Tatjanavasilevich: A Formidable Force on the Chessboard
Tatjanavasilevich has emerged as a compelling figure in the world of chess, carving out a reputation that is built on a blend of deep tactical insight and a resilient competitive spirit. Notably excelling in rapid chess, where his win rate exceeds 70%, his swift and incisive play reflects not only a mastery of complex positions but also an intuitive sense for the ebb and flow of modern chess battles.
Across all time controls—rapid, blitz, and bullet—Tatjanavasilevich has amassed impressive records. In rapid formats, his record of 113 wins, 25 losses, and 23 draws underlines his solid approach, while his blitz and bullet statistics, with 257 and 156 wins respectively, demonstrate a versatility that is as effective in fast-paced scenarios as it is in classical settings. His longest winning streak of an astounding 20 games is a testament to his consistency and competitive fortitude.
His style on the board is defined by a meticulous balance between aggressive initiative and well-honed endgame skills. With an endgame frequency reaching over 83% and average winning moves numbering in the mid-70s, Tatjanavasilevich’s games are often long, combative affairs where every move is calculated. Remarkably, his tactical awareness is such that he boasts a comeback rate above 90% and has an almost unfailing ability to turn situations around—even after early setbacks.
Beyond his individual performance, his time performance metrics reveal an intriguing rhythm to his play. His win rates peak on certain days, notably on Thursdays and Mondays, and he often excels during key hours of the day—indicative of a player who is not only technically proficient but also in tune with his natural biorhythms and preparation routines.
Engaging with a diverse spectrum of opponents—from regular encounters with familiar rivals like artemiy1709 to more sporadic clashes with high-caliber adversaries—Tatjanavasilevich’s record speaks for itself. His impressive statistics, low early resignation rate, and the strategic depth evident in his opening choices all contribute to a richly detailed chess profile. Though his official rating history may be sparse, his win-loss-draw narratives and the evolving nuances of his play have firmly established him as a modern chess warrior committed to the art and science of the game.
Hi Tatjana, here is your personalized coaching report!
Quick Snapshot
• Current form: You just beat Matvey Galchenko (2978) with an energetic Four-Pawns Attack and you held your own against several 2800+ blitz specialists.
• Personal best: 2721 (2024-12-10)
• Activity trends:
Your Competitive Strengths
- Fearless opening choices. You confidently enter sharp main lines (e.g. Four-Pawns vs KID, Alapin Sicilian) and often seize the initiative by move 10.
- Dynamic pawn play. Advance breaks such as 22.e5/23.e6 (!!) vs MatthewG-p4p and b-pawn storms (b5/b4) regularly crack open files for your rooks.
- Tactical alertness. In several wins you spotted deflections (25.Nd5!, 31.Bxc5!) and mating nets (44.Rxg7+ vs alanchamp) faster than 30-second 2700s—a sign your pattern base is elite.
Key Growth Areas
-
Time management & conversion.
Three of your last five defeats (e.g. vs Nguyen Ngoc Truong Son, G10De_Arrascaeta) were lost on the clock from roughly equal or better positions.
Training task: Play two 5-minute games each day where you must hit 30 seconds in reserve before executing any forcing sequence. This builds an “internal clock” so you keep >10 s for the unavoidable blitz scramble. -
King safety in the Sicilian Alapin (Black).
Against Jose Martinez you followed a typical setup (…Nc6, …d5) but 12…Ba6?! 16…c4 allowed White’s pawn roller (g-h file) to explode. Modern theory prefers 12…Be6 or 12…Qc7 keeping dark-square control.
Action plan: Review three recent GM games in the …e6 & …g6 Alapin tabiya and note how Black meets g-pawn advances with timely …h5, …Bg4, or …f5. -
Handling counter-play when a pawn up.
In the loss to rasmussvane (QGD Janowski) you were a clear pawn ahead but 28…Rc4!! swung the game. Your pieces were split between attack and defense.
Technique drill: Set the engine to +1 pawn endgames and practice converting with the “no tactics” rule—every move must improve king, rooks, or passers, ignoring flashy shots. This nurtures prophylaxis prophylaxis and reduces swindles. -
End-game finesse.
Versus Mikhail_Bryakin you won on time in a rook-and-pawn ending that was drawn with best play. Small improvements (e.g. cutting the king with Rc2 before pushing pawns) would secure the table-base win and save clock.
Opening Notebook
• White vs KID: Your Four-Pawns move order is excellent. Add 12.e5! plans if Black delays …e6, and study the rare 10…Qc8 pivot.
• Black vs 1.e4: Decide between a pure …e6-Alapin or drifting into Scheveningen structures; mixing plans can leave dark squares soft (see loss to Jospem).
• White vs QGD/Slav: After 18.Nc5 in the rasmussvane game, consider 19.e4! instead of Qd3/Qd2 to keep tension and stop …d4 ideas.
Suggested Weekly Routine (2-hour block)
- 30 min: End-game conversion drill (rook & minor vs pawns).
- 30 min: Flash-card tactics focusing on quiet defences: (e.g. avoiding automatic captures).
- 20 min: Annotate one blitz loss—identify the first moment your evaluation slipped.
- 20 min: Replay a model game in your pet opening, pausing before each candidate move.
- 20 min: One rated 3 + 1 blitz game applying the day’s theme.
Motivation Corner
Your attacking flair already beats super-GMs on a good day—refining end-game and clock skills could push you over the 2800 blitz barrier. Stay curious, trust the process, and keep enjoying the fight!
– Coach AI
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dianavelieva1 | 0W / 4L / 16D | View Games |
| artemiy1709 | 11W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| goran961 | 4W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| Anastasia Avramidou | 3W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| isikey | 4W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2710 | 2719 | ||
| 2023 | 2624 | 2646 | ||
| 2021 | 2459 | 2126 | ||
| 2020 | 2449 | 1650 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 62W / 31L / 7D | 52W / 38L / 4D | 90.8 |
| 2023 | 87W / 69L / 17D | 81W / 88L / 7D | 94.7 |
| 2021 | 38W / 7L / 1D | 32W / 11L / 6D | 69.4 |
| 2020 | 88W / 40L / 13D | 86W / 42L / 15D | 66.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benko Gambit | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 23 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 52.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 35.7% |
| Modern | 14 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 30.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| French Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 1 |