Nicolas De La Colina
Nicolas De La Colina, a formidable National Master, is a chess player who dances with the 64 squares like it’s a never-ending ballroom. With a peak blitz rating pushing an impressive 2748 and a bullet rating that climbed all the way to 2886, Nicolas has shown a knack for fast and furious games — and occasionally for terrifying opponents within seconds.
Rising through the ranks with unparalleled dedication and a dash of creative panache, Nicolas has played tens of thousands of games across all formats. Whether blitz, bullet, rapid, or daily chess, their relentless pursuit of checkmate is nothing short of legendary. In blitz alone, they've battled fiercely in over 7,000 games, boasting a win record that could intimidate even the most confident grandmasters.
Nicolas isn’t just about raw numbers, though; the player exhibits a tactical awareness that’s reflected by an impressive comeback rate of 83.17%, meaning that giving up a piece is merely a prelude to a dazzling turnaround. Their average game length hovers around 80 moves — proof that this master plays the long game, savoring the struggle and never tiring before the final checkmate.
When it comes to openings, Nicolas prefers to keep opponents guessing. Despite having a mysterious “Top Secret” opening that yields a win rate just above 52% in blitz, they also maneuver deftly through less charted territories like the Magnus Sicilian and the Caro-Kann Defense Fantasy Variation, displaying considerable versatility that keeps rivals on their toes.
Outside the battlefield, Nicolas likely has a witty sense of humor — how else to explain enduring the ruthless grind of bullet chess where the clock is your greatest enemy? Their psychological resilience is proven by a notorious tilt factor of just 23%, which means when the going gets tough, Nicolas gets going even tougher.
To sum it up: Nicolas De La Colina is a master tactician, a swift endgame wizard, and a chess gladiator who thrives under pressure. Whether winning by resignation, timeout, or pure skill, opponents leave the board knowing they faced a true contender. One can only imagine what cunning moves and hilarious remarks await in their next legendary encounter.
“Chess is 99% tactics, but the remaining 1% is Nicolas making the unexpected.”
Overview of your blitz performance
You’ve shown a willingness to engage in sharp, tactical battles and to press for concrete goals when you have the initiative. The recent win sequences demonstrate your ability to generate forcing sequences and finish with checkmate threats. At times, blitz games have featured risky ideas or heavy tactical skirmishes, which can lead to both spectacular wins and tough losses. Overall, you’re combining dynamic play with practical finishing instinct, and there’s clear room to convert more of the complex middlegames into clean, controlled wins.
What you are doing well
- Finding and executing tactical opportunities when the position is open and your pieces are active.
- Maintaining pressure and creating concrete threats that force opponent responses in critical moments.
- Showing resilience in complicated middlegames, keeping chances alive even when the position becomes unclear.
- Competing well in long blitz sequences, where your piece activity and king safety often determine the outcome.
Areas to improve
- Opening choices and early planning: some losses stem from early speculative moves or unnecessary material sacrifices. Build a compact two-line repertoire you trust for White and Black to reach solid middlegames more consistently.
- Time management in blitz: balance your clock so you have enough time for critical middlegame decisions. Practice a steady time budget per move to avoid rushed, high-variance choices late in the game.
- Calculation discipline: in sharp lines, pause at key decision points to confirm your opponent’s best defensive resources. Look for hidden counterplay and back-rank or mating threats that could flip the evaluation quickly.
- Endgame technique: blitz endings can be unforgiving. Strengthen practical rook endings and king activity patterns so you can convert small advantages into wins or hold draws more reliably.
- Post-game review: after blitz sessions, capture one concrete takeaway per game and track it across the next session to build a targeted improvement loop.
Training plan for the next 2 weeks
- Daily tactics: 15 minutes of puzzle practice focusing on both attack resources and defensive resources to improve your calculation in tight moments.
- Opening focus: choose two reliable lines you enjoy (one as White, one as Black) and study the typical middlegame plans, common pawn breaks, and typical tactical motifs for those lines.
- Endgame practice: dedicate 20 minutes per week to rook endings and king-activity drills to improve practical conversion in blitz.
- Post-game analysis: for each blitz game, note one concrete improvement and one reinforcement to apply in the next game.
Openings snapshot (informal guidance)
Your openings performance suggests comfort with several dynamic Sicilian lines and Colle-type structures. Consider maintaining a compact repertoire for both colors to reduce early risk while preserving your ability to press for initiative. If you want, we can tailor a short, practical opening set based on the lines you enjoy most and the typical responses you face.
Performance context
Your strength-adjusted win rate sits close to parity, and the six-month trend shows positive momentum. Keep feeding your growth with the plan above and continue reviewing recent games to turn aggressive opportunities into consistent wins.
For quick reference to your profile and openings, you can view your details here: Nicolas De La Colina
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Raunak Sadhwani | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| Joseph Levine | 47W / 33L / 3D | |
| Tim Wong | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| Patryk Chylewski | 6W / 9L / 2D | |
| PartyPandaBear | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| plorpz | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| tactrics64 | 16W / 11L / 2D | |
| Rohith Krishna | 8W / 29L / 0D | |
| rohith-p | 139W / 70L / 12D | |
| oshriejreyes | 1W / 0L / 2D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Michael Guan | 749W / 344L / 107D | |
| Tanitoluwa Adewumi | 211W / 236L / 26D | |
| Sharvesh Deviprasath | 235W / 207L / 22D | |
| Jose Martinez | 21W / 355L / 23D | |
| shivampant20052006 | 165W / 86L / 17D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2811 | 2752 | 1961 | |
| 2024 | 2839 | 2703 | 2241 | |
| 2023 | 2802 | 2650 | 2241 | |
| 2022 | 2719 | 2619 | 2302 | 1959 |
| 2021 | 1910 | 2501 | 2412 | 1955 |
| 2020 | 2545 | 2428 | 2412 | 1942 |
| 2019 | 2017 | 1867 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 400W / 412L / 60D | 390W / 434L / 48D | 84.7 |
| 2024 | 2328W / 2486L / 368D | 2206W / 2676L / 301D | 85.5 |
| 2023 | 1011W / 951L / 139D | 950W / 1015L / 134D | 86.4 |
| 2022 | 1441W / 1430L / 285D | 1294W / 1600L / 253D | 85.1 |
| 2021 | 1080W / 1234L / 211D | 1003W / 1327L / 202D | 86.8 |
| 2020 | 2808W / 2603L / 424D | 2661W / 2689L / 410D | 80.5 |
| 2019 | 436W / 378L / 40D | 448W / 369L / 40D | 77.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 616 | 301 | 250 | 65 | 48.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 335 | 161 | 141 | 33 | 48.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 303 | 151 | 112 | 40 | 49.8% |
| Unknown | 271 | 107 | 155 | 9 | 39.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 264 | 129 | 98 | 37 | 48.9% |
| Dutch Defense | 232 | 100 | 113 | 19 | 43.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 205 | 102 | 88 | 15 | 49.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 197 | 122 | 63 | 12 | 61.9% |
| Modern | 174 | 74 | 85 | 15 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 158 | 68 | 75 | 15 | 43.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2688 | 1111 | 1421 | 156 | 41.3% |
| Modern | 2033 | 873 | 1050 | 110 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1908 | 850 | 927 | 131 | 44.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1881 | 844 | 941 | 96 | 44.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1598 | 692 | 787 | 119 | 43.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1424 | 604 | 724 | 96 | 42.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1337 | 513 | 744 | 80 | 38.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 1178 | 523 | 590 | 65 | 44.4% |
| Dutch Defense | 1060 | 503 | 485 | 72 | 47.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 850 | 381 | 424 | 45 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 24 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 58.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 35.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 32 | 18 | 10 | 4 | 56.2% |
| Dutch Defense | 25 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 68.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 24 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 24 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 70.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 23 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 73.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 23 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 73.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 18 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 22.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 18 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 85.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 1 |
| Losing | 23 | 0 |