Llambi Pasko: The International Master on a Mission
Meet Llambi Pasko, a chess tactician officially recognized as an International Master by FIDE, who has mastered the art of turning pawns into legends and kings into victims. Known in the digital arenas as LlambiPasku, this player’s blitz rating has skyrocketed from a humble 1371 in 2015 to a mind-boggling peak of 2824 in May 2025. To put that into perspective: if chess ratings were temperatures, Llambi would have just hit the molten lava stage.
Playing Style & Personality
Llambi is the kind of player who prefers a long, winding battle, savoring an average of 82 moves per win, proving patience is indeed a virtue—especially when waiting for opponents to blunder. With a staggering 91% comeback rate after losing a piece, resigning early is barely in their vocabulary (early resignation rate: 1.22%).
Clocking in fierce focus, Llambi’s best time to play is the magical 4 AM, when the stars align and the queen’s gambit feels like a midnight snack. Beware opponents: this is when strategies become nightmares.
Record & Statistics
- Overall blitz wins: 1,803 with a win rate just below half at 47.56% — proving consistency under fire.
- Rapid and bullet challenges: Also highly competitive with rapid peak rating near 2600 and bullet max 2712.
- Longest winning streak: 23 games in a row — enough to make anyone consider swapping their king for a rook just to survive.
- Favorite Openings: The mysterious "Top Secret" opening dominates with over 3,700 games played — obviously classified for a reason!
Recent Battles
Llambi’s latest victory was a spectacular win over cosmicphoenix4 in a Caro-Kann Defense Two Knights Attack, clinched by resignation after tactical fireworks dazzled on May 8, 2025. And if you want to catch the replay, it’s all archived here — popcorn recommended.
Despite a string of recent losses (everyone has bad days even at this level), these tough matches only fuel Llambi’s relentless climb toward chess immortality. After all, every defeat is merely a plot twist in the grand novel of their chess career.
Legacy and Fun Facts
To say Llambi is a resilient player would be an understatement: with a tilt factor of just 11 (that’s low for a gladiator in the chess arena) and a comeback rate that would make a Terminator proud, surrender never lasts long around them.
Whether wielding the queen with surgical precision or sneaking victory from the jaws of defeat, Llambi Pasko continues to be a rising star — or perhaps a supernova — in the vast cosmos of chess.
What to build on now
You’ve shown you can generate active, tactical play in blitz and press when the position becomes sharp. The best blitz players convert initiative into material or decisive attacks, and you’re already comfortable entering complex lines. The next step is to raise the consistency of those decisions and finish games more reliably.
What you’re doing well
- You seek active piece play and are willing to enter tactical seas when the opportunity arises, which is essential in blitz.
- You adapt to dynamic structures and keep pressure on the opponent’s king, especially when the position opens up.
- You manage to convert advantages into wins in a few sharp sequences, showing good calculation when you have momentum.
Key areas to improve
- Decision quality under time pressure: when ahead, look for simpler, clean lines to convert rather than going for overly long combinations that invite counterplay.
- Endgame technique: practice common blitz endgames (king and pawns, rook endings) so small edge becomes a clean win rather than a struggle under time pressure.
- Opening consistency: pick 2–3 openings you feel comfortable with and build a simple, repeatable plan for each. This reduces early-middle-game mistakes and helps you keep a clear trajectory.
- Pattern recognition: reinforce standard middlegame plans in your favorite openings (pawn breaks, typical piece maneuvers, and back-rank concerns) so you can act fast in blitz.
Opening focus and repertoire suggestions
Your openings data shows stronger results in certain lines. Consider leaning more on these and developing a concise plan for each:
- Queen’s Gambit Declined: 4.Nf3 line – this is a solid, reliable choice that often leads to clear middlegame plans. Build a 3-step plan for the early middlegame in this line (develop pieces, control the center, look for a timely break).
- Australian Defense – a flexible option that often leads to solid structures. Develop a simple plan around solid pawn structure and gradual piece activity.
- Other lines with mixed results (for example, some aggressive gambit setups) can be revisited later, but try to minimize high-variance choices in blitz until you’re confident in the core plan.
If you want a quick annotated focus for a specific opening, I can provide a short guide tailored to your style. Queen’s Gambit Declined: 4.Nf3
Two-week practice plan
- Choose two openings to master (for example, Queen’s Gambit Declined: 4.Nf3 and Australian Defense). Create a short, 3-point plan for the early middlegame in each.
- Daily puzzles: 15 minutes focused on tactical motifs common in blitz (forks, pins, discovered attacks, back-rank ideas).
- Game review ritual: after every blitz game, write 2 quick notes:
- What was the plan you were aiming for in the opening/midgame?
- Where did a decisive or near-decisive moment occur, and could you have avoided over-pressing or simplified earlier?
- Endgame drills: practice two simple rook endings or king-and-pawn endings per week, with a focus on activating the king and using opposition.
- Time management drill: in a 3+2 blitz session, allocate a finite amount of thinking time per move (e.g., 15 seconds for non-critical moves, 30–40 seconds for critical moments) and stick to it.
Quick notes you can use in between games
If you’d like, I can generate a brief annotated PGN of a recent game to highlight critical moments and better next-step decisions. For example, a concise review could be prepared as:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dinastia | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| PracticeMakesOK | 22W / 17L / 11D | View |
| mikael_zare | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| gjanidavid | 1W / 8L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| emanueli | 56W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| PracticeMakesOK | 22W / 17L / 11D | View Games |
| gau_npukyputb | 18W / 26L / 3D | View Games |
| totail | 38W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 13W / 17L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2730 | 2903 | 2539 | 1254 |
| 2024 | 2708 | 2803 | 2548 | 1206 |
| 2023 | 2691 | 2754 | 2477 | 1004 |
| 2022 | 2432 | 2473 | 2016 | |
| 2021 | 2525 | 2244 | ||
| 2020 | 2634 | 2290 | ||
| 2015 | 1477 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 331W / 308L / 46D | 293W / 358L / 50D | 86.7 |
| 2024 | 287W / 282L / 61D | 267W / 308L / 58D | 87.0 |
| 2023 | 428W / 420L / 77D | 387W / 450L / 69D | 86.2 |
| 2022 | 265W / 166L / 26D | 219W / 196L / 34D | 84.0 |
| 2021 | 86W / 52L / 10D | 83W / 56L / 11D | 82.1 |
| 2020 | 80W / 43L / 7D | 74W / 44L / 5D | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 66.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 227 | 105 | 105 | 17 | 46.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 144 | 59 | 74 | 11 | 41.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 142 | 70 | 63 | 9 | 49.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 130 | 57 | 61 | 12 | 43.9% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 120 | 47 | 60 | 13 | 39.2% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 119 | 65 | 47 | 7 | 54.6% |
| Australian Defense | 118 | 59 | 52 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 112 | 49 | 52 | 11 | 43.8% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 105 | 55 | 42 | 8 | 52.4% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 103 | 46 | 45 | 12 | 44.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 19 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 68.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Scotch Game | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Slav Defense | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 64 | 23 | 36 | 5 | 35.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 49 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 49.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 49 | 23 | 21 | 5 | 46.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 44 | 18 | 23 | 3 | 40.9% |
| Australian Defense | 40 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 35 | 15 | 18 | 2 | 42.9% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 28 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 26 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 38.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 25 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 40.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 25 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 40.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 3 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |