Jan van de Mortel - The International Master of Mayhem
Meet Jan van de Mortel, or as the chessboard secretly calls him, "LePlusMortel"—a title earned and feared in equal measure. An International Master recognized by FIDE, Jan doesn’t just play chess; he practically dances a deadly tango with 64 squares.
Since 2013, Jan has been a bullet chess powerhouse, boasting a peak rating of 2720 in 2023—enough to make even grandmasters glance nervously at their screens. Known for lightning-fast moves and a win rate that can only be described as merciless (with a staggering 66% overall win rate in bullet!), Jan’s games resemble thrilling blitz battles where hesitation means checkmate.
Not content with just bullet blitzing his way to glory, Jan excels in blitz chess too, peaking at a rating near 2777 in 2018, making his opponents feel like they’ve just been hit by a chess hurricane. And when it comes to rapid games, Jan’s unbeaten streak speaks for itself with a flawless 100% win rate in the games he’s played.
Jan's style? He thrives in complex endgames, plays long battles averaging 82 moves per win (because why end the fun early?), and exhibits an unbelievable tactical awareness—snatching victory even after losing pieces, proving he’s the king of comebacks with a near 100% win rate post setbacks. His longest winning streak sits comfortably at 46 games, because losing is clearly optional.
While he might occasionally tilt (hey, even IMs have mortal moments), Jan's psychological resilience and rapid-fire thinking make him a formidable foe any day of the week, especially on Sunday evenings or just before midnight—prime time for lethal plot twists on the board.
Off the board, Jan is known to crack a smile or two, but don’t let that fool you—when the clock starts ticking, it's all business. Jan van de Mortel isn’t just a chess player; he’s a blitz legend with a deadly signature—whether you’re playing him or just spectating, expect thrills, spills, and some seriously fast knights!
Quick summary for Jan van de Mortel
Nice run — your recent bullet games show a clear strength in creating passed pawns and finishing in the endgame. You convert advantages confidently and punish opponents who allow counterplay. The main recurring issue is time management: several games became decided by the clock rather than by the position. Below are focused notes and a short practice plan.
Where you're strong
- Passed pawn creation and promotion — you spot and push candidates reliably.
- Endgame technique — converting material and promoting with active king play is a clear plus.
- Practical aggression — you create threats that put opponents under severe clock pressure.
- Consistent opening choices — your setups get you comfortable positions quickly in bullet.
High-impact improvements
- Clock play & Flagging: avoid long calculations when ahead on the clock — pick a simple, fast plan and execute it.
- Simplify when winning: trade into technical endgames earlier to reduce tactical swindles and Loose pieces risks.
- Tactical hygiene — stop leaving pieces en prise; in bullet a single loose piece often decides the game.
- React to pawn breaks: identify whether to stop a break immediately or accept it and blockade — many opponents gained counterplay with central pawn thrusts.
Concrete bullet drills (do these 3×/week)
- 10 minutes tactics: focus on forks, pins and back-rank mates (set a 1–2 min per puzzle cap).
- 5–7 minutes endgame drills: king and pawn races, queen vs rook, and rook + pawn technical positions.
- Clock discipline: play 10 bullet games with the “no move under 2s” rule except for safe pre-moves — trains quick plan selection.
- Post-game 60s review: after each loss/win note one recurring mistake and one successful pattern to repeat.
Practical game tips to apply immediately
- When materially ahead: exchange queens and simplify to an endgame where your passed pawn decides the race.
- When low on time: choose a single, forced-looking plan (e.g., invade with rook, push passed pawn) instead of deep calculation.
- Limit pre-moves — allow them only when the opponent has exactly one legal, harmless reply to avoid costly Mouse Slip losses.
- Opening habit: your flank a4/a5 approach is fine — but don’t delay central development and castling if the opponent opens the center.
Short session checklist
- Warm up: 5 tactical puzzles (5 minutes).
- Main set: 20 bullet games with the “2s rule”.
- Review: pick 1 win and 1 loss — mark one decision that cost/earned you the game.
Mini replay (opening snapshot)
Here’s a short replay of the opening from one of your recent wins — use it to review development and short plans:
Offer
If you want a move-by-move breakdown of a specific game, send the game link or PGN and I’ll mark 3–5 exact moves to change next session. Would you like me to analyse your loss to Miller Rojas next?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Miller Rojas | 4W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Larry Yang | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Corey Acor | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Hitmantotez | 11W / 6L / 0D | View |
| castlingpunisher | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jat0123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| yoni grabinsky | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thecalculator101001011001 | 8W / 4L / 0D | View |
| yoni | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kaazbe7 | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| grandemas | 145W / 44L / 3D | View Games |
| myrating2500 | 121W / 30L / 9D | View Games |
| mattydperrine | 73W / 28L / 1D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 53W / 43L / 4D | View Games |
| mgl_nomad | 67W / 28L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2700 | |||
| 2024 | 2545 | |||
| 2023 | 2609 | 2521 | ||
| 2022 | 2624 | 2591 | ||
| 2021 | 2604 | 2583 | 2004 | |
| 2020 | 2641 | 2627 | ||
| 2019 | 2530 | 2532 | ||
| 2018 | 2442 | 2461 | ||
| 2016 | 2540 | 2461 | ||
| 2015 | 2504 | 2423 | ||
| 2014 | 2423 | 2383 | ||
| 2013 | 2431 | 2374 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60W / 36L / 6D | 54W / 41L / 7D | 93.6 |
| 2024 | 122W / 95L / 15D | 131W / 88L / 14D | 88.9 |
| 2023 | 346W / 172L / 29D | 291W / 218L / 29D | 86.9 |
| 2022 | 174W / 88L / 12D | 159W / 101L / 17D | 86.8 |
| 2021 | 460W / 251L / 52D | 441W / 264L / 52D | 87.3 |
| 2020 | 710W / 337L / 54D | 648W / 409L / 68D | 88.6 |
| 2019 | 542W / 268L / 38D | 488W / 308L / 46D | 87.9 |
| 2018 | 533W / 271L / 36D | 485W / 324L / 42D | 90.2 |
| 2016 | 139W / 54L / 8D | 126W / 61L / 10D | 87.8 |
| 2015 | 1287W / 445L / 78D | 1166W / 569L / 89D | 86.7 |
| 2014 | 2070W / 600L / 85D | 1919W / 731L / 83D | 83.7 |
| 2013 | 366W / 88L / 17D | 360W / 79L / 17D | 85.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2131 | 1471 | 583 | 77 | 69.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1673 | 1156 | 460 | 57 | 69.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1381 | 978 | 359 | 44 | 70.8% |
| Australian Defense | 1114 | 684 | 384 | 46 | 61.4% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1108 | 739 | 309 | 60 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 1022 | 605 | 366 | 51 | 59.2% |
| Czech Defense | 853 | 620 | 205 | 28 | 72.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 773 | 558 | 183 | 32 | 72.2% |
| French Defense | 536 | 357 | 159 | 20 | 66.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 407 | 280 | 111 | 16 | 68.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 219 | 134 | 74 | 11 | 61.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 184 | 108 | 60 | 16 | 58.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 159 | 98 | 49 | 12 | 61.6% |
| Australian Defense | 120 | 73 | 38 | 9 | 60.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 104 | 61 | 29 | 14 | 58.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 93 | 60 | 27 | 6 | 64.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 90 | 58 | 26 | 6 | 64.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 70 | 43 | 22 | 5 | 61.4% |
| Döry Defense | 46 | 27 | 15 | 4 | 58.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 45 | 25 | 14 | 6 | 55.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 46 | 3 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |