QDcoach – A Dynamic Chess Virtuoso
QDcoach stands out as a versatile and resilient competitive chess player, with a career marked by stellar blitz performances and a solid command over rapid and bullet formats. Over the years, QDcoach has built an impressive rating history – from a breathtaking 2800+ blitz performance in 2018 to consistently strong results in subsequent years – reflecting remarkable adaptability and a passion for mastery in every time control.
Known for an uncanny tactical awareness, QDcoach has demonstrated the ability to mount astounding comebacks, even when faced with seemingly insurmountable disadvantages. With a comeback rate soaring over 92%, and a near-perfect win‐rate after losing a piece, this player’s tenacity is only matched by a meticulous understanding of endgame intricacies – evident in an endgame frequency of over 82 percent and carefully calculated move counts in victories.
QDcoach’s methodical approach to the opening phase and diverse repertoire highlights an in‐depth preparation and an appetite for creative play. Whether navigating complex blitz scenarios or orchestrating methodical exchanges in bullet formats, the player has shown that both precision and psychological fortitude play a critical role. This is further underscored by a low early resignation rate and a noteworthy balance between aggressive counterattacks and solid defensive strategies.
Balancing both intuition and rigorous study, QDcoach exhibits a unique blend of strategic insight combined with a pragmatic, results‐oriented mindset. With his ratings reflecting consistent high performances, particularly in blitz and bullet – where rapid decision-making and tactical alertness are paramount – QDcoach continues to inspire fellow players and enthusiasts with his dedication and innovative style of play.
Today, QDcoach remains a respected figure in the chess community, a coach and competitor whose work bridges the gap between analytical preparation and the art of live play. His journey is a testament to the ideal that chess is not just a game but a lifelong pursuit of excellence, creativity, and resilience.
Personalised Feedback for QDcoach
What you already do very well
- Dynamic piece play. Your wins regularly feature early activity – see hansen – QDcoach where the queen-side pawn storm (…b5, …a5) set the tone from move 8.
- Resourcefulness in complications. Several games swing back in your favour after tactical flurries (e.g. 28…Nf4!! in the victory vs adotand).
- Endgame knowledge. Converting the rook-and-pawn ending against Mykola-Bortnyk was technically clean.
- You have already climbed to 2911 (2019-09-07) and can clearly compete with titled opposition.
Improvement priorities
1 Time management & practical decisions
Five of your last six losses were on the clock, often from playable (or even better) positions. In the Rossolimo loss to hansen you still held equality after 31…Re2, yet flagged a few moves later.
- Adopt a “no-think” opening sequence. Spend 0–2 s on the first 10 moves by limiting the repertoire in bullet/blitz. The d4 Nf3 Nc3 Bf4 system you play as White already fits this idea – keep the same spirit as Black.
- Use the 30-second rule. When your clock drops below 0:30, instantly
- Simplify (trade queens or enter an endgame),
- Pre-move whenever the reply is forced,
- Push a passed pawn instead of calculating a win of material.
- Quick scan routine. Force yourself to glance at checks, captures, threats one time only and then move. This cuts 1–2 s per decision – enough to avoid repeated flagging.
2 Tighten the Modern/Pirc structure
In several Black games (e.g. DanielDardha2005 – QDcoach) the early …a6/…b5 left you with weak dark squares and time-consuming defence.
- Consider the […c6 & …d5] “Gurgenidze” move-order which keeps the queen-side compact while still staying in Pirc territory.
- Memorise one crisp equalising line versus the Austrian Attack so you can blitz out the first 12 moves.
- Against 1.e4 in bullet, trial the […e5 2…Nc6] Vienna/Two Knights setup you already use as White – positions will feel familiar and cost less time.
3 Opposite-colour bishop positions
Both your loss in the Nimzo-Indian and your win over DanielDardha2005 featured opposite-colour bishops where the initiative mattered more than material. In the loss you attacked the queen side but neglected the h-file assault against your king.
Re-examine the critical phase
- Blocking checks with piece trades (…Bf6 was safer than …Re5).
- Activating the passive bishop first – make it a reflex.
Micro-targets for your next 50 games
- Finish 90 % of games with >5 s remaining.
- Limit yourself to one Modern/Pirc loss caused by dark-square holes.
- Score +70 % in positions with opposite-colour bishops.
When you perform best
Notice how your win-rate spikes in certain time windows:
and on specific days: . Schedule serious sessions during those peak periods.Next steps
1. Create a 10-line “bullet repertoire” cheat-sheet.
2. Solve 20 ultra-fast tactics (< 30 s each) before playing – this sets the calculation tempo.
3. Review one flag-loss per day; stop when you identify the first slow move.
Good luck, and feel free to challenge me or ping for a follow-up! – Your coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hoang Thong Tu | 49W / 57L / 5D | |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 38W / 32L / 7D | |
| Yaacov Norowitz | 27W / 39L / 6D | |
| Robert L. Hess | 12W / 50L / 2D | |
| holdenhc | 41W / 12L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2673 | 2809 | ||
| 2020 | 2815 | |||
| 2019 | 2666 | 2755 | ||
| 2018 | 2640 | 2780 | 2136 | 1859 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 12W / 11L / 0D | 12W / 11L / 1D | 85.3 |
| 2020 | 71W / 40L / 11D | 58W / 49L / 9D | 84.7 |
| 2019 | 342W / 226L / 50D | 302W / 273L / 59D | 83.3 |
| 2018 | 2336W / 1598L / 366D | 2137W / 1758L / 346D | 80.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 233 | 132 | 80 | 21 | 56.6% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 228 | 125 | 82 | 21 | 54.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 200 | 103 | 83 | 14 | 51.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 197 | 110 | 64 | 23 | 55.8% |
| Döry Defense | 191 | 97 | 78 | 16 | 50.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 178 | 98 | 69 | 11 | 55.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 167 | 92 | 61 | 14 | 55.1% |
| Modern | 161 | 86 | 65 | 10 | 53.4% |
| Australian Defense | 156 | 87 | 54 | 15 | 55.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 155 | 72 | 65 | 18 | 46.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 128 | 55 | 68 | 5 | 43.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 100 | 37 | 61 | 2 | 37.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 96 | 48 | 45 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 88 | 54 | 27 | 7 | 61.4% |
| Döry Defense | 76 | 40 | 34 | 2 | 52.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 66 | 24 | 36 | 6 | 36.4% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 49 | 24 | 23 | 2 | 49.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 43 | 20 | 20 | 3 | 46.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 42 | 19 | 22 | 1 | 45.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 39 | 26 | 12 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Réti Opening | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen's Indian Defense: Capablanca Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 4 |