Overview
Shivam Pant (ShivamPant20052006) is a prolific online chess player known for marathon bullet sessions, cheeky gambits and a surprising love of long endgames. Preferred time control: Daily — when Shivam isn't blitzing through tactics, he enjoys thinking between moves and collecting tiny, satisfying wins.
Quick snapshot: a tireless competitor with tens of thousands of bullet games under the belt and an instinct for tactical comebacks that can frustrate even seasoned opponents.
Career arc & highlights
Shivam rose from energetic club-level play into an online powerhouse. The timeline shows a steady climb punctuated by spectacular peaks — a testament to dedication, practice and countless online hours.
- Played over 36,000 bullet decisions (wins, losses and draws combined) — a true online workhorse.
- Longest winning streak: 42 games; resilience shown by a Comeback Rate of about 86.7% after difficult positions.
- Notable peak performances: 2926 (2025-11-24), 2711 (2025-11-01), 1477 (2025-11-17), 2306 (2022-01-15)
- Rating trend (bullet, 2020–2025):
Playing style
Shivam’s style blends tactical sharpness with endgame persistence. He often plays long games (average decisive game length around the mid-80s in moves) and tends to drive positions toward complex endgames rather than quick resignations.
- Endgame frequency: high (plays long finales and grinds wins)
- Average moves per decisive game: ~84 — patient, persistent, and often creative in the late middlegame
- White win tendency: ~53.8% win rate with White; Black is solid too (~50%)
- Early resignation rate: very low (0.9%) — Shivam fights on.
Openings & repertoire
Shivam is an eclectic opening player who mixes solid defenses with surprise gambits. He frequently relies on the Caro-Kann and Nimzo-Larsen families, but he'll gladly spring an Amar Gambit or Poisoned Pawn when the mood strikes.
- Favorite(s) in Bullet: Caro-Kann Defense, Nimzo-Larsen Attack, Amar Gambit
- Strong Blitz choices: London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation and the Blackburne Shilling Gambit for shock value
- Daily picks (thoughtful play): Caro-Kann variations and the occasional Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Representative opening PGN (a quick tactical skirmish):
Top rivals & community
Shivam has faced many regulars online; a handful of frequent opponents stand out by game count and rivalry intensity.
- Most-played opponent: Nicolas De La Colina (268 games)
- Other regulars: ugetting (179), timeless limitless (176), WarlordX (159)
- Rivalries are friendly-but-fierce — expect rematches and creative opening choices.
Statistics & streaks
Shivam’s statistical profile reveals stamina, adaptability and a readiness to play at all hours (with notable strength in evening play). Below are compact performance highlights derived from long-term tracking.
- Huge sample of bullet games: tens of thousands played — experience is real.
- Streaks: longest win streak 42, longest losing streak 22; current losing streak: 2
- Time habits: strong results at 19:00; solid Sunday and Friday win rates
- Strength-adjusted win rates show Daily and Rapid as particularly favorable time controls for Shivam
Fun facts & personality
Shivam’s profile blends seriousness with mischief — an opponent might see a calm opening and then suddenly be hit by an Amar Gambit or a Blackburne Shilling. Off the board, expect witty chat, rapid analysis and the occasional meme about "one more game."
- Nickname possibility: “The Endgame Hoarder” (because those long wins are so satisfying)
- Favors creative sidelines to keep matches spicy — unpredictable and entertaining
- Preferred time control (for deliberate play): Daily — savor the thought, seal the win.
Want to explore more?
Check recent peak milestones and the interactive rating chart embedded above. For opening study, look up the linked terms above to learn the lines Shivam prefers — or prepare a surprise of your own.
Placeholders you can use:
- Peak rating placeholder examples: 2926 (2025-11-24), 2711 (2025-11-01)
- Opponent profile quick links: Nicolas De La Colina
- Opening glossary: Caro-Kann Defense, Amar Gambit
Quick recap
Nice momentum — your recent streak shows growth: strong rating trend and a healthy win rate. You finished a few games with direct tactical finishes (a queen mate and decisive knight tactics), and you converted a central breakthrough in a Petroff. At the same time two losses point to recurring practical issues you can fix quickly.
- Recent decisive mate: against kerjhaken using a queen invasion after building pressure in the center/king‑side. See the final sequence:
- Win by forcing tactic: against vekagra you finished with a strong knight jump leading to decisive material (12...Nf3+).
- Losses came from tactical oversights and accepting risky pawn structures (see the game vs chesscarolina_102 where a b‑pawn and open file became decisive).
What you're doing well
- Spotting mating patterns and decisive tactical shots — you converted when the opponent left tactical holes.
- Active piece play: knights and queen invasions in your wins show you use piece activity rather than passive retreating.
- Strong opening preparation in several lines — your Caro‑Kann and Sicilian Alapin results are excellent (100% in those sample games).
- Positive rating trend and good Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~59%) — you're beating comparable opposition consistently.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
These are the patterns I see across your recent losses and close wins:
- King safety — some games ended with a direct queen or knight invasion. Don’t rely on the opponent to blunder; make sure you neutralize attacking vectors (check diagonals and knight outposts before castling decisions).
- Tactical awareness around b‑pawns and queenside pawns — a capture on b2 (or similar) cost you material/position in a loss. Before expanding on the wings, calculate opponent tactical replies on the long diagonals and open files.
- Overextending central pawns without piece coordination — pushing pawns is good, but ensure pieces are ready to exploit or defend the resulting tension.
- Two specific openings have negative results in your sample: Colle System (Rhamphorhynchus variation) and the Scotch Game — these deserve targeted study.
Concrete next steps (short term)
- Daily tactics: 10–15 puzzles focused on forks, discovered checks and mating nets. Target motifs you saw in your wins (knight forks, queen mates).
- One opening review per week: pick the Scotch and Colle lines you lost and learn the main plans, typical pawn breaks, and one or two refuting ideas for the opponent. Add a reminder: when you play the line, always look for the opponent’s tactical replies to pawn pushes.
- Game review habit: after every finished game, mark the decisive mistake and write one sentence: “What I missed” and “How to avoid it next time.” Keep these notes for two weeks and revisit them.
- King‑safety checklist before each move in the middle game: Are there open diagonals to my king? Any knights/queen ready to jump to g4/g2 or h2? If yes, neutralize or calculate before castling.
Study plan (4 week cycle)
- Week 1 — Tactics and mates: focus on forks, pins, discovered attacks. Do 50 puzzles (5–10/day).
- Week 2 — Two problem openings: Scotch and Colle. Learn typical pawn structures, piece plans and 5 model games each. Add one refutation/idea for your opponents’ common replies.
- Week 3 — Endgame basics & conversion: practice basic king + pawn vs king, and simple piece‑endgames so you convert material advantages confidently.
- Week 4 — Play 8 daily games slowly (2–3 day moves) and annotate the losses. Focus on applying the king‑safety checklist and the opening plans you learned.
Practice drills (quick)
- Spot the tactic: take the last losing game and before looking at engine/solution, spend 10 minutes finding why Bxb2 worked for your opponent — this trains pattern recognition.
- Mini‑training: 3 puzzles before each game session — primes your tactical scanning.
- One annotated win and one annotated loss per week — write 3 sentences each: what was good, what went wrong, and one precise improvement.
Other practical tips
- When ahead in material, simplify (trade queens and heavy pieces) unless you have a forced mate — don’t allow counterplay.
- Before making pawn breaks, list opponent replies (especially knight jumps and queen checks) — take an extra moment to calculate them.
- Keep your opening repertoire tight — you already score well in the Caro‑Kann, Sicilian Alapin and similar lines. Play what you know and deepen plans instead of switching too many openings at once.
Small wins to celebrate
- Good finishing instincts — you found clean forcing sequences in multiple games.
- Fast rating improvement and a consistent positive slope — keep the study/play cycle balanced and the trend will continue.
Follow-up
Want a short annotated review of one of these games (loss or the queen‑mate win)? Tell me which game and I’ll prepare a move‑by‑move commentary and 3 key lessons you can apply immediately.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Qi b Chen | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| elpatodice | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Fernando Oliveira | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Jerzy Slaby | 5W / 4L / 0D | View |
| adam4757 | 3W / 4L / 0D | View |
| karthikeyan pandian | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| good-byeandgood-knight | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| girlz_can_too | 12W / 0L / 0D | View |
| toxicmybrother | 2W / 5L / 0D | View |
| just_bahodirovv | 1W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nicolas De La Colina | 86W / 165L / 17D | View Games |
| ugetting | 110W / 58L / 11D | View Games |
| timeless limitless | 101W / 71L / 4D | View Games |
| WarlordX | 63W / 90L / 6D | View Games |
| urban_chess | 74W / 58L / 16D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2724 | 2637 | 2200 | 1443 |
| 2024 | 2646 | 2518 | 2195 | 1137 |
| 2023 | 2367 | 2292 | 2156 | 1102 |
| 2022 | 2183 | 2331 | 2165 | |
| 2021 | 2351 | 2319 | 2079 | |
| 2020 | 2211 | 2066 | 2024 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2823W / 2075L / 343D | 2641W / 2266L / 322D | 90.9 |
| 2024 | 2344W / 1783L / 312D | 2096W / 2045L / 293D | 87.6 |
| 2023 | 1485W / 1012L / 140D | 1375W / 1119L / 131D | 84.8 |
| 2022 | 513W / 390L / 80D | 480W / 437L / 59D | 81.1 |
| 2021 | 2543W / 1844L / 256D | 2410W / 1985L / 286D | 84.2 |
| 2020 | 1527W / 1226L / 199D | 1434W / 1327L / 167D | 79.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3696 | 1967 | 1535 | 194 | 53.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2668 | 1443 | 1091 | 134 | 54.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 2494 | 1321 | 1022 | 151 | 53.0% |
| Modern | 1960 | 964 | 885 | 111 | 49.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1888 | 986 | 787 | 115 | 52.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1675 | 873 | 682 | 120 | 52.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1317 | 696 | 548 | 73 | 52.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 1191 | 616 | 526 | 49 | 51.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1010 | 516 | 431 | 63 | 51.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 994 | 542 | 383 | 69 | 54.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 590 | 288 | 259 | 43 | 48.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 237 | 128 | 94 | 15 | 54.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 203 | 93 | 93 | 17 | 45.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 171 | 103 | 56 | 12 | 60.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 124 | 75 | 44 | 5 | 60.5% |
| Modern | 123 | 76 | 38 | 9 | 61.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 113 | 53 | 53 | 7 | 46.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 104 | 61 | 40 | 3 | 58.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 98 | 58 | 24 | 16 | 59.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 94 | 59 | 29 | 6 | 62.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 18 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Scotch Game | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 42 | 0 |
| Losing | 22 | 2 |