Indy Southcott-Moyers — FIDE Master & Blitz Specialist
Indy Southcott-Moyers (also known online as NottheBishopSacrifice when they’re feeling theatrical) is a FIDE Master and a devoted blitz specialist. Known for breakneck time scrambles, stubborn endgames and an uncanny ability to snatch victories from the jaws of time trouble, Indy has built a reputation as a tactical dynamo and entertaining opponent.
Career snapshot
Indy’s focus is clear: blitz chess. Their peak blitz form is captured here:
- Peak Blitz (highlight): 2711 (2025-04-01)
- Preferred time control: Blitz — lightning-fast calculation and nerves of steel.
- Over 750 recorded blitz games with a long winning streak as high as 11 games.
- Interactive rating trend:
Playing style & strengths
Indy blends tactical aggression with surprising endgame resilience. Expect messy middlegames that often fizzle into long, technical endgames — Indy actually finishes more than 90% of games to an endgame decision.
- Style: Tactical, opportunistic, and endgame-savvy (Endgame frequency: high).
- Comback spirit: Exceptional — high comeback rate and a 50% win rate even after losing material.
- Average game length: ~88–90 moves for decisive games — Indy isn’t in a hurry to resign (or to stop talking during postgame analysis).
- Psychology: Best time of day to play — around noon; tilt factor low but present (TiltFactor: 6).
Openings & signature lines
Indy has clear opening preferences and some surprising specialist lines. They’re especially comfortable facing structure-heavy systems and enjoy springing traps in the early middlegame.
- Favorite defenses and systems:
- Caro-Kann Defense — used a lot with solid success (many recorded games).
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — high win rate when the complications arrive.
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — a reliable scoring line for Indy.
- Other frequent openings: English Opening (Agincourt Defense), Nimzo-Larsen Attack and creative sidelines like the Amar Gambit.
- Opening confidence: Indy shows excellent preparation in A04/A07-like systems and often scores well with less common continuations.
Notable statistics & streaks
- All-time recorded blitz wins: 399; losses: 267; draws: 91 — a strong positive record across heavy play.
- Longest winning streak: 11 games. Current winning streak (recent): 3 games.
- Longest losing streak: 6 games. Current losing streak: 0 (resilience in action).
- Typical performance windows: excellent on Saturday and Sunday, deadly around midday.
Sample game (playable)
Explore a compact blitz skirmish — viewer will derive the position from the moves below:
Try the embedded replay:
Notable opponents & community
Indy has faced many strong and familiar opponents repeatedly — part sparring partner, part rival:
- Most-played opponents include: Alexander Rustemov (8 games), robertojbm (5), karinachess1 (5).
- Memorable records: undefeated vs. chuessco (4–0) and strong series vs. natalya_buksa (3–0).
Personality, quirks & fun facts
- Nickname-ready: “NottheBishopSacrifice” — expect theatrical piece sacrifices and witty chat messages.
- High comeback rate — Indy is the sort of player who makes spectators believe in drama until the final move.
- Plays best around noon; avoids playing at 23:00 if they can help it (win rate dips late at night).
- Early resignations are rare-ish — Indy fights on (EarlyResignationRate: 0.36), often turning lost positions into instructive lessons.
Follow and learn
Indy’s games are a great study source if you want to learn blitz tactics, how to convert chaotic middlegames into long endgames, or how to thrive under time pressure. Search the community for Indy’s handle or study the openings listed above (Caro-Kann Defense, London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation) to see Indy in action.
Quick summary
Indy — nice string of wins and some instructive losses in the latest blitz batch. You convert passed pawns well and your king activity in endgames is strong. Main leak: time management and a few passive responses in unfamiliar setups (Chess960) that allow opponents to generate counterplay.
- Recent win highlight: strong pawn-promotion technique and active king play in the final phase — small conversion details mattered.
- Recent loss takeaway: Chess960 games (vs Andrey Ubushiev) exposed passive piece placement and missed simplification opportunities.
- Overall trend: positive momentum (one-month jump +348) and a Strength-Adjusted Win Rate around 56.6% — you're consistently beating appropriately rated opponents.
- Example short sequence (illustrative): .
What you're doing well
- Endgame conversion — you consistently push passed pawns and use the king effectively to support promotion races.
- Opening familiarity — strong results in your core lines (for example Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation and Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation), which gives you comfortable middlegame plans.
- Practical pressure — winning on time and creating chaos when ahead shows good psychological and practical play.
- Tactical scanning — you spot forks and mating nets quickly in many wins.
Recurring issues and how to fix them
These are the common mistakes that cost you points in blitz.
-
Time management
- Problem: tight clocks lead to rushed moves and occasional blunders.
- Fix: warm up with 3|0 games focusing on making decent moves quickly; practice a 2s "safety check" before each move to avoid hanging pieces.
-
Passive play in unfamiliar openings (Chess960)
- Problem: passive setups let the opponent seize the initiative early.
- Fix: prioritize piece activity and early king safety. If unsure, trade a pair of pieces and steer toward an endgame you know.
-
Missed simplification opportunities
- Problem: you sometimes shuffle when a timely exchange or pawn break would decide the game.
- Fix: set one clear strategic goal per turn: improve a piece, create a break, or simplify. If none is clear, favor activity or an exchange that reduces opponent counterplay.
Concrete drills and study plan (weekly)
- Daily: 15–20 minutes of tactics (forks, skewers, back-rank, promotion tactics).
- 3×/week: 20 minutes of endgame practice — king+pawn, queen vs rook endgames and basic rook endgames; focus on converting a single passed pawn.
- 2×/week: 10 Chess960 rapid games to reduce confusion from odd starting setups.
- Weekly: review 3 blitz games (one win, one loss, one draw). Annotate the critical decision and pick one recurring mistake to fix.
- One-month goal: reduce time blunders by establishing the 2s safety-check habit.
Opening notes — targeted tips
- Stick with what works: deepen plans in your best lines (for example English Opening: Agincourt Defense and the Colle) so you can play faster and more confidently out of the opening.
- In the Caro‑Kann: avoid exchanging into equal structures unless your rooks will be active on the open files; look for timely c4 or f3 breaks to gain space.
- For flank openings like the Nimzo‑Larsen: define a pawn-break plan (c4/c5) early so you have a concrete middlegame plan instead of aimless piece moves.
Practical tips for your next session
- Start with 5 minutes of tactics to warm up pattern recognition.
- Play a block of 3|0 games to train fast decisions, then 5|0 to practice slightly deeper calculation under time pressure.
- In Chess960 or novel positions: if you feel lost, exchange pieces and head for an endgame you can convert.
- Before each move, do the micro-check: any hanging pieces? Any direct forks or pins created by this move?
Resources & next steps
- Endgame set: practise basic promotion and king activation positions until converting becomes almost automatic.
- Tactics streaks: aim for 15–30 puzzles with >85% accuracy.
- Game review: annotate the loss to Andrey Ubushiev and one Chess960 loss to identify the turning moment.
- Expand one opening line by adding a prepared transposition so you avoid surprises early on.
Closing
You’re on an upward trajectory: strong endgame technique and practical pressure are your biggest assets. Tightening the clock habits and improving clarity in unfamiliar openings will push the next rating jump. Want a short annotated review of one of the specific games above (win, loss, or draw)? Pick one and I’ll mark critical moments and suggest exact alternatives.
- Pick a game to deep-dive: win vs kolomeets_daniel, win vs Sandokan, or loss vs Andrey Ubushiev.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kolomeets_daniel | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Sandokan | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tilt | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| naaats888 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| koziororo | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| fischerbobbyjames | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mostafasakha | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Phuong Hanh Luong | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| fandebobbyfischer | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bbartekk | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Rustemov | 1W / 4L / 3D | View Games |
| Karina Ambartsumova | 0W / 2L / 3D | View Games |
| Roberto Junio Brito Molina | 1W / 2L / 2D | View Games |
| Ian Ocampos | 4W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| Polina Shuvalova | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2570 | 2652 | ||
| 2024 | 2595 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 114W / 81L / 30D | 95W / 100L / 20D | 93.4 |
| 2024 | 109W / 40L / 19D | 89W / 56L / 27D | 96.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 106 | 51 | 43 | 12 | 48.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 68 | 27 | 29 | 12 | 39.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 41 | 24 | 10 | 7 | 58.5% |
| Unknown Opening* | 30 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 56.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 28 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 71.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 28 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 64.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 26 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 65.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 20 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 19 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 47.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 18 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 61.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 3 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |