Senorpetrosian — Blitz-profile
Senorpetrosian is a chess player who thrives on the pace of the clock and the thrill of sharp, tactical skirmishes. Known for his quick calculation and fearless switch to the attack, he treats Blitz as both a laboratory and a battlefield. His preferred time control appears to be Blitz, where he weaves together speed, courage, and a pinch of humor on the board.
A public trajectory charting his Blitz journey shows a steady ascent from 2018 through 2025, with a peak reach in August 2025. For a quick glance, see the
and note his peak Blitz rating of 2478 (2025-08-14).Rivals and battles have peppered his path, including notable encounters with players like Yasser Quesada Perez and Gregory Kilishek in recent seasons, where nerves, nerves, and nerve were all on display on the same 3+0 or 5+0 clock.
Blitz style and repertoire
On the Blitz circuit, Senorpetrosian builds his games around rapid piece activity, tactical motifs, and clean transitions into sharp positions. His Blitz openings are varied, but he shows a fondness for the London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation and the Alekhine Defense as part of his go-to toolkit. These choices reflect a preference for dynamic structures that reward quick, precise moves and timely surprise threats.
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — a trusted Blitz weapon with flexible plans and surprising resistance to overextension.
- Alekhine Defense — a provocative, counterattacking choice that keeps opponents wary of quiet, positional pressure turning into tactical melees.
- Scandinavian and other solid defenses occasionally surface when time pressure tightens, providing him with robust, straightforward paths to activate his pieces.
For enthusiasts tracking performance, you can explore his Blitz repertoire across periods in the year-by-year data, and see how his style adapts as the clock shortens.
Rivals, records, and moments
Senorpetrosian has a habit of testing his mettle against a rotating cast of strong opponents. In head-to-head contexts, he’s faced rivals such as Yasser Quesada Perez and Gregory Kilishek, among others, with several notable clashes that showcase his willingness to take risks in the blitz arena.
Fun fact: his Lightning-quick decisions aren’t just about winning; they’re about the story told on the board in those decisive minutes, where every move can swing the rhythm of the game.
Fun teaser
For a quick snapshot of his peak performance, check the Blitz peak bracket: 2478 (2025-08-14). A concise timeline of his rated play is summarized in the year-by-year entries, highlighting growth, stamina, and the occasional brilliant tactical shot that keeps observers smiling.
What you’re doing well
You show a willingness to play sharp, tactical lines in blitz and you often keep initiative when the position becomes dynamic. Your recent win demonstrates you can coordinate pieces actively and convert pressure into a decisive sequence when your opponent isn’t fully prepared.
- You’re comfortable entering tactical melees and creating concrete threats that force your opponent to find accurate defense under time pressure.
- Your openings feel dynamic and you can steer the game into positions where your piece activity and king safety matter more than pure material balance.
- You’ve shown solid understanding in a few flexible openings, which helps you adapt to different opponents and stay unpredictable in blitz.
Openings and plan guidance
- Your openings data indicates strength in dynamic systems (for example, lines associated with the Hungarian Opening family and the King’s Indian Attack family). These often give you clear attacking chances in blitz if you stay precise.
- Consider maintaining a compact opening repertoire with 1–2 reliable lines for black and white. Having a few solid, slightly less-ambitious alternatives can help you avoid getting surprised by prepared opponents.
- In sharp openings, always aim to keep your king safe and coordinate your pieces so attacks don’t outpace your defense.
Areas to improve
- Time management in critical moments: try to allocate your thinking time to the most forcing parts of the position and avoid deep, uncertain lines when the clock is tight.
- Calculation under pressure: train short, forcing lines (two to three moves) and verify key captures or threats before committing to a sequence.
- Endgame conversion: practice straightforward rook endings and king activity to convert small advantages more reliably, instead of allowing unclear endgames to slip away.
- Pattern recognition: regular tactics practice helps you spot common motifs (forks, skewers, discovered attacks) quickly during blitz.
Targeted training plan
- Daily tactical puzzles (10–15 minutes) focusing on prevalent motifs and forcing sequences.
- Endgames practice (15–20 minutes) with rook endings and king-pawn endings to sharpen conversion skills.
- Opening study (2–3 days per week) to reinforce 1–2 favorite lines and learn typical middlegame plans for them.
- Time-pressure drills (1–2 times per week): play short sessions with a strict clock to develop efficient decision-making under pressure.
Recent game takeaways
- Your win shows you can create concrete tactical threats and drive a favorable sequence; when you spot a forcing line, confirm the follow-up carefully to avoid misses under time pressure.
- In the loss, there were moments where a calmer consolidation or a simpler simplification would have preserved the pressure; balance ambition with solid, incremental improvements in such positions.
- In the draw, maintain a clear plan in the middlegame and avoid over-activating if it exposes you to counterplay; look for steady ways to improve position rather than chasing every tactical possibility.
Profile quick reference
Link to your profile for quick reference: senorpetrosian
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yasser Quesada Perez | 0W / 82L / 2D | |
| Gregory Kilishek | 26W / 28L / 5D | |
| Ben Al-shami | 38W / 17L / 2D | |
| iamcreamchess | 28W / 23L / 2D | |
| username64835 | 26W / 22L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2217 | 2315 | 2410 | 2423 |
| 2024 | 2171 | 2247 | 2370 | |
| 2023 | 2200 | 2312 | 2384 | |
| 2022 | 2161 | 2218 | 2230 | |
| 2021 | 2129 | 2305 | 2167 | |
| 2020 | 2122 | 2306 | 2122 | |
| 2019 | 2129 | |||
| 2018 | 2039 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 853W / 645L / 78D | 734W / 779L / 77D | 80.8 |
| 2024 | 1036W / 726L / 94D | 888W / 850L / 113D | 81.0 |
| 2023 | 439W / 469L / 74D | 431W / 480L / 68D | 82.0 |
| 2022 | 644W / 642L / 67D | 586W / 695L / 72D | 81.4 |
| 2021 | 781W / 748L / 95D | 718W / 867L / 69D | 81.3 |
| 2020 | 1144W / 1029L / 109D | 1005W / 1219L / 113D | 80.9 |
| 2019 | 948W / 738L / 97D | 777W / 921L / 91D | 80.1 |
| 2018 | 190W / 135L / 18D | 166W / 159L / 9D | 78.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 1365 | 639 | 650 | 76 | 46.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1303 | 559 | 688 | 56 | 42.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1058 | 524 | 473 | 61 | 49.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 922 | 503 | 390 | 29 | 54.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 849 | 428 | 375 | 46 | 50.4% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 812 | 426 | 351 | 35 | 52.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 683 | 281 | 372 | 30 | 41.1% |
| Döry Defense | 601 | 281 | 289 | 31 | 46.8% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 567 | 324 | 217 | 26 | 57.1% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 519 | 268 | 230 | 21 | 51.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 233 | 106 | 111 | 16 | 45.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 182 | 83 | 92 | 7 | 45.6% |
| Döry Defense | 162 | 72 | 84 | 6 | 44.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 131 | 61 | 61 | 9 | 46.6% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 126 | 60 | 52 | 14 | 47.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 120 | 68 | 43 | 9 | 56.7% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 92 | 50 | 39 | 3 | 54.4% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 89 | 35 | 51 | 3 | 39.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 84 | 39 | 37 | 8 | 46.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 60 | 26 | 30 | 4 | 43.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: Albin, 3.dxe5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 134 | 66 | 66 | 2 | 49.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 126 | 62 | 59 | 5 | 49.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 95 | 43 | 47 | 5 | 45.3% |
| Australian Defense | 77 | 40 | 34 | 3 | 52.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 67 | 33 | 31 | 3 | 49.2% |
| Modern | 57 | 33 | 24 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 47 | 22 | 23 | 2 | 46.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 20 | 20 | 3 | 46.5% |
| Modern Defense | 33 | 14 | 15 | 4 | 42.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 33 | 11 | 21 | 1 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |