Avatar of Nasanjargal Urtnasan

Nasanjargal Urtnasan GM

Username: Naaas1

Location: Ulaanbaatar

Playing Since: 2018-03-14 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Rapid: 2213
16W / 11L / 11D
Blitz: 2760
693W / 670L / 113D
Bullet: 2749
702W / 811L / 75D

Grandmaster Nasanjargal Urtnasan (Naaas1)

Meet Nasanjargal Urtnasan, known in the chess world and online arenas as Naaas1, a Grandmaster who turns the 64 squares into a battlefield playground where tactics and nerve reign supreme. With a FIDE Grandmaster title under their belt, Naaas1 is a fierce competitor who has been rattling clocks—and opponents—since at least 2018.

Rating Rollercoaster and Fierce Fight Records

Our GM has a bullet rating that soared to an impressive peak of 2850 in January 2025, a score defying mere mortals and challenging the gods of speed chess. Blitz enthusiasts have witnessed Naaas1 storm up to 2808, while rapid games showcase a solid 2398.

But it's not all smooth sailing—victories and defeats dance closely in Naaas1’s game history, with a bullet win-loss record showing 261 wins to 314 losses, exemplifying the daring, take-no-prisoners style. Blitz battles are almost neck and neck, with 500 wins versus 454 losses. In rapid, a snug positive edge of 22 wins to 11 losses proves versatility beyond lightning speed.

Playing Style: The Chess Ninja

Averages speak volumes: an average 85 moves per win, demonstrating stamina and deep strategic prowess, while endgame frequency near 85% suggests Naaas1 likes to settle scores late and strong, squeezing every drop of advantage out of the final phase.

Early resignation is rare (2.18%), showing a true fighter spirit, but watch out if you think you can break Naaas1’s spirit after snatching a piece—an incredible 44.8% win rate even after losing material means comebacks are their calling card. Their knack for staging epic recoveries is enough to give opponents sleepless nights.

The Psychological Arena

With a tilt factor of only 11, Naaas1 manages to keep cool under pressure, although sometimes losing streaks reach up to 11 games—because even GMs aren’t immune to the trollish curse of chess volatility. The best hour to catch this storm brewing? Around 3 PM, when their win rate peaks above 58%.

Memorable Games

A recent delight was a battle against marty-bird, where Naaas1 emerged victorious via resignation after skillfully converting a queen promotion advantage deep into the endgame. The game was a poetic dance of subtle exchanges and calculated bravery—check it out here.

Of course, no career is without hiccups. Recently, Naaas1 lost on time against want2lose, reminding us all that even grandmasters need caffeine breaks and better time management!

Opponents Beware!

With a fascinating record against various players, Naaas1 thrives especially well against foes like nafanya04 and shivampant20052006, boasting wins over 60% of the time, while notorious rivals like knvb hold a tougher edge, proving that every hero has their arch-nemesis.

In Summary

Nasanjargal Urtnasan (Naaas1) is the kind of player who makes you rethink what it means to be resilient, strategic, and just a little bit unpredictable. Whether blitzing through an opening or grinding out a marathon endgame, this Grandmaster blends skill, stamina, and a sprinkle of whimsy in every move. So, if you meet Naaas1 across the board, be ready for a match that’s as much a mental marathon as it is a lightning sprint!


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Overview of your recent rapid games

Your results show a mix of wins, losses, and draws, with a stronger performance in certain openings and some volatility in short-term changes. Short-term rating change over the last one to six months is negative, but the longer‑term trend slope suggests there is underlying improvement over a year. In rapid play, this kind of fluctuation is common—your task is to stabilize the pace, convert more chances into wins, and minimize avoidable errors in the early or middle game.

What you’re doing well

  • You show good results with specific openings where you have clear plans, notably the Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit and the Catalan Closed. These demonstrate your ability to handle both dynamic and positional positions when you know the typical ideas well.
  • You keep fighting in middlegame structures and can generate pressure through active piece play and pawn breaks. This helps you create chances even in slightly imperfect positions.
  • Your overall win/loss/draw record indicates you’re capable of drawing out complex fights and staying resourceful in uncertain positions.

Key areas to improve

  • Time management in rapid games: allocate time more consistently across the opening, middlegame, and endgame. Avoid spending too many minutes on light moves and ensure you have a plan going into the middlegame.
  • Converting small advantages: when you gain a tiny edge, lock in a concrete plan rather than allowing the position to become too flexible. This helps turn draws or near-equalities into wins.
  • Opening discipline: you have solid results with a few core openings, but several lines show mixed outcomes. Narrow your repertoire to 2–3 dependable openings for White and Black, and study common middlegame themes and typical endgames that arise from them.
  • Pattern recognition and tactical alertness: practice recognizing common tactical motifs (forks, pins, overloads, and discovered attacks) so you don’t miss forcing sequences in rapid games.

Opening performance snapshot

Strong performers: Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit (high win rate) and Catalan Closed (solid win rate). Other openings show room for growth, while a few “Unknown” lines indicate opportunities to consolidate your repertoire with more studied, repeatable choices.

Actionable steps: - Choose 2 White openings you feel comfortable with and 2 Black defenses you understand well. - For each chosen opening, write down the typical pawn structures, key piece placements, and 2–3 standard plans for the middlegame. - Review at least 1 model game per opening per week to reinforce the plan and reduce uncertainty in live games.

Endgame and tactical improvement plan

  • Endgames: dedicate 1–2 sessions per week to rook endings and minor-piece endings that commonly arise from your favorite openings. Focus on king safety, active king activity, and textbook techniques (opposite-colour bishop endings, technique to force a passers pawn, etc.).
  • Tactics: daily short drills (10–15 minutes) focused on common rapid-game motifs: forks, pins, skewers, and tactic nets around exposed kings.

Recommended training plan (2–3 weeks)

  • Week 1: reinforce two primary openings (one White, one Black). Build a simple, repeatable middlegame plan for each, plus 5–6 common endgames that arise from those structures.
  • Week 2: practice 2–3 endgames per session and continue tactical puzzles focusing on immediate threats near the king and tactical shot patterns you often miss.
  • Week 3: play 4–6 rapid practice games focusing on your chosen openings, then review each game to extract 2–3 concrete improvements (time management, decision quality, or endgame technique).

Optional reflections

Keep track of a small set of personal notes after each game: what plan you attempted, where you felt unsure, and what you would do differently next time. This will help you translate practice into real-game improvements and stabilize your performance across rapid events.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
Andras Toth 2W / 1L / 0D View
Bakhtiyar Askarov 0W / 2L / 0D View
Ian Dzhumagaliev 0W / 1L / 0D View
guardian_ofthegalaxy 0W / 1L / 0D View
virgo15 2W / 3L / 5D View
Viktor Komliakov 1W / 0L / 0D View
WhooopsIDidItAgain 0W / 1L / 0D View
smilefrombrunei 1W / 1L / 0D View
Robert Ris 0W / 1L / 1D View
theopera 1W / 2L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
Joseph Levine 17W / 19L / 0D View Games
Arnar Erwin Gunnarsson 20W / 13L / 1D View Games
Aman Hambleton 5W / 21L / 0D View Games
Angelo Etienne 19W / 5L / 1D View Games
Sully McConnell 13W / 11L / 1D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2749 2796
2024 2808 2621
2023 2504 2630
2022 2724 2213
2021 2740 2266
2020 2550 2675 2263
2018 1221
Rating by Year201820202021202220232024202528081221YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 372W / 402L / 41D 339W / 433L / 44D 86.9
2024 69W / 57L / 11D 65W / 64L / 6D 83.2
2023 5W / 5L / 3D 3W / 10L / 0D 87.3
2022 13W / 18L / 1D 14W / 15L / 3D 82.9
2021 94W / 71L / 19D 89W / 89L / 16D 87.0
2020 165W / 119L / 20D 136W / 140L / 30D 87.2
2018 1W / 0L / 0D 0W / 0L / 0D 89.0

Openings: Most Played

Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 187 86 92 9 46.0%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 83 36 44 3 43.4%
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 78 41 35 2 52.6%
Amar Gambit 56 19 36 1 33.9%
Sicilian Defense 54 24 26 4 44.4%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation 48 20 27 1 41.7%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 40 16 21 3 40.0%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 39 16 23 0 41.0%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 39 16 21 2 41.0%
Amazon Attack 37 13 23 1 35.1%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 57 23 31 3 40.4%
Modern 52 29 21 2 55.8%
Australian Defense 37 17 19 1 46.0%
Nimzo-Indian Defense 36 23 11 2 63.9%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 36 19 15 2 52.8%
Amar Gambit 36 18 18 0 50.0%
Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation 33 18 13 2 54.5%
Sicilian Defense 32 18 11 3 56.2%
Catalan Opening: Open Defense 32 7 18 7 21.9%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 30 13 15 2 43.3%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Unknown 4 0 4 0 0.0%
Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit 3 3 0 0 100.0%
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 3 1 2 0 33.3%
Modern 3 0 1 2 0.0%
Catalan Opening: Closed 3 2 0 1 66.7%
Modern Defense 2 0 0 2 0.0%
Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation 2 1 0 1 50.0%
Catalan Opening: Open Defense 2 1 1 0 50.0%
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation 2 2 0 0 100.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 10 0
Losing 11 1
🐞 Report a Problem