Roza Eynula (rozabaku) - Woman FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Roza Eynula, known in the chess world as rozabaku, is a formidable Woman FIDE Master whose passion for the game leaps off the board faster than her bullet rating peaks! Starting from humble beginnings in 2014 with a bullet rating under 1500, Rozabaku zoomed through the ranks with fierce tactics and resilience, cracking the 2400+ mark in bullet chess—a league most mortals only dream of. And she's not just a speedster; her blitz peak rating soared even higher to an impressive 2532 in 2025, proving that when she switches gears, opponents better take cover.
Playing Style & Strengths
With an average of nearly 79 moves per win, Roza’s games are marathons of strategy and endurance, often involving epic endgames—a feature she frequents in over 85% of her matches. Her comeback rate stands tall at 85%, making it clear that no material loss or tricky position keeps her down for long. And talk about nerves of steel: with a tilt factor of just 9, Rozabaku keeps her cool when others might be flipping the board.
Favorite Openings and Tactics
Rozabaku is a master of the French Defense Exchange Variation, having showcased her brilliance with a recent victory by checkmate in this very opening. The Queen's Gambit Declined variations are also close to her heart, where she maintains a respectable 60-75% win rate. Her adventurous side occasionally dabbles in sharp lines like the Grunfeld Defense and Slav Defense, proving she’s both versatile and unpredictable.
Chess Career Highlights
- Achieved peak bullet rating of 2485 in February 2021
- Reached an astonishing blitz peak rating of 2532 in May 2025
- Held a tactical comeback rate over 85%, making her a nightmare to finish off
- Notorious for marathon games that test patience and precision
Recent Performance
Just recently, Rozabaku dazzled the chess community with a stunning checkmate victory using the French Defense Exchange Variation against MisterBurner in a tense live chess match. Despite the fast pace of bullet games, Roza’s tactical alertness and psychological resilience shine, often turning seemingly losing positions into prized victories.
Fun Facts
- Known for a best playing time around 7 AM, perfect for morning coffee and crushing opponents before the day even begins.
- Her winning streak record is a jaw-dropping 18 consecutive games—now that’s some serious momentum!
- When losing pieces, she bounces back nearly half of the time—showing some serious fightback spirit.
In short, Roza Eynula is a chess force to be reckoned with, blending strategic depth with rapid-fire execution and a pinch of humor for good measure. Whether you meet her in bullet, blitz, or rapid, one thing's for sure: underestimating rozabaku might just be your last blunder.
Roza, here is your personalised post-session report
Over the last block of games you displayed impressive fighting spirit and tactical alertness, often turning middlegame complications in your favour. Your current is evidence that you are already a strong player, yet the games suggest several “low-hanging fruits” that can convert still more of your good positions into wins.
What you are already doing very well
- Piece activity out of the opening. In both colours you consistently develop quickly and seize space (e.g. 17 c5! in your French win and 22 e5! in the Benko game).
- Tactical awareness. Ideas such as …Nf4–g6 against the Tarrasch French and the exchange sac 22 Rxe6 show a good eye for initiative and flexibility.
- Practical mindset when ahead on the clock. Several victories came from putting your opponent under time pressure once you had a stable edge.
Recurring issues that are costing you points
-
Severe Zeitnot (time trouble) in winning positions.
• Four of your last five losses were on time, all in endgames where you were equal or better.
• Average remaining time on move 40 in losses: 8 s; in wins: 31 s.
Quick fix: adopt an “automatic move” policy in simple positions (king centralise, push passed pawn, trade pieces) rather than searching for perfection.
Drill: play 1-minute bullet output sessions focused only on making a move every two seconds to desensitise the fear of “sub-optimal but good enough”. -
Conversion technique in pawn & minor-piece endings.
In the D53 loss you were two pawns up (diagram after 63…Rd7) but could not conclude.
The plan 60…Re8! followed by …Re6–xd6 is clean and fast.
Study set: Capablanca vs. Lasker endings, and a daily batch of 5 pawn endings on a trainer. -
Unnecessary pawn thrusts that create long-term weaknesses.
Examples: 29 h5? in the Nimzo-Indian loss and 30 g4?! in the QGD game weakened dark squares and invited counter-play.
Ask “Does this pawn move increase the mobility of my worst piece?” before committing.
Opening cornerstones for the next month
| Colour | Keep | Tune |
|---|---|---|
| White | 1.d4 repertoire with KIA/Gligoric set-ups (scores 67 %). | Prepare vs …c5 early: memorise the critical line 6…b5 (Benko accepted) up to move 12 so you can blitz it out. |
| Black | French Rubinstein (excellent practical weapon). | Add a solid line vs. 1.c4/1.Nf3 (you currently improvise with …g6 systems and spend valuable time). |
Endgame focus for 15 minutes a day
- King + pawn vs. king basics until you can recite the rule of the square blindfold.
- Minor-piece vs. pawns endings, especially opposite-colored%20bishop%20ending patterns where the stronger side still wins.
- Practical rook endings: Lucena, Philidor, and the “long-side check” method.
Time-management micro-routine (takes 2 seconds per move)
S.A.F.E checklist:
- Scan for checks/captures/Zwischenzug.
- Assess king safety on both sides.
- Fix hanging pieces (one-move tactics).
- Execute the move you already wanted; don’t restart calculation.
Use it every single turn until it becomes automatic; the goal is to free up time for genuinely critical positions.
Recommended weekly structure (≈3 hrs total)
- 1 hr: Thematic blitz (only French as Black, only KIA as White) to build muscle memory.
- 45 min: Endgame drills (lichess trainer, CT-Art, etc.).
- 30 min: Annotate one of your own games without an engine, then compare.
- 45 min: Tactics spree & pattern recognition.
Motivation snapshot
You score +15 % above average between 08:00–11:00 local time. Try scheduling serious sessions then — see the trend below.
Keep the fighting spirit, tighten the clock discipline, and the next rating jump will follow soon. I look forward to our next review!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Knyaz13 | 15W / 7L / 0D | |
| lossmoose | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| clemt77 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| alexk71 | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| kellad | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| presentchoice | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| iourique | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| blv_cuongpham | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| matsekak88 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| j0vempadawan | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Anis Achour | 9W / 21L / 3D | |
| CatAteMcD | 14W / 13L / 2D | |
| doctorino | 12W / 12L / 2D | |
| enochtso7 | 16W / 10L / 0D | |
| Gabriel Curi | 15W / 7L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2267 | 2434 | 2314 | |
| 2024 | 2372 | 2297 | 2308 | |
| 2023 | 2340 | 2286 | 2268 | |
| 2022 | 2271 | 2411 | 2107 | 1860 |
| 2021 | 2291 | 2276 | 2226 | 1721 |
| 2020 | 2407 | 2210 | 2264 | 1719 |
| 2019 | 2144 | 2248 | 2002 | 1634 |
| 2018 | 2260 | 2324 | 1634 | |
| 2017 | 2301 | 2245 | ||
| 2016 | 2317 | 2189 | 1463 | |
| 2015 | 1994 | 1365 | ||
| 2014 | 1561 | 1856 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 472W / 406L / 55D | 436W / 420L / 73D | 83.4 |
| 2024 | 444W / 336L / 61D | 392W / 388L / 56D | 82.4 |
| 2023 | 275W / 219L / 46D | 248W / 243L / 49D | 83.3 |
| 2022 | 198W / 163L / 23D | 184W / 163L / 38D | 83.1 |
| 2021 | 455W / 379L / 49D | 407W / 418L / 68D | 84.6 |
| 2020 | 195W / 133L / 27D | 185W / 159L / 24D | 83.0 |
| 2019 | 331W / 274L / 44D | 308W / 302L / 38D | 81.5 |
| 2018 | 351W / 301L / 41D | 330W / 322L / 41D | 84.4 |
| 2017 | 329W / 271L / 34D | 283W / 308L / 39D | 82.7 |
| 2016 | 639W / 555L / 62D | 559W / 629L / 79D | 83.7 |
| 2015 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 0D | 75.4 |
| 2014 | 12W / 4L / 0D | 7W / 6L / 0D | 63.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 529 | 254 | 231 | 44 | 48.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 431 | 266 | 145 | 20 | 61.7% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 424 | 199 | 199 | 26 | 46.9% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 421 | 199 | 193 | 29 | 47.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 394 | 185 | 165 | 44 | 47.0% |
| Slav Defense | 365 | 189 | 153 | 23 | 51.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 365 | 177 | 172 | 16 | 48.5% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 349 | 171 | 157 | 21 | 49.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 340 | 174 | 141 | 25 | 51.2% |
| Australian Defense | 247 | 121 | 106 | 20 | 49.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 205 | 117 | 77 | 11 | 57.1% |
| French Defense | 186 | 93 | 81 | 12 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 150 | 70 | 69 | 11 | 46.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 86 | 47 | 37 | 2 | 54.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 83 | 47 | 33 | 3 | 56.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 81 | 32 | 46 | 3 | 39.5% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 74 | 36 | 34 | 4 | 48.6% |
| Slav Defense | 73 | 39 | 28 | 6 | 53.4% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Be7 5.cxd5 Nxd5 | 66 | 37 | 27 | 2 | 56.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 66 | 42 | 20 | 4 | 63.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |