Grandmaster Nasanjargal Urtnasan (Naaas1)
Meet Nasanjargal Urtnasan, known in the chess world and online arenas as Naaas1, a Grandmaster who turns the 64 squares into a battlefield playground where tactics and nerve reign supreme. With a FIDE Grandmaster title under their belt, Naaas1 is a fierce competitor who has been rattling clocks—and opponents—since at least 2018.
Rating Rollercoaster and Fierce Fight Records
Our GM has a bullet rating that soared to an impressive peak of 2850 in January 2025, a score defying mere mortals and challenging the gods of speed chess. Blitz enthusiasts have witnessed Naaas1 storm up to 2808, while rapid games showcase a solid 2398.
But it's not all smooth sailing—victories and defeats dance closely in Naaas1’s game history, with a bullet win-loss record showing 261 wins to 314 losses, exemplifying the daring, take-no-prisoners style. Blitz battles are almost neck and neck, with 500 wins versus 454 losses. In rapid, a snug positive edge of 22 wins to 11 losses proves versatility beyond lightning speed.
Playing Style: The Chess Ninja
Averages speak volumes: an average 85 moves per win, demonstrating stamina and deep strategic prowess, while endgame frequency near 85% suggests Naaas1 likes to settle scores late and strong, squeezing every drop of advantage out of the final phase.
Early resignation is rare (2.18%), showing a true fighter spirit, but watch out if you think you can break Naaas1’s spirit after snatching a piece—an incredible 44.8% win rate even after losing material means comebacks are their calling card. Their knack for staging epic recoveries is enough to give opponents sleepless nights.
The Psychological Arena
With a tilt factor of only 11, Naaas1 manages to keep cool under pressure, although sometimes losing streaks reach up to 11 games—because even GMs aren’t immune to the trollish curse of chess volatility. The best hour to catch this storm brewing? Around 3 PM, when their win rate peaks above 58%.
Memorable Games
A recent delight was a battle against marty-bird, where Naaas1 emerged victorious via resignation after skillfully converting a queen promotion advantage deep into the endgame. The game was a poetic dance of subtle exchanges and calculated bravery—check it out here.
Of course, no career is without hiccups. Recently, Naaas1 lost on time against want2lose, reminding us all that even grandmasters need caffeine breaks and better time management!
Opponents Beware!
With a fascinating record against various players, Naaas1 thrives especially well against foes like nafanya04 and shivampant20052006, boasting wins over 60% of the time, while notorious rivals like knvb hold a tougher edge, proving that every hero has their arch-nemesis.
In Summary
Nasanjargal Urtnasan (Naaas1) is the kind of player who makes you rethink what it means to be resilient, strategic, and just a little bit unpredictable. Whether blitzing through an opening or grinding out a marathon endgame, this Grandmaster blends skill, stamina, and a sprinkle of whimsy in every move. So, if you meet Naaas1 across the board, be ready for a match that’s as much a mental marathon as it is a lightning sprint!
Overview of your recent rapid games
Your results show a mix of wins, losses, and draws, with a stronger performance in certain openings and some volatility in short-term changes. Short-term rating change over the last one to six months is negative, but the longer‑term trend slope suggests there is underlying improvement over a year. In rapid play, this kind of fluctuation is common—your task is to stabilize the pace, convert more chances into wins, and minimize avoidable errors in the early or middle game.
What you’re doing well
- You show good results with specific openings where you have clear plans, notably the Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit and the Catalan Closed. These demonstrate your ability to handle both dynamic and positional positions when you know the typical ideas well.
- You keep fighting in middlegame structures and can generate pressure through active piece play and pawn breaks. This helps you create chances even in slightly imperfect positions.
- Your overall win/loss/draw record indicates you’re capable of drawing out complex fights and staying resourceful in uncertain positions.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in rapid games: allocate time more consistently across the opening, middlegame, and endgame. Avoid spending too many minutes on light moves and ensure you have a plan going into the middlegame.
- Converting small advantages: when you gain a tiny edge, lock in a concrete plan rather than allowing the position to become too flexible. This helps turn draws or near-equalities into wins.
- Opening discipline: you have solid results with a few core openings, but several lines show mixed outcomes. Narrow your repertoire to 2–3 dependable openings for White and Black, and study common middlegame themes and typical endgames that arise from them.
- Pattern recognition and tactical alertness: practice recognizing common tactical motifs (forks, pins, overloads, and discovered attacks) so you don’t miss forcing sequences in rapid games.
Opening performance snapshot
Strong performers: Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit (high win rate) and Catalan Closed (solid win rate). Other openings show room for growth, while a few “Unknown” lines indicate opportunities to consolidate your repertoire with more studied, repeatable choices.
Actionable steps: - Choose 2 White openings you feel comfortable with and 2 Black defenses you understand well. - For each chosen opening, write down the typical pawn structures, key piece placements, and 2–3 standard plans for the middlegame. - Review at least 1 model game per opening per week to reinforce the plan and reduce uncertainty in live games.
Endgame and tactical improvement plan
- Endgames: dedicate 1–2 sessions per week to rook endings and minor-piece endings that commonly arise from your favorite openings. Focus on king safety, active king activity, and textbook techniques (opposite-colour bishop endings, technique to force a passers pawn, etc.).
- Tactics: daily short drills (10–15 minutes) focused on common rapid-game motifs: forks, pins, skewers, and tactic nets around exposed kings.
Recommended training plan (2–3 weeks)
- Week 1: reinforce two primary openings (one White, one Black). Build a simple, repeatable middlegame plan for each, plus 5–6 common endgames that arise from those structures.
- Week 2: practice 2–3 endgames per session and continue tactical puzzles focusing on immediate threats near the king and tactical shot patterns you often miss.
- Week 3: play 4–6 rapid practice games focusing on your chosen openings, then review each game to extract 2–3 concrete improvements (time management, decision quality, or endgame technique).
Optional reflections
Keep track of a small set of personal notes after each game: what plan you attempted, where you felt unsure, and what you would do differently next time. This will help you translate practice into real-game improvements and stabilize your performance across rapid events.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Masha Klinova | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Logan Clark Shafer | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Arnar Erwin Gunnarsson | 20W / 12L / 1D | |
| imaster20 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| just_biz | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| lagedema | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| magzypotato | 4W / 3L / 1D | |
| astronut_x | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| gmfrankenstein-dracula | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cabflores | 1W / 1L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Levine | 17W / 19L / 0D | |
| Arnar Erwin Gunnarsson | 20W / 12L / 1D | |
| Aman Hambleton | 5W / 21L / 0D | |
| Angelo Etienne | 19W / 5L / 1D | |
| Sully McConnell | 13W / 11L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2784 | 2653 | ||
| 2024 | 2808 | 2621 | ||
| 2023 | 2504 | 2630 | ||
| 2022 | 2724 | 2213 | ||
| 2021 | 2740 | 2266 | ||
| 2020 | 2550 | 2675 | 2263 | |
| 2018 | 1221 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 294W / 339L / 24D | 278W / 341L / 37D | 84.9 |
| 2024 | 69W / 57L / 11D | 65W / 64L / 6D | 83.2 |
| 2023 | 5W / 5L / 3D | 3W / 10L / 0D | 87.3 |
| 2022 | 13W / 18L / 1D | 14W / 15L / 3D | 82.9 |
| 2021 | 94W / 71L / 19D | 89W / 89L / 16D | 87.0 |
| 2020 | 165W / 119L / 20D | 136W / 140L / 30D | 87.2 |
| 2018 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 89.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 181 | 83 | 89 | 9 | 45.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 80 | 36 | 41 | 3 | 45.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 76 | 40 | 34 | 2 | 52.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 54 | 19 | 34 | 1 | 35.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 54 | 24 | 26 | 4 | 44.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 43 | 16 | 26 | 1 | 37.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 39 | 16 | 20 | 3 | 41.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 39 | 16 | 23 | 0 | 41.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 37 | 16 | 19 | 2 | 43.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 37 | 13 | 23 | 1 | 35.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 51 | 28 | 21 | 2 | 54.9% |
| Australian Defense | 33 | 13 | 19 | 1 | 39.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 54.5% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 31 | 13 | 15 | 3 | 41.9% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 28 | 6 | 16 | 6 | 21.4% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 28 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 26 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 42.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 26 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation | 24 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 24 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 45.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Modern | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |