Stanislav Mikheev - International Master
Meet Stanislav Mikheev, also known by his online handle Mikheev1976, a cunning International Master (IM) who dances through the chessboard with a blend of precision, tactical awareness, and the occasional sneaky trick that leaves opponents wondering if they just blinked at the wrong moment.
Rise and Rating
Since 2018, Stanislav has carved a remarkable path through the blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily chess arenas. His blitz rating peaked impressively at 2529 in July 2022, a rating that would make even Grandmasters raise an eyebrow. His bullet skills aren’t too shabby either, hitting a high of 2414 in late 2021. Known for his resilience, Mikheev's come-back rate is an astonishing 89.09%, proving he never goes down without a fight.
Playing Style and Mental Fortitude
With an average game length of around 73 moves, Stanislav isn’t one to rush — he savors each duel like a fine chess wine. His endgame frequency (78.42%) suggests a player who thrives in the trenches, grinding down opponents with methodical play. Despite a tilt factor of 9 (yes, even titans get ruffled), his psychological resilience shines through his consistent comebacks and tactical tenacity.
Preferred Time and Day for Chess Battles
For those hoping to catch Mikheev at his absolute best, set your clocks to 6:00 AM. That’s when his win rate peaks, especially in blitz games—much to the dismay of opponents who probably haven’t had breakfast yet!
Favorite Openings & Performance
Always keeping opponents guessing with his "Top Secret" repertoire, Mikheev’s games tally over 2,900 in blitz alone, winning almost half of them (46.05%). Whether it’s bullet, rapid, or daily games, his win rates hover comfortably above 50% against varied competition.
Legendary Streaks
Like a true chess gladiator, Stanislav boasts a longest winning streak of 18 games and is currently riding a hot streak of 3 wins! His longest losing streak stands at 9 games—proof that even the best have dark days, but it’s all about the comeback.
Recent Adventures on The Virtual 64 Squares
Stanislav’s most recent victory was not just a win, but an artistic checkmate secured on January 2, 2025, against PogU99. The final position showed off his endgame prowess, finishing the game with a decisive and elegant checkmate. For those curious, the battle featured a Queens Pawn Opening, revealing Stanislav's readiness to take charge early and hammer the initiative home.
Fun Fact
When not plotting checkmates, Stanislav could be busy secretly testing if chess clocks double as kitchen timers—because how else does one keep sharp at 6:00 AM?
In the world of chess, Stanislav Mikheev is a formidable opponent, a strategist of deep thought, and a master who understands that every piece on the board tells a story.
Postgame snapshot
Nice win — you converted a complicated middlegame into a winning passed-pawn race and active king play. Below is a compact replay of the critical sequence from the game and the final position so you can quickly revisit the turning points.
Opening played: Sicilian Defense - Chekhover Variation • Opponent: waterexpense
[[Pgn|23 fxe5|24 Qh5|26 Qxh6|27 Bxg5|31 Rxb7|34 Rcc6|41 Rxc8+|43 Rxa5|49 Rf6+|52 g6|53 g7|54 Rxg7|55 Rd7|56 Bxe1+|63 Rxd2|64 h7|65 Kf6|fen|8/7P/2n2K2/8/8/8/3k4/8|orientation|white|autoplay|false]What you did well
You showed several practical strengths that won this game:
- Direct attacking instincts — you repeatedly opened lines against Black’s king (Qxh6, Bxg5) and kept the initiative.
- Creating and running a passed pawn — the h‑pawn march (h3–h4–h5–h6–h7) was decisive and you timed it well with rook activity behind it.
- Active rook play — exchanges and rook lifts (Rxb7, Rxc8+, Rxa5) simplified into a favourable endgame while keeping pressure on the enemy king.
- Good king activation in the endgame — moving your king toward the action (Kg3–Kf4–Ke5–Kf6) was the right idea to support the pawn race.
- Practical decision making — when the opponent tried to queen, you found ways to neutralize the counterplay and trade into a winning position.
Key moments to review
Replay these decision points and ask “what else was possible?”
- Early queen moves: Qxd4 then Qe3/Qh3 — they were effective this game, but repeated queen moves in the opening can cost time and allow the opponent easy development. Check alternatives that develop pieces first.
- 31.Rxb7 — this won material and simplified; review whether the simplification was the fastest technical path. Could any tactic have made the win faster?
- 41.Rxc8+ — a critical exchange sac/threshold moment. Verify the calculation that allowed simplifying into a winning king+pawn endgame rather than letting Black build counterplay.
- Pawn push timing in the endgame — you converted well, but the opponent had a counter-queening attempt (e1=Q). Study similar queening-race motifs to speed up the right choices under time pressure.
- Time usage — you reached the final phase with only a few minutes left. Look for places earlier where you can save time (standardized opening play, quick candidate moves) so you have breathing room in the endgame.
Concrete improvements — short term plan
Focus on a small, practical set of training tasks you can do over the next 2–4 weeks:
- Tactics: 15–20 minutes daily on puzzles emphasizing mating nets, queening races, and rook tactics (forks, skewers, back-rank themes).
- Endgames: 3x/week practice of rook + pawn vs rook endgames and basic king+pawn promotion races — these patterns appeared in your game and are high ROI.
- Opening: tighten your responses to the Chekhover/Sicilian lines you face. Pick 2 reliable move-orders so you don’t spend too much time in the first 10 moves.
- Tempo & clock: play 10–15 rapid games with the explicit goal of reaching move 15 with at least 10 minutes on the clock. Practice quick, good-enough decisions in known positions.
Study checklist — what to practice next
Reference these drills after each session/game:
- One tactic theme per day (pins, forks, discovered attacks). Track accuracy and speed.
- One endgame example per day — convert one won rook+passed pawn position and defend one lost pawn race.
- One opening line: learn a typical middlegame plan (not just moves) for your favoured Sicilian/Catalan lines — you already have strong results in Catalan and several gambits, nurture that edge.
- Review 2 recent wins and 1 loss per week — annotate candidate moves and where you could have saved time.
Longer-term goals (3 months)
Based on your rating trend and win rate, aim for:
- Sharpening endgame technique so that pawn races and rook endings are routine wins.
- Reducing early time consumption by having a concise opening repertoire — this preserves time for critical calculations later in the game.
- Raising your puzzle solving streak and average speed; that will reduce blunders in complex tactical middlegames.
Quick takeaways
- Strengths: attacking sense, passed-pawn technique, active rook + king coordination — these are your winning patterns, use them.
- Main fix: time management and minimizing unnecessary opening queen shuttles (unless they serve a clear purpose).
- Daily micro‑habits: 15 minutes tactics, 10 minutes endgame, one opening line review — small, steady work will convert your current momentum into consistent rating gains.
Want a follow-up?
If you like, I can:
- Annotate the full game move‑by‑move with short comments on most critical positions.
- Create a 2‑week training plan tailored to this game (tactics list + endgame exercises + opening drills).
- Generate 10 tactical puzzles drawn from motifs in this game for targeted practice.
Tell me which option you want and I’ll prepare it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| asbrodolau | 48W / 32L / 0D | View Games |
| waterexpense | 47W / 2L / 26D | View Games |
| leokhine1999 | 31W / 34L / 1D | View Games |
| arnthetemplar | 20W / 19L / 1D | View Games |
| pwnattack | 12W / 27L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2449 | |||
| 2024 | 2309 | 1866 | ||
| 2023 | 2249 | |||
| 2022 | 2434 | 1956 | ||
| 2021 | 2348 | 2362 | 1844 | |
| 2020 | 2346 | 1844 | ||
| 2019 | 2138 | 2327 | 1864 | 1853 |
| 2018 | 2084 | 2369 | 1400 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6W / 3L / 0D | 4W / 1L / 2D | 72.6 |
| 2024 | 3W / 3L / 2D | 6W / 3L / 2D | 77.9 |
| 2023 | 1W / 2L / 1D | 1W / 3L / 1D | 74.7 |
| 2022 | 7W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 3D | 88.4 |
| 2021 | 30W / 27L / 3D | 29W / 31L / 4D | 68.4 |
| 2020 | 272W / 210L / 69D | 227W / 260L / 64D | 77.6 |
| 2019 | 507W / 435L / 70D | 448W / 483L / 86D | 75.6 |
| 2018 | 190W / 129L / 15D | 174W / 133L / 18D | 69.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 228 | 93 | 102 | 33 | 40.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 92 | 44 | 41 | 7 | 47.8% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 90 | 41 | 35 | 14 | 45.6% |
| Alekhine Defense | 88 | 36 | 45 | 7 | 40.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 73 | 34 | 33 | 6 | 46.6% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 66 | 24 | 32 | 10 | 36.4% |
| Australian Defense | 57 | 29 | 25 | 3 | 50.9% |
| Döry Defense | 52 | 20 | 26 | 6 | 38.5% |
| Benko Gambit | 48 | 24 | 20 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation | 48 | 19 | 25 | 4 | 39.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 57 | 31 | 23 | 3 | 54.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 54 | 28 | 24 | 2 | 51.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 39 | 27 | 11 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 32 | 14 | 18 | 0 | 43.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 29 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 51.7% |
| Modern | 28 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 27 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 63.0% |
| French Defense | 26 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Petrov's Defense | 23 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 65.2% |
| Modern Defense | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 52.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |