Roman Cherevatenko: International Master of the Board
Known online as roman_2112, Roman Cherevatenko holds the prestigious title of International Master awarded by FIDE, a testament to their intricate understanding and masterful execution in the world of chess. Navigating the black and white squares with warrior-like intensity, Roman has built an impressive legacy in online chess arenas.
Starting with modest beginnings, their bullet rating surged from a humble 1364 in 2016 to a peak of 2508 in early 2024—faster than most of us solve a Rubik’s cube! Their blitz prowess is equally formidable, peaking at a dazzling 2638 rating by December 2024, showcasing a blend of speed and strategy rarely seen outside of grandmaster circles.
Roman's style? Let’s just say patience is key: with an average of about 66 moves per win and a knack for clawing back from tough positions (a comeback rate of over 83%), they are not just a tactician but a psychological gladiator. Their “TiltFactor” is a cool 30, meaning when pressure mounts, Roman keeps their cool better than most chess sets keep their pieces.
Openings like the “Top Secret” (a mysterious favorite) and “Modern Defense” variations are their playgrounds, revealing a preference for solid yet flexible game plans. Whether commanding the tempo in rapid games or on the blitz battlefield, Roman demonstrates resilience and a willingness to dive deep into the complexities of the position.
Not immune to defeat, Roman’s longest losing streak hit 30 games, proving even the best have their “bad hair day,” but true to the spirit of chess warriors, their longest winning streak stretches a commendable 16 games.
Recent Battles on the 64 Squares
Just days ago, our IM clinched a thrilling checkmate victory against Kotofeyca in an intense bout of the Vienna Game, showcasing strategic mastery and tactical flair that left spectators breathless. A memorable sequence culminated with a knight delivering the final blow, a move signed "Ng1#" for checkmate - proof that Roman’s knights are no less fearsome than their rooks and queens.
On the flip side, a recent encounter with kulandy ended in a rare resignation loss, reminding us that every chess journey is a rollercoaster with its highs and lows.
Fun Facts & Quirks
- Roman’s best time to play is just after midnight – basically the witching hour for opponents.
- Despite rapid-fire bullet games, they hold steady with a psychological tilt factor of only 30.
- Winning rates hover close to 50% playing White, showing a knack for seizing the initiative.
- Known for ultimate persistence, Roman doesn’t give up quietly and excels at comebacks.
In a nutshell, Roman Cherevatenko is a fierce competitor, a strategic thinker, and sometimes a knight in shining armor – but on the chessboard, definitely the dragon to watch out for!
Overview and improvement plan
Your opening choices show a willingness to engage in dynamic, unbalanced positions, which can be a powerful way to outplay opponents in daily games. There is a note of progress to be made in the short term, as the rating changes over the last few months show a downward trend. The good news is your strength-adjusted win rate is strong, and you have several solid opening ideas in your repertoire. The plan below focuses on converting your dynamic opportunities into consistent results and strengthening your endgame technique to reverse the recent decline trend.
What went well in your recent games
- You used flexible defenses (Modern Defense lineage, Barnes/Australian defenses) to keep your opponent out of easy plans and force them to think critically about their pawn structure and piece placement.
- You demonstrated willingness to participate in sharp middlegames where piece activity and king safety are crucial, which suits your current openings and style.
- You managed to create imbalances that gave you practical chances to press for an advantage rather than trading to dull positions. This openness to active play is a strength to build on.
Key improvement areas to focus on
- Endgame conversion: Work on common rook-and-pawn ending patterns and simple king activity. Practice converting small material advantages into a win, and learn how to simplify into favorable endings when you are ahead.
- Calculation in imbalanced middlegames: When positions are dynamic, invest a few additional forcing moves to verify critical continuations. Develop a quick, repeatable calculation process (e.g., identify opponent threats, list 2-3 candidate moves, and check the most forcing line first).
- Opening plan consistency: For the Modern Defense and related lines in your repertoire, solidify a few core middlegame plans. Know where your pieces should go after typical moves, and have a clear idea of typical pawn breaks to look for (for example, central or flank breaks that challenge White’s structure).
- Time management in longer games: Allocate a small fixed thinking period for critical middlegame decisions, and avoid spending too long on non-critical moves. Build a habit of noting a plan after 8–12 moves and reassessing every 6–8 moves.
Opening performance snapshot (actions you can take)
From your openings data, you show diverse results across Modern, Barnes Defense, Australian Defense, and a Vienna Gambit branch. Given the small sample sizes for some lines, the key is to deepen your understanding of the most comfortable lines and prepare a clear plan for the middlegame. Focus areas:
- Modern Defense: Build a concrete middlegame plan after 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6. Practice key pawn breaks and piece setups that let you seize the initiative.
- Barnes/Australian Defenses: Identify 2–3 typical middlegame themes you enjoy and drill those in training games so you can recognize them quickly in daily play.
- Vienna Gambit (Max Lange Defense): If you prefer aggressive play, keep a short checklist of safe, standard responses to common White setups so you don’t get surprised in the early middlegame.
Practice plan for the next weeks
- Endgame drills: Twice a week, practice rook endings and simple king-and-pawn endings. Use two-column setups to simulate real endgame scenarios and emphasize king activity.
- Daily calculation training: 10–15 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on imbalanced positions similar to your openings. Prioritize puzzles that involve multiple candidate moves and forcing variations.
- Opening study sprints: Pick one line from Modern Defense and one from your other main defenses. Create a 1-page cheat sheet with typical piece placements, key pawn breaks, and a simple plan for the middlegame.
- Game review routine: After each daily game, write down the critical turning point, why it mattered, and what you would do differently next time. If possible, review the most recent loss with a coach or engine to confirm the best practical plan.
Notes on your data and how to use it
Your recent month-to-month rating changes indicate a short-term decline, while the trend slope values suggest a different measure of progress. If you have a chance, we can align these metrics and make the plan even more precise. In the meantime, treat the recent downward moves as motivation to tighten your middlegame plans and endgame technique, which are areas that reliably translate into longer-term gains.
Next steps and accountability
- Try implementing the opening plan cheat sheets in your next 3–5 daily games and note which middlegame plans work best for you.
- Track one endgame technique per week (e.g., rook endings, minor-piece endings). Report back on improvements and any persistent difficulties.
- If you'd like, I can generate a concise three-game summary focused on the upcoming plan and compare it with this guidance to measure progress. You can also share a quick note about which opening you want to prioritize next.
Profile placeholder for convenience: Roman Cherevatenko
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dejan Dinev | 46W / 33L / 3D | |
| Mark Heimann | 3W / 3L / 0D | |
| tramontanaaa | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| yn1088 | 11W / 14L / 2D | |
| thediamondbest | 1W / 4L / 0D | |
| parapalooka | 26W / 17L / 1D | |
| henriquesa | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| reitsy | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| davidlam99 | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| reddogpt | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Goran Galiot | 84W / 58L / 3D | |
| JohnsonXi | 51W / 63L / 3D | |
| Socrates | 64W / 49L / 4D | |
| ludo_sta | 48W / 60L / 0D | |
| cruz29 | 54W / 41L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2195 | 2522 | ||
| 2024 | 2313 | 2504 | 2427 | |
| 2023 | 2306 | 2483 | 2413 | 1463 |
| 2022 | 2331 | 2458 | 2375 | 1211 |
| 2021 | 2341 | 2423 | 967 | |
| 2020 | 2263 | 2472 | 1234 | |
| 2019 | 2084 | 2475 | ||
| 2018 | 2169 | 2426 | ||
| 2017 | 2260 | 2303 | ||
| 2016 | 1988 | 2295 | ||
| 2015 | 2176 | |||
| 2014 | 2064 | |||
| 2013 | 1974 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1825W / 2078L / 81D | 1798W / 2097L / 63D | 68.7 |
| 2024 | 1654W / 1950L / 85D | 1615W / 1965L / 98D | 69.3 |
| 2023 | 2687W / 3088L / 195D | 2501W / 3262L / 169D | 72.3 |
| 2022 | 2454W / 2481L / 208D | 2369W / 2568L / 187D | 72.8 |
| 2021 | 1543W / 1216L / 91D | 1437W / 1260L / 92D | 73.5 |
| 2020 | 1706W / 1598L / 174D | 1668W / 1659L / 148D | 74.9 |
| 2019 | 1316W / 1201L / 124D | 1277W / 1240L / 116D | 75.7 |
| 2018 | 1469W / 1187L / 144D | 1404W / 1245L / 128D | 76.7 |
| 2017 | 2142W / 1707L / 138D | 2086W / 1789L / 133D | 74.3 |
| 2016 | 1175W / 924L / 118D | 1121W / 1015L / 114D | 77.5 |
| 2015 | 301W / 251L / 23D | 287W / 244L / 39D | 77.1 |
| 2014 | 70W / 39L / 6D | 74W / 42L / 2D | 81.6 |
| 2013 | 126W / 69L / 5D | 131W / 65L / 9D | 78.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 9609 | 4405 | 5009 | 195 | 45.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5482 | 2855 | 2519 | 108 | 52.1% |
| Modern Defense | 2699 | 1310 | 1348 | 41 | 48.5% |
| Australian Defense | 2666 | 1226 | 1397 | 43 | 46.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2534 | 1178 | 1305 | 51 | 46.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2025 | 963 | 1016 | 46 | 47.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2011 | 914 | 1045 | 52 | 45.5% |
| Czech Defense | 1835 | 821 | 975 | 39 | 44.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 1253 | 562 | 664 | 27 | 44.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 1091 | 541 | 531 | 19 | 49.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 8933 | 4305 | 4183 | 445 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6253 | 3401 | 2549 | 303 | 54.4% |
| Modern Defense | 2569 | 1257 | 1156 | 156 | 48.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1897 | 916 | 880 | 101 | 48.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1537 | 721 | 744 | 72 | 46.9% |
| Czech Defense | 1053 | 492 | 500 | 61 | 46.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 886 | 416 | 415 | 55 | 47.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 793 | 396 | 345 | 52 | 49.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 767 | 373 | 351 | 43 | 48.6% |
| English Opening | 743 | 374 | 332 | 37 | 50.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 52 | 36 | 9 | 7 | 69.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 34 | 23 | 9 | 2 | 67.7% |
| Modern Defense | 19 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 84.2% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 30 | 5 |