised training tips.
Quick stats
- Personal best so far: 2288 (2021-05-17)
- When you score best:
- Strongest day(s):
Your current strengths
- Opening depth in the Sicilian – Your victories against David Camacho and Elise Wu show confident handling of both ...e6 and ...d5 set-ups, gaining central breaks and piece activity.
- Tactical alertness – In several wins you converted material advantages with precise combinations (e.g. ...Nc4! in the Taimanov, ...Re1+ sequence vs. 2306 opposition).
- Feel for initiative – You willingly sacrifice pawns (…d5, …b5) to seize open files and create mating nets on the light squares.
Key themes to improve
- Clock management – Four of your last six losses were on time (vs. Vitor Ferreira, Daniel Beletic, Alexander Hernandez Jimenez, Alessandro Rodrigues Da Silva). Positions were still playable, so speeding up by move 20 would instantly lift your score.
- Conversion technique – Good positions sometimes fizzle out when extra material is returned without necessity (e.g. the Q vs. R+B ending on move 30 against Beletko). Strengthening your end-game routine will turn more edges into points.
- Handling of opposite-side pawn storms – The loss vs. VitorBronson featured pawn chains on both flanks; your king lacked luft and counter-play. Sharpen your understanding of pawn lever timing and prophylactic moves like h3/h6.
- Early queen choices as White – In multiple English games you played Qd1–c2–d1 (or similar), costing precious tempi and leaving you behind in development. Streamline the move order or choose plans where the queen has a clear destination.
Training plan (4 weeks)
| Week | Main focus | Practical task |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clock discipline | Play 30 games of 3 + 2 using a “30-second rule”: make every move in under 30 s until move 20. |
| 2 | Technical end-games | Solve 10 rook-and-pawn studies daily; drill R+P vs. R and opposite-colour bishops on an end-game trainer. |
| 3 | Pawn-storm defence | Analyse 5 master games where one side wins despite being attacked (start with Caruana–MvL 2019). Annotate when each defensive resource was played. |
| 4 | Opening tidying | Prepare one English line with an early e4 push so your queen stays home; add a concrete anti-Mengarini reply as Black to avoid time-consuming improv. |
Pro-tips you can apply immediately
- Adopt the “Scan-Plan-Move” routine: check forcing moves (checks, captures, threats), set a plan, then play – this keeps calculation concise and quick.
- When up material, simplify using piece exchanges rather than pawn grabs; your pieces coordinate better than pawns defend.
- Create a pre-move package for obvious recaptures in increment games – safe pre-moves buy you vital seconds.
- Use the two-pawn test: if you push a wing pawn two squares, ask “Can it become a target in three moves?” If unsure, play a developing move instead.
Final encouragement
Your tactical eye and opening repertoire are already title-worthy. Tightening time usage and polishing end-game fundamentals could easily add 100+ Elo. Keep analysing your own games (especially the ones you flagged on time) and stay curious — improvement will follow quickly.
Good luck in your next Late Titled Tuesday, Lenka!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| choose_your_weapon | 61W / 0L / 0D | |
| adam4757 | 22W / 9L / 3D | |
| star_wars39 | 30W / 0L / 0D | |
| cuba76 | 14W / 3L / 1D | |
| karrppov | 8W / 7L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1632 | 2260 | ||
| 2024 | 2171 | 2217 | 2016 | |
| 2023 | 2171 | 1782 | 2052 | |
| 2022 | 1720 | 2176 | 1826 | 2081 |
| 2021 | 1860 | 2170 | 2305 | 1983 |
| 2020 | 1835 | 2131 | 2112 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15W / 20L / 0D | 11W / 17L / 2D | 79.7 |
| 2024 | 25W / 18L / 4D | 20W / 21L / 7D | 78.6 |
| 2023 | 24W / 16L / 1D | 24W / 14L / 5D | 67.9 |
| 2022 | 131W / 44L / 21D | 126W / 62L / 9D | 66.4 |
| 2021 | 239W / 145L / 28D | 211W / 178L / 19D | 70.0 |
| 2020 | 73W / 60L / 8D | 83W / 46L / 12D | 74.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 60 | 30 | 28 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 51 | 27 | 20 | 4 | 52.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 51 | 30 | 18 | 3 | 58.8% |
| English Opening | 48 | 27 | 17 | 4 | 56.2% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 44 | 21 | 19 | 4 | 47.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 44 | 19 | 22 | 3 | 43.2% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 41 | 16 | 20 | 5 | 39.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 34 | 15 | 17 | 2 | 44.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 34 | 20 | 13 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 34 | 16 | 14 | 4 | 47.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 15 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Modern | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 1 |