Murad İbrahimli - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Murad İbrahimli, a chess player who doesn't just play the game – they master it with an international flair. Holding the esteemed title of International Master granted by FIDE, Murad blends deep strategy with a touch of flair, proving that chess is both an art and a battleground.
Rating & Style
Murad's blitz rating hit an astonishing peak of 3075 in March 2025 – yes, you read that right, 3000+! Bullets? They've reached nearly 2964, while their rapid peak was 2657 back in 2020. Such consistency across formats shows a player who’s as comfortable in lightning-fast chaos as in calmly calculated endgames.
Playing Style & Psychology
If chess were a movie, Murad would be the comeback kid. With an incredible 89.19% comeback rate and a knack to win even after losing a piece (44.82% winning afterward), they rarely bow out early. The average game lasts a hefty 87 moves, proving that Murad likes a battle of endurance – plus, an endgame frequency of nearly 88.5% confirms they love to keep their opponents on edge until the very last move.
Early resignation? A meager 0.41% shows they fight till the bitter end. Just don’t play Murad around 3:00 AM – their best time appears to be the surprisingly specific 2:00 AM, when their tactical genius truly awakens.
Signature Openings
Murad is no one-trick pony. Among their vast trove of openings, the mysterious "Top Secret" strategy stands out with nearly a 48% win rate in blitz games. They also dabble expertly in the Caro-Kann Defense and deliver lethal blows from the English Opening, boasting a 100% win rate in the quiet Four Knights variation. It’s a blend of classic theory and modern surprises – keep your eyes peeled!
Prolific Competitor
With over 22,700 blitz games played (!), Murad truly lives and breathes chess. They’ve secured 10,484 wins and twisted the thumbs of fate on 2,853 draws, making them a true gladiator of the online chess arena. In bullet chess, they've collected 757 wins with lightning speed, proving that quick reflexes are no accident.
Their most frequent opponents include blitzstream and francyim, two worthy contemporaries who’ve sparked many thrilling battles. And their win rates against tough names like gmhess hover above 50%, reflecting Murad's competitive edge.
Recent Battles
Fresh from the battlefield, Murad recently conquered the formidable BogdanDeac in a captivating English Opening skirmish, winning on time and demonstrating tactical endurance befitting their title. They've also fought close battles with bancsoo, showing that even masters have their off-days.
Trivia & Fun
- Longest winning streak: a heroic 15 games.
- Once lost 13 games in a row, but hey, even legends have their rough days.
- Highest blitz rating in the entire galaxy (okay, maybe just Earth): 3075!
- If you challenge Murad after midnight, beware – that’s when their chess senses are tingling.
So, whether it’s blitz, bullet, or rapid, Murad İbrahimli is a name to watch – a true master with a sharp mind, an unyielding spirit, and probably a secret stash of chess jokes.
What you’re doing well in blitz
You tend to stay active and look for the initiative in many positions. In several games, you keep pieces coordinated and push ahead with pressure rather than passively defending. You also demonstrate willingness to enter tactical lines, which can create practical chances in fast time controls.
- Active piece play: you frequently develop pieces toward central and aggressive squares, keeping options open for attacks.
- Competing for initiative: you often seek to seize the moment when your opponent’s king safety or pawn structure is under stimulus.
- Decisive attacking ideas in middlegames: you pursue forcing lines and tactical motifs that can win material or deliver threats quickly.
Key areas to improve for stronger blitz results
- Time management under increment: one notable recent result shows you can be tight on the clock in sharp moments. Build a simple time-management routine to avoid flagging, especially in complex middlegames.
- Blunder avoidance: in several recent games, the pace of play led to over-ambitious or risky moves. Practice a quick safety check before critical decisions (threats, undefended pieces, and back-rank ideas).
- Structured calculation: in blitz, focusing on 2–3 forcing ideas ahead is usually enough. Train to identify two candidate moves and verify their main tactical themes within a short window.
- King safety and simplifications: in the heat of the clock, it’s easy to stray into tangles. Aim to keep the king safe and consider simplifying when you’re ahead or when the position is unclear.
- Endgame readiness: many blitz games drift into rook and pawn endings. Improve basic endgame technique (opposite rooks, passed pawns, active king in rook endings) to convert advantages reliably.
Opening choices and practical study plan
Based on your openings performance, your results are strongest with solid, flexible setups that lead to clear middlegame plans. Consider prioritizing a compact, repeatable White repertoire and reliable Black systems to reduce guesswork in blitz.
- White repertoire to consider: London System (solid and easy to memorize) and Colle System with a Colle–Rhamphorhynchus flavor (high win rate and practical ideas).
- Black repertoire to consider: Slav Defense or Modern/Colle-style setups that lead to solid structures and straightforward plans.
- Study plan:
- For White: learn 2-3 main lines for the London and Colle, plus 2 typical middlegame ideas in each setup.
- For Black: focus on 2 responses, Slav and a reliable 1.e4 or 1.d4 counter system, with 1–2 typical pawn structures and piece maneuvers.
- Review 2 model games per week in each chosen opening to distill common plans and typical tactical themes.
Time management and practical tips for blitz
- Use the increment to your advantage: aim to leave 10–15 seconds for critical endgame thinking, not for the whole game.
- Adopt a two-pass thinking approach in tight positions: first check for threats and material balance, then consider safe, safe-ish moves before deeper calculations.
- When behind on time, simplify: exchange pieces and seek straightforward plans (purely tactical complications are less likely to pay off).
- Develop a quick pattern-recognition habit: before each move, glance for a direct threat, a potential fork/skewer, or a tactical trap your opponent might be setting.
- Endgame practice: dedicate a weekly session to rook endings and king activity with pawns, so you can convert advantages more reliably in blitz.
Progress plan and weekly goals
- Week 1: Lock in 2 White openings (London and Colle) and 2 Black openings (Slav and Modern). Watch 2 short instructional games for each line and summarize 3 key middlegame ideas per line.
- Week 2: Start a daily 15-minute tactics routine focusing on blunder-prevention motifs (back rank, overloaded pieces, and hanging pawns). Play 5 blitz games with a post-game quick review.
- Week 3: Practice endgames twice (rook endings and king-pawn endings). Review 3 recent blitz games to identify recurring time-pressure moments and plan adjustments.
- Week 4: Combine openings with endgames in longer blitz sessions (3+5 or 5+3 time controls) to build consistency in both early and late phases.
Encouraging note and next steps
You’ve shown long-term potential with positive trend lines and solid openings. By tightening up time management, reducing risky tactical plunges in the moment, and reinforcing a compact opening plan, you can convert more blitz opportunities into wins. If you want, share a specific recent game you’d like me to annotate move-by-move, and I’ll tailor concrete improvement notes for that position.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Seo Jungmin | 28W / 12L / 14D | |
| Antoni Kozak | 12W / 4L / 3D | |
| James Chirilov | 3W / 4L / 2D | |
| Denis Makhnev | 12W / 10L / 0D | |
| Shelev Oberoi | 14W / 9L / 3D | |
| Vladimir Seliverstov | 66W / 40L / 11D | |
| Momchil Petkov | 43W / 44L / 9D | |
| Aram Hakobyan | 6W / 7L / 5D | |
| Maksym Dubnevych | 4W / 2L / 2D | |
| Elham Amar | 78W / 86L / 21D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Bordi | 148W / 95L / 60D | |
| Francesco Sonis | 118W / 130L / 28D | |
| Rudik Makarian | 108W / 116L / 44D | |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 45W / 161L / 37D | |
| Szymon Gumularz | 84W / 101L / 34D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2901 | 3004 | ||
| 2024 | 2924 | 2966 | 2552 | |
| 2023 | 2816 | 2844 | 2562 | |
| 2022 | 2728 | 2953 | ||
| 2021 | 2720 | 2834 | ||
| 2020 | 2607 | 2805 | 2562 | |
| 2019 | 2206 | 2543 | ||
| 2018 | 1555 | 2417 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 729W / 526L / 178D | 619W / 637L / 174D | 93.6 |
| 2024 | 475W / 348L / 120D | 411W / 400L / 121D | 91.3 |
| 2023 | 560W / 430L / 156D | 500W / 489L / 140D | 92.6 |
| 2022 | 569W / 440L / 158D | 515W / 511L / 140D | 92.3 |
| 2021 | 2472W / 1998L / 664D | 2169W / 2311L / 657D | 91.2 |
| 2020 | 1214W / 926L / 277D | 1050W / 1072L / 276D | 87.1 |
| 2019 | 229W / 198L / 33D | 217W / 208L / 24D | 86.3 |
| 2018 | 39W / 11L / 2D | 36W / 15L / 2D | 80.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1121 | 490 | 489 | 142 | 43.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 761 | 346 | 311 | 104 | 45.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 500 | 230 | 194 | 76 | 46.0% |
| Modern | 459 | 221 | 184 | 54 | 48.1% |
| Döry Defense | 428 | 204 | 171 | 53 | 47.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 380 | 172 | 164 | 44 | 45.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 357 | 158 | 153 | 46 | 44.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 348 | 171 | 134 | 43 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 337 | 147 | 140 | 50 | 43.6% |
| Slav Defense | 336 | 161 | 128 | 47 | 47.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 121 | 59 | 52 | 10 | 48.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 90 | 39 | 47 | 4 | 43.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 79 | 36 | 34 | 9 | 45.6% |
| Modern | 64 | 34 | 25 | 5 | 53.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 51 | 24 | 23 | 4 | 47.1% |
| Australian Defense | 48 | 27 | 19 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 48 | 25 | 20 | 3 | 52.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 47 | 23 | 22 | 2 | 48.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 47 | 24 | 17 | 6 | 51.1% |
| Czech Defense | 39 | 14 | 21 | 4 | 35.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Modern Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |