LxChubby - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet LxChubby, a chess maestro who has earned the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE. With a blitz rating soaring past 2900 at peak moments, LxChubby isn’t just playing chess; they’re redefining rapid-fire strategy. Having grappled with over 3,000 blitz games across recent years, their winning move might just be the 14-game winning streak they've boldly conquered—because who said blitz was just a game of speed and luck?
LxChubby's style is a curious blend of relentless endurance and tactical wizardry. Averaging an astounding 86 moves per win, they aren’t the type to surrender easily—resigning early is rare (a mere 0.31%), and the endgame? Almost their playground, appearing in nearly 86% of games. Losing a piece? A terrifying scenario for most, but LxChubby turns this into opportunity with a 100% win rate after dropping material. Talk about turning lemons into chess victories!
Not just a cold strategist, LxChubby has personality too. Their tilt factor sits at a humble 8, proving even chess immortals have their spicy moments. Despite this, they display impressive mental fortitude, coming back from difficult situations 92.55% of the time. They enjoy a better record when playing white but show no fear rocking the black pieces with a win rate close to 45%.
Ever curious when LxChubby shines brightest? Prime hours seem to be late-night blitz battles—23:00 boasts a nifty 56.25% win rate, while morning matches at 10 AM feature an impressive 57.38%. Saturdays and Tuesdays are their tested lucky days, winning more than half of their games on those dates.
Opponents beware: LxChubby has an extensive rivalry list with hundreds of games against fellow warriors like thesilmarils and igor_janik, and manages to keep formidable win rates across the board. Recent foes include tacticator29 (100% wins) and kopylov_alex (80%), showcasing both skill and consistency.
When asked about their secret weapon, LxChubby keeps all openings "Top Secret," boasting a near 50% win rate over thousands of blitz games—because why give away the good stuff?
Whether you’re a fellow competitor or a casual observer, one thing is clear: LxChubby plays chess like a joyous duel between wit, speed, and humor. Behind that username lies a fierce competitor who just might checkmate you with a smile.
Hi LxChubby!
You are playing at an impressive level – the quality of your tactical calculation and your willingness to seize the initiative stand out. Below is a concise review of recent games, followed by suggestions that should give you the next performance bump on the road beyond 3019 (2023-10-13).
What you’re already doing well
- Dynamic piece play. In both your wins with Black (e.g. vs KRAT0S_GOW) and White (vs TargetTheTop) you repeatedly chose active squares for your knights and bishops, keeping constant pressure.
- Practical speed. You manage the clock nicely in 3-minute games, often keeping a 15–20 s cushion while posing tough questions to your opponent.
- Endgame resourcefulness. The win vs PyrihRoman showed good awareness of passer races and rook activity. Even when positions simplify you still hunt for winning chances.
Recurring trouble-spots
-
King safety when you delay castling.
• In the Nimzo-Indian loss to Gangster-accountant01 your king wandered to e7 on move 17 and never found shelter. • In the Ruy López vs Statham, keeping the king in the centre allowed White’s rook lift 23.Nd2–f1–g3–g7 to appear with tempo. ➜ Action plan: Make a “castle or clarify” decision by move 10 in every opening. If you stay in the centre, the position must be closed or you must be a full pawn up. -
Over-committing pawn thrusts.
• Against the English (loss to FGHSMN) the early …b5/…c5 left holes on d5/e5 and weakened dark squares after 14.g6. • In the Kmoch Nimzo you played …b5, …c6, …c5, …g6 in rapid succession – four pawn moves and zero new pieces developed. ➜ Action plan: Before pushing side pawns ask, “Am I ahead in development? Will this pawn still be well-placed if files open?” Quick test: if you cannot meet a central break (e4/e5 or d4/d5) comfortably, postpone the pawn push. -
Handling opposite-flank races.
Several losses feature positions where both sides attack (e.g. your queenside play vs Ga_R while White built up in the centre/kingside). ➜ Action plan: During mutual races count tempi objectively. If you’re one tempo slower, switch to defence; if equal, trade a pair of attacking pieces to blunt his initiative. -
Converting technical wins.
The long Q vs RR endgame vs Gangster-accountant01 slipped away into mate. You forced 60-move technique but missed57…Qc6+!earlier. ➜ Action plan: Add 15 minutes of tablebase drill each week (Q vs RR, Q vs R + P, R + P vs R). It will repay itself many times in bullet & blitz.
Opening tweaks worth testing
- As Black vs 1.e4: Your Italian …Bc5 system is solid, but in bullet the early …a5/…Ra5 manoeuvre costs time. Test the Two Knights (3…Nf6 4.Ng5 d5) to keep pieces closer to the king and cut theory memorisation.
- As Black vs 1.d4/c4: Blend your Nimzo repertoire with an occasional Bogo-Indian (3…Bb4+) to sidestep the f3 & 4.Qc2 lines that slowed you down in recent games.
- As White: Your d4 games look sharp, but your e4 portfolio is narrower. Sprinkle in one anti-…e5 line (e.g. the Scotch or deferred exchange Ruy) to stay fresh.
Suggested weekly routine
- 3 × 15 min tactics burst (rating > 3200 problems) – keep calculation sharp.
- 2 × 20 min endgame tablebase drill (see point 4).
- Analyze one of your own losses without engine first; then verify with engine. Focus on first irreversible error, not the blunder that ended the game.
- Play a slow (15|10) game once a week to practise disciplined development before pawn expansion.
Your performance snapshots
Keep the pressure, refine the structure of your games, and you’ll soon convert even more of those razor-sharp positions into wins. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nice_2_m8te_u | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Pavan_Putra_Maruthi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Lemmingsplayer | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Shaaketh Sivakumar | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 1e41-0 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jan Malek | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Viacheslav Mikhailov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mudinoss | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Matfey Rogov | 3W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Grigor Grigorov | 4W / 4L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Giorgi Margvelashvili | 13W / 17L / 4D | View Games |
| Szymon Gumularz | 10W / 15L / 4D | View Games |
| Igor Janik | 12W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| Abhijeet Gupta | 6W / 14L / 6D | View Games |
| Semen Khanin | 16W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2913 | |||
| 2024 | 2788 | |||
| 2023 | 2911 | |||
| 2022 | 2703 | 2804 | 2000 | |
| 2021 | 2727 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 215W / 145L / 52D | 197W / 177L / 44D | 93.0 |
| 2024 | 74W / 70L / 16D | 63W / 78L / 18D | 87.4 |
| 2023 | 141W / 118L / 29D | 137W / 122L / 29D | 88.7 |
| 2022 | 236W / 178L / 49D | 207W / 210L / 47D | 91.1 |
| 2021 | 22W / 14L / 3D | 20W / 16L / 4D | 92.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 123 | 50 | 61 | 12 | 40.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 95 | 53 | 29 | 13 | 55.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 69 | 34 | 30 | 5 | 49.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 69 | 32 | 33 | 4 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 61 | 36 | 21 | 4 | 59.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 60 | 32 | 23 | 5 | 53.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 56 | 26 | 21 | 9 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 49 | 27 | 19 | 3 | 55.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 47 | 15 | 23 | 9 | 31.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 37 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 48.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Open, Howell Attack | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 1 |